Alan A Peters1, Adrian T Huber2, Verena C Obmann2, Johannes T Heverhagen2,3,4, Andreas Christe2, Lukas Ebner2. 1. Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital Bern, 3010, Switzerland. alan.peters@insel.ch. 2. Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital Bern, 3010, Switzerland. 3. Department of BioMedical Research, Experimental Radiology, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dose reduction on the performance of a deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system regarding pulmonary nodule detection in a virtual screening scenario. METHODS: Sixty-eight anthropomorphic chest phantoms were equipped with 329 nodules (150 ground glass, 179 solid) with four sizes (5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, 12 mm) and scanned with nine tube voltage/current combinations. The examinations were analyzed by a commercially available DL-based CAD system. The results were compared by a comparison of proportions. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the impact of tube voltage, tube current, nodule size, nodule density, and nodule location. RESULTS: The combination with the lowest effective dose (E) and unimpaired detection rate was 80 kV/50 mAs (sensitivity: 97.9%, mean false-positive rate (FPR): 1.9, mean CTDIvol: 1.2 ± 0.4 mGy, mean E: 0.66 mSv). Logistic regression revealed that tube voltage and current had the greatest impact on the detection rate, while nodule size and density had no significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal tube voltage/current combination proposed in this study (80 kV/50 mAs) is comparable to the proposed combinations in similar studies, which mostly dealt with conventional CAD software. Modification of tube voltage and tube current has a significant impact on the performance of DL-based CAD software in pulmonary nodule detection regardless of their size and composition. KEY POINTS: • Modification of tube voltage and tube current has a significant impact on the performance of deep learning-based CAD software. • Nodule size and composition have no significant impact on the software's performance. • The optimal tube voltage/current combination for the examined software is 80 kV/50 mAs.
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dose reduction on the performance of a deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system regarding pulmonary nodule detection in a virtual screening scenario. METHODS: Sixty-eight anthropomorphic chest phantoms were equipped with 329 nodules (150 ground glass, 179 solid) with four sizes (5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, 12 mm) and scanned with nine tube voltage/current combinations. The examinations were analyzed by a commercially available DL-based CAD system. The results were compared by a comparison of proportions. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the impact of tube voltage, tube current, nodule size, nodule density, and nodule location. RESULTS: The combination with the lowest effective dose (E) and unimpaired detection rate was 80 kV/50 mAs (sensitivity: 97.9%, mean false-positive rate (FPR): 1.9, mean CTDIvol: 1.2 ± 0.4 mGy, mean E: 0.66 mSv). Logistic regression revealed that tube voltage and current had the greatest impact on the detection rate, while nodule size and density had no significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal tube voltage/current combination proposed in this study (80 kV/50 mAs) is comparable to the proposed combinations in similar studies, which mostly dealt with conventional CAD software. Modification of tube voltage and tube current has a significant impact on the performance of DL-based CAD software in pulmonary nodule detection regardless of their size and composition. KEY POINTS: • Modification of tube voltage and tube current has a significant impact on the performance of deep learning-based CAD software. • Nodule size and composition have no significant impact on the software's performance. • The optimal tube voltage/current combination for the examined software is 80 kV/50 mAs.
Authors: Adrian Huber; Julia Landau; Lukas Ebner; Yanik Bütikofer; Lars Leidolt; Barbara Brela; Michelle May; Johannes Heverhagen; Andreas Christe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael Messerli; Thomas Kluckert; Meinhard Knitel; Fabian Rengier; René Warschkow; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka; Simon Wildermuth; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: N Becker; E Motsch; M-L Gross; A Eigentopf; C P Heussel; H Dienemann; P A Schnabel; M Eichinger; D-E Optazaite; M Puderbach; M Wielpütz; H-U Kauczor; J Tremper; S Delorme Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Harry J de Koning; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Pim A de Jong; Ernst T Scholten; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Carla Weenink; Uraujh Yousaf-Khan; Nanda Horeweg; Susan van 't Westeinde; Mathias Prokop; Willem P Mali; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Peter M A van Ooijen; Joachim G J V Aerts; Michael A den Bakker; Erik Thunnissen; Johny Verschakelen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Joan E Walter; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J M Groen; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lucia J M Kroft; Levinia van der Velden; Irene Hernández Girón; Joost J H Roelofs; Albert de Roos; Jacob Geleijns Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.000