Literature DB >> 25783198

Randomized Study on Early Detection of Lung Cancer with MSCT in Germany: Results of the First 3 Years of Follow-up After Randomization.

N Becker1, E Motsch, M-L Gross, A Eigentopf, C P Heussel, H Dienemann, P A Schnabel, M Eichinger, D-E Optazaite, M Puderbach, M Wielpütz, H-U Kauczor, J Tremper, S Delorme.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The German Lung Cancer Screening Intervention Trial (LUSI) is one of the European randomized trials investigating the efficacy of low-dose multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as a screening tool for lung cancer. In the evaluation of the first (prevalence) screening round, we observed exceptionally high early recall rates, which made the routine application of MSCT screening questionable. Because screening may behave differently in subsequent (incidence) screening rounds, we analyzed (a) basic characteristics for the annual rounds 2 to 4, which have now also been completed, and (b) the first 3 years with complete follow-up since time of randomization.
METHODS: Data material was the data record of LUSI after the fourth screening round and the 3-year follow-up had been completed. Basic characteristics of screening, e.g., early recall rate, detection rate, and interval cancers as well of proportion of advanced cancers, were descriptively evaluated and, if informative, group differences were tested for statistical significance.
RESULTS: Early recall rates were significantly lower in the subsequent screening rounds than in the first one if the MSCT information from the previous screening rounds was available. Detection and biopsy rates were approximately 1% or lower, ratio of benign:malignant biopsies: 1:1.6 to 1:3.
CONCLUSION: Our recent data may not only settle one concern regarding high recall rates in routine MSCT screening but also indicate that screening must be strictly organized to be effective. Performance indicators are similar to those in mammography screening. Nevertheless, possible consequences for the participants (diagnostic workup of suspicious findings, biopsies) are more invasive than in mammography screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783198     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  43 in total

1.  Screening for Lung Cancer: Balancing Hope With Doubt About Applicability.

Authors:  Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Effect of smoking cessation counseling within a randomised study on early detection of lung cancer in Germany.

Authors:  M Bade; V Bähr; U Brandt; A Eigentopf; T Brüchert; M-L Gross; E Motsch; N Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Longitudinal airway remodeling in active and past smokers in a lung cancer screening population.

Authors:  Bertram J Jobst; Oliver Weinheimer; Torben Buschulte; Mila Trauth; Jan Tremper; Stefan Delorme; Nikolaus Becker; Erna Motsch; Marie-Luise Groß; Anke Trotter; Monika Eichinger; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Mark O Wielpütz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Efficacy of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the current state of evidence of mortality reduction.

Authors:  Motoyasu Sagawa; Takafumi Sugawara; Naoya Ishibashi; Akira Koyanagi; Takashi Kondo; Toshiharu Tabata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  The narrow path to organized LDCT lung cancer screening programs in Europe.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  [Lung cancer screening with thoracic X‑ray and CT : Current situation].

Authors:  O von Stackelberg; H-U Kauczor
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Recommendations on screening for lung cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Pulmonary quantitative CT imaging in focal and diffuse disease: current research and clinical applications.

Authors:  Mario Silva; Gianluca Milanese; Valeria Seletti; Alarico Ariani; Nicola Sverzellati
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Effect of smoking cessation on quantitative computed tomography in smokers at risk in a lung cancer screening population.

Authors:  Bertram J Jobst; Oliver Weinheimer; Mila Trauth; Nikolaus Becker; Erna Motsch; Marie-Luise Groß; Jan Tremper; Stefan Delorme; Anke Eigentopf; Monika Eichinger; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Mark O Wielpütz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Do doctors understand the test characteristics of lung cancer screening?

Authors:  Richard Schmidt; Marie Breyer; Robab Breyer-Kohansal; Matthias Urban; Georg-Christian Funk
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.