| Literature DB >> 35057471 |
Aiperi Otunchieva1, Jamila Smanalieva2, Angelika Ploeger1.
Abstract
Dietary diversity and adequate nutrient intake are essential for conducting a healthy life. However, women in low-income settings often face difficulties in ensuring dietary quality. This research assessed relationships between the dietary diversity, nutrient adequacy, and socio-economic factors among women of reproductive age (WRA) in Kyrgyzstan. A cross-sectional study was undertaken in four locations, including two rural and two urban areas in the north and south of Kyrgyzstan. A survey with pre-coded and open-ended questions was employed during the interviews of 423 WRAs aged 18-49. Data collection was conducted in March-May 2021. The average value body mass index (BMI) of WRA was 24.2 ± 4.6 kg/m2. The dietary diversity score (DDS) was higher among rural women (common language effect size) cles = 0.67, adjusted p < 0.001) in the northern region (cles = 0.61, p < 0.05) who have cropland (cles = 0.60, p < 0.001) and a farm animal (cles = 0.60, p < 0.05). Mean nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) was below 1 in most micronutrients, whereas thiamine, riboflavin, vitamins B6 and C, folic acid, calcium, and magnesium were even lower than 0.5. Women with a kitchen garden or a cropland had better NAR energy (cles = 0.57), NAR carbohydrate (cles = 0.60), NAR fiber (cles = 0.60), NAR vitamin B1 (cles = 0.53), and NAR folic acid (cles = 0.54). Respondents who receive remittances and a farm animal have better NARs for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, vitamin B1, folic acid, iron, zinc, and mean adequacy ratio for 16 nutrients (MAR 16) than those who do not. Education and income have a negative correlation with dietary quality. This study contributes to the limited literature on the quality of diets in Kyrgyzstan. Hidden hunger and undernutrition are a severe problem among WRA in low-income settings. Recommendations are including study programs in nutrition, teaching households farming practices, and raising awareness on adequate nutrition.Entities:
Keywords: dietary diversity; nutrient adequacy ratio; the triple burden of malnutrition; women of reproductive age
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057471 PMCID: PMC8780699 DOI: 10.3390/nu14020289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Study area information.
| Region | North | South | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bishkek | At Bashi | Osh | Aravan |
|
| Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural |
|
| 99 | 90 | 98 | 136 |
|
| 42.87′ N | 41.16′ N | 40.52′ N | 40.51′ N |
Figure 1Map of Kyrgyzstan with an indication of field locations [51].
Figure 2Determining factors impacting dietary quality of WRA (Source: authors’ visualization).
Socioeconomic characteristics of respondents (n = 423).
| Characteristic | Rural | Urban | Total Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years): | |||
| 18–27 | 50 (22.1%) | 77 (39%) | 127 (30.0%) |
| 28–39 | 96 (42.5%) | 66 (33.5%) | 162 (38.3%) |
| 40–49 | 80 (35.4%) | 54 (27.4%) | 134 (31.7%) |
| Ethnicity: | |||
| Kyrgyz | 105 (46.5%) | 182 (92.3%) | 287 (67.7%) |
| Non-Kyrgyz | 121 (53.5%) | 15 (7.6%) | 136 (32.3%) |
| Education: | |||
| Primary Education | 35 (15.5%) | 8 (4%) | 43 (10.2%) |
| Secondary Education | 104 (46%) | 66 (33.5%) | 170 (40.2%) |
| Vocational School | 25 (11%) | 16 (8.1%) | 41 (9.7%) |
| Higher Education | 60 (26.5%) | 107 (54.3%) | 167 (39.5%) |
| Marital status: | |||
| Single | 29 (12.8%) | 66 (33.5%) | 95 (22.5%) |
| Married | 189 (83.6%) | 120 (60.9%) | 309 (73.0%) |
| Divorced | 8 (3.5%) | 11 (5.6%) | 19 (4.5%) |
| Household Income (KG soms) *: | |||
| 0–5000 | 32 (14.2%) | 21 (10.6%) | 53 (12.5%) |
| 5000–10,000 | 82 (36.3%) | 42 (21.3%) | 124 (29.3%) |
| 10,001–20,000 | 67 (29.6%) | 66 (33.5%) | 133 (31.4%) |
| 20,001–30,000 | 29 (12.8%) | 55 (27.9%) | 84 (19.9%) |
| 30,001–40,000 | 10 (4.4%) | 10 (5%) | 20 (4.7%) |
| 40,000 and More | 6 (2.7%) | 3 (1.5%) | 9 (2.1%) |
| Family Size: | |||
| 4 or Less | 55 (24.3%) | 116 (58.9%) | 171 (40.4%) |
| More than 4 | 171 (75.7%) | 81 (41.1%) | 252 (59.6%) |
| Receive remittances: | |||
| Yes | 67 (29.6%) | 26 (13.2%) | 93 (22.0%) |
| No | 159 (70.4%) | 171 (86.8%) | 330 (78.0%) |
| BMI level (kg/m2): | |||
| Underweight | 13 (5.7%) | 19 (9.6%) | 32 (7.6%) |
| Normal Weight | 118 (52.2%) | 118 (59.9%) | 236 (55.8%) |
| Overweight | 59 (26.1%) | 44 (22.3%) | 103 (24.3%) |
| Obese | 36 (15.9%) | 16 (8.1%) | 52 (12.3%) |
| Mean (±SD) | 24.82 (±4.47) | 23.52 (±4.82) | 24.21 (±4.68) |
| Children: | |||
| Yes | 175 (77.4%) | 98 (49.7%) | 273 (64.5%) |
| No | 51 (22.6%) | 99 (50.3%) | 150 (35.5%) |
| Source of income: | |||
| Employment | 97 (42.9%) | 155 (78.7%) | 252 (59.6%) |
| Agriculture | 65 (29%) | 6 (3%) | 71 (16.8%) |
| Remittances | 41 (18.1%) | 22 (11.2%) | 63 (14.9%) |
| Private Business | 17 (7.5%) | 10 (5%) | 27 (6.4%) |
| Government Support | 6 (2.6%) | 4 (2%) | 10 (2.4%) |
* KG soms is the local currency, 1 USD = 84.8 KG soms; BMI stands for body mass index; Underweight (below 18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25.0–29.9), obese (30.0 and above).
Figure 3Consumption of ten food groups among women of reproductive age (WRA), and dietary diversity score (DDS) in rural and urban areas.
Food groups and locally consumed foods obtained from 24-hour diet recall.
| Food Groups | Reported and Locally Consumed Foods |
|---|---|
| Grains, white roots and tubers, and plantains | Wheat, rice, buckwheat, pearl barley, wheat bread, pasta products, potato, oatmeal, radish |
| Meat, poultry and fish | Beef, mutton, goat, chicken, sausage products (sosiska, kolbasa), smoked sausage, horse sausage (chuchuk), liver, stomach, intestine, canned fish |
| Other Vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables | Carrot, sweet red pepper, pumpkin, apricot, dried apricot, peach, persimmon, melon |
| Milk and milk products | Cow milk, ayran, kefir, dried suzmo (kurut), concentrated ayran (suzmo), cream (kajmak, smetana), ghee (sary maj), fermented mare’s milk (kymyz), quark (tvorog), cheese |
| Nuts and seeds | Walnuts, peanuts, pistachios, sunflower seeds |
| Pulses (Beans, peas and lentils) | Red beans, chickpeas, mung beans, lentils |
| Eggs | Chicken eggs |
| Dark green leafy vegetables | Dill, coriander, parsley, green garlic, green onion, grape leaves, rhubarb, chives |
| Other fruits | Apple, banana, dried fruits, oranges, cherries, quince, pomegranate, prune, raspberries, sandthorn, currant berries |
| Other vegetables | Cabbage, garlic, cucumber, tomato, onion, eggplant, beetroot |
In parenthesis, Kyrgyz names are indicated.
Nutrient intake and its adequacy measured by 24-hour diet recall (n = 423).
| Nutrient | Rural ( | Urban ( | Total Group | RDI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | NAR Russia | NAR DGE | Mean ± SD | NAR Russia | NAR DGE | Mean ± SD | NAR Russia | NAR DGE | Russia | DGE | |
| Energy (kcal) | 1731.42 ± 569.4 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 1551.58 ± 611.26 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1647.66 ± 595.36 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 2150 | 2200 |
| Protein (g) | 58.14 ± 21.51 | 0.89 | 1.12 | 61.51 ± 30.00 | 0.95 | 1.25 | 59.71 ± 25.84 | 0.92 | 1.18 | 65 | 50.70 |
| Fat (g) | 61.98 ± 31.98 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 59.68 ± 30.89 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 60.91 ± 31.46 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 72 | 73.3 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 231.57 ± 89.99 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 188.67 ± 86.41 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 211.59 ± 90.80 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 311 | 275 |
| Fiber (g) | 17.99 ± 7.04 | 0.90 | 0.60 | 14.90 ± 6.91 | 0.74 | 0.50 | 16.55 ± 7.14 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 20 | 30 |
| Vitamin A (µg) | 910.09 ± 997.47 | 1.01 | 1.30 | 820.24 ± 665.65 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 868.24 ± 859.24 | 0.96 | 1.24 | 900 | 700 |
| Vitamin E. (mg) | 11.20 ± 8.02 | 0.75 | 0.93 | 12.34 ± 8.94 | 0.82 | 1.03 | 11.73 ± 8.47 | 0.78 | 0.98 | 15 | 12 |
| Vitamin B1 (mg) | 0.62 ± 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.62 | 0.59 ± 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.60 ± 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 1.5 | 1 |
| Vitamin B2 (mg) | 0.78 ± 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 0.77 ± 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.77 ± 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 1.8 | 1.1 |
| Vitamin B6 (mg) | 0.92 ± 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.93 ± 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.92 ± 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 2 | 1.4 |
| Fol. acid (µg) | 165.2 ± 74.17 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 145.75 ± 79.53 | 0.36 | 0.49 | 156.14 ± 77.24 | 0.39 | 0.52 | 400 | 300 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 42.01 ± 36.84 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 44.52 ± 45.98 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 43.18 ± 41.31 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 90 | 95 |
| Calcium (mg) | 323.16 ± 161.04 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 286.13 ± 132.01 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 305.92 ± 149.21 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 1000 | 1000 |
| Magnesium (mg) | 198.82 ± 72.59 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 185.24 ± 82.05 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 192.50 ± 77.35 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 400 | 305 |
| Iron (mg) | 10.08 ± 3.61 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 9.93 ± 4.42 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 10.01 ± 4.00 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 18 | 15 |
| Zinc (mg) | 9.25 ± 3.75 | 0.77 | 1.16 | 10.19 ± 5.34 | 0.85 | 1.27 | 9.69 ± 4.58 | 0.81 | 1.21 | 12 | 8 |
RDI stands for recommended daily intake; NAR stands for nutrient adequacy ratio; SD is standard deviation; DGE stands for Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung e.V., the German Nutrition Society.
Figure 4Determining factors for dietary diversity. The figure shows CLES-common language effect size in two groups. Group A includes urban residents; -northern region; remittances; non-Kyrgyz ethnicity; kitchen garden, farm animals, children; harvest animal purpose is to mostly self-consume; store distance more than 2 km. Group B includes rural residents, southern region; no remittances; Kyrgyz ethnicity, no kitchen garden, farm animals, or children; harvest animal purpose is mostly to sell; store distance-2 km or less. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.001; *** adjusted p-value is < 0.001 (The Benjamini–Hochberg method).
Figure 5Correlation of NAR for nutrients with income. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; Mar-16—mean nutrient adequacy for 16 nutrients * p-value < 0.05; ** adjusted p-value < 0.05.
Figure 6Correlation of NAR for nutrients with education. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; Mar-16—mean nutrient adequacy for 16 nutrients, * p-value < 0.05; ** adjusted p-value < 0.05; *** adjusted p-value < 0.001.
Figure 7Correlation of NAR for nutrients with BMI. BMI stands for body mass index. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; Mar-16—mean nutrient adequacy for 16 nutrients; * p-value < 0.05.
Figure 8Comparison of NAR for 16 nutrients with urban and rural areas. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; Mar-16—mean nutrient adequacy ratio for 16 nutrients; CLES—common language effect size; Wilcoxon p-value; * p-value < 0.05; **adjusted p-value < 0.05.
Figure 9Comparison of NAR for 16 nutrients with the presence of kitchen garden/cropland. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; Mar-16—mean nutrient adequacy ratio for 16 nutrients. CLES—common language effect size; Wilcoxon p-value; * p-value < 0.05; ** adjusted p-value < 0.05.
Figure 10Comparison of NAR for 16 nutrients with getting remittances or not. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; MAR 16—mean nutrient adequacy ratio for 16 nutrients. CLES—common language effect size; Wilcoxon p-value; * p-value < 0.05.
Figure 11Comparison of NAR 16 nutrients with having at least one farm animal or not. NAR—nutrient adequacy ratio; Mar-16—mean nutrient adequacy ratio for 16 nutrients. CLES—common language effect size; Wilcoxon p-value; ** adjusted p-value < 0.05.