| Literature DB >> 35056393 |
Mimi Zhang1, Fei Yu1, Yuan Xue1, Lulu Song1, Mengsi Du1, Xing Li1, Wenjie Li1.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: T2DM; dyslipidemia; serum 25(OH)D3 level; serum lipid profile; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35056393 PMCID: PMC8781849 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58010085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Characteristics of the study population according to the presence of T2DM.
| Variable | Event (T2DM) | No Event |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.004 * | ||
| male | 155 (39.24%) | 911 (47.18%) | |
| female | 240 (60.76%) | 1020 (52.82%) | |
| Age | <0.001 * | ||
| <18 | 1 (0.25%) | 97 (5.02%) | |
| ≥18 | 394 (99.75%) | 1834 (94.98%) | |
| Education (years) | <0.001 * | ||
| ≤6 | 218 (55.10%) | 797 (41.30%) | |
| 6~12 | 173 (43.88%) | 1061 (54.94%) | |
| >12 | 4 (1.02%) | 73 (3.76%) | |
| Occupation | <0.001 * | ||
| Farmer | 338 (85.53%) | 1424 (73.73%) | |
| Worker | 33 (8.38%) | 236 (12.22%) | |
| Office worker | 24 (6.09%) | 271 (14.05%) | |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 9.08 ± 3.32 | 4.71 ± 0.81 | <0.001 * |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.74 ± 1.05 | 4.42 ± 1.01 | <0.001 * |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.29 ± 1.76 | 1.55 ± 1.21 | <0.001 * |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.21 ± 0.27 | 1.26 ± 0.31 | 0.003 * |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.56 ± 0.80 | 2.48 ± 0.78 | 0.066 |
| 25(OH)D3 (ng/mL) | 29.07 ± 28.76 | 34.75 ± 37.04 | 0.001 * |
Data are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables. TC (total cholesterol). TG (triglyceride). HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol). 25(OH) D3 (25-hydroxyvitamin D3). T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus); * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 1The proportion of the demographic characteristics in different 25(OH)D3 levels. The proportion of gender distribution (A), Age (years) distribution (B), Education (years) levels (C), and Occupation distribution (D) in different 25(OH)D3 levels.
Figure 2Simple linear correlation between serum GLU and 25(OH)D3 level.
Figure 3The proportion of T2DM prevalence in different 25(OH)D3 levels.
Figure 4Simple linear correlation between serum lipids and 25(OH)D3 level. Simple linear correlation between TC (A), TG (B), HDL-C (C), LDL-C (D) and 25(OH)D3 level. TC (the cholesterol), TG (triglyceride), HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein- cholesterol), LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol).
OR and 95%CI for the risk of T2DM according to the levels of serum lipids.
| Parameter | Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI |
| OR | 95%CI |
| |
| TC | ||||||
| Low TC | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | ||||
| High TC | 1.58 | 1.02–2.46 | 0.040 * | 1.34 | 0.84–2.13 | 0.220 |
| TG | ||||||
| Low TG | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | ||||
| High TG | 2.40 | 1.89–3.05 | <0.001 * | 2.48 | 1.94–3.18 | <0.001 * |
| HDL-C | ||||||
| High HDL-C | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | ||||
| Low HDL-C | 1.44 | 1.14–1.82 | 0.003 * | 1.37 | 1.07–1.75 | 0.011 * |
| LDL-C | ||||||
| Low LDL-C | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | ||||
| High LDL-C | 0.65 | 0.29–1.45 | 0.295 | 0.51 | 0.23–1.15 | 0.106 |
Notes: Adjustment for sex, age, education levels and Occupation. OR (odds ratio). CI (confidence interval). TC (total cholesterol). TG (triglyceride). HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol); * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 5The mediation model: “a” represents the path from 25(OH)D3 (Predictor) to TG (Mediator), “b” represents the path from TG or HDL-C (Mediator) to T2DM (Outcome), “c” represents the path from 25(OH)D3 (Predictor) to T2DM (Outcome), and “c’” represents the path from 25(OH)D3 (Predictor) to T2DM (Outcome) after TG or HDL-C (Mediator) is controlled.
Mediation analysis of the relationship between 25(OH)D3 levels and T2DM by TG.
| Effects | Parameter Estimate (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | Relative Effect Value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path a | −0.15 (−0.28, −0.02) | 0.86 (0.76, 0.98) | — | 0.025 * |
| Path b | 0.32 (0.25, 0.39) | 1.38 (1.28, 1.48) | — | <0.001 * |
| Indirect effect-path a, b | −0.04 (−0.09, −0.01) | 0.96 (0.91, 0.99) | 10.26% | — |
| Direct effect-path c’ | −0.35 (−0.62, −0.08) | 0.70 (0.54, 0.92) | 89.74% | 0.012 * |
| Total effect-path c | −0.39 (−0.68, −0.14) | 0.68 (0.51, 0.87) | 100% | 0.004 * |
Notes: Path a, b coefficients represent 5000 bootstrapped samples and Percentile 95%CIs. OR (odds ratios). CI (confidence interval). TG (triglyceride); * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Mediation analysis of the relationship between 25(OH)D3 levels and T2DM by HDL-C.
| Effects | Parameter Estimate (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | Relative Effect Value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path a | 0.14 (0.11, 0.16) | 1.15 (1.12,1.17) | — | <0.001 * |
| Path b | −0.47 (−0.84, −0.10) | 0.63 (0.43,0.90) | — | 0.013 * |
| Indirect effect-path a, b | −0.06 (−0.12, −0.01) | 0.94 (0.89,0.99) | 15.38% | — |
| Direct effect-path c’ | −0.33 (−0.60, −0.06) | 0.72 (0.55,0.94) | 84.62% | 0.017 * |
| Total effect-path c | −0.39 (−0.68, −0.14) | 0.68 (0.51,0.87) | 100% | 0.004 * |
Notes: Path a, b coefficients represent 5000 bootstrapped samples and Percentile 95%CIs. OR (odds ratios). CI (confidence interval). HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol); * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.