BACKGROUND: Low vitamin D has been associated with low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, a marker of coronary risk. Whether atheroprotective HDL particle composition accounts for this association and whether fat affects this association is not known. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between HDL particle composition and 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25[OH]D) in post-menopausal women. METHODS: Vitamin D levels and lipoprotein composition were assessed in fasting blood samples of apparently healthy women from a diverse Chicago community. Visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) abdominal fat area were assessed using computed tomography. Total body fat mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: We enrolled 78 women (50% black; 50% white), age 48 to 64 years, all of whom were participants in a longitudinal study of fat patterning. They had a mean 25[OH]D of 31 ± 15 μg/L, HDL cholesterol 57±11 mg/dL, and large HDL particle subclass 8.6±3.4 μmol/L. In a multivariable-adjusted regression model, each 5 μg/L higher 25[OH]D predicted 0.57 μmol/L (95%CI 0.20-0.95) higher large HDL particles, independent of race, season, and total HDL particle concentration. This association was only partially confounded by total body fat mass (0.49, 95%CI 0.10-0.89), SAT (0.50, 95%CI 0.11-0.90), or VAT (0.37, 95%CI 0.01-0.74). Age did not significantly influence the strength of associations. CONCLUSIONS: Higher 25[OH]D levels are associated with large HDL particles. This association is stronger than that of HDL cholesterol and only partially confounded by body fat. Theoretically, vitamin D may protect against cardiovascular risk by promoting formation of large HDL particles, affecting reverse cholesterol transport.
BACKGROUND: Low vitamin D has been associated with low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, a marker of coronary risk. Whether atheroprotective HDL particle composition accounts for this association and whether fat affects this association is not known. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between HDL particle composition and 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25[OH]D) in post-menopausal women. METHODS:Vitamin D levels and lipoprotein composition were assessed in fasting blood samples of apparently healthy women from a diverse Chicago community. Visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) abdominal fat area were assessed using computed tomography. Total body fat mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: We enrolled 78 women (50% black; 50% white), age 48 to 64 years, all of whom were participants in a longitudinal study of fat patterning. They had a mean 25[OH]D of 31 ± 15 μg/L, HDL cholesterol 57±11 mg/dL, and large HDL particle subclass 8.6±3.4 μmol/L. In a multivariable-adjusted regression model, each 5 μg/L higher 25[OH]D predicted 0.57 μmol/L (95%CI 0.20-0.95) higher large HDL particles, independent of race, season, and total HDL particle concentration. This association was only partially confounded by total body fat mass (0.49, 95%CI 0.10-0.89), SAT (0.50, 95%CI 0.11-0.90), or VAT (0.37, 95%CI 0.01-0.74). Age did not significantly influence the strength of associations. CONCLUSIONS: Higher 25[OH]D levels are associated with large HDL particles. This association is stronger than that of HDL cholesterol and only partially confounded by body fat. Theoretically, vitamin D may protect against cardiovascular risk by promoting formation of large HDL particles, affecting reverse cholesterol transport.
Authors: Jared P Reis; Denise von Mühlen; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Deborah L Wingard; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: José L Pérez-Castrillón; Gemma Vega; Laura Abad; Alberto Sanz; José Chaves; Gonzalo Hernandez; Antonio Dueñas Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-02-08 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Kendra A Young; Corinne D Engelman; Carl D Langefeld; Kristen G Hairston; Steven M Haffner; Michael Bryer-Ash; Jill M Norris Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Susan Sam; Steven Haffner; Michael H Davidson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Steven Feinstein; George Kondos; Alfonso Perez; Theodore Mazzone Journal: Diabetes Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Kamil F Faridi; Di Zhao; Seth S Martin; Joshua R Lupton; Steven R Jones; Eliseo Guallar; Christie M Ballantyne; Pamela L Lutsey; Erin D Michos Journal: Nutrition Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Peter F Schnatz; Matthew Nudy; David M O'Sullivan; Xuezhi Jiang; J Mark Cline; Jay R Kaplan; Thomas B Clarkson; Susan E Appt Journal: Maturitas Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Peter F Schnatz; Matthew Nudy; David M O'Sullivan; Kelly Ethun; Susan E Appt; Thomas B Clarkson Journal: Menopause Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Peter F Schnatz; Xuezhi Jiang; Sharon Vila-Wright; Aaron K Aragaki; Matthew Nudy; David M O'Sullivan; Rebecca Jackson; Erin LeBlanc; Jennifer G Robinson; James M Shikany; Catherine R Womack; Lisa W Martin; Marian L Neuhouser; Mara Z Vitolins; Yiqing Song; Stephen Kritchevsky; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Menopause Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.953