| Literature DB >> 35053400 |
Paulina Wigner1, Michał Bijak2, Joanna Saluk-Bijak1.
Abstract
Nephrolithiasis ranks third among urological diseases in terms of prevalence, making up about 15% of cases. The continued increase in the incidence of nephrolithiasis is most probably due to changes in eating habits (high protein, sodium, and sugar diets) and lifestyle (reduced physical activity) in all developed countries. Some 80% of all kidney stones cases are oxalate urolithiasis, which is also characterized by the highest risk of recurrence. Frequent relapses of nephrolithiasis contribute to severe complications and high treatment costs. Unfortunately, there is no known effective way to prevent urolithiasis at present. In cases of diet-related urolithiasis, dietary changes may prevent recurrence. However, in some patients, the condition is unrelated to diet; in such cases, there is evidence to support the use of stone-related medications. Interestingly, a growing body of evidence indicates the potential of the microbiome to reduce the risk of developing renal colic. Previous studies have primarily focused on the use of Oxalobacterformigenes in patients with urolithiasis. Unfortunately, this bacterium is not an ideal probiotic due to its antibiotic sensitivity and low pH. Therefore, subsequent studies sought to find bacteria which are capable of oxalate degradation, focusing on well-known probiotics including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains, Eubacterium lentum, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli.Entities:
Keywords: kidney stones; oxalate metabolism; probiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053400 PMCID: PMC8773937 DOI: 10.3390/cells11020284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Risk factors of nephrolithiasis development.
| Type of Risk | Risk Factors | Description | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intrinsic factors | Gender | Deposits in the urinary tract were found to be 2–3 times more common in men than in women. | [ |
| Age | The incidence of nephrolithiasis has increased dramatically over the past 30 years. | [ | |
| Ethnic differences | Non-Hispanic white individuals were characterized by the highest stone risk (10.3%), followed by Hispanics (6.4%) and non-Hispanic African Americans (4.3%). | [ | |
| Family or personal history | If someone in your family has had kidney stones, you are more likely to develop them than someone without a family history. | [ | |
| Extrinsic factors | Environmental factors | Regions with higher average temperatures in the United States showed the highest risk of urinary tract stone occurrence. | [ |
| “Western diets” | “Western diets” are characterized by the consumption of large amounts of animal protein, which leads to an increase in the excretion of calcium, oxalate, and uric acid in the urine, consequently predisposing individuals to kidney stones. | [ | |
| Fluid intake | The reduction of fluid intake may contribute to increased urine saturation. | [ | |
| Sodium intake | Increased sodium intake causes increased urine calcium and reduced citrate excretion. | [ | |
| Calcium intake | Reduction in calcium intake causes an increase in urinary oxalate excretion. | [ | |
| Meat intake | Increased meat intake causes a decrease in urine pH and an increase urinary calcium excretion. | [ | |
| Fruits intake | Decreased fruit intake causes a decrease in urine pH and reduces in citrate excretion. | [ | |
| Diet content in oxalate foods | Increased oxalate in food contributes to an increase in urinary oxalate extraction. | [ | |
| BMI (body mass index) | An increase in BMI was positively correlated with increased risk of nephrolithiasis. | [ | |
| Metabolic disorders | Diabetes mellitus, obesity and metabolic syndrome may increase the risk of kidney stones. | [ | |
| Urinary tract infections | Patients who suffer from chronic urinary tract infections may form larger stones. | [ |
Figure 1In supersaturated urine, calcium and oxalate combine to form initially microscopic insoluble crystals. This is the first stage of deposit formation (nucleus formation). Then, individual microcrystals combine into larger forms (crystal growth), which, in turn, can aggregate together to form large, stable deposits (crystal aggregation) [34,35]. In the next stage, the crystals interact with the cells of the renal tubular epithelium. Crystal–cell interaction causes the movement of crystals from the basolateral side of cells to the basal membrane [36]. Injured cells release substances such as the kidney fragment of prothrombin−1 or other anionic proteins that induce crystal agglomeration [37]. Moreover, injured cells can invert their cell membrane, which is anionic to the urinary environment and acts as a place of crystal adhesion. The inverted cell membrane makes it easy for other crystals to attach [38]. Exposure to calcium oxalate crystals induces oxidative stress in renal epithelial cells. In addition, calcium oxalate influences the composition and function of the renal epithelial cell membrane. Calcium oxalate crystals destroy tight junctions and the polarity of the cell membrane that carries the components of the basolateral or tight junction region to the apical surface of the cell, which, in turn, leads to rupture of the cell membrane and the release of intracellular organic substances. Damaged tubular epithelial cells also show increased expression of crystal adhesion molecules such as hyaluronan, osteopontin, and CD44, which promote crystal adhesion and retention. Endocytosed crystals adversely affect mitochondrial function, causing abnormality in the respiratory chain and increasing the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may damage, and induce apoptosis of, renal epithelial cells [39].
Characteristics of Oxalobacter formigenes.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Characteristic | Description |
| Morphology | Rod shaped |
| Gram staining | Gram-negative |
| Mobility | Nonmotile |
| Spore-forming | Nonspore-forming |
| Anaerobic/aerobic | Obligate anaerobes |
Figure 2Oxalate metabolism by Oxalobacter formigenes. OxIT—oxalate transporter, Oxc—oxalyl-CoA decarboxylase, Frc—formyl-CoA transferase.
A summary of previous studies on the use of O. formigenes for the prevention of urolithiasis.
| Author | Type of Study | Study Design | Main Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sidhu et al. [ | Animal study | Laboratory rats known to be noncolonized were colonized with live bacteria or treated with a preparation of oxalate-degrading enzymes derived from | The absence of |
| Sidhu et al. [ | Animal model of severe hyperoxaluria | Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six subgroups: group 1 was given a normal diet, group 2 was given an oxalate-rich diet; group 3 was given an oxalate-rich diet and an esophageal gavage of 1 × 103
| Urine oxalate levels were lower in the group that received an oxalate-rich diet and |
| Hatch et al. [ | Animal study | Male Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into two groups: group 1 was colonized by esophageal gavage of a 1.5 mL inoculum of 20 × 108 bacteria from a 24-h culture of a wild rat strain of | Rats colonized by |
| Duncan et al. [ | Clinical study (Four healthy volunteers) | Adult volunteers lacking detectable oxalate-degrading activity in feces were subjected to an oxalate loading test and then administered 500 mg wet weight containing approximately 108 viable cells in 1 mg of | |
| Hoppe et al. [ | Clinical study (16 patients with urolithiasis) | Patients were divided into two groups. The first group included nine patients to whom | |
| Siener et al. [ | Clinical study (37 patients with idiopathic calcium oxalate stone) | The presence of | Plasma oxalate concentrations were significantly higher in noncolonized (5.79 μmol/L) than colonized stone formers (1.70 μmol/L). Colonization with |
| Kaufman et al. [ | Clinical study (247 patients with recurrent calcium oxalate stones and 259 controls) | Stool samples were collected to assess the presence of | The prevalence of |
| Troxel et al. [ | Clinical study (five first time calcium stone formers and10 control participants) | Stool samples were collected for culture and detection of | Urine oxalate levels were lower in |
| Kwak et al. [ | Clinical study (30 healthy volunteers and 38 patients with urolithiasis) | Determination of | The colonization rate of |
| Kodama et al. [ | Clinical study (55 male and 37 female healthy volunteers) | Determination of the presence of | Female subjects showed a 15% lower rate of |
| Kumar et al. [ | Clinical study (63 patients with calcium oxalate stone formers and 40 controls from North India) | Stool samples were collected to assess the presence of | |
| Kharlamb et al. [ | Clinical study (patients with confirmed | The impact of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clarithromycin) on | Among the 12 patients who were positive for |
| Nazzal et al. [ | Clinical study (23 patients with a positive test of | Patients with confirmed | |
| Jiang et al. [ | Clinical study (11 | The study was divided into two, three-week dietary phases. For the first phase, dietary oxalate intake was varied, including 50 mg daily for the first week, 250 mg for the second week, and 750 mg for the third week. For the second phase, dietary calcium intake was varied, i.e., 400 mg daily for the first week, 1000 mg for the second week, and 2000 mg for the third week. Finally, urine and stool samples were collected and used to determine stone risk parameters and | |
| Hoppe et al. [ | Phase I/II clinical trial (28 patients randomized to the treatment group (OC5) or the placebo group | There was no significant difference in the change in urinary oxalate excretion and plasma oxalate excretion between the studied groups after eight weeks of OC5 treatment. However, the group which received OC5 treatment was characterized by increased urinary oxalate excretion compared to urinary creatinine excretion. | Treatment with OC5 preparation did not significantly reduce urinary or plasma oxalate extraction; however, this therapy was well tolerated and successfully delivered to the gastrointestinal tract. |
| Milliner et al. [ | Phase II/III clinical trial (26 patients randomized to the treatment group (OC3) or the placebo group | There were no significant differences in the change in urinary oxalate excretion, urinary oxalate/urinary creatinine ratio or plasma oxalate excretion among the studied groups after 24 weeks of OC3 treatment; however, this treatment was well tolerated. | OC3 treatment was well tolerated but was not found to reduce urinary oxalate excretion. |
Characteristics of Lactobacillus spp.
| Characteristic | Description |
| Morphology | Rod shaped |
| Gram staining | Gram-positive |
| Mobility | Nonmotile |
| Spore-forming | Nonspore-forming |
| Anaerobic/aerobic | Facultative anaerobic |
| Catalase | Catalase-negative |
A summary of previous studies on the use of Lactobacillus spp. for the prevention of urolithiasis.
| Author | Type of Study | Study Design | Main Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turroni et al. [ | In vitro | Among the 60 | High oxalate degradation levels were obtained with |
| Turroni et al. [ | In vitro | The oxalate-degrading activities of 14 | Only the five |
| Mogna et al. [ | In vitro | Thirteen strains of | Screening of different |
| Lewanika et al. [ | In vitro | ||
| Azcarate-Peril et al. [ | In vitro | Strains of | |
| Gomathi et al. [ | In vitro | Six hundred and seventy-three bacterial isolates were isolated from stool samples collected from 30 patients. A strain analysis showed that 251 of the isolates were lactic acid bacteria, but only 17 were capable of metabolizing oxalate. The bacteria selected in this way were analyzed to assess their ability to adhere to epithelial cells. | Obtained results suggest that |
| Giardina et al. [ | In vitro | Eleven strains of lactic acid bacteria ( | |
| Campieri et al. [ | In vitro and animal | All the tested bacteria showed an oxalate degradation capacity of 1–11%. The mixed probiotic treatment resulted in a great reduction of the excretion of oxalate in all six patients. | |
| Wei et al. [ | In vivo (ethylene glycol induced-animal model of kidney stones) | Male rats were given 1% ethylene glycol dissolved in their drinking water for four weeks to develop hyperoxaluria, and half of them received an additional LPN1 for four weeks prior to treatment with ethylene glycol as a preventive intervention. | LPN1 probiotic can prevent ethylene glycol induced hyperoxaluria by regulating the gut microflora and improving gut barrier function. |
| Lieske et al. [ | Clinical (10 patients with chronic fat malabsorption, calcium oxalate stones, and hyperoxaluria) | Patients took 1 (4 g), 2 (8 g), and 3 (12 g) packets of Oxadrop® daily for three four-week periods. The preparation was mixed in a glass of cold beverage including water, orange juice, or tea, but no milk. The preparation was taken 1 to 2 h after the major meal of the day. Finally, urine samples were collected and it has been determined urinary concentrations of oxalate. | 70% of patients were characterized by decreased urinary oxalate extraction. Moreover, taking 4 g of Oxadrop® per day reduced urinary oxalate excretion by 19%, and this increased to 24% when 8 g per day were administered. |
| Lieske et al. [ | Clinical (40 patients with nephrolithiasis and mild hyperoxaluria of unknown etiologist) | Patients were divided into three study groups that received placebo, Agri-King Synbiotic Preparation, and Oxadrop®, respectively. Finally, urinary samples were collected to assess the level of oxalate extraction. | Tested probiotic preparation did not influence urinary oxalate levels in patients on a restricted oxalate diet. |
| Goldfarb et al. [ | Clinical (20 stone formers with idiopathic and enteric hyperoxaluria) | Patients were divided into two studied groups that received placebo and Oxadrop®, respectively. Finally, urinary samples were also collected to assess the level of oxalate extraction. | Oxadrop® did not reduce urinary oxalate excretion in participants with idiopathic hyperoxaluria as compared with the placebo group. |
| Siener et al. [ | Clinical (20 healthy subjects) | Healthy volunteers who were initially on a normal diet changed to a supplemented diet with calcium oxalate for six weeks and received lactic acid bacteria preparation for five weeks. After this time, they returned to their original diet. Urine samples were collected weekly throughout the study period. Moreover, blood samples were analyzed before and at the end of treatment. | The study preparation neither reduced urinary oxalate excretion nor plasma oxalate concentration. |
| Ferraz et al. [ | Clinical (14 stone-forming patients without hyperoxaluria) | Patients consumed a diet supplemented with oxalate for four weeks and a lyophilized | Seven out of 14 patients presented a reduction in oxaluria after probiotic preparation as compared before treatment, being the reduction higher than 25% in four participants and up to 50% in two participants. |
| Okombo et al. [ | Clinical (11 healthy volunteers) | Participants took VSL#3® for four weeks followed by a four-week washout period. Oxalate load tests, providing a total of 80 mg oxalate, were conducted at baseline (pre-probiotic), and after the probiotic and washout periods. Fecal samples were collected before the initiation of the study to assess the presence of | The average total 22 h oxalate absorption at baseline (30.8%) was higher compared to after the probiotic (11.6%) and washout (11.5%) periods. |
| Al-Wahsh et al. [ | Clinical (11 healthy nonstone formers) | Healthy nonstone formers divided into three groups: (i) oral ingestion of sodium oxalate (176 mg), (ii) 2 packets of VSL#3® preparation with a 176 mg oxalate sodium, (iii) 1 packet of VSL#3® preparation with a 176 mg oxalate sodium. Finally, urinary samples were collected to assess the level of oxalate extraction. | Both the doses of VSL#3® were effective in reducing urinary oxalate and estimated oxalate absorption with no significant difference between the two probiotic doses. |
| Kwak et al. [ | Stone-forming animal model using selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitor | Male Sprague–Dawley rats divided into seven groups: (i) rats were maintained on the powdered regular diet for the whole study, (ii) rats received the powdered regular diet supplemented with 3% ( | In both groups of co-treatment and previous treatment with |
Characteristics of Bifidobacterium spp.
| Characteristic | Description |
| Morphology | Bifid or irregular V- or Y-shaped rods resembling branches |
| Gram staining | Gram-positive |
| Mobility | Nonmotile |
| Spore-forming | Nonspore-forming |
| Anaerobic/aerobic | Anaerobic |
| Catalase | Catalase-negative |
A summary of previous studies on the use of Bifdobacterum spp. for the prevention of urolithiasis.
| Author | Type of Study | Study Design | Main Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federici et al. [ | In vitro | Twelve strains of | |
| Giardina et al. [ | In vitro | Eleven strains of lactic acid bacteria ( | |
| Campieri et al. [ | In vitro and animal | All of the tested bacteria showed an oxalate degradation capacity of 1–11%. The mixed probiotics treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the excretion of oxalate in all six patients. | |
| Mogna et al. [ | In vitro | Thirteen | Screening of different |
| Klimesova et l. [ | Mouse model of primary hyperoxaluria | The administration of | |
| Hatch [ | Male and female C57BL/6 mice with | The combined administration of the human |
Characteristics of O. formigenes, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in the prevention of urolithiasis.
| Characteristic |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxalate degradability | The presence of two enzymes (formyl-CoA-transferase and oxalyl-CoA-decarboxylase) ensures the ability of bacteria to break down oxalate [ | ||
| Ability to grow in the presence of oxalate | Oxalate use as the sole source of carbon and energy causes these bacteria to show unlimited growth in conditions of high oxalate concentrations [ | Under conditions of limited access to other energy sources, they are able to grow using oxalate as an energy source [ | In the case of |
| Sensitivity to antibiotics | Susceptibility analyses of | All strains of | |
| Sensitivity to low pH and the presence of oxygen | Sensitivity to low pH strongly limits the use of oral probiotics containing | In general, it can be considered that Bifidobacterium, with the exception of | |
| Possibility of lyophilization and production in the form of conventional probiotics | Most strains are sensitive to the conditions of lyophilization and the formulation of conventional probiotics. Moreover, the administration of | Most | Most |
| The optimal mode of administration | Successful and long-lasting colonization has been observed in healthy adults where | Oral preparations in the form of drops, capsules, sachets and lozenges [ | Usually administered in fermented dairy products [ |
| FDA approved as GRAS | Not certified GRAS by the FDA [ | Certified as GRAS by the FDA [ | Certified as GRAS by the FDA [ |
| Clinical trials | Clinical trials of Oxabact® OC5 (I/II phase) and Oxabact® OC3 (II/III phase) did not confirm the ability of the preparations to lower urine oxalate excretion [ | Studies on an Oxadrop® probiotic preparation containing | |