Literature DB >> 35048273

Carrier screening and PGT for an autosomal recessive monogenic disorder: insights from virtual trials.

Paul N Scriven1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the costs and benefits of carrier screening and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for recessive autosomal monogenic disorders for couples attempting assisted conception.
METHODS: A simulated first full cycle for women less than 35 years transferring embryos one at a time. The effect of testing on pregnancy outcomes was evaluated for different reporting scenarios. A Monte Carlo method utilising 1000 trials for 10,000 couples, testing 4, 16 and 38 genes, was used to assess the numbers likely to be at high risk and to estimate the incremental cost of screening and PGT to avoid an affected child.
RESULTS: PGT for high-risk couples: testing embryos only for the monogenic condition avoided 1 affected pregnancy for 4 cycles started. Combined with testing for chromosomal aneuploidy: ranking test results avoided 1 adverse pregnancy (affected, biochemical, clinical miscarriage) from 3 cycles started; 1 in 2 when excluding from transfer all embryos with an abnormal test result, within 1 in 25 fewer women achieving an unaffected live birth. Carrier screening for 4, 16 and 38 gene scenarios, where 1:250, 1:196 and 1:29 couples were at high risk: the incremental cost to prevent 1 affected live birth was estimated to be less than GBP 1,150,000 (US $1,587,000), < 836,642 (1,154,566) and < 137,794 (190,156), respectively, in 95% of trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Carrier screening combined with PGT, with and without testing for unrelated chromosomal abnormalities, for couples attempting assisted conception is complex but likely to be effective and also expensive.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Carrier screening; Monogenic disorders; Preimplantation genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35048273      PMCID: PMC8956760          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02398-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of DNA diagnosis for four monogenic diseases.

Authors:  A A van der Riet; B A van Hout; F F Rutten
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  PGT-SR (reciprocal translocation) using trophectoderm sampling and next-generation sequencing: insights from a virtual trial.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XVI-XVIII: cycles from 2013 to 2015.

Authors:  E Coonen; A van Montfoort; F Carvalho; G Kokkali; C Moutou; C Rubio; M De Rycke; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-10-03

4.  Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities from preimplantation genetic testing to the reproductive outcomes: a comparison between three different structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Ping Yuan; Lingyan Zheng; Songbang Ou; Haijing Zhao; Ruiqi Li; HongJiao Luo; Xin Tan; Qingxue Zhang; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors.

Authors:  Molly R Payne; Anne-Bine Skytte; Joyce C Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.353

6.  Towards a better understanding of preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy: insights from a virtual trial for women under the age of 40 when transferring embryos one at a time.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the organisation of PGT.

Authors:  Filipa Carvalho; Edith Coonen; Veerle Goossens; Georgia Kokkali; Carmen Rubio; Madelon Meijer-Hoogeveen; Céline Moutou; Nathalie Vermeulen; Martine De Rycke
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-05-29

8.  Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  Dehua Cheng; Liang Hu; Fei Gong; Shimin Yuan; Keli Luo; Xianhong Wu; Pingyuan Xie; Changfu Lu; Guangxiu Lu; Yue-Qiu Tan; Ge Lin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Haploseek: a 24-hour all-in-one method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of monogenic disease and aneuploidy.

Authors:  Daniel Backenroth; Fouad Zahdeh; Yehuda Kling; Aharon Peretz; Tzvia Rosen; Dina Kort; Sharon Zeligson; Tal Dror; Sophie Kirshberg; Efrat Burak; Reeval Segel; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; David Zangen; Gheona Altarescu; Shai Carmi; David A Zeevi
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Live birth rate is associated with oocyte yield and number of biopsied and suitable blastocysts to transfer in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.

Authors:  Jara Ben-Nagi; Benjamin Jones; Roy Naja; Ahmed Amer; Sesh Sunkara; Sioban SenGupta; Paul Serhal
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-06-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Combining PGT-A with PGT-M risks trying to do too much.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Combined Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Genetic Kidney Disease: Genetic Risk Identification, Assisted Reproductive Cycle, and Pregnancy Outcome Analysis.

Authors:  Min Xiao; Hua Shi; Jia Rao; Yanping Xi; Shuo Zhang; Junping Wu; Saijuan Zhu; Jing Zhou; Hong Xu; Caixia Lei; Xiaoxi Sun
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.