Literature DB >> 33409753

Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities from preimplantation genetic testing to the reproductive outcomes: a comparison between three different structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing.

Ping Yuan1, Lingyan Zheng1, Songbang Ou1, Haijing Zhao1, Ruiqi Li1, HongJiao Luo1, Xin Tan1, Qingxue Zhang1, Wenjun Wang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the chromosome imbalance in blastocysts and reproductive outcomes by a comparison between the reciprocal translocation (REC), inversion (INV), and Robertsonian translocation (ROB) carriers.
METHODS: Couples with one partner carrying translocation or inversion underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) cycles, including 215 PGT-SR cycles performed in subsequent 164 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles and 61 prenatal diagnoses of fetuses and 59 normal live birth babies. A total of 899 samples were processed by whole-genome amplification followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Karyotype and chromosome microarray analyses were used to confirm the PGT results from the amniotic fluid samples.
RESULTS: A total of 843 blastocysts from 124 REC, 21 INV, and 35 ROB carriers were diagnosed by PGT-SR. The percentage of unbalanced blastocysts was significantly higher in REC than in INV and ROB carriers (64.31% vs. 28.05% vs. 37.02%). Stratification analysis of female carrier age and gonadotropin doses showed no significant increase in unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities in the three groups. Also, the different breakpoints in chromosomal arms did not affect the rate of unbalanced chromosomes in the embryos. Logistic regression indicated blastocyst quality as a statistically significant risk factor associated with unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities from translocation carriers (P < 0.001). The source of abnormalities in the three groups showed significant differences such that the abnormalities in REC mostly originated from parental translocation but the abnormalities in INV were mainly de novo variations. 164 blastocysts were transferred, and there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. A total of 59 healthy babies were born, and there were no significant differences in the gender ratio and birth height, except the birth weight of boys between INV and ROB groups (P = 0.02). The results of amniocentesis revealed that more fetuses have normal chromosomal karyotypes than balanced carriers, particularly in the REC group.
CONCLUSIONS: Reciprocal translocation carriers have more risk of unbalanced rearrangement, but embryonic chromosome abnormalities of inversion carriers come mainly from de novo variations. This is the first study specifically comparing three different PGT-SRs using the NGS method and evaluating their reproductive outcomes. Our findings will provide the reciprocal translocation, inversion, and Robertsonian translocation carrier couples with more accurate genetic counseling on the reproductive risk of chromosomal imbalance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inversion; Preimplantation genetic testing; Reciprocal translocation; Robertsonian translocation; Unbalanced chromosomal abnormality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33409753      PMCID: PMC7910334          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02053-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  2 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and analysis of meiotic segregation modes in reciprocal translocation carriers.

Authors:  Duck Sung Ko; Jae Won Cho; So Yeon Park; Jin Young Kim; Mi Kyoung Koong; In Ok Song; Inn Soo Kang; Chun Kyu Lim
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  The frequency and mutation rate of balanced autosomal rearrangements in man estimated from prenatal genetic studies for advanced maternal age.

Authors:  D L Van Dyke; L Weiss; J R Roberson; V R Babu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.025

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  PGT-SR (reciprocal translocation) using trophectoderm sampling and next-generation sequencing: insights from a virtual trial.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nakano; Michiko Ammae; Manabu Satoh; Satoshi Mizuno; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  Carrier screening and PGT for an autosomal recessive monogenic disorder: insights from virtual trials.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The Relationship between Human Embryo Parameters and De Novo Chromosomal Abnormalities in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles.

Authors:  Yanli Liu; Junhan Shen; Rujing Yang; Yuchao Zhang; Liting Jia; Yichun Guan
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 5.  A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach.

Authors:  Bogdan Doroftei; Ovidiu-Dumitru Ilie; Nicoleta Anton; Theodora Armeanu; Ciprian Ilea
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.