| Literature DB >> 35044553 |
Antonio Benito Porcaro1, Andrea Panunzio2, Alessandro Tafuri2,3,4, Giovanni Mazzucato2, Clara Cerrato2, Sebastian Gallina2, Alberto Bianchi2, Riccardo Rizzetto2, Nelia Amigoni2, Emanuele Serafin2, Francesco Cianflone2, Rossella Orlando2, Ilaria Gentile2, Filippo Migliorini2, Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli2, Giacomo Di Filippo5, Matteo Brunelli6, Vincenzo Pagliarulo3, Maria Angela Cerruto2, Alessandro Antonelli2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of endogenous testosterone density (ETD) on pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) in high risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and staged with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND).Entities:
Keywords: Endogenous testosterone; Endogenous testosterone density; Extended pelvic lymph node dissection; High risk prostate cancer; Pelvic lymph node invasion; Percentage of biopsy positive cores density; Prostate cancer; Prostate specific antigen; Prostate specific antigen density; Prostate volume; Radical prostatectomy; Tumor load density
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35044553 PMCID: PMC8831287 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03103-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Urol Nephrol ISSN: 0301-1623 Impact factor: 2.370
Demographics of 201 high risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection
| Continuous variables | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 65.9 (6.1) | 67 (61.7–71) |
| Body mass index; BMI (kg/m^2) | 26.2 (3.3) | 25.6 (24–28.7) |
| Endogenous testosterone; ET (ng/dL) | 450.4 (132.4) | 445 (364.1–537.2) |
| ET density; ETD (ng/(dL x mL)) | 11.9 (7.38) | 10 (7.1–15.1) |
| Prostate specific antigen; PSA (ng/mL) | 12.5 (15.6) | 7.5 (5.4–14.1) |
| PSA density; PSAD (ng/(mL x mL)) | 0.29 (0.33) | 0.19 (0.12–0.34) |
| Prostate volume; PV (mL) | 44.7 (18.4) | 41 (30–57) |
| Percentage of biopsy positive cores; BPC (%) | 48.9 (26.8) | 50 (26.5–70) |
| BPC density; BPCD (%/mL) | 1.2 (0.9) | 1.1 (0.5–1.7) |
| Prostate weight; PW (grams; gr) | 57.6 (20.2) | 54.5 (44.3–70) |
| Tumor load; TL (%) | 29.8 (21.8) | 25 (15–40) |
| Tumor load density; TLD (%/gr) | 0.5 (0.4) | 0.43 (0.21–0.70) |
| Number od dissected lymph nodes; LN (n) | 26 (9.4) | 26 (20–32) |
| Categorical variables | Number (%) | |
| ISUP at biopsy | ||
| ISUP 1 | 25 (12.4) | |
| ISUP 2 | 36 (17.9) | |
| ISUP 3 | 26 (12.9) | |
| ISUP 4 | 93 (46.3) | |
| ISUP 5 | 21 (10.5) | |
| Clinical T stage (cT) | ||
| cT1c | 90 (44.8) | |
| cT > 1 | 111 (55.2) | |
| Clinical nodal stage (cN) | ||
| cN0 | 167 (83.1) | |
| cN1 | 34 (16.9) | |
| ISUP at pathology | ||
| ISUP = 1 | 8 (4) | |
| ISUP = 2 | 28 (13.9) | |
| ISUP = 3 | 50 (24.9) | |
| ISUP = 4 | 66 (32.8) | |
| ISUP = 5 | 49 (24.4) | |
| Pathologic tumor stage (pT) | ||
| pT2 | 120 (62.7) | |
| pT3a | 51 (25.4) | |
| pT3b | 24 (11.9) | |
| Surgical margins status (SM) | ||
| Negative (NSM) | 126 (62.7) | |
| Positive (PSM) | 75 (37.3) | |
| Pathologic nodal stage (pN) | ||
| pN0 | 159 (79.1) | |
| pN1 | 42 (20.9) | |
Factors predicting pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) in 201 high risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection
| No PLNI | PLNI | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) or frequency (%) | Median (IQR) or frequency (%) | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Clinical model | ||||||
| Age | 67 (61–71) | 68.5 (62.7–71) | 1.036 (0.978–1.0.98) | 0.232 | ||
| BMI | 25.4 (23.7–28.4) | 26.1 (24.2–28.7) | 1.024 (0.945–1.110) | 0.560 | ||
| ET | 446.6 (343–548) | 435.4 (361.8–493.5) | 0.999 (0.997–1.001) | 0.417 | ||
| ETD | ||||||
| PSA | 1.023 (0.996–1.050) | 0.092 | ||||
| PSAD | 0.19 (0.11–0.34) | 0.25 (0.12–0.34) | 1.940 (0.784–4.802) | 0.152 | ||
| PV | 40 (30–56) | 46.5 (38–62.4) | 1.018 (1.000–1.036) | 0.050 | ||
| BPC | ||||||
| BPCD | 1.00 (0.48–1.66) | 1.23 (0.62–1.71) | 1.109 (0.799–1.538) | 0.537 | ||
| ISUP < 4 | 75 (47.2) | 12 (28.6) | Reference | |||
| ISUP > 3 | ||||||
| cT1c | 77 (44.8) | 13 (31) | Reference | |||
| cT > 1c | 1.713 (0.787–3.276) | 0.175 | ||||
| cN0 | 130 (81.8) | 37 (88.1) | Reference | |||
| cN1 | 28 (18.2) | 5 (11.9) | 0.606 (0.219–1.675) | 0.334 | ||
| No RARP | 24 (15.1) | 6 (14.3) | Reference | |||
| RARP | 135 (84.9) | 36 (85.4) | 1.067 (0.405–2.806) | 0.896 | ||
| Pathological model | ||||||
| PW | 52 (42–67) | 56 (46.5–73.2) | 1.012 (0.996–1.028) | 0.132 | ||
| TLD | 1.817 (0.799–4.135) | 0.155 | ||||
| ISUP < 4 | 83 (52.2) | 3 (7.1) | Reference | |||
| ISUP > 3 | ||||||
| pT2 | 106 (66.7) | 14 (33.3) | Reference | |||
| pT3a | 25 (15.7) | 3 (7.1) | 0.909 (0.242–3.404) | 0.887 | ||
| pT3b | ||||||
| NSM | 10 (69.2) | 16 (38.1) | Reference | |||
| PSM | ||||||
| LN (n) | ||||||
IQR interquartile range; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; see also Table 1
Factors predicting PLNI for which a statistically significant associations was found in the univariate and multivariate analysis are reported in bold
Fig. 1Inverse association between endogenous testosterone density (ETD) and risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI). Significantly lower median levels of ETD were detected in tumors associated with PLNI compared with cancers without (8.4 vs 10.8 ng/(dL × mL); odd ratio, OR 0.931; 95% CI 0.873–0.994; p = 0.031). As ETD decreased, the risk of detecting PLNI increased, accordingly
Fig. 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of significant clinical continuous variables associated with the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI), which was positive for prostate specific antigen (PSA) and percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC), but inverse for endogenous testosterone density (ETD). The risk of PLNI increased as PSA and BPC increased as well as ETD decreased, accordingly. Area under the curves (AUC) and (95% CI) were as follows: a ETD: 0.389 (0.300–0.477; p = 0.026); b BPC: 0.678 (0.588–0.769; p < 0.0001); c PSA: 0.588 (0.486–0.690; p = 0.079)
Clinical factors associated with the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion in 201 high risk prostate cancer patients
| Statistics | No PLNI | PLNI | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| ETD | |||||||
| Above the median | 100 (49.8) | 86 (86) | 14 (14) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Up to the median | 101 (50.2) | 73 (72.3) | 28 (27.7) | 2356 (1155–4809) | 0.019 | 2379 (1134—4991) | 0.022 |
| BPC | |||||||
| Up to 50% | 128 (63.7) | 110 (85.9) | 18 (14.1) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Above 50% | 73 (36.3) | 49 (67.1) | 24 (32.9) | 2993 (1490–6014) | 0.002 | 3125 (1520—6425) | 0.002 |
| ISUP (biopsy) | |||||||
| Up to 3 | 87 (43.3) | 75 (86.2) | 12 (13.8) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Above 3 | 114 (56.7) | 84 (73.7) | 30 (26.3) | 2232 (1067–4671) | 0.033 | 2219 (1031—4776) | 0.042 |
PLNI pelvic lymph node invasion; OR odd ratio; CI confidence interval; EDT endogenous testosterone density; BPC percentage of biopsy positive cores; ISUP International Society of Urologic Pathology tumor grade system; see also results for further details
Fig. 3Endogenous testosterone density (ETD) associated with the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Patients presenting with ETD up to the median were more likely to occult PLNI (27.7%) compared with subjects having ETD measurements above the median (14%) and the association was significant on both univariate analysis (OR 2.356; 95% CI 1.155–4.809; p = 0.019) as well as after adjusting for percentage of biopsy positive cores above 50% and tumor grade above 3 according to the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) system (adjusted OR 2.379; 95% CI 1.134–4.991; p = 0.022). See also Table 3 and results for further details