Literature DB >> 35035577

Safety evaluation of a food enzyme containing chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from the abomasum of suckling goats.

Claude Lambré, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Evgenia Lampi, Marcel Mengelers, Alicja Mortensen, Gilles Rivière, Inger-Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Boet Glandorf, Lieve Herman, Natália Kovalkovičová, Yi Liu, Joaquim Maia, Andrew Chesson.   

Abstract

The food enzyme containing chymosin (EC 3.4.23.4), pepsin (EC 3.4.23.1) and gastricsin (EC 3.4.23.3) is prepared from the abomasum of suckling goats by Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Palmero and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Majorero. The food enzyme is intended to be used in milk processing for cheese production. As no concerns arise from the animal source of the food enzyme, from its manufacture, and based on the history of safe use and consumption, the Panel considered that toxicological data were not required and no exposure assessment was necessary. Similarity of the amino acid sequences of the three proteins (chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin) to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concludes that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
© 2022 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EC 3.4.23.1; EC 3.4.23.3; EC 3.4.23.4; abomasum; chymosin; food enzyme; gastricsin; pepsin; suckling goats

Year:  2022        PMID: 35035577      PMCID: PMC8753581          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


Introduction

Article 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008 provides definition for ‘food enzyme’ and ‘food enzyme preparation’. ‘Food enzyme’ means a product obtained from plants, animals or micro‐organisms or products thereof including a product obtained by a fermentation process using micro‐organisms: i) containing one or more enzymes capable of catalysing a specific biochemical reaction; and ii) added to food for a technological purpose at any stage of the manufacturing, processing, preparation, treatment, packaging, transport or storage of foods. ‘Food enzyme preparation’ means a formulation consisting of one or more food enzymes in which substances such as food additives and/or other food ingredients are incorporated to facilitate their storage, sale, standardisation, dilution or dissolution. Before January 2009, food enzymes other than those used as food additives were not regulated or were regulated as processing aids under the legislation of the Member States. On 20 January 2009, Regulation (EC) No 1332/20081 on food enzymes came into force. This Regulation applies to enzymes that are added to food to perform a technological function in the manufacture, processing, preparation, treatment, packaging, transport or storage of such food, including enzymes used as processing aids. Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 established the European Union (EU) procedures for the safety assessment and the authorisation procedure of food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings. The use of a food enzyme shall be authorised only if it is demonstrated that: it does not pose a safety concern to the health of the consumer at the level of use proposed; there is a reasonable technological need; its use does not mislead the consumer. All food enzymes currently on the EU market and intended to remain on that market, as well as all new food enzymes, shall be subjected to a safety evaluation by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and approval via an EU Community list. The ‘Guidance on submission of a dossier on food enzymes for safety evaluation’ (EFSA CEF Panel, 2009) lays down the administrative, technical and toxicological data required.

Background and Terms of Reference as provided by the requestor

Background as provided by the European Commission

Only food enzymes included in the European Union (EU) Community list may be placed on the market as such and used in foods, in accordance with the specifications and conditions of use provided for in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1332/20081 on food enzymes. An application has been introduced by the ‘Instituto Canario de Calidad Agroalimentaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria’ for the authorisation of the food enzyme preparation chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from stomachs (abomasum) of kids (young goats). Following the requirements of Article 12.1 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 234/2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1331/20082, the Commission has verified that the application falls within the scope of the food enzyme Regulation and contains all the elements required under Chapter II of that Regulation.

Terms of Reference

The European Commission (EC) requests the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to carry out the safety assessment on the following food enzyme preparation chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from stomachs (abomasum) of kids (young goats) in accordance with Article 17.3 of Regulation (EC) No 1332/20081 on food enzymes.

Interpretation of the Terms of Reference

The present scientific opinion addresses the European Commission’s request to carry out the safety assessment of a food enzyme containing chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from the abomasum of suckling goats.

Data and methodologies

Data

The applicant has submitted a dossier in support of the application for authorisation of the food enzyme containing chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from the abomasum of suckling goats. Additional information was requested from the applicant during the assessment process on 14 April 2020 and 15 February 2021 and received on 21 December 2020 and 1 July 2021 (see ‘Documentation as provided to EFSA’).

Methodologies

The assessment was conducted in line with the principles described in the EFSA ‘Guidance on transparency in the scientific aspects of risk assessment’ (EFSA, 2009) and following the relevant existing guidance documents of EFSA Scientific Committee. The current ‘Guidance on the submission of a dossier on food enzymes for safety evaluation’ (EFSA CEF Panel, 2009) has been followed for the evaluation of the application with the exception of the exposure assessment, which was carried out in accordance with the methodology described in the ‘CEF Panel statement on the exposure assessment of food enzymes’ (EFSA CEF Panel, 2016).

Assessment

The food enzyme under application contains three declared activities: chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin : Chymosin is an aspartic endopeptidase that catalyses the hydrolysis of the 104‐Ser‐Phe‐/‐Met‐Ala‐107 bonds of κ‐casein, resulting in the destabilisation of casein micelles and causing milk to clot. Pepsin, also an aspartic endopeptidase, breaks down peptide bonds in proteins and peptide molecules with the formation of shorter peptides, and free amino acids. It preferably cleaves peptide bonds between hydrophobic and aromatic amino acids. Gastricsin is also an aspartic endopeptidase, with more restricted specificity than pepsin A, but shows preferential cleavage adjacent to tyrosine residues. The food enzyme is intended to be used in milk processing for cheese production.

Source of the food enzyme

The food enzyme is obtained from the abomasum of suckling goats from the species Capra hircus from certified European suppliers, surveyed and approved by the competent authorities. The food enzyme is exclusively obtained from healthy animals slaughtered under the supervision of official health authorities, following the requirements of the relevant EU hygiene regulations, the Food Hygiene Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 853/2004. , In EU, according to Regulation (EC) 1774/2002 , stomach (abomasum) of goats is considered fit for human consumption. It is an edible offal as defined in Regulation (EC) No 853/200410, but it has not been reported to be commonly consumed in the European Union. Stomach of goats has been considered an edible part of a goat in the US (Marti et al., 2011; Nollet and Toldra, 2011) and Australia (FSANZ, 2016). No issues of concern arising from the safety of the source material were identified by the Panel.

Production of the food enzyme

The food enzyme is manufactured according to the Food Hygiene Regulation (EC) No 852/20049, with food safety procedures based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points, and in accordance with current Good Manufacturing Practice. The food enzyme is extracted from the abomasum of suckling goats. After the animal is slaughtered, the abomasum is collected with its content (in some cases, the abomasa are intentionally filled with milk), salted (storage in brine or salt layers) and air‐dried. The dry abomasa with content are then cut, ground, mixed with salt and homogenised. The applicant provided information on the identity of the substances used in the extraction and in the subsequent downstream processing. The Panel considered that sufficient information has been provided on the manufacturing process and the quality assurance system implemented by the applicant to exclude issues of concern.

Characteristics of the food enzyme

Properties of the food enzyme

The chymosin is a single polypeptide chain of 366 amino acids. The molecular mass was calculated to be 36.0 kDa. The pepsin A is a single polypeptide chain of 386 amino acids. The molecular mass was calculated to be 40.0 kDa. The gastricsin is a single polypeptide chain of 391 amino acids. The molecular mass was calculated to be 39.0 kDa. The determination of chymosin and pepsin activities is based on the official method ISO 11815|IDF 157:2007, 2007 for bovine rennet and ISO 23058|IDF 199:2006, 2006 for sheep and goat rennet. The time needed for visual flocculation of a standard milk substrate prepared with a calcium chloride solution of 0.5 g per litre (pH ≈ 6.5) is determined. The clotting time of the rennet sample is compared to that of a bovine rennet reference standard with a known milk‐clotting activity. The total milk‐clotting activity of both enzymes is expressed in IMCU (International Milk‐Clotting Units). The relative contents of chymosin and pepsin present in the rennet were determined by chromatographic analysis, based on the recognised official method ISO 15163|IDF 110:2012, 2012 for milk and milk products, indicated for calf rennet and adult bovine rennet. The analysis of gastricsin was not considered of relevance as it is found only in low concentrations in the stomach of young goats. Literature data showed that the kid chymosin has a temperature optimum around 48–52°C (pH 6.6) and a pH optimum around pH 6 (at 35°C).6 The kid pepsin has a temperature optimum around 44–46°C (pH 6.6) and a pH optimum around pH 6 (at 35°C).6 The kid gastricsin has a pH optimum around pH 3 (at 37°C).6 Literature data on a temperature optimum of gastricsin from the abomasum of suckling goats are not available. Literature data on thermostability showed that chymosin becomes inactive at temperature above 60°C (at pH 6.2), 56°C (at pH 6.4) and 52°C (at pH 6.6) and pepsin A becomes inactive at temperature above 56°C (at pH 6.2), 52°C (at pH 6.4) and 46°C (at pH 6.6) (Moschopoulou et al., 2006).6

Chemical parameters

Analytical data on the enzyme activity were provided by the applicant for 5 batches (batches 1–5) of rennet from the abomasum of suckling goats (Table 1). Data on other chemical parameters of the food enzyme were provided for 25 batches (batches 6–30) of rennet used for commercialisation (Table 1). The average total organic solids (TOS) of the 25 food enzyme batches was 24 ± 8%.
Table 1

Compositional data of the rennet from the abomasum of suckling goats

ParameterUnitBatchesBatches
1–5 (mean ± SD)6–30 (mean ± SD)
Enzyme activity (official method ISO 1815|IDF 157:2007, 2007)IMCU/g batch a 91 ± 39NA c
Enzyme activity (official method ISO 23058|IDF 199:2006, 2006)IMCU/g batch a 88 ± 38NA
Protein%NA
Ash%21 ± 5
Water%56 ± 6
Total organic solids (TOS) b %24 ± 8
Activity/mg TOSIMCU/mg TOSNA

: IMCU: International Milk‐Clotting Units (see Section 3.3.1).

: TOS calculated as 100 % – % water – % ash.

: NA: not analysed.

Compositional data of the rennet from the abomasum of suckling goats : IMCU: International Milk‐Clotting Units (see Section 3.3.1). : TOS calculated as 100 % – % water – % ash. : NA: not analysed. The chromatographic analysis of the two main enzymes present in the rennet (chymosin and pepsin) for five analysed samples showed an average value (± SD) of 91 ± 5% for chymosin and 9 ± 5% for pepsin, respectively. As the third declared activity, gastricsin, is present only in low concentrations in the abomasum of suckling goats (Addis et al., 2008; Moschopoulou, 2011), it was not included in the analysis made by the applicant.23

Purity

The lead content in the 25 commercial batches was below 0.03 mg/kg which complies with the specification for lead (≤ 5 mg/kg) as laid down in the general specifications for enzymes used in food processing (FAO/WHO, 2006). In addition, the levels of arsenic, cadmium and mercury27 were below the limits of detection of the employed methodologies. The microbiological analyses of 25 commercial batches were reported. The food enzyme complies with the microbiological criteria (for total coliforms, Escherichia coli and Salmonella) as laid down in the general specifications for enzymes used in food processing (FAO/WHO, 2006). Additional microbiological parameters (sulfite‐reducing clostridia, enterococci, Pseudomonas spp., Listeria spp., fungi, yeasts) were also reported and raised no concern.

Toxicological data

According to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 562/2012 , an application for the safety evaluation of a food enzyme does not need to include toxicological data if the food enzyme is obtained from edible parts of animals intended or reasonably expected to be ingested by humans. According to the ‘EFSA Guidance on the submission of a dossier on food enzymes for safety evaluation’, the justification for not supplying toxicological data may include a documented history on the safety of the source of the food enzyme, the composition and the properties of the food enzyme, as well as its use in foods, demonstrating no adverse effects on human health when consumed in a comparable way (EFSA CEF Panel, 2009). The Panel considers that these requirements are fulfilled, because: Rennet obtained from the abomasum of suckling goats has been safely used in the production of cheese and related products for many centuries; The abomasum from suckling goats is consumed throughout the EU and elsewhere in the world as a meat product; The manufacturing process of the food enzyme is not considered to introduce substances that could raise safety concerns; The compositional and purity data provided on the food enzyme are considered sufficient. The Panel considered that sufficient information has been provided on the animal source, its history of safe use and consumption, and the manufacturing process. Therefore, the need for toxicological data is waived.

Allergenicity

The potential allergenicity of the food enzyme containing chymosin, pepsin A and gastricsin derived from the abomasum of suckling goats was assessed by comparing its amino acid sequence with those of known allergens according to the Scientific opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel, 2010). Using higher than 35% identity in a sliding window of 80 amino acids as the criterion, one match was found. The matching allergen was pig pepsin known as an occupational respiratory allergen. Occupational respiratory allergies and skin sensitisation to dust of chymosin, pepsin A and gastricsin have been described in workers upon industrial exposure and in medical laboratory technicians (Cartier et al., 1984; Jensen et al., 2006; van Kampen et al., 2013; Gómez Torrijos et al., 2018; Khan and Selamoglu, 2020). However, several studies have shown that adults with occupational asthma to an enzyme can commonly ingest the corresponding respiratory allergens without acquiring clinical symptoms of food allergy (Cullinan et al., 1997; Brisman, 2002; Poulsen, 2004; Armentia et al., 2009). There are no reports in the literature on adverse reactions upon ingestion of these enzymes in individuals sensitised through the respiratory route. The Panel noted that milk proteins are present in the goat rennet paste. However, as the paste is used in cheese processing this will not pose an additional risk to cheese consumption. No information is available on oral sensitisation or elicitation reactions to this chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin obtained from the abomasum of suckling goats under evaluation. Goat is not a source included in the list of substances or products causing allergies or intolerances (EU Regulation 1169/2011). Consequently, the Panel considers that the likelihood of food allergic reactions to this food enzyme obtained from the abomasum of suckling goats is low and, therefore, does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.

Dietary exposure

Intended use of the food enzyme

The food enzyme (rennet paste) is intended to be used in milk processing for cheese production and by‐products at a use level of 10–20 g rennet/100 L of milk, corresponding to 23.7–47.5 mg TOS/kg milk.6 The food enzyme preparation is added to milk to separate milk into solid curd and liquid whey (coagulation).6 The majority of the food enzyme TOS partitions into the whey and is mostly removed during the draining of the whey. Only a small portion of the food enzyme TOS remains in the curd (approximately 6–12%). The remaining rennet contributes to the ripening of cheese due to its general proteolytic activity. Based on data provided on thermostability (see Section 3.3.1), it is expected that the remaining chymosin and pepsin are inactivated during cheese making.

Dietary exposure estimation

The technology of extracting enzymes from animal abomasum and the technology of using animal rennet for cheese making have remained the same over thousands of years and remains the major source of human exposure to the food enzyme. Cheese and by‐products of cheese making have been consumed by humans in Europe and many other parts of the world for millennia. In addition, abomasum from ruminants is consumed in some European countries, which constitutes a minor fraction of the overall exposure to the food enzyme in EU. In the view of the Panel, dietary exposure estimation is not required.

Margin of exposure

Since no toxicological assessment and no dietary exposure estimation were considered necessary by the Panel, the margin of exposure was not calculated.

Conclusion

Based on the data provided, the origin of the food enzyme and its history of safe use, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme containing chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from abomasum of suckling goats does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.

Documentation as provided to EFSA

Technical dossier ˋFood enzyme preparation chymosin, pepsin and gastricsin from stomachs (abomasum) of kids (young goats)ʻ. 9 March 2015. Submitted by Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Palmero and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Majorero (Instituto Canario de Calidad Agroalimentaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria). Additional information. 21 December 2020. Submitted by Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Palmero and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Majorero (Instituto Canario de Calidad Agroalimentaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria). Additional information. 1 July 2021. Submitted by Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Palmero and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Queso Majorero (Instituto Canario de Calidad Agroalimentaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria).

Abbreviations

Chemical Abstracts Service EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Food Standards Australia New Zealand genetically modified genetically modified organism International Diary Federation International Milk‐Clotting Units International Organization for Standardization International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives limit of detection not analysed standard deviation total organic solids World Health Organization
IUBMB nomenclatureChymosin
SynonymsRennin, preprorennin
IUBMB No.3.4.23.4
CAS No.9001‐98‐3
EINECS No.232‐645‐0
IUBMB nomenclaturePepsin A
SynonymsPepsin; lactated pepsin; pepsin fortior; fundus‐pepsin
IUBMB No.3.4.23.1
CAS No.9001‐75‐6
EINECS No.232‐629‐3
IUBMB nomenclatureGastricsin
SynonymsPepsin C; parapepsin II
IUBMB No.3.4.23.3
CAS No.9012‐71‐9
EINECS No.232‐645‐0
  11 in total

Review 1.  Baker's asthma.

Authors:  Jonas Brisman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Purification and characterization of chymosin and pepsin from kid.

Authors:  Ekaterini E Moschopoulou; Ioannis G Kandarakis; Efstathios Alichanidis; Emmanouil M Anifantakis
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Respiratory complaints and high sensitization rate at a rennet-producing plant.

Authors:  Anker Jensen; Søren Dahl; David Sherson; Birgitte Sommer
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Occupational allergic respiratory disease (rinoconjunctivitis and asthma) in a cheese factory worker.

Authors:  Elisa Gómez Torrijos; Carmen García Rodriguez; Beatriz Veleiro Pérez; Borja Bartolomé; Marcos Prado Barragan; Rosa Garcia Rodriguez
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-01-17

5.  Clinical responses to ingested fungal alpha-amylase and hemicellulase in persons sensitized to Aspergillus fumigatus?

Authors:  P Cullinan; A Cook; M Jones; J Cannon; B Fitzgerald; A J Taylor
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.146

6.  Occupational asthma due to pepsin.

Authors:  A Cartier; J L Malo; L Pineau; J Dolovich
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Use of Enzymes in Dairy Industry: A Review of Current Progress.

Authors:  U Khan; Z Selamoglu
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2020-03-01

8.  Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant?

Authors:  A Armentia; A Díaz-Perales; J Castrodeza; A Dueñas-Laita; A Palacin; S Fernández
Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 1.667

Review 9.  [Occupational allergies against pepsin, chymosin and microbial rennet].

Authors:  V van Kampen; H Lessmann; T Brüning; R Merget
Journal:  Pneumologie       Date:  2013-03-20

10.  Safety evaluation of the food enzyme rennet paste from the abomasum of suckling goats, lambs and calves.

Authors:  Claude Lambré; José Manuel Barat Baviera; Claudia Bolognesi; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Riccardo Crebelli; David Michael Gott; Konrad Grob; Evgenia Lampi; Marcel Mengelers; Alicja Mortensen; Gilles Rivière; Inger-Lise Steffensen; Christina Tlustos; Henk Van Loveren; Laurence Vernis; Holger Zorn; Boet Glandorf; Lieve Herman; Jaime Aguilera; Magdalena Andryszkiewicz; Natália Kovalkovičová; Yi Liu; Andrew Chesson
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.