| Literature DB >> 35035248 |
Thu Thuy Pham1, Khuong V Dinh2, Van Duy Nguyen1.
Abstract
The coastal marine ecosystems of Vietnam are one of the global biodiversity hotspots, but the biodiversity of marine fungi is not well known. To fill this major gap of knowledge, we assessed the genetic diversity (ITS sequence) of 75 fungal strains isolated from 11 surface coastal marine and deeper waters in Nha Trang Bay and Van Phong Bay using a culture-dependent approach and 5 OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) of fungi in three representative sampling sites using next-generation sequencing. The results from both approaches shared similar fungal taxonomy to the most abundant phylum (Ascomycota), genera (Candida and Aspergillus) and species (Candida blankii) but were different at less common taxa. Culturable fungal strains in this study belong to 3 phyla, 5 subdivisions, 7 classes, 12 orders, 17 families, 22 genera and at least 40 species, of which 29 species have been identified and several species are likely novel. Among identified species, 12 and 28 are new records in global and Vietnamese marine areas, respectively. The analysis of enzyme activity and the checklist of trophic mode and guild assignment provided valuable additional biological information and suggested the ecological function of planktonic fungi in the marine food web. This is the largest dataset of marine fungal biodiversity on morphology, phylogeny and enzyme activity in the tropical coastal ecosystems of Vietnam and Southeast Asia. Biogeographic aspects, ecological factors and human impact may structure mycoplankton communities in such aquatic habitats.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiversity; Vietnam; enzyme activity; marine fungi; next-generation sequencing; phylogeny
Year: 2021 PMID: 35035248 PMCID: PMC8725946 DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2021.2008103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.858
Details regarding colony forming units (CFUs) of fungal colonies on the SDA medium plates and strains identified with ITS sequence.
| Sampling date | Location | Lat (°N) | Long (°E) | Habitat | Depth (m) | pH | Temperature (°C) | Salinity (ppt) | CFU L–1 | No. of colonies (strains) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast | Filamentous fungi | Total | ||||||||||
| 07/05/2017 | Nha Trang Central Beach (NB) | 12o14′ | 109o11′ | Coastal marine waters (CMW) | 0.03–0.05 | 7.95 | 29 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 6 (5) | 2 (2) | 8 (7) |
| 07/05/2017 | Song Cai River Estuarine (SC) | 12o15′ | 109o11′ | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 8.15 | 28 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 6 (2) | 7 (5) | 13 (7) |
| 20/5/2017 | Doc Let Beach (DL) | 12o33′ | 109o13′ | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 7.79 | 31 | 3.45 | 9.3 | 10 (5) | 2 (2) | 12 (7) |
| 24/5/2017 | Dam Mon Lagoon (DM) | 12o40′ | 109o24′ | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 8.4 | 32 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 10 (7) | 3 (3) | 13 (10) |
| 24/5/2017 | Tu Bong River Estuarine (TB) | 12o46′ | 109o19′ | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 8.38 | 33.5 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 7 (5) | 4 (4) | 11 (9) |
| 24/5/2017 | Ran Trao Marine Ecosystem Reserve (RT) | 12o37′ | 109o12′ | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 7.96 | 32 | 3.25 | 1.4 | 16 (3) | 1 (1) | 17 (4) |
| 09/06/2017 | Cau Da Port (CD) | 12o12′ | 109o13′ | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 8.01 | 29.5 | 3.3 | 5.4 | 19 (4) | 3 (2) | 22 (6) |
| 10/8/2017 | Vung Ngan Aquaculture Zone (VN) | 12°11′06" | 109°16′25" | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 8.01 | 29 | 3.25 | 5.7 | 13 (2) | 5 (4) | 18 (6) |
| 10/8/2017 | Hon Mun Core Zone (HMC) | 12°10′33" | 109°18′16" | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 7.97 | 29 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 21 (3) | 1 (1) | 22 (4) |
| 10/8/2017 | Hon Mun Buffer Zone (HMB) | 12°10′72" | 109̊18′56” | CMW | 0.03–0.05 | 7.96 | 30 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 7 (2) | 4 (4) | 11 (6) |
| 01/6/2017 | Deep Waters (DW) | 12°18′31′’ | 109°31′67′’ | Deep waters | 40–47 | 7.0 | 22 | 3.44 | 8.8 | 0 (0) | 16 (9) | 16 (9) |
| Total | 115 (38) | 48 (37) | 163 (75) | |||||||||
Figure 1.Sampling positions at Nha Trang Bay and Van Phong Bay of Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Detail information on locations was given in the Table 1.
Taxonomy of cultured fungal species found in this study.
| No. | Division | Subdivision | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species | Strain | Relative abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ascomycota | Pezizomycotina | Dothideomycetes | Capnodiales | Cladosporiaceae |
| DM11M1, NB8M | 2.67 | |
| 2 |
| DW8M | 1.33 | ||||||
| 3 |
| VN16M | 1.33 | ||||||
| 4 | Dothideales | Saccotheciaceae |
|
| DL9Y | 1.33 | |||
| 5 | Pleosporales | Didymellaceae |
| DW3M | 1.33 | ||||
| 6 | Pleosporaceae |
|
| CD22M | 1.33 | ||||
| 7 | Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | Cyphellophoraceae |
|
| HMB10M | 1.33 | ||
| 8 | Eurotiales | Aspergillaceae |
| TB8M, TB9M | 5.33 | ||||
| 9 | TB10M | 1.33 | |||||||
| 10 | DM11M2, DM12M | 2.67 | |||||||
| 11 |
| HMB8M, HMB9M | 4.00 | ||||||
| 12 | VN17M, VN18M, | 4.00 | |||||||
| 13 |
|
| NB7M | 1.33 | |||||
| 14 |
| SC7M | 1.33 | ||||||
| 15 |
| CD20M | 1.33 | ||||||
| 16 |
| TB11M | 1.33 | ||||||
| 17 | DL11M | 1.33 | |||||||
| 18 | DW14M | 1.33 | |||||||
| 19 | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Cordycipitaceae |
|
| DW11M | 2.67 | ||
| 20 |
|
| DW15M | 1.33 | |||||
| 21 | Hypocreaceae |
|
| SC9M | 1.33 | ||||
| 22 |
| SC11M | 1.33 | ||||||
| 23 | SC13M | 1.33 | |||||||
| 24 | Nectriaceae |
| DW7M | 1.33 | |||||
| 25 | Trichosphaeriales | Trichosphaeriaceae |
|
| HMC22M | 1.33 | |||
| 26 | Sordariales | Sordariaceae |
|
| RT3M | 1.33 | |||
| 27 | Saccharomycotina | Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycetales | Debaryomycetaceae |
|
| 152 | 20.00 | |
| 28 |
| 63 | 8.00 | ||||||
| 29 |
| TB1Y, TB6Y | 2.67 | ||||||
| 30 |
| DL6Y | 2.67 | ||||||
| 31 |
|
| NB1Y | 1.33 | |||||
| 32 |
|
| TB3Y | 1.33 | |||||
| 33 |
|
| DL7Y | 1.33 | |||||
| 34 | Pichiaceae |
|
| TB5Y, DM4Y, VN9Y | 4.00 | ||||
| 35 | Metschnikowiaceae |
|
| DM2Y | 2.67 | ||||
| 36 | Basidiomycota | Agaricomycotina | Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Phanerochaetaceae |
| DL12M | 1.33 | |
| 37 | Pucciniomycotina | Microbotryomycetes | Sporidiobolales | Sporidiobolaceae |
|
| NB2Y, CD18Y | 2.67 | |
| 38 |
| DM5Y | 1.33 | ||||||
| 39 |
|
| CD19Y | 1.33 | |||||
| 40 | Mucoromycota | Mucoromycotina | Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae |
|
| SC10M | 1.33 |
| Total | 3 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | ≥ 40 | 75 | 100 |
1Strains identified by molecular data in this study. 215 Candida blankii strains: SC2Y, CD1Y, CD2Y, DM6Y, DM7Y, DM8Y, RT5Y, RT6Y, RT7Y, HMC1Y, HMC2Y, HMC11Y, HMB1Y, HMB7Y, VN1Y; and 36 Candida tropicalis strains: NB3Y, NB5Y, NB6Y, SC1Y, DL5Y, TB4Y.
Phylogenetic affiliation and taxonomy of the fungal OTUs obtained with ITS primers based on cultivated-independence studies.
| GenBank Accession | Final taxon | Phylum | Function | Closest relative | GenBank Accession | Identity (Coverage) % | Originally reported habitat | Abundance count | Abundance (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | HMC | DW | Average | CD | HMC | DW | All | ||||||||
| MT364509 | Ascomycota | Pathotroph: Human, animal and plant Pathogen | MF940143 | 100 (100) | Sands of Copacabana’s beach, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | 2467 | 51,651 | 0 | 18039.33 | 95.95 | 97.99 | 0 | 97.74 | ||
| MT102799 | 99.65–100 (95) | CD and HMC samples in this study (direct matching) | |||||||||||||
| MT364534 | Ascomycota | Saprotroph: Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon degradation | KJ527011 | 100 (100) | Fen-Daqu fermentation starter (China) | 43 | 782 | 0 | 275.00 | 1.67 | 1.48 | 0 | 1.49 | ||
| MT364570 | Ascomycota | Possible plant pathogen | MT125854 | 100 (100) | Dark Leaf Spot Diseased Rice | 0 | 250 | 0 | 83.33 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0 | 0.45 | ||
| MT364606 | Chytridiomycota OTU_101 | Chytridiomycota | Unknown | Uncultured fungus clone S12T_70 | KU163812 | 100 (94) | Sea water in China | 0 | 0 | 87 | 29.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.16 |
| MT364609 | Fungal OTU_104 | Unclassified Fungi | Possible phytoplankton pathogen | Uncultured fungus isolate DGGE gel band F-SW39 | KC491368 | 90.3 (100) | Sea water in South Florida, Crab Cove, USA | 61 | 27 | 0 | 29.33 | 2.37 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.16 |
| Total | 2571 | 52,710 | 87 | 18,456 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Figure 2.The percentage abundance of major phyla of fungi isolates from all 11 samples using culture-dependent approach (A), fungi isolates from 3 samples HMC, CD and DW using culture-dependent approach (B), and fungal OTUs from 3 samples HMC, CD and DW using culture-independent approach (C).
Figure 3.Phylogenetic tree of Orders Capnodiales, Dothideales and Pleosporales (class Dothideomycetes, Phylum Ascomycota) based on ITS rRNA genes. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter model [54]. The tree with the highest log likelihood –2876.51) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 34.52% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 18 nucleotide sequences, including ones in this study (*), from type strains (T) and Chytridium olla UACCC ARG100 (T) used as an outgroup.
Figure 8.Relative extracellular enzyme activity (AU) of all fungal strains from each sample at Nha Trang Bay and Van Phong Bay, Khanh Hoa province, Vietnam. For each strain, 1 AU was defined as an enzyme activity unit with hydrolysis zone diameter D–d = 10–15 mm, 2 AU for D–d = 15-20 mm and 3 AU for D–d > 20 mm. Based on total relative enzyme activity shown, the samples were divided into 5 groups: Group A (>60 AU), Group B (23–33 AU), Group C (20 AU), Group D (12–16 AU), and Group E (0–5 AU).