Literature DB >> 23196967

A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-arm imaging system and StealthStation Navigation.

Erik Van de Kelft1, F Costa, D Van der Planken, F Schils.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An international, multicenter, prospective, postmarketing clinical registry to record the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, using the O-arm Complete Multidimensional Surgical Imaging System with StealthStation Navigation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in common neurosurgical practice and assess the patient's radiation exposure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several imaging techniques have been used to increase accurate pedicle screw placement. The O-arm 3-dimensional (3D) imaging (Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO), an intraoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan, combined with an existing navigation system was reported to further increase accuracy of screw placement, especially because an intraoperative 3D scan provides information for screw adjustment before wound closure.
METHODS: Patients already planned for instrumented spinal surgery were operated while using the O-arm as imaging device and the StealthStation Navigation (Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO) as navigation tool. At the end of all pedicle screw insertions, the placement was classified according to a validated method. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on the intraoperative 3D scan and the surgeon's perception of correct screw placement were assessed as well as the radiation doses the patient received during the entire procedure.
RESULTS: During a 16-month period, a total of 1922 screws in 353 patients were evaluated. In 97.5%, the screws were correctly placed. Only 2.5% of the screws were considered as misplaced, and 1.8% of the screws were revised during the same procedure. When the surgeon perceived the screws to be correctly placed, the CT scan verified his assessment in 98.5% of the cases. The mean radiation dose was comparable with half the dose of a 64 multislice CT scan.
CONCLUSION: The use of the O-arm in combination with a navigation system increases the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. The accuracy of the surgeon's perception and the need to limit the radiation dose for the patient justify an additional CT scan only after careful assessment of the potential additional value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23196967     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318271b1fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  65 in total

1.  A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kleck; Ian Cullilmore; Matthew LaFleur; Emily Lindley; Mark E Rentschler; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Usefulness of Intraoperative Computer Tomography-Assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Small-Sized Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Soo Chang; Takayuki Nakano; Taku Okamoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

4.  Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and lumbar spine instrumentation using navigation based on an intraoperative cone beam CT imaging system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nathalie Pireau; Virginie Cordemans; Xavier Banse; Nadia Irda; Sébastien Lichtherte; Ludovic Kaminski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Accuracy and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO(®) CT scanner.

Authors:  Nils Hecht; Marije Kamphuis; Marcus Czabanka; Bernd Hamm; Susanne König; Johannes Woitzik; Michael Synowitz; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in posterior scoliosis surgery: a comparison between intraoperative navigation and preoperative navigation techniques.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Tomoyuki Takigawa; YongGang Wu; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masato Tanaka; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Transfacet screws using spinal navigation in addition to anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and preliminary results.

Authors:  Antoine Gennari; Amandine Gavotto; Fabien Almairac; Yann Pelletier; Philippe Paquis; Stéphane Litrico
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Trials that fail to show advantages of 3D navigation in spine surgery-is it the technology or the trial?

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

9.  Reliability of the Planned Pedicle Screw Trajectory versus the Actual Pedicle Screw Trajectory using Intra-operative 3D CT and Image Guidance.

Authors:  Catherine A Miller; Charles G Ledonio; Matthew A Hunt; Farhan Siddiq; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-10-24

10.  Rate and mode of screw misplacements after 3D-fluoroscopy navigation-assisted insertion and 3D-imaging control of 1547 pedicle screws in spinal levels T10-S1 related to vertebrae and spinal sections.

Authors:  Horst Balling; Thomas R Blattert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.