| Literature DB >> 35020834 |
Tim Pieters1,2,3, André Almeida1,2,3, Sara T'Sas1,2,3, Kelly Lemeire4,5, Tino Hochepied4,5, Geert Berx3,4,5, Alex Kentsis6,7,8, Steven Goossens1,2,3,9, Pieter Van Vlierberghe1,2,3.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35020834 PMCID: PMC9131915 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529
Figure 1.Myb overexpression enables the formation of B-cell and myeloid neoplasms in vivo. (A) Schematic representation of R26-Myb mice that allow Cre-dependent conditional expression of a bicistronic transgene transcript, encoding for Myb and the eGFP/Luciferase reporter, from the Rosa26 promoter. Breeding scheme to obtain R26-Myb (Myb) mice with hematopoietic-specific overexpression of Myb. R26, Rosa26; IRES, independent ribosomal entry site; eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; PKG, phosphoglycerate kinase 1; NeoR, neomycin resistance gene. (B) Kaplan Meier survival curve of Cre-negative control (R26-Myb) vs Myb mice. A log-rank Mantel-Cox test showed that survival of Myb mice was significantly lower. *P = .0302. (C) Peripheral blood values of Myb mice and nonrecombined controls. WBC, white blood cells; RBC, red blood cells. An unpaired t-test indicated that there was no significant difference between tumor-carrying Myb mice and nonrecombined controls. (D) Graph depicting the spleen-to-body weight ratio of Myb mice that developed neoplasm and age-matched Cre-negative littermate control mice. *P = .0450. (E) Flow cytometry analysis of 4 Myb tumors. Single live cells were analyzed for the T-cell marker Thy1.1 (CD90), B-cell markers B220 and CD19, and myeloid markers Gr-1 and Cd11b. FSC-A, forward scatter area. (F) Left: heatmap summarizing flow data of tumor samples, including BM, LN, and spleen, from 4 Myb mice. Right: Graph depicting the percentage of T cells, B cells, or myeloid cells from panel E, which were pregated for single live cells. (G,H) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining or representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the proliferation marker KI67 or MYB on paraffin sections of Myb liver (G) and LN (H) tumors and of an aged-matched Cre-negative littermate control. Scale bar: 25 µm. Scale bar inset: 50 µm.
Figure 2.Transplantation and therapeutic targeting of the transcriptional activity of Myb. (A) Scheme of primary transplantation of Myb tumor cells into immunocompromised nonobese diabetic/severely compromised immunodeficiency γ (NSG) mice. (B) Bioluminescence of a primary BM tumor sample from Myb mouse #2 that was transplanted in an NSG mouse. Bioluminescence was measured over time. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of myeloid (Gr-1+Cd11b+) and B cells (B220+CD19+) of a control NSG and NSGs that were transplanted primary Myb tumor cells. (D) Graphs showing the percentage of B cells or myeloid cells which were pregated for single live cells. (E) Luciferase assay on Myb transplants. (F) Violin plots showing CERES cell dependency scores for MYB from AML (n = 20), ALL (n = 10), and 772 other cancer cell lines which were taken from DepMap (https://depmap.org/portal/). CERES is a computational method that estimates gene dependency based on data from CRISPR-Cas9 screens. A CERES score of 0 indicates that MYB is not essential, while a lower score indicates a higher likelihood that MYB is essential in a given cell line. MYB, AML, and ALL cell lines had a significantly lower CERES score than other cell lines. ****P < .0001. (G) Graphs depicting the survival of myeloid, B-cell, and mixed Myb hematopoietic malignancies, which were treated for 48 hours with increasing concentrations of either MYBMIM or TG3.