Literature DB >> 28671688

The genomic landscape of pediatric and young adult T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Yu Liu1, John Easton1, Ying Shao1,2, Jamie Maciaszek3, Zhaoming Wang1, Mark R Wilkinson2, Kelly McCastlain2, Michael Edmonson1, Stanley B Pounds4, Lei Shi4, Xin Zhou1, Xiaotu Ma1, Edgar Sioson1, Yongjin Li1, Michael Rusch1, Pankaj Gupta1, Deqing Pei4, Cheng Cheng4, Malcolm A Smith5, Jaime Guidry Auvil6, Daniela S Gerhard6, Mary V Relling7, Naomi J Winick8, Andrew J Carroll9, Nyla A Heerema10, Elizabeth Raetz11, Meenakshi Devidas12, Cheryl L Willman13, Richard C Harvey13, William L Carroll14, Kimberly P Dunsmore15, Stuart S Winter16, Brent L Wood17, Brian P Sorrentino3, James R Downing2, Mignon L Loh18, Stephen P Hunger19, Jinghui Zhang1, Charles G Mullighan2.   

Abstract

Genetic alterations that activate NOTCH1 signaling and T cell transcription factors, coupled with inactivation of the INK4/ARF tumor suppressors, are hallmarks of T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), but detailed genome-wide sequencing of large T-ALL cohorts has not been carried out. Using integrated genomic analysis of 264 T-ALL cases, we identified 106 putative driver genes, half of which had not previously been described in childhood T-ALL (for example, CCND3, CTCF, MYB, SMARCA4, ZFP36L2 and MYCN). We describe new mechanisms of coding and noncoding alteration and identify ten recurrently altered pathways, with associations between mutated genes and pathways, and stage or subtype of T-ALL. For example, NRAS/FLT3 mutations were associated with immature T-ALL, JAK3/STAT5B mutations in HOXA1 deregulated ALL, PTPN2 mutations in TLX1 deregulated T-ALL, and PIK3R1/PTEN mutations in TAL1 deregulated ALL, which suggests that different signaling pathways have distinct roles according to maturational stage. This genomic landscape provides a logical framework for the development of faithful genetic models and new therapeutic approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28671688      PMCID: PMC5535770          DOI: 10.1038/ng.3909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


T-lineage ALL comprises up to 25% of ALL cases,[1,2] and is sub classified according to stages of thymic maturation, including early cortical, late cortical and mature T-cell stages. Early T-cell precursor T-ALL (ETP ALL) is an additional high-risk subtype that lacks expression of several T cell surface markers, and exhibits aberrant expression of myeloid and stem cell markers.[3,4] Cytogenetic and candidate gene mutational analyses have identified recurring genetic alterations in T-ALL, several of which show association with tumor cell maturational stage or clinical features. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 are present in at least 60% of ALL cases.[5,6] Activation of oncogenic transcription factors is also a hallmark of T-ALL, commonly from rearrangement to T-cell receptor loci. These include the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor genes TAL1,[7] TAL2,[8] LYL1[9] and OLIG2 (BHLHB1);[10] TLX1 (HOX11),[11] TLX3 (HOX11L2),[12] NKX2-1, NKX2-2 and NKX2-5;[13,14] the LIM-only domain genes LMO1 and LMO2;[15,16] the HOXA homeobox genes; MYC[17] and MYB.[18,19] Additional rearrangements result in the expression of chimeric fusion genes involving KMT2A (MLL), HOXA and tyrosine kinase genes such as ABL1.[20,21] Deletion of the CDKN2A/CDKN2B tumor suppressor loci is observed in over 70% of T-ALL,[22] with deletion of genes encoding the cell cycle regulators RB1[18] and CDKN1B (p27Kip1)[23] in approximated 15% of cases. Additional targets of mutation include loss-of-function alterations of hematopoietic transcription factor genes including BCL11B, ETV6, GATA3, LEF1, RUNX1 and WT1.[24-28] Several genes encoding epigenetic regulators and chromatin modifiers are also mutated in T-ALL, including EED, EZH2 and SUZ12 that encode core components of the polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2) that mediates the repressive histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation mark, the histone demethylase KDM6A[29,30] and the deubiquitinating enzyme USP7.[31] Several intracellular signaling pathways are activated by mutation, including the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, most commonly from PTEN deletion[18,32], PTPN2 deletion[33] or AKT1 mutation;[34] the JAK-STAT pathway via activating mutations in the interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7RA) gene,[35,36] JAK1,[37] JAK3[38,39] or STAT5B;[40] the Ras-MAPK signaling through KRAS and NF1 mutation,[24,41] and chimeric ABL1 fusion proteins such as NUP214-ABL1 and ETV6-ABL1.[20,21] Mutations in ribosomal biogenesis processing have recently been identified, including RPL5, RPL10 and RPL11[42] and the plant homeodomain factor gene PHF6 that has a putative role in chromatin modification.[43] Although these data have provided important insights into the oncogenic pathways that drive leukemogenesis in T-ALL there are relatively few data from unbiased, genome-wide sequencing approaches, and those available have usually examined relatively small cohorts,[24,44] gene panels[31,45] or a single modality of sequencing,[42,46]. Here we performed an integrated, multimodality genomic analysis of a uniformly treated cohort of childhood and young adult T-ALL to identify the spectrum and constellations of genetic alterations in this disease.

Molecular classification of T-ALL

In a collaborative study of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), the National Cancer Institute Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) initiative and the St Jude–Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genomic Project (PCGP), we studied 264 children and young adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL consecutively enrolled on the COG trial AALL0434[47] between 2007–2011 with available tumor and remission material (Supplementary Tables 1 – 2). DNA extracted from tumor and remission samples was subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray genotyping, and tumor RNA to transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) (Supplementary Tables 3 – 5). A subset of novel or complex sequence mutations and mutations of the TAL1 enhancer[48,49] were verified by amplicon-based next generation sequencing (Supplementary Table 6). Immunophenotypic data were available for all cases and 189 (71.6%) cases included data necessary to enable classification into ETP-ALL (19 cases), near-ETP (24 cases fulfilling criteria for ETP ALL, except with normal expression CD5 expression)[4] and non-ETP ALL (146 cases). Based on genetic alterations and dysregulated expression of transcription factor genes, and hierarchical clustering of RNA-seq gene expression data, 242 (91.7%) patients were classified into 8 subgroups: deregulation of TAL1 (N=87), TAL2 (N=8), TLX1 (N=26), TLX3 (N=46), HOXA (N=33), LMO1/2 (N=10), LMO2-LYL1 (N=18) and NKX2-1 (N=14) (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1). ETP ALL cases commonly exhibited LMO2/LYL1 deregulation (7 of 19 cases, 36.8%), near- and non-ETP ALL cases were enriched for TAL1 deregulation (41.7% and 27.4% respectively), TLX3 deregulation was most commonly observed in near-ETP cases, and TLX1 deregulation in non-ETP ALL (χ2 P=0.0004, Supplementary Table 7).

Sequence mutations in pediatric T-ALL

We identified 4165 non-synonymous single nucleotide (SNV), insertion/deletion (indel) or internal tandem duplication (ITD) sequence mutations in 2694 genes by exome or RNA sequencing in the cohort of 264 samples, with a mean of 15.8 mutations (range 2–50) per case (s). We used the mutation significance detection tools MutSigCV[50], MuSiC[51] and Medal Ceremony, and mutant allele expression data to identify potential driver mutations. Importantly, 24 genes harboring somatic mutations of known functional significance were mutated in only a single case, including EP300 (p300), KIT and TP53. Overall, 106 driver genes were identified (Supplementary Table 9), including known targets of mutation in T-ALL: NOTCH1 (N=197 cases; 74.6%, including 5 cases with intragenic NOTCH1 deletions), FBXW7 (63; 23.9%), PHF6 (50; 18.9%), PTEN (37; 14.0%), USP7 (31; 11.7%), DNM2 (29; 11.0%); BCL11B (26; 9.8%), WT1 (24; 9.1%), JAK3 (20; 7.6%), NRAS (20; 7.6%), IL7R (18; 6.8%), PIK3R1 (17; 6.4%) and RPL10 (16; 6.1%) (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 2). Fifty-three (51%) of these 106 genes, and 39 (48%) of 82 recurrently mutated genes had not previously been described to be mutated in pediatric T-ALL.[24,31,34,42,44] These included mutations in the transcriptional regulatory genes MYB (N=13), CNOT3 (N=9), MED12 (N=7), MYCN (N=6) and TSPYL2 (N=4); epigenetic regulators, including CTCF (N=13), SMARCA4 (N=7) and CREBBP (N=5); cell cycle genes, including CCND3 (N=15) and CDKN1B (N=4); the deubiquitination gene USP9X (N=7); RNA processing genes, including DDX3X (N=4) and U2AF1 (N=4); mutations predicted to activate PI3K-AKT signaling, including PIK3CD (N=5); and the RNA-binding protein and suppressor of NOTCH1 expression ZFP36L2[52,53] (N=5, 3 mutations and three fusions). Four genes (CNOT3, KMT2D, RPL5 and FAT1) were previously identified as targets of mutation in adult, but not pediatric T-ALL.
Figure 1

The fifty-five most common targets of sequence mutation in T-ALL

The left panel shows genes with mutations ordered by recurrence, and stratified by mutation type. Gene symbols in blue denote those previously found to be mutated in adult T-ALL cases, but not children. Those in red have not previously been reported in T-ALL. Genes on chromosome X are indicated with asterisks. The center panel depicts the number of mutations for each gene per case. The right panel indicates mutant allele fraction (MAF) of sequence mutation across the cohort.

Sub-clonal mutations (defined as those with a mutant allele fraction (MAF) of less than 0.3) were frequently observed in many driver genes (Figure 1), indicating sub-clonal evolution is a hallmark of T-ALL. Moreover, many cases harbored multiple subclonal mutations in the same gene, indicating that these mutations are secondary events in leukemogenesis but exert driver functions in individual subclones. For example, NOTCH1 was the most frequently mutated gene with 264 sequence mutations identified in 196 cases, with majority of mutations in the heterodimerization (HD) domain (62.9%, 166/264) or PEST domain (31.4%, 83/264). Although subclonal NOTCH1 mutations have been previously reported, the extent of multi- and subclonality revealed in this study is substantially greater that previously described.[54] Of the 264 mutations, 116 (43.9%) were sub-clonal. Fifty-eight (29.6%) samples harbored multiple NOTCH1 mutations (49 samples with 2 mutations and 9 samples with 3 mutations). To determine if germline sequence mutations may influence the risk of developing T-ALL, we analyzed 89 genes (Supplementary Table 10), including 60 associated with autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndromes,[55] and the 35 most frequent targets of somatic mutation in this study. Only 4 potentially deleterious germline mutations, in BRAF, BRCA1, BRCA2 and RUNX1 were identified (Supplementary results).

Gene rearrangements in pediatric T-ALL

Analysis of transcriptome sequencing data identified transcripts derived from 255 gene rearrangements in 191 (72.3%) samples (Supplementary Table 11). Eighty-three chimeric in-frame fusions were identified, 54 of which arose from inter-chromosomal rearrangements, 29 from intra-chromosomal events. The most frequent were MLLT10 fusions (6 unique rearrangements in 13 cases); fusions of KMT2A (6 fusions in 12 cases); ABL1 fusions (4 fusions in 5 cases); and NUP98 fusions (4 fusions in 5 cases) (Table 1). Multiple novel fusions involving signaling pathways, transcriptional regulation or RNA processing were identified, including ETV6-CTNNB1, IL9R-VAMP7, PCM1-JAK2, CD99-JAK2, CSTF3-LMO2, STMN1-SPI1 and NCOR1-NFIA (1 case each). The second class of rearrangements identified by RNA-seq were those deregulating oncogenes, including TAL1 (N=58), TLX1 (N=17), TLX3 (N=13), and TAL2 (N=6). Importantly, this analysis identified involving novel rearrangement partners and/or mechanisms of deregulation for known targets of rearrangement, but also showed that transcriptome sequencing does not identify all rearrangements, notably cases with TLX3 deregulation (Supplementary Results; Supplementary Table 12 and Supplementary Figure 3). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 25 cases lacking a rearrangement identified 5 additional cases with rearrangements of core T-ALL transcription factor genes that were not identified by analysis of transcriptome sequencing data as breakpoints were located in intergenic regions, and the rearrangements did not result in expression of a chimeric fusion product: TCRA-LMO2, TCRB-TAL2, TCRA-LMO2, BCL11B-TLX3 and NKX2-1 (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1
Rearrangement resulting in deregulated expression of target gene
Target GeneNRearrangement partner
TLX117TRB (7), TRA (5), TLX1-upstream (4), LINC00502-TLX1 (1)
TLX313BCL11B-TLX3 (8), CDK6-TLX3 (2), TRB (1), TLX3-CACS15 (1), TLX3-TARBP1 (1)
TAL158STIL (50), TRA (5), DHX9-TAL1 (1), GNPAT-TAL1 (1), TAL1-TARP (1)
TAL26TRB (6)
LMO13TRB (2), TRA (1)
LMO213TRA (6), TRB (5), CSTF3-LMO2 (1), FOXJ3-LMO2 (1)
LYL11TRB (1)
NKX2-19TRA (6), NKX2-1-BCL11B (1), CDK6-NKX2-1 (1), NKX2-1-DIO2 (1)
HOXA7TRB (4), HOXA insertion (1), LINC01260-HOXA (1), POLR2E-HOXA (1)
MYB11TRB (2), SLC12A9-MYB (1), MYB-PLAGL1 (1), MYB-BDP1 (1), MYB-CHMP1A (1)
AHI1-MYB (5)
b. Rearrangement resulting in chimeric Fusions
GeneNPartner Gene
MLLT1015PICALM (9), DDX3X (2), KMT2A (1), FAM171A1 (1), NAP1L1 (1), CAPS2 (1)
KMT2A12MLLT1 (7), ELL (1), MLLT10 (1), MLLT4 (1), MLLT6 (1), CT45A4 (1)
ABL17NUP214 (4), SLC9A3R1 (1), ETV6 (1), MBNL1 (1)
NUP985RAP1GDS1 (2), CCDC28A (1), LNP1 (1), PSIP1 (1)
TFG3GPR128 (3)
JAK22PCM1 (1), CD99 (1)
ETV62ABL1 (1), CTNNB1 (1)
ZC3HAV12ABL2 (1), AKAP11 (1)
LMAN22NSD1 (1), PAPOLA (1)
The transcription factor gene MYB was altered by amplification (N=33), rearrangement (N=11) or mutation (N=13) in 49 (18.6%) cases (Supplementary Figure 4). We identified multiple mechanisms of rearrangement, including juxtaposition of the 5′ region of MYB to promoter/enhancer regions of partner genes (TCRB, N=2) and SLC12A9 (N=1). Rearrangements of the 3′ region of MYB resulting in loss of a negative regulatory region were identified in 3 cases (involving PLAGL1, BDP1 and CHMP1A, N=1 each). Fourteen sequence mutations in 13 samples were identified, including a novel hot spot of missense and in-frame insertion mutations at codon 14 in 7 cases (Supplementary Figure 2). This residue lies in an unstructured region of MYB adjacent to a nuclear localization sequence that may perturb the intracellular localization, and thus activity of MYB.

Recurrently targeted pathways in pediatric T-ALL

We integrated sequence mutation, structural variant/rearrangement and DNA copy number alteration data (Supplementary Tables 13–14) and identified 10 functional pathways recurrently mutated in T-ALL: transcriptional regulation (91% of cases), cell cycle regulation and tumor suppression (84%), NOTCH1 signaling (79%), epigenetic regulation (68%), PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling (29%), JAK-STAT signaling (25%), Ras signaling (14%), ribosomal function (13%), ubiquitination (9%) and RNA processing (9%) (Figure 2 and Supplementary Tables 15 – 16). Most commonly mutated were transcriptional regulators including those oncogenes defining T-ALL subgroups (e.g. TAL1, TLX1, TLX3, LMO2, and NKX2-1), known recurrently mutated genes (MYB, LEF1, BCL11B) as well as 16 genes mutated in less than 10 cases (Supplementary Figure 5). Genes encoding regulators of cell cycle progression and/or tumor suppressors were mutated in 83.7% of cases, the recurrent targets of alteration being CDKN2A/CDKN2B (78.4%), CDKN1B (12.9%) RB1 (9.5%), CCND3 (6.1%), with single mutations in CASP8, CDKN2C and TP53. In addition, broad deletions of chromosome 6q14-q23 were present in 19.3% of cases, and were enriched in TAL1 cases (Supplementary Results, Supplementary Table 17 and Supplementary Figures 6 – 8).
Figure 2

Recurrently mutated pathways in T-ALL

Ten recurrently mutated pathways and the proportion of cases in each T-ALL subgroup shown as pie diagrams. The majority of pathways showed significant associations between prevalence of alteration and T-ALL subgroup, **, P<0.01.

Mutations activating NOTCH1 signaling were observed in 79% of cases, including NOTCH1 mutations (74.6%; 149 HD, 78 PEST), FBXW7 mutations (25.4%) and mutations in both genes in 20.8% cases (N=55) (Supplementary Figure 9). We observed significant association between mutations and T-ALL subtypes, and variation in the frequency of genes and pathways mutated across T-ALL subtypes, consistent with the notion that such subtype-enriched genomic alterations reflect genes critical to specific stages of T-cell development (Figure 3, Supplementary Tables 18 – 19 and Supplementary Figure 10). Notably, the NOTCH1 signaling pathway was nearly always mutated in LMO1/2, NKX2-1, and TLX1 cases, but was less frequently mutated in TAL1/2 and LMO2-LYL1 cases. Epigenetic mutations were particularly common in TLX3 cases (93.5%), and ribosomal processing mutations were highly enriched in NKX2-1 cases (50.0%).
Figure 3

A network depicting association between genetic alterations and T-ALL subgroups and stages of T-cell development

Nodes represent genetic alterations and are color-coded by the T-ALL subtype in which they are most enriched. The size of each node represents the frequency of the genetic alteration across the entire cohort. Lines connecting the nodes indicate statistically significant co-occurrence of a gene-gene pair or a gene-subtype pair. Intra- and inter- subtype co-occurrence is shown in red and blue, respectively with the thickness of each line represents the significance of P value. Nodes in gray are genetic alterations that are not specifically enriched in a T-ALL subtype.

Excluding CDKN2A, NOTCH1 and FBXW7, which are mutated in multiple T-ALL subtypes, we identified the 37 most recurrently mutated genes that were significantly enriched in at least one T-ALL subtype. We constructed a network linking mutations to T cell developmental stages considering both gene-subgroup and gene-gene correlation (Figure 3). Mutation of the JAK-STAT or Ras signaling pathways (e.g. FLT3, NRAS and JAK3) were enriched in the LMO2/LYL1 and HOXA subgroups while those of PI3K signaling pathway (commonly PTEN and PIK3R1) were enriched in the TAL1 subgroup, suggesting a transition of the predominant signaling pathway from early T cell development to later stages. USP7 alterations were significantly enriched in the TAL1 subgroup, CTCF in TLX3 cases, and DNM2 and PHF6 in TLX1/3 cases, suggesting that different epigenetic regulators are involved in the early versus late cortical stages of T cell development. Alteration of the transcription factor LEF1 was most common in NKX2-1 cases and BCL11B, MYC in TLX1 cases. Mutations in RPL5 and RPL10 were enriched in TLX3 and NKX2-1 subgroups, respectively, suggesting that these two ribosome biogenesis genes may have distinct roles in early and late cortical development. MYB (n=49), IL7R (n=18) and ABL1 (n=18, including 3 cases with NUP214-ABL1, one with NUP214-ABL1 and ETV6-ABL1, one with MBNL1-ABL1, one with an in frame ABL1 deletion and the remainder with broad amplification of 9q, see Supplementary Results and Supplementary Figure 11) were the most frequently mutated genes that were not associated with a subtype, suggesting that these may drive signaling pathways in multiple stages of T-cell maturation.

Somatic alterations targeting transcriptional regulators

In addition to alterations of transcription factor genes that define T-ALL subgroups, 26 transcription factor genes were mutated, 24 in more than one case (Supplementary Figure 5).[56] A novel mutation in T-ALL was the MYCN p.Pro44Leu (P44L) mutation, identified in 6 cases (Figure 4a). This mutation has previously been identified in neuroblastoma and is associated with elevated levels of MYCN gene expression, suggesting a role in oncogenesis.[57] The mutated residue lies adjacent to the conserved phospho-degron recognized by E3 ubiquitin ligases FBXW7, SKP2 and HUWE1, consistent with the possibility that this mutation may perturb MYCN protein levels or protein-protein interactions.[58-60] To examine the functional consequences of this mutation, we transduced Arf−/− mouse thymocytes with lentiviral vectors expressing either wild-type or P44L MYCN. Transduced cells were cultured on OP9-DL1 cells and transplanted after ten days into irradiated Rag−/− recipient mice.[61] Both wild-type and mutant MYCN vectors induced a highly penetrant T-lineage leukemia, but with a modest but significantly shorter latency in cells expressing the mutant P44L MYCN vector (Figure 4b–d). To explore the hypothesis that this mutation may perturb ubiquitin-mediated degradation, we transfected NIH3T3 cells with wild-type or mutant HA-tagged MYCN lentiviral vectors, treated cells with cycloheximide to block protein translation, and quantified MYCN protein levels over time by immunoblotting. We observed significantly slower decay of MYCN P44L levels compared to wild-type protein (Figure 4e–f), consistent with the notion that this mutation impairs protein degradation, thus enhancing oncogenicity.
Figure 4

Accelerated leukemogenesis in mutant MYCN driven T-ALL

a, MYCN mutations in T-ALL. The putative MYCN phosphodegron is showin in red. b, Kaplan-Meier curves from 1 of two experiments showing leukemia-free survival of mice transplanted with thymocytes transduced with the wild-type P44L MYCN vectors, N=10 per arm. c, Leukemic infiltrates were present in the liver (shown), kidney, spleen, thymus, and bone marrow of all animals. Tumors were of T cell lineage (CD3+, RUNX1+, MPO−, GATA1−, TdT−). Bars, 75μm. d, Expression of CD3, CD4, B220 and Gr1 in leukemic cells. e–f. Immunoblot analysis of MYCN expression (via the HA epitope tag) in NIH3T3 cells showing increased stability following cycloheximide treatment for MYCN P44L. The estimated half-life for wild-type MYCN was 0.47 hours (95% CI −.38–0.6) compared to 0.96 hours (0.77–1.27) for MYCN P44L (P=0.0013). Two independent cycloheximide treatment experiments were performed, with one representative experiment shown in e and data in f showing mean ± SD. Immunoblots in e have been cropped.

TAL1-deregulated ALL was the most common subtype of T-ALL in this study (87/33.0% cases). Fifty-nine cases had structural alterations identified by RNA-seq or SNP array analysis (51 with deletions resulting STIL-TAL1 fusion, 8 with other TAL1 rearrangements) but a substantial minority lacked such an alteration. Recently, a non-coding insertion mutation upstream of the TAL1 locus was reported that creates a MYB binding site, which results in recruitment of CREBBP (CBP), acetylation of histone 3 lysine 27 and recruitment of RUNX1, GATA3 and TAL1.[48] We identified 15 cases (5.7%) with identical or similar TAL1 mutations that result in acquisition of the MYB binding motif. Notably, we identified a distinct indel mutation in four additional cases that results acquisition of TCF1/2 motifs, and loss of a GMEB1 binding motif, suggesting a distinct mechanism for TAL1 deregulation in these cases (Supplementary Figure 12). The remaining 11 TAL1 cases lack a known genomic mechanism for gene deregulation. Additional transcription factor mutations included MED12 (N=7) and TSPYL2 (N=4, Supplementary Figure 2). MED12 encodes part of the kinase module of the large MEDIATOR complex that bridges a range of transcriptional pathways to RNA polymerase 2 and transcription, and is mutated in multiple tumors.[62] The majority of mutations were frame-shift or nonsense mutations, suggesting these are tumor suppressor genes in T-ALL. Thirty-two cases had focal deletions or gains of chromosome 8q distal to MYC at or adjacent to the NOTCH1 MYC Enhancer (NME) region that interacts with the MYC locus and facilitates MYC expression (Supplementary Figure 13).[63,64] These alterations were most common in the HOXA and TLX1/3 subgroups, and included deletions in addition to the previously reported amplifications, both of which were associated with elevated MYC expression (data not shown).

Signaling pathway mutations in T-ALL

Mutations activating signaling pathways were observed in 65% of cases. These included PI3K-AKT (28.8% of cases), JAK-STAT (24.6%), Ras signaling (13.6%) and rearrangements involving ABL1, GPR128, IL2RB and IL9R (Figure 5). Exclusivity was observed between PI3K-AKT pathway and JAK-STAT or Ras pathway alterations (Fisher’s exact test, P<0.0001), with PI3K-AKT mutations prevalent in TAL1 cases, and JAK-STAT or Ras mutations in TLX1/3 and HOXA cases. Although PTEN, PIK3R1 and AKT1 were the most commonly mutated genes in the PI3K-AKT pathway, multiple novel targets of mutation in T-ALL were identified. These included a recurrent somatic PIK3CD p.Glu1021Lys mutation observed in five cases (four TAL1 and one LMO2/LYL1 case). This has been reported to be a dominant AKT activating germline mutation.[65] Other recurring alterations resulting in activation of signaling pathways included rearrangement of ABL1 and TFG-GPR128, a rearrangement also observed in high-risk B-ALL and lymphoma (N=3).[66]
Figure 5

Signaling mutations in T-ALL

Heatmap showing the enrichment of PI3K mutations in TAL1-deregulated ALL cases, and the enrichment of JAK-STAT and Ras mutations in TLX1/3 deregulated cases.

Fifty-five (20.8%) cases had multiple signaling mutations, with 13 cases carrying at least 3 mutations. The most common patterns were a JAK-STAT activating mutation and concomitant mutations involving additional JAK-STAT (N=19), Ras (N=11), PI3K-AKT (N=6) or other mutations (N=6), or PI3K-AKT mutations with second PI3K-AKT mutations (N=13), Ras (N=4) or other mutations (N=3). This raised that question as to whether these concomitant mutations reside in the same or distinct clones. This is of importance for the selection of targeted therapeutic approaches, and the potential for emergence of subclones resistant to agents targeting a single pathway. To address this, we examined the MAF of signaling pathway mutations in 14 cases with JAK3 sequence mutations. Thirteen cases carried JAK3 variant with MAF >0.3 (30%) indicating the mutations were present in a predominant/major clone (Supplementary Figure 14). In 10 of these cases, the signaling mutation of the next highest MAF (including JAK-STAT and Ras pathways) was also clonal. In three cases the JAK3 mutation was clonal, but the second signaling mutation was subclonal, indicating that both mutations coexist in a subclone. In one case, both mutations were subclonal, and may exist in the same or different clones. Thus, in the majority of cases, the most common JAK-STAT and second most common signaling mutations coexist in the same clone.

Patterns of epigenetic mutation in T-ALL

Epigenomic regulators were recurrently mutated in all T-ALL sub-groups with the exception of TAL2-rearranged ALL (0 of 8 cases), with a prevalence ranging from 10 of 18 (55.6%) LMO2/LYL1 cases to 43 of 46 (93.5%) TLX3 cases (Supplementary Table 19 and Supplementary Figure 15). In addition to the known association between PHF6 mutations and TLX3 rearrangement,[43] several additional associations between mutation and subtype were observed. Alterations of USP7 were almost exclusively observed in TAL1 cases (29 of 33 USP7 mutations). USP7 encodes a ubiquitin-specific protease that stabilizes MDM2 and TP53.[67] The majority of mutations (76.5%) were heterozygous out-of-frame indel (N=25) or nonsense (N=1) mutations in or proximal to the catalytic domain indicating the mutations result in loss-of-function (Supplementary Figure 2). Additional associations between mutations and T-ALL subtypes included CTCF (56.0% of 25 mutations) and KDM6A (42.9% of 21 mutations) in TLX3 cases, and KMT2A (77.8% of 18 mutations) in HOXA cases (Supplementary Table 19).

Mutational spectra of ETP and non-ETP T-ALL

ETP ALL has previously been described to be a distinct form of leukemia with characteristic immunophenotypic, transcriptomic, genetic, and clinical features compared to other T-ALL cases.[3] Prior studies have reported a mutational spectrum enriched for mutations in transcriptional, epigenetic and signaling genes more characteristic of myeloid malignancies.[3,68] As expected, many (7 of 19) ETP ALL cases fell in the LMO2/LYL1 overexpressing group, but with additional cases in the HOXA (N=3), TAL1 (N=2) and TLX3 (N=4) subgroups (Supplementary Table 6). Alterations in transcriptional regulators were nearly universal, occurring in 89.5% of ETP ALL, 87.5% of near-ETP and 89.0% of non-ETP cases). Alterations in JAK-STAT signaling (47.4% c.f. 25.0%/21.9%, P=0.05), Ras signaling (36.8% c.f. 20.8%/10.3%, P=0.005) and epigenetic regulation (84.2% c.f. 83.3%/65.8%, P=0.08) were more common, and cell cycle alterations (31.6% c.f. 87.5%/87.0%, P<0.001) less common (Supplementary Table 19). Genes more frequently altered in ETP ALL included FLT3 (5 of 9 in ETP cases, P<0.001), WT1 (8 of 21 in ETP, P<0.001), IKZF1 (3 of 8 ETP, P=0.029) and MED12 (4 of 6 in ETP, P<0.001) and rearrangement of NUP98 (3 of 4 cases in ETP ALL, P<0.001). FLT3 was also overexpressed in ETP versus near-/non-ETP cases, with five of 8 cases with highest FLT3 expression having concomitant mutations (data not shown). In contrast, genes less commonly mutated in ETP ALL were CDKN2A/B, CNOT3, DDX3X, FBXW7, LEF1, MYCN and RPL10, alterations of which were exclusively observed in non-ETP cases.

Genomic determinants of outcome

The incidence of relapse was only 7.5% (95% CI ±1.7%) in this cohort, and the only univariable associations with relapse identified were with AKT1, MLLT10, CNOT3 and PTEN alterations (see supplementary results and Supplementary Tables 20 – 23).

Discussion

Although many of the most frequent mutations in T-ALL have previously been described, by performing integrated genomic analysis in a large cohort of T-ALL cases, we have identified a large number of unrecognized targets of mutation, and demonstrated stage- and subtype-specific associations between genes, cellular pathway and outcome. While many mutated genes reside in a “long tail” of mutations, in silico functional analysis shown that many of these mutations are likely deleterious and contribute to the pathogenesis of ALL. Moreover, many such genes fall in pathways known to be mutated in T-ALL (including JAK-STAT, Ras and PTEN-PI3K signaling pathways), thereby increasing the proportion of T-ALL cases with mutations in these pathways that are potentially amenable to therapeutic approaches with signal transduction inhibitors. We also show that many of the known targets of mutation are altered at greater frequency than previously recognized (e.g. NOTCH1), and that subclonal and multiclonal mutations are more prevalent than previously recognized. This is consistent with the notion that many of these mutations are acquired as secondary events subsequent to the founding alterations deregulating hematopoietic transcription factors. This is also a finding of potential therapeutic relevance, as we show that multiple signaling mutations commonly co-occur in the same clone. This supports the rationale for targeting these pathway(s) in such cases. In addition to identifying new targets of mutation, the integrated analysis identified multiple new modalities of mutation in known T-ALL driver genes, including sequence mutations and enhancer alterations deregulating MYCN, novel rearrangements and mutations of MYB, rearrangements and complex mutations of ZFP36L2, and novel TAL1 enhancer mutations. As proof of principal, we show that the MYCN mutations accelerate leukemogenesis, in part by stabilizing protein expression. This integrated analysis also suggests that genetic alterations, such as the common broad deletion of 6q, is likely to promote tumorigenesis by disrupting multiple genes, although this will require formal testing in models that engineer the deletion or disrupt the activity of multiple genes in the region simultaneously. A limitation of this study is that whole genome sequencing was not performed on all cases. Analysis of RNA-seq, exome and DNA copy number data failed to identify lesions activating key transcription factors in a proportion of cases. Using whole genome sequencing in a subset of cases, we identified additional rearrangements in a subset of cases. Thus, comprehensive definition of the genomic landscape of T-ALL will require this approach. The multi-modality genomic analysis performed in all cases enabled a detailed analysis of associations between mutated gene and subtypes of ALL that are considered to arise at defined stages of thymic development. We show that while several pathways are mutated in the majority of cases, mutations in individual genes (e.g. JAK-STAT, Ras or PTEN mutations; ETV6 or RUNX1 transcription factor mutations; and PHF6 and USP7 epigenetic mutations) are significantly enriched in different ALL subtypes. This suggests that not only are these alterations leukemogenic cooperative driver events with the founding alterations deregulating transcription factors, but that these genes may have central roles in distinct stages of thymic ontogeny, and are “primed” for mutational deregulation following acquisition of a sentinel rearrangement in specific progenitors. Consequently, this detailed portrait of the T-ALL genomic landscape offers a rational foundation for the design of genetic models of T-ALL that faithfully mirror the human disease.

ONLINE METHODS

Patients and samples

264 consecutively recruited children and young adults with available banked diagnostic and remission material on the Children’s Oncology Group Study of T-lineage ALL (NCT00408005) were studied. The study was approved by the St Jude Children’s Research Hospital Institutional Review Board. Informed consent or assent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians.

Exome sequencing

Exome sequencing was performed by Beckman Coulter Genomics (Danvers, MA) or at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital. In general, samples with at least 1μg each of tumor and remission DNA were sequenced at Beckman Coulter (216 samples), and those with limiting material at St Jude. Details are as follows.

Beckman Coulter Genomics

DNA shearing was performed using Covaris instrument library construction a done on a Beckman Coulter Biomek FXP using Beckman Coulter Genomics SPRIworks HT Kit (https://www.beckmancoulter.com/wsrportal/wsr/research-and-discovery/products-and-services/next-gen-library-preparation/spriworks-ht/index.htm). First-round PCR (4–8 cycles) was performed using primers appropriate for Illumina (GA and HiSeq) sequencers, and clean-up steps with BC/Agencourt AMPure XP beads. Target capture utilized SureSelectXT Human All Exon V5 (Agilent Technologies) and supplied hybridization and associated reagents. Second-round PCR (10–16 cycles) used TruSeq index adapters. Library quality control was performed using a TapeStation (Agilent) and qPCR using Kapa standard curves. Sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2000 and 2500 sequencers in high-output (TruSeq SBS v3), rapid-high-output (HiSeq SBS v4) and rapid run (HiSeq Rapid SBS v1) modes. All runs were 100 nucleotide paired end reads, analyzed with on-board software RTA v1.18 and HCS v2.2.

St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Library construction utilized DNA tagmentation (fragmentation and adapter attachment) performed using the reagent provided in the Illumina Nextera rapid exome kit, and was performed using the Caliper Biosciences (Perking Elmer) Sciclone G3. First-round PCR (10 cycles) was performed using Illumina Nextera kit reagents, and clean-up steps employ BC/Agencourt AMPure XP beads. Target capture utilized Illumina Nextera rapid capture exome kit and supplied hybridization and associated reagents. The pre-hybridization pool size was 12 samples, and second round PCR (10 cycles) performed with Nextera kit reagents. Library quality control was performed using a Victor fluorescence plate reader with Quant-it dsDNA reagents for pre-pool quantitation, and Agilent Bio-analyzer 2200 for final library quantitation. Sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2500 instruments in high output mode using TruSeq SBS v3 chemistry. All runs were 100-nt paired end reads, and data analyzed using on-board software RTA v1.18 and HCS v2.2. A detailed comparison of coverage using the two sequencing approaches is available upon request.

Whole Exome Sequencing Analysis

Paired-end reads were aligned to the reference human genome assembly GRCh37-lite using BWA[69] (version 0.5.10), and analyzed as previously described[24], including coverage and quality assessment, single nucleotide variation (SNV) and indel detection, annotation and prediction of deleterious effects for sequence mutations. High C>A/G>T mutation rate was observed in a subset of 43 samples that had shorter library insert size (ranging from 88bp to 141bp, with a median of 103bp) than the expected median library insert size of 190bp. Variants detected in these samples shown enrichment for subclonal C>A or G>T mutations, which matched the profile of previously described 8-oxoG mutations caused by sequencing artifacts introduced by DNA shearing during library construction[57]. For these samples, we applied a filter to remove the low MAF (≤ 0.2) C>A or G>T mutations except for those that were detected in samples with expected library insert size. A subset (N=271) of novel or complex sequence mutations was selected for verification by amplicon-based next generation sequencing. We included 21 of potential artifactual 8-oxoG variants (Supplementary Table 6), none of which were verified. Driver mutations were identified based on the analysis of MutSigCV[50], MuSiC[51] and Medal Ceremony, a novel algorithm that we developed to assess mutation pathogenicity based on match to known hotspots in oncogenes or loss-of-function in known tumor suppressor genes (M.E. et al., manuscript in preparation). Expression of the mutant allele is required to consider a missense mutation a candidate driver if it was not identified by MutSigCV or MuSIC. The sequence mutations were visualized in PeCan Data Portal[70] (https://pecan.stjude.org/home).

RNA-sequencing

TRIzol was used to extract RNA from acute lymphoblastic leukemia samples of bone marrow or peripheral blood. 500ng DNaseI treated total RNA had ribosomal RNA removed using Ribo-Zero rRNA removal beads and was converted into a cDNA library using Illumina TruSeq stranded Total RNA Kit with Ribo-Zero Gold. After adapter ligation each cDNA library was purified and enriched by PCR amplification. Each library underwent 100-cycle paired-end sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 2000. Four samples were multiplexed into each flow cell lane for sequencing. Base calls and quality scores were produced by CASAVA 1.8.

RNA Sequencing Analysis

RNA-seq data were mapped using StrongArm (M.R. et al., manuscript in preparation) and rearrangements were identified using CICERO as previously described[71]. Gene level read count was generated using HTseq-count[72] and FPKM value was calculated based on the transcript models in GENCODE v19. Quantile normalization was applied to the log2 transformed FPKM matrix. Only gene expressed (defined as FPKM > 1) in more than 30% of samples were further analyzed[73]. Median absolute deviation (MAD) was calculated for each gene across the cohort and top 500 genes with largest MAD were selected for cluster analysis using Ward’s minimum variance method.

Vector constructs and lentiviral production

A hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged wild-type MYCN cDNA in the mouse stem cell virus-internal ribosome entry site-yellow fluorescent protein (MSCV-IRES-YFP) retroviral vector was provided by Dr. Gerard Grosveld[74]. The MSCV-HA-MYCN region was excised from the retroviral vector with XbaI and DraIII and cloned into a self-inactivating CL20 lentiviral vector backbone to yield a CL20-HA-NMYC-IRES-GFP vector. The introduction of a point mutation at codon 44 changing the native amino acid from proline to leucine was performed with the QuikChange II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Ecotropic lentivirus was produced by transient transfection of 293T cells with helper plasmids and then concentrated by centrifugation.

Thymocyte transduction and transplantation

Thymi were explanted from 4–8 week old Arf−/− mice[75] and single cell suspensions prepared. Thymocytes were then stained with CD4-phycoerythrin (PE), CD8-PE, and Ter119-PE antibodies (BD), incubated at 4°C for 10 min, washed with MACS buffer (PBS, MACS BSA Stock Solution (Miltenyi Biotec), and 2 mM EDTA (Sigma), and incubated with anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 15 min. Cells washed with MACS buffer were centrifuged, filtered, and placed on a pre-rinsed LS column (Miltenyi Biotec). Unattached CD4-/CD8-/Ter119- cells were collected and the purity of the “double-negative” thymocyte population was analyzed by flow cytometry. For viral vector transduction, the CD4-/CD8- thymocytes were plated at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/well on OP9-DL1 stromal cells (gift from J.C. Zuniga-Pflucker, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) in α-MEM (Invitrogen) containing 20% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, glutamine, sodium pyruvate, and supplemented with 5 ng/ml each of FLT-3 (R&D Systems) and IL-7 (PeproTech). After 24 hours, polybrene was added and the cells were transduced with 1ml of vector supernatant collected from 293T cells, and spun at 2000 RPM for 1h at room temperature. This transduction was repeated again at 48h. Every 2–3 days, thymocytes were replated onto fresh OP9-DL1 cells and on day 8 were immunophenotyped by flow cytometric analysis. Vector-transduced thymocytes were harvested from OP9-DL1 cell cultures on day 10 and transplanted by tail vein injection into sublethally irradiated (6Gy) female γc−/−Rag2−/− mice. In the initial primary transplant, 1×106 bulk cells containing 92% and 88% vector positive cells for wild-type or mutant MYCN, respectively were transplanted. In the second primary transplant, 0.5×106 bulk cells containing 70% and 53% vector positive cells for wild-type or mutant MYCN, respectively were transplanted. No randomization or blinding was performed. All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

Histology and immunophenotypic analysis

Tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and immunohistochemistry was performed using standard procedures. Slides of 4–6μm sections were cut from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues, and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method using anti-Myeloperoxidase, CD3, B220, CD117, GATA-1, RUNX1, and TdT antibodies. Peripheral blood was collected in 10 mmol/L EDTA for standard CBCs and smears stained with Wright-Giemsa. Expression of cell surface markers and GFP was measured by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences Fortessa) using fluorophore-conjugated antibodies to CD4, CD8, CD25, CD44, CD3, B220, Gr1, Mac1, Ter119, and (BD Pharminogen, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

Immunoblot analysis

Protein lysates were extracted from unsorted splenic tumor samples using fresh RIPA lysis and extraction buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) prepared with cOmplete protease inhibitor and PhosSTOP phosphotase inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Protein concentration was quantified by the BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Tumor samples were separated by electrophoresis in MOPS buffer on 4–12% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen), transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Invitrogen), blocked with 5% milk, and probed using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against HA (Y-11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) at a 1/200 dilution. The secondary antibody utilized was a donkey anti-rabbit (GE Healthcare) at a dilution of 1/500 and an antibody to beta actin (C-4, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) was used at a dilution of 1/1000 to control for protein loading.

Cycloheximide stability assays

NIH 3T3 Cells were transduced with HA-tagged constructs expressing either MYC-WT or the MYCN P44L mutant, treated with cycloheximide (20ug/mL), and collected at baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 minutes for protein analysis. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Sigma) and 30μg of protein was loaded on 4–12% NuPage Bis-Tris gels (Life Technologies) and electrophoresed at 200V for 1 hour. Blots were simultaneously probed with anti-HA-Tag (1:1,000; SIGMA #SAB4300603) and actin (1:1,000; S. Cruz #sc-1615) antibodies, subsequently detected using fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies, and quantified using Odyssey Imaging System Studio Software (v4.0, LI-COR Biosciences). The HA signal was log-transformed and curves fitted using the least squares method, and curves compared by F test in Prism (GraphPad).

Statistical analysis

Associations between categorical values were examined using Fisher’s exact test. These included associations of T-ALL subtype and gene/pathway, and subtype/gene/pathway with level of minimal residual disease (MRD). Data are reported as P values without correction for multiple comparisons. Associations between T-ALL subtype and treatment outcome (event-free survival and overall survival) were performed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator with Peto’s estimator of standard deviation and the log-rank test[76-78]. An event was defined as a failure to achieve remission, a relapse after remission, or the development of a second malignancy. Analyses were performed using Prism v6.0 (GraphPad), R (www.r-project.org)[79], and SAS (v9.1.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Integrated analysis and statistical modeling of genomic data is described in detail in Supplementary Results.

Data availability

Data may be accessed through the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) website at https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target. The NCI TARGET initiative specifies and supports the long-term deposition and maintenance of the data files, methods and quality control steps involved in the comprehensive genomic analysis of TARGET samples. The sequencing BAM and FASTQ files from whole exome and RNA-seq are accessible through the database of genotypes and phenotypes (dbGaP, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap) under the accession numbers phs000218 (TARGET) and substudy specific accession phs000464 (TARGET ALL Expansion Phase 2). Gene expression, chromosome segmental copy number, SNV/indel, structural variants, and the clinical information are available through the TARGET Data Matrix (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target/data-matrix). These are annotated within MIAME-compliant MAGE-TAB metadata files fully describing the methods, the specimen processing details and the quality control parameters. The genomic landscape reported in this study could be explored at the St. Jude PeCan Data Portal available at http://pecan.stjude.org/proteinpaint/study/target-tall.
  76 in total

1.  WT1 mutations in T-ALL.

Authors:  Valeria Tosello; Marc R Mansour; Kelly Barnes; Maddalena Paganin; Maria Luisa Sulis; Sarah Jenkinson; Christopher G Allen; Rosemary E Gale; David C Linch; Teresa Palomero; Pedro Real; Vundavalli Murty; Xiaopan Yao; Susan M Richards; Anthony Goldstone; Jacob Rowe; Giuseppe Basso; Peter H Wiernik; Elisabeth Paietta; Rob Pieters; Martin Horstmann; Jules P P Meijerink; Adolfo A Ferrando
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Oncogene regulation. An oncogenic super-enhancer formed through somatic mutation of a noncoding intergenic element.

Authors:  Marc R Mansour; Brian J Abraham; Lars Anders; Alla Berezovskaya; Alejandro Gutierrez; Adam D Durbin; Julia Etchin; Lee Lawton; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; Mignon L Loh; Stephen P Hunger; Takaomi Sanda; Richard A Young; A Thomas Look
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Novel activating STAT5B mutations as putative drivers of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  M Kontro; H Kuusanmäki; S Eldfors; T Burmeister; E I Andersson; O Bruserud; T H Brümmendorf; H Edgren; B T Gjertsen; M Itälä-Remes; S Lagström; O Lohi; T Lundán; J M L Martí; M M Majumder; A Parsons; T Pemovska; H Rajala; K Vettenranta; O Kallioniemi; S Mustjoki; K Porkka; C A Heckman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  The H3K27me3 demethylase UTX is a gender-specific tumor suppressor in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Joni Van der Meulen; Viraj Sanghvi; Konstantinos Mavrakis; Kaat Durinck; Fang Fang; Filip Matthijssens; Pieter Rondou; Monica Rosen; Tim Pieters; Peter Vandenberghe; Eric Delabesse; Tim Lammens; Barbara De Moerloose; Björn Menten; Nadine Van Roy; Bruno Verhasselt; Bruce Poppe; Yves Benoit; Tom Taghon; Ari M Melnick; Frank Speleman; Hans-Guido Wendel; Pieter Van Vlierberghe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Candidate tumor-suppressor genes MTS1 (p16INK4A) and MTS2 (p15INK4B) display frequent homozygous deletions in primary cells from T- but not from B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemias.

Authors:  J Hebert; J M Cayuela; J Berkeley; F Sigaux
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Somatic mutations of JAK1 and JAK3 in acute leukemias and solid cancers.

Authors:  Eun Goo Jeong; Min Sung Kim; Hyo Kyung Nam; Chang Ki Min; Seok Lee; Yeun Jun Chung; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Interleukin-7 receptor mutants initiate early T cell precursor leukemia in murine thymocyte progenitors with multipotent potential.

Authors:  Louise M Treanor; Sheng Zhou; Laura Janke; Michelle L Churchman; Zhijun Ma; Taihe Lu; Shann-Ching Chen; Charles G Mullighan; Brian P Sorrentino
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Trevor J Pugh; Olena Morozova; Edward F Attiyeh; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Jun S Wei; Daniel Auclair; Scott L Carter; Kristian Cibulskis; Megan Hanna; Adam Kiezun; Jaegil Kim; Michael S Lawrence; Lee Lichenstein; Aaron McKenna; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Alex H Ramos; Erica Shefler; Andrey Sivachenko; Carrie Sougnez; Chip Stewart; Adrian Ally; Inanc Birol; Readman Chiu; Richard D Corbett; Martin Hirst; Shaun D Jackman; Baljit Kamoh; Alireza Hadj Khodabakshi; Martin Krzywinski; Allan Lo; Richard A Moore; Karen L Mungall; Jenny Qian; Angela Tam; Nina Thiessen; Yongjun Zhao; Kristina A Cole; Maura Diamond; Sharon J Diskin; Yael P Mosse; Andrew C Wood; Lingyun Ji; Richard Sposto; Thomas Badgett; Wendy B London; Yvonne Moyer; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Malcolm A Smith; Jaime M Guidry Auvil; Daniela S Gerhard; Michael D Hogarty; Steven J M Jones; Eric S Lander; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Robert C Seeger; Javed Khan; Marco A Marra; Matthew Meyerson; John M Maris
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes.

Authors:  Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Paz Polak; Gregory V Kryukov; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrey Sivachenko; Scott L Carter; Chip Stewart; Craig H Mermel; Steven A Roberts; Adam Kiezun; Peter S Hammerman; Aaron McKenna; Yotam Drier; Lihua Zou; Alex H Ramos; Trevor J Pugh; Nicolas Stransky; Elena Helman; Jaegil Kim; Carrie Sougnez; Lauren Ambrogio; Elizabeth Nickerson; Erica Shefler; Maria L Cortés; Daniel Auclair; Gordon Saksena; Douglas Voet; Michael Noble; Daniel DiCara; Pei Lin; Lee Lichtenstein; David I Heiman; Timothy Fennell; Marcin Imielinski; Bryan Hernandez; Eran Hodis; Sylvan Baca; Austin M Dulak; Jens Lohr; Dan-Avi Landau; Catherine J Wu; Jorge Melendez-Zajgla; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda; Amnon Koren; Steven A McCarroll; Jaume Mora; Brian Crompton; Robert Onofrio; Melissa Parkin; Wendy Winckler; Kristin Ardlie; Stacey B Gabriel; Charles W M Roberts; Jaclyn A Biegel; Kimberly Stegmaier; Adam J Bass; Levi A Garraway; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Dmitry A Gordenin; Shamil Sunyaev; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  284 in total

1.  Eradication of Central Nervous System Leukemia of T-Cell Origin with a Brain-Permeable LSD1 Inhibitor.

Authors:  Shiori Saito; Jiro Kikuchi; Daisuke Koyama; Shin Sato; Hiroo Koyama; Naoki Osada; Yoshiaki Kuroda; Koshi Akahane; Takeshi Inukai; Takashi Umehara; Yusuke Furukawa
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Using genomics to define pediatric blood cancers and inform practice.

Authors:  Rachel E Rau; Mignon L Loh
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Susceptibility Loci for T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children.

Authors:  Maoxiang Qian; Xujie Zhao; Meenakshi Devidas; Wenjian Yang; Yoshihiro Gocho; Colton Smith; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Yizhen Li; Heng Xu; Shouyue Zhang; Sima Jeha; Xiaowen Zhai; Takaomi Sanda; Stuart S Winter; Kimberly P Dunsmore; Elizabeth A Raetz; William L Carroll; Naomi J Winick; Karen R Rabin; Patrick A Zweidler-Mckay; Brent Wood; Ching-Hon Pui; William E Evans; Stephen P Hunger; Charles G Mullighan; Mary V Relling; Mignon L Loh; Jun J Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Updates in the Pathology of Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms in the Revised Fourth Edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues.

Authors:  Christopher Wenzinger; Eli Williams; Alejandro A Gru
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 5.  Next-Generation Evaluation and Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Emily B Heikamp; Ching-Hon Pui
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 6.  3D Chromosomal Landscapes in Hematopoiesis and Immunity.

Authors:  Andreas Kloetgen; Palaniraja Thandapani; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Iannis Aifantis
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 7.  Challenges and Opportunities for Childhood Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Raushan T Kurmasheva
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  Genomic and clinical characterization of early T-cell precursor lymphoblastic lymphoma.

Authors:  Xinjie Xu; Christian N Paxton; Robert J Hayashi; Kimberly P Dunsmore; Stuart S Winter; Stephen P Hunger; Naomi J Winick; William L Carroll; Mignon L Loh; Meenakshi Devidas; Thomas G Gross; Catherine M Bollard; Sherrie L Perkins; Rodney R Miles
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-07-27

9.  Ribosomal Lesions Promote Oncogenic Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Sergey O Sulima; Kim R Kampen; Stijn Vereecke; Daniele Pepe; Laura Fancello; Jelle Verbeeck; Jonathan D Dinman; Kim De Keersmaecker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Pre-clinical evaluation of second generation PIM inhibitors for the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma.

Authors:  Renate De Smedt; Sofie Peirs; Julie Morscio; Filip Matthijssens; Juliette Roels; Lindy Reunes; Beatrice Lintermans; Steven Goossens; Tim Lammens; Nadine Van Roy; Aurore Touzart; Silvia Jenni; Yi-Chien Tsai; Federica Lovisa; Lara Mussolin; Valentina Serafin; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce; Anne Uyttebroeck; Thomas Tousseyn; Birgit Burkhardt; Wolfram Klapper; Barbara De Moerloose; Yves Benoit; Elizabeth Macintyre; Jean-Pierre Bourquin; Giuseppe Basso; Benedetta Accordi; Beat Bornhauser; Jules Meijerink; Peter Vandenberghe; Pieter Van Vlierberghe
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.