| Literature DB >> 35016658 |
Jiang Luo1,2,3,4, Yan Wang1,2,3,4, Yongze Zhang1,2,3,4, Xiaofang Yan1,2,3,4, Xiaoting Huang1,2,3,4, Fengying Zhao5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was designed for the research and development (R&D) and application of a storage inflow and outflow management system enabling departments to perform efficient, scientific, and information-based consumable management.Entities:
Keywords: Consumable management; Consumable storage inflow and outflow management system; Information based; Nursing management
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35016658 PMCID: PMC8753857 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01744-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ISSN: 1472-6947 Impact factor: 2.796
Fig. 1Introduction to the module functions and software interfaces of the in–out storage management system. The picture is a translated excerpt from the in–out storage management system for consumables described in this paper. Reference the attached software copyright certificate for details
Fig. 2Closed-loop management of consumables. The picture is a translated excerpt from the in–out storage management system for consumables described in this paper. Reference the attached software copyright certificate for details
Fig. 3Comparisons of the quantity of daily consumables per bed and monthly consumable storage outflow (*P < 0.05). a One-way ANOVA and least significant difference for post-test comparisons. b Kruskal–Wallis test and Nemeyi method for post-test comparisons
Fig. 4Comparisons of the number of missed bookkeeping events per month and types of expired stock (*P < 0.05). P < 0.05 one-way ANOVA and least significant difference for post-test comparisons
Fig. 5Time spent on registration, inventory, and discharge settlement in different management groups (*P < 0.05). P < 0.05 one-way ANOVA and least significant difference for post-test comparisons
Fig. 6The collection and use of blood glucose test strips and insulin needles in different groups
Comparison of burnout scores of nurses in different management groups (n = 22; *P < 0.05)
| January 2013 to February 2015 | March 2015 to February 2018 | March 2018 to December 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual group | Excel group | System group | ||
| Emotional fatigue | 22.9 ± 1.65 | 19.7 ± 1.72a | 17.2 ± 2.04 ab | < 0.001 |
| Job indifference | 8.75 ± 1.25 | 6.9 ± 1.37 a | 6 ± 1.3 ab | < 0.001 |
| Lack of sense of achievement | 35 ± 4.4 | 40.65 ± 3.12 a | 42.1 ± 2.61 a | < 0.001 |
aComparison with the manual group p < 0.05, bComparison with the Excel group p < 0.05;
P < 0.05, Repetitive measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant difference for post-test comparisons