Literature DB >> 31735577

Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Edward C Beck1, Benedict U Nwachukwu2, Nabil Mehta2, Kyleen Jan2, Kelechi R Okoroha2, Jonathan Rasio2, Shane J Nho2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To (1) define Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS), and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the visual analog scale (VAS) Satisfaction in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each outcome end-point.
METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between November 2014 and January 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with clinical and radiographic diagnosis of FAIS, who failed nonoperative treatment, underwent primary hip arthroscopy to address the FAIS, and had at minimum 2-year follow-up. Baseline data and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores were recorded at 2 years postoperatively. To quantify clinical significance of outcome achievement on the VAS)Satisfaction, we calculated MCID, PASS, and SCB for this outcome measure. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify preoperative predictors of achieving SCB, PASS, and MCID satisfaction.
RESULTS: A total of 335 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age and body mass index (BMI) of 32.8 (standard deviation ± 12.4) years and 25.2 (standard deviation ± 5.3), respectively, and the majority being female (69.3%). The values on the VAS satisfaction were identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively: 52.8, 80.9, and 89.7. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement on the VAS Satisfaction was 85.6%, 68.1%, and 56.9% for MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively. A larger preoperative alpha angle was predictive for achieving SCB (odds ratio [OR], 1.076; P = .046), whereas lower BMI (OR, 0.955; P = .047) and larger preoperative alpha angle (OR, 1.12; P = .025) were predictors for achieving PASS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified threshold VAS satisfaction scores of 52.8, 80.9, and 89.7 for achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS, respectively, at 2-year follow-up following hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Furthermore, preoperative variables including larger preoperative alpha angles and lower BMI are predictors of achieving superior clinical satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31735577     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eva De Wachter; Johan Vanlauwe; Robert Krause; Hans Bayer-Helms; Dirk Ganzer; Thierry Scheerlinck
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-10-05

2.  Research, development, and evaluation of the practical effect of a storage inflow and outflow management system for consumables in the endocrinology department of a hospital.

Authors:  Jiang Luo; Yan Wang; Yongze Zhang; Xiaofang Yan; Xiaoting Huang; Fengying Zhao
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Wei Sheng Foong; Gerald Joseph Zeng; Graham S Goh; Ying Hao; Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie; Paul Chee Cheng Chang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-04

4.  Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using the Forgotten Joint Score 12 After Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Patrick G Robinson; Paul Gaston; Thomas R Williamson; Iain R Murray; Julian F Maempel; Conor S Rankin; Deborah J MacDonald; David F Hamilton
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-30

5.  Collection of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Using a Smartphone Application Format Is Faster and Preferred When Compared With the Paper Version: A Pilot Study of rHip.

Authors:  David Zhu; Steven F DeFroda; Robert Browning; Ian M Clapp; Thomas D Alter; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-19

6.  Extent of Cam Resection Relative to Epiphyseal Line and Its Association With Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Syndrome.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Hong-Jie Huang; Zi-Yi He; Yan Xu; Xin Zhang; Jian-Quan Wang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment.

Authors:  Philip Winnock de Grave; Thomas Luyckx; Kurt Claeys; Thomas Tampere; Jonas Kellens; Jacobus Müller; Paul Gunst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.114

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.