BACKGROUND: The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is considered the "gold standard" for measuring burnout, encompassing 3 scales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Other well-being instruments have shown utility in various settings, and correlations between MBI and these instruments could provide evidence of relationships among key variables to guide well-being efforts. OBJECTIVE: We explored correlations between the MBI and other well-being instruments. METHODS: We fielded a multicenter survey of 9 emergency medicine (EM) residencies, administering the MBI and 4 published well-being instruments: a quality-of-life assessment, a work-life balance rating, an appraisal of career satisfaction, and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Patient Health Questionnaire 2 question screen. Consistent with the Maslach definition, burnout was defined by high emotional exhaustion (> 26) and high depersonalization (> 12). RESULTS: Of 334 residents, 261 (78%) responded. Residents who reported lower quality of life had higher emotional exhaustion (ρ = -0.437, P < .0001), higher depersonalization (ρ = -0.18, P < .005), and lower personal accomplishment (ρ = 0.347, P < .001). Residents who reported a negative work-life balance had emotional exhaustion (P < .001) and depersonalization (P < .009). Positive career satisfaction was associated with lower emotional exhaustion (P < .0001), lower depersonalization (P < .005), and higher personal accomplishment (P < .05). A positive depression screen was associated with higher emotional exhaustion, higher depersonalization, and lower personal achievement (all P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter study of EM residents demonstrated that assessments using the MBI correlate with other well-being instruments.
BACKGROUND: The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is considered the "gold standard" for measuring burnout, encompassing 3 scales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Other well-being instruments have shown utility in various settings, and correlations between MBI and these instruments could provide evidence of relationships among key variables to guide well-being efforts. OBJECTIVE: We explored correlations between the MBI and other well-being instruments. METHODS: We fielded a multicenter survey of 9 emergency medicine (EM) residencies, administering the MBI and 4 published well-being instruments: a quality-of-life assessment, a work-life balance rating, an appraisal of career satisfaction, and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Patient Health Questionnaire 2 question screen. Consistent with the Maslach definition, burnout was defined by high emotional exhaustion (> 26) and high depersonalization (> 12). RESULTS: Of 334 residents, 261 (78%) responded. Residents who reported lower quality of life had higher emotional exhaustion (ρ = -0.437, P < .0001), higher depersonalization (ρ = -0.18, P < .005), and lower personal accomplishment (ρ = 0.347, P < .001). Residents who reported a negative work-life balance had emotional exhaustion (P < .001) and depersonalization (P < .009). Positive career satisfaction was associated with lower emotional exhaustion (P < .0001), lower depersonalization (P < .005), and higher personal accomplishment (P < .05). A positive depression screen was associated with higher emotional exhaustion, higher depersonalization, and lower personal achievement (all P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter study of EM residents demonstrated that assessments using the MBI correlate with other well-being instruments.
Authors: A G E M de Boer; J J B van Lanschot; P F M Stalmeier; J W van Sandick; J B F Hulscher; J C J M de Haes; M A G Sprangers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald J Bechamps; Thomas Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie A Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald Bechamps; Tom Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Michelle Mungo; Jaime Schmitgen; Kristin A Storz; David Reeves; Sharonne N Hayes; Jeff A Sloan; Stephen J Swensen; Steven J Buskirk Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Douglas A Mata; Marco A Ramos; Narinder Bansal; Rida Khan; Constance Guille; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Srijan Sen Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Y Shoman; S C Marca; R Bianchi; L Godderis; H F van der Molen; I Guseva Canu Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Jeffrey T Sakamoto; Justin Lee; Dave W Lu; Vandana Sundaram; Steven B Bird; Andra L Blomkalns; Al'ai Alvarez Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Laura Cottey; Tom Roberts; Blair Graham; Daniel Horner; Kara Nicola Stevens; Doyo Enki; Mark David Lyttle; Jos Latour Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Revathi Jyothindran; James P d'Etienne; Kevin Marcum; Amy F Ho; Richard D Robinson; Aubre Tijerina; Clare Graca; Heidi C Knowles; Nestor R Zenarosa; Hao Wang Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2021-03-31