| Literature DB >> 35016642 |
Youxia Liu1, Hongfen Li2, Huyan Yu3, Fanghao Wang2, Junya Jia4, Tiekun Yan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The addition of sialic acid alters IgG from a pro-inflammatory state to an anti-inflammatory state. However, there is a lack of research on the changes of IgG sialylation in IgA nephropathy (IgAN).Entities:
Keywords: IL-6; IgA nephropathy; Immune complex; Sialylated IgG; Sialylated IgG-IgA1 complex; TGF-β; TNF-α
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35016642 PMCID: PMC8751338 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02657-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1Increased sialylated IgG (SA-IgG) in 184 patients with IgAN. A Plasma sialylated IgG levels in 184 patients with IgAN and 50 healthy controls. B The percentage of CD19+IgG+SNA+ cells in CD19+IgG+ cells from 24 patients with IgAN and 24 healthy controls. C Correlation between SA-IgG levels in plasma and CD19+IgG+ cells
The baseline data for IgAN patients with lower and higher sialylated IgG (SA-IgG) levels
| Characters | Mean ± SD or n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower SA-IgG (OD > 2.02) | Higher SA-IgG (< 2.02) | ||
| Gender (M/F) | 46 (50)/46 (50) | 43 (52)/39 (48) | 0.75 |
| Age (mean ± SD, year) | 39.3±13.36 | 40.12±13.36 | 0.68 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.52±18.21 | 132.59±16.73 | 0.68 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.58±11.51 | 82.68±11.51 | 0.22 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.57±4.02 | 24.88±3.86 | 0.62 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 133.64±16.74 | 129.16±18.74 | 0.09 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 36.78±5.19 | 36.90±4.85 | 0.87 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 2.06±1.66 | 2.25±2.44 | 0.57 |
| Serum creatinine (μmol/L) | 85.98±36.55 | 89.95±54.73 | 0.61 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 92.22±26.91 | 93.08±37.63 | 0.86 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 368.7±101.28 | 377.77±109.87 | 0.56 |
| Serum IgA (mg/dL) | 408.24±270.22 | 407.48±315.29 | 0.99 |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL) | 994.31±356.51 | 1066.39±347.24 | 0.18 |
| Serum IgM (mg/dL) | 105.19±43.75 | 118.53±56.22 | 0.09 |
| Serum IgE (mg/dL) | 88.24±181.58 | 132.19±471.25 | 0.44 |
| Serum C3 (mg/dL) | 89.96±17.5 | 90.43±17.93 | 0.86 |
| Serum C4 (mg/dL) | 22.22±6.11 | 24.55±8.64 | 0.06 |
| Proteinuria (mg/24 h) | 1853.82±1942.8 | 1644.17±1340.79 | 0.4 |
| Urine RBC (/HP) | 37.18±64.36 | 54.38±168.04 | 0.36 |
| Gd-IgA1 (μg/ml) | 12.23±6.94 | 10.14±5.06 | 0.02 |
| Oxford classification | |||
| M score (M0/M1) | 5 (6)/77(94) | 4(5)/78(95) | 0.73 |
| E score (E0/E1) | 51(62)/31 (38) | 46(56)/36 (44) | 0.43 |
| S score (S0/S1) | 38 (46)/44 (54) | 35(43)/47 (57) | 0.64 |
| T score (T0/T1/T2) | 37(45)/39 (48)/6 (7) | 35 (43)/40 (49)/8(8) | 0.84 |
| C score (C0/C1/C2) | 21 (26)/49 (60)/12 (14) | 20(24)/44 (54)/18 (22) | 0.48 |
Fig. 2Verification of successful preparation of SA-IgG, NSA-IgG and complexes. A Sialic acid status of IgG and IgG-IgA1 complex were detected by sialic acid ELISA kit. SA-IgG and its complex showed high levels of sialic acid . In contrary, NSA-IgG and its complex showed low levels of sialic acid. B Existence of SA-IgG, NSA-IgG and complexes were tested by Western blot
Fig. 3The expression of IgG-Gd-IgA1 complex after sialylated IgG (SA-IgG) stimulation in supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Fig. 4Assay for proliferation after sialylated IgG (SA-IgG) stimulation in supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Fig. 5The expression of IL-6 (A), TNF-α (B) and TGF-β (C) in supernatant of mesangial cells after SA-IgG-IgA1 and NSA-IgG-IgA1 stimulation from patients of IgAN and healthy controls