Jinghua Wang1, Peng Xie2, Jian-Min Huang3, Yan Qu4, Fang Zhang3, Ling-Ge Wei3, Peng Fu3, Xiao-Jie Huang3. 1. Department of Nephrology, Bethune International Peace Hospital, No. 398 of Zhongshan Western Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China. 2. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, People's Republic of China. woxinfly1982@126.com. 3. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Research, The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation improved the performance of original one in determining GFR in Chinese patients with CKD. METHOD: A well-designed paired cohort was set up. Measured GFR (mGFR) was the result of 99mTc-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method. The estimated GFR (eGFR) was the result of the CKD-EPI equation (eGFR1) and the new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation (eGFR2). The comparisons were performed to evaluate the superiority of the eGFR2 in bias, accuracy, precision, concordance correlation coefficient and the slope of regression equation and measure agreement. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled and analyzed. The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation improved the performance of the original one in bias and accuracy. However, nearly identical performance was observed in the respect of precision, concordance correlation coefficient, slope of eGFR against mGFR and 95 % limit of agreement. In the subgroup of GFR < 60 mL min-1/1.73 m2, the bias of eGFR1 was less than eGFR2 but they have comparable precision and accuracy. In the subgroup of GFR > 60 mL min-1/1.73 m2, eGFR2 performed better than eGFR1 in terms of bias and accuracy. CONCLUSION: The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation can lead to more accurate GFR estimation in Chinese patients with CKD in general practice, especially in the higher GFR group.
OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation improved the performance of original one in determining GFR in Chinese patients with CKD. METHOD: A well-designed paired cohort was set up. Measured GFR (mGFR) was the result of 99mTc-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method. The estimated GFR (eGFR) was the result of the CKD-EPI equation (eGFR1) and the new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation (eGFR2). The comparisons were performed to evaluate the superiority of the eGFR2 in bias, accuracy, precision, concordance correlation coefficient and the slope of regression equation and measure agreement. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled and analyzed. The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation improved the performance of the original one in bias and accuracy. However, nearly identical performance was observed in the respect of precision, concordance correlation coefficient, slope of eGFR against mGFR and 95 % limit of agreement. In the subgroup of GFR < 60 mL min-1/1.73 m2, the bias of eGFR1 was less than eGFR2 but they have comparable precision and accuracy. In the subgroup of GFR > 60 mL min-1/1.73 m2, eGFR2 performed better than eGFR1 in terms of bias and accuracy. CONCLUSION: The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation can lead to more accurate GFR estimation in Chinese patients with CKD in general practice, especially in the higher GFR group.
Authors: A S Levey; R Atkins; J Coresh; E P Cohen; A J Collins; K-U Eckardt; M E Nahas; B L Jaber; M Jadoul; A Levin; N R Powe; J Rossert; D C Wheeler; N Lameire; G Eknoyan Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2007-06-13 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: June Fabian; Jaya A George; Harriet R Etheredge; Manuel van Deventer; Robert Kalyesubula; Alisha N Wade; Laurie A Tomlinson; Stephen Tollman; Saraladevi Naicker Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2019-08-19
Authors: Ahmed Alaini; Deepak Malhotra; Helbert Rondon-Berrios; Christos P Argyropoulos; Zeid J Khitan; Dominic S C Raj; Mark Rohrscheib; Joseph I Shapiro; Antonios H Tzamaloukas Journal: World J Methodol Date: 2017-09-26
Authors: Vera E Bukkems; Elise J Smolders; Gonzague Jourdain; David M Burger; Angela P Colbers; Tim R Cressey Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 3.126