| Literature DB >> 35012664 |
Meseret Belete Fite1, Abera Kenay Tura2,3, Tesfaye Assebe Yadeta2, Lemessa Oljira4, Kedir Teji Roba2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Appropriate dietary practices in pregnancy are critical to meet the increased metabolic and physiological demands; however, information about dietary practices among pregnant women, particularly rural residents, is limited. The study aimed to assess the level of appropriate dietary practices and associated determinants among pregnant women in Haramaya District, eastern Ethiopia, 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary diversity; Dietary practice; Ethiopia; Food variety score; Pregnancy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35012664 PMCID: PMC8751267 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-021-00494-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nutr ISSN: 2055-0928
Socio-demographic of pregnant women in Haramaya District, eastern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 448)
| Variables | Frequency(n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| < 18 | 25 | 5.58 |
| 18–35 | 400 | 89.29 |
| > 35 | 23 | 5.13 |
| Mean ( | 25.68( | |
| Educational level of the woman | ||
| Can’t read or write | 331 | 73.88 |
| Read or write | 26 | 5.81 |
| Formal education | 91 | 20.31 |
| Educational Level of husband | 49 (23.33) | |
| Can’t read or write | 259 | 57.81 |
| Read or write | 61 | 13.62 |
| Grade 1–8 | 102 | 22.77 |
| Grade 9 and above | 26 | 5.8 |
| Occupation of the woman | ||
| Housewives | 433 | 96.65 |
| Merchants | 15 | 3.65 |
| Occupation of husband | ||
| Farmers | 420 | 93.75 |
| Daily labors | 28 | 6.25 |
| Family size | ||
| 1–5 | 343 | 76.56 |
| | 105 | 23.44 |
| Agricultural land possession | ||
| No | 271 | 60.49 |
| Yes | 177 | 39.51 |
| Livestock possession | ||
| Yes | 299 | 66.74 |
| No | 149 | 33.26 |
| Wealth Index (Quintile) | ||
| Poorest | 90 | 20.09 |
| Poor | 90 | 20.09 |
| Middle | 89 | 19.87 |
| Rich | 90 | 20.09 |
| Richest | 89 | 19.87 |
| Parity | ||
| 0 | 103 | 22.99 |
| 1–4 | 294 | 65.63 |
| | 51 | 11.38 |
Dietary practices of pregnant women in Haramaya district, eastern Ethiopia,2021
| Variables | Frequency(n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) | ||
| Low | 316 | 70.54 |
| High | 132 | 29.46 |
| Mean ( | 3.73( | |
| Food Variety Sore (FVS) | ||
| Low | 280 | 62.50 |
| High | 168 | 37.50 |
| Mean ( | 9.03( | |
| Animal Source Foods (ASFs) | ||
| Low | 337 | 75.22 |
| High | 111 | 24.78 |
| Mean ( | 25.68( | |
| Meal frequency | ||
| < 4 | 331 | 73.88 |
| | 117 | 26.12 |
| Mean ( | 2.98( | |
| Dietary practice | ||
| Appropriate | 433 | 96.65 |
| Inappropriate | 15 | 3.65 |
Fig. 1Percentage of different food groups consumed by pregnant women in Haramaya District, Eastern Ethiopia,2021
Factors associated with dietary practice among pregnant women in Haramaya district, eastern Ethiopia, 2021
| Variables | Dietary Practice | CPR (95%CI) | APR (95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appropriate | Inappropriate | ||||
| Educational Level of Husband | |||||
| Illiterate | 33 (48.53) | 287 (75.53) | 1 | 1 | |
| Elementary School | 26 (38) | 2.47 (1.554, 3.929) | 1.99 (1.214, 3.280) | 0.006* | |
| High school and above | 9 (13.24) | 17 (4.47) | 3.37 (1.806, 6.239) | 1.92 (1.063, 3.460) | |
| Occupational status of Women | |||||
| Housewives | 61 (89.71) | 372 (97.89) | 1 | 1 | |
| Merchants | 7 (10.29) | 8 (2.11) | 3.31 (1.837, 5.973) | 2.07 (1.071, 4.016) | 0.030* |
| ANC visit | |||||
| No | 17 (25.00) | 147 (38.6) | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 51 (75.00) | 233 (61.32) | 1.73 (1.035, 2.898) | 1.36 (0.776,2.394) | 0.281 |
| Perceived Venerability | |||||
| No | 18 (26.47 | (67 (17.63) | 1 | 1 | |
| yes | 50 (73.53) | 313 (82.37) | 1.54 (0.947, 2.496) | 0.82 (0.469 1.428 | 0.481 |
| Perceived severity | |||||
| No | 47 (69.12) | 313 (82.37) | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 21 (30.88) | 67 (17.63) | 1.83 (1.155, 2.892) | 1.31 (0.747 2.303) | 0.346 |
| Perceived Benefit | |||||
| No | 39 (57.35) | 288 (75.79) | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 29 (42.65) | 92 (24.21) | 2.01 (1.302, 3.099) | 1.39 (0.811, 2.412) | 0.228 |
| Chat chewing | |||||
| No | 38 (55.88) | 142 (37.37) | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 30 (44.12) | 238 (62.63) | 0.53 (0.341, 0.824) | 0.58 (0.370, 0.901) | 0.016 |
| Drinking water | |||||
| Protected | 42 (61.76) | 156 (41.05) | 1 | 1 | |
| Unprotected | 26 (38.24) | 224 (58.95) | 0.49 (0.312,0.771) | 0.61 (0.350, 1.048) | 0.073 |
| Food restriction | |||||
| No | 53 (77.94) | 246 (64.74) | |||
| Yes | 15 (22.06 | 134 (35.26) | 0.57 (0.331, 0.974) | 0.36 (0.200, 0.651) | 0.001** |
| Food aversion (Strong disliked of foods) | |||||
| No | 47 (69.12) | 267 (70.26) | 1 | 1 | |
| yes | 21 (30.88) | 113 (29.74) | 0.96 (0.594, 1.533) | 0.99 (0.631, 1.554) | 0.967 |
Appropriate dietary practice: is defined as the consumption of at least four meals daily, high DDS, high FVS and high ASF; otherwise, Inappropriate dietary practice
Drinking water sources: ‘Protected’ if tap/hand pump and not otherwise Elementary school: Grade 1–8
CPR Crude Prevalence Ration, APR Adjusted Prevalence Ratio, CI Confidence Interval at 95%
CPR: was obtained from bi-variate of Poisson regression analysis model with robust variance estimate
APR, CI and P-Value were found from multivariable Poisson regression analysis model with robust variance estimate.
** statistically significant at p-value < 0.001, * statistically significant at p-value < 0.05