| Literature DB >> 31906981 |
Yeshalem Mulugeta Demilew1, Getu Degu Alene2, Tefera Belachew3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal dietary practice is a critical requisite for maternal nutrition. However, the majority of Ethiopian pregnant women have inadequate nutrient intakes. These may be due to their poor dietary habits. Identifying factors affecting the dietary practices of pregnant women is crucial to design appropriate interventions. In this country, the dietary practices of pregnant women and determinants are not well studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the dietary practices and associated factors among pregnant women in West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary diversity; Dietary practice; Food variety score; Pregnant women
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906981 PMCID: PMC6945405 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2702-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Socio-demographic characteristics of qualitative study participants in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
| Variable | Key-informant interviews ( | Focus-group-discussions( |
|---|---|---|
| Age in years | ||
| <=30 | 7 | 5 |
| 31–34 | 5 | 7 |
| 35–39 | 1 | 8 |
| > = 40 | 4 | 6 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 8 | 14 |
| Female | 9 | 12 |
| Occupation | ||
| Farmer | 5 | 20 |
| Clinical Nurse | 4 | |
| Midwife | 5 | 6 |
| Pharmacist(officer) | 1 | |
| Doctor | 2 | |
| Educational status | ||
| No formal education | 6 | 15 |
| Primary education | 1 | 5 |
| Diploma | 7 | 6 |
| Degree | 3 | |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 4 | 6 |
| Unmarried | 13 | 20 |
Socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics of pregnant women in West Gojjam Zone
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| < 20 | 42 | 6.1 |
| 20–24 | 138 | 19.9 |
| 25–29 | 207 | 29.8 |
| 30–34 | 171 | 24.6 |
| > =35 | 136 | 19.6 |
| Mean ( | 28.14( | |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox | 690 | 99.4 |
| Muslim | 4 | 0.6 |
| Educational status | ||
| Cannot read and write | 520 | 74.9 |
| Can read and write | 42 | 6.1 |
| Primary education | 84 | 12.1 |
| Secondary education | 48 | 6.9 |
| Occupational status | ||
| Housewife | 355 | 51.2 |
| Farmer | 339 | 48.8 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 687 | 99.0 |
| Single/ divorced | 7 | 1.0 |
| Husband education ( | ||
| Cannot read and write | 344 | 50.1 |
| Can read and write | 176 | 25.6 |
| Primary education | 120 | 17.5 |
| Secondary and above education | 47 | 6.8 |
| Husband occupation ( | ||
| Farmer | 686 | 99.9 |
| Government employee | 1 | 0.1 |
| Wealth index | ||
| Poorest | 126 | 18.1 |
| Poor | 151 | 21.8 |
| Medium | 139 | 20.0 |
| Rich | 142 | 20.5 |
| Richest | 136 | 19.6 |
| Family Size | ||
| < 5 | 358 | 51.6 |
| > =5 | 336 | 48.4 |
| Gravidity | ||
| 1 | 142 | 20.5 |
| 2–3 | 199 | 28.7 |
| 4–5 | 218 | 31.4 |
| > =6 | 135 | 19.4 |
| Parity | ||
| 0 | 153 | 22.0 |
| 1–3 | 331 | 47.7 |
| 4–5 | 159 | 22.9 |
| > =6 | 51 | 7.4 |
Dietary practice of pregnant women in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary practice | ||
| Appropriate | 138 | 19.9 |
| Inappropriate | 556 | 80.1 |
| Women dietary diversity | ||
| High | 229 | 33.0 |
| Low | 465 | 67.0 |
| Food variety score | ||
| Good (above the mean) | 322 | 46.4 |
| Poor (mean & lower) | 372 | 53.6 |
| Utilization of animal source food | ||
| High | 254 | 36.6 |
| Low | 440 | 63.4 |
| Frequency of meal/day | ||
| > =4 | 245 | 35.3 |
| < 4 | 449 | 64.7 |
Fig. 1Consumption of foods by pregnant women based on food groups in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
Factors associated with dietary practices of pregnant women in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
| Variable | Dietary practice | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appropriate | inappropriate | |||
| Get nutrition education | ||||
| Yes | 56(8.1) | 140(20.1) | 2.02(1.3,2.9) | |
| No | 82(11.8) | 416(60.0) | 1.00 | |
| Food secure | ||||
| Yes | 127(18.3) | 417(60.1) | 3.84(2.0,7.3) | 2.25(1.1,4.5) |
| No | 11(1.6) | 139(20.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Intention | ||||
| Yes | 95(13.7) | 260(37.5) | 2.51(1.7,3.7) | |
| No | 43(6.2) | 296(42.6) | 1.00 | |
| Knowledge on diet | ||||
| High | 65(9.4) | 108(15.6) | 5.61(3.4,9.1) | 3.23(1.9,5.5) |
| Medium | 42(6.0) | 159(22.9) | 2.46(1.5,4.1) | 1.81(1.1,3.1) |
| Low | 31(4.5) | 289(41.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Attitude | ||||
| Favorable | 76(11.0) | 154(22.2) | 3.20(2.1,4.6) | 1.69(1.1,2.6) |
| Unfavorable | 62(8.9) | 402(57.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Wealth index | ||||
| Richest | 42(6.1) | 94(13.5) | 3.30(1.7,6.3) | |
| Rich | 34(4.9) | 108(15.6) | 2.33(1.2,4.5) | |
| Medium | 21(3.0) | 118(17.0) | 1.31(0.6,2.6) | |
| Poor | 26(3.7) | 125(18.0) | 1.53(0.7,3.0) | |
| Poorest | 15(2.2) | 111(16.0) | 1.00 | |
| Family support | ||||
| Yes | 66(9.5) | 189(27.2) | 1.78(1.2,2.5) | |
| No | 72(10.4) | 367(52.9) | 1.00 | |
| Edible crop production | ||||
| High | 52(7.5) | 91(13.1) | 3.13 (2.0,4.7) | 2.00(1.2,3.2) |
| Low | 86(12.4) | 465(67.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Household decision making | ||||
| Yes | 105(15.1) | 358(51.6) | 1.76(1.1,2.7) | |
| No | 33(4.8) | 198(28.5) | 1.00 | |
| Perceived susceptibility | ||||
| Yes | 92(13.3) | 263(37.9) | 2.22(1.5,3.2) | |
| No | 46(6.6) | 293(42.2) | 1.00 | |
| Perceived severity | ||||
| Yes | 112(16.1) | 374(53.9) | 2.09(1.3,3.3) | |
| No | 26(3.8) | 182(26.2) | 1.00 | |
| Perceived benefit | ||||
| Yes | 112(16.1) | 345(49.7) | 2.63(1.6,4.1) | |
| No | 26(3.8) | 211(30.4) | 1.00 | |
| Vegetable production | ||||
| High | 72(10.4) | 170(24.5) | 2.47(1.7,3.6) | 1.50(1.1,2.2) |
| Low | 66(9.5) | 386(55.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
AOR Adjusted odds ratio, COR Crude odds ratio, 95%CI 95 % confidence interval