| Literature DB >> 35399554 |
Anteneh Berhane1,2, Tewodros Fikadu3, Tefera Belachew2.
Abstract
Despite the high burden of neural tube defects (NTD) in eastern Ethiopia, there is no evidence that it is related to maternal dietary practice. The aim of the present study was to compare dietary practice between women who gave birth to newborns with and without NTDs. A comparative cross-sectional study was performed on a total of 276 (138 in each group) mothers who delivered neonates with or without NTD. Study participants were selected from three hospitals found in the eastern part of Ethiopia. The dietary practice was determined using the indicators including meal frequency, dietary diversity score (DDS), food variety score (FVS) and consumption of animal source food (ASF) generated from the dietary data collected using validated and pre-tested Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to isolate independent predictors of dietary practices. The prevalence of good dietary practice was 29 % (95 % CI 23·6 %, 34·3 %). There was a significant difference in dietary practices (P = 0·034), in FVS (P = 0·01), in DDS (P = 0·045) between the two groups. In multivariable logistic regression, independent predictors of having good dietary practice were: not being the mother of a newborn with NTDs [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2·1, 95 % CI 1·07, 4·1], being from a rural residence area (AOR 0·29, 95 % CI 0·1, 0·7) and being illiterate (AOR 0·16, 95 % CI 0·03, 0·8). The present study found that dietary practice is associated with the development of NTDs. Nutrition education, food fortification and supplementation are needed to address this issue, and further research is needed to explore the mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; ASF, animal source food; CI, confidence interval; DDS, dietary diversity score; Developing neural tube defects; Dietary practice; FVS, food variety score; NTD, neural tube defect; OR, odds ratio; Pregnant women
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399554 PMCID: PMC8943563 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2022.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Socio-demographic data among the case group and the comparison group in Eastern Ethiopia
| Variables | Case group ( | Comparison group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| Living area | |||||
| Urban | 81 | 58·7 | 78 | 56·5 | |
| Rural | 57 | 41·3 | 60 | 43·5 | |
| Maternal age | |||||
| 15–24 | 57 | 41·3 | 37 | 26·8 | |
| 25–34 | 67 | 48·6 | 86 | 62·3 | |
| >34 | 14 | 10·1 | 15 | 10·9 | |
| Educational status | |||||
| No formal education | 23 | 16·7 | 30 | 21·7 | |
| Primary (1–8) | 70 | 50·7 | 65 | 45·7 | |
| Secondary (9–12) | 37 | 26·8 | 28 | 20·3 | |
| Tertiary education | 8 | 5·8 | 17 | 12·3 | |
| Occupational status | |||||
| Governmental | 13 | 9·4 | 9 | 6·5 | |
| Housewife | 90 | 65·2 | 89 | 64·5 | |
| Private | 15 | 10·9 | 20 | 14·5 | |
| Daily worker | 20 | 14·5 | 20 | 14·5 | |
| Family size | |||||
| 1–3 | 48 | 34·8 | 53 | 38·4 | |
| 4–6 | 41 | 29·7 | 48 | 34·8 | |
| >7 | 49 | 35·5 | 37 | 26·8 | |
All results are described as Pearson's chi square and all p values are p < 0.05 (*).
Fig. 1.Percentage of foods groups consumed by the case and comparison groups of cohort pregnant women in eastern Ethiopia.
Food groups consumed during the 3-month dietary recalls, among participant women's case and comparison group in Eastern Ethiopias
| Characteristics | Case group ( | Comparison group ( | Mean difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | |||
| Starchy and staple foods | 5·5 (2·13) | 5·4 (2·11) | 0·00725 | |
| Beans and peas | 5·5 (3·75) | 5·7 (3·5) | 0·10145 | |
| Nuts and seeds | 0·1 (0·3) | 0·1 (0·3) | 0·01449 | |
| Dairy | 1·01(1·0) | 1·16 (0·89) | −0·01449 | |
| Flesh foods | 0·18 (0·38) | 0·13 (0·4) | −0·0942 | |
| Eggs | 0·25 (0·43) | 0·19 (0·39) | 0·10145 | |
| Vitamin A-rich DGLV | 0·64 (0·49) | 0·83 (0·5) | −0·08696 | |
| Other vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables | 0·73 (0·9) | 0·76 (0·89) | 0·26087 | |
| Other vegetables | 0·54 (0·51) | 0·55 (0·6) | 0·26087 | |
| Other fruits | 0·57 (0·49) | 0·41 (0·49) | 0·28986 |
DGLV, dark green leaf and vegetables.
p values denotes as p < 0.05* (χ2 test), p < 0.01** (Independent Sample t-test) and p < 0.001***.
Fig. 2.Prevalence of dietary practice study participants in eastern Ethiopia.
Dietary practice and anthropometric indices, between case group and counterpart
| Characteristics | Case group ( | Comparison group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary practice | |||
| Poor | 106 (76·8) | 90 (65·2) | |
| Good | 32 (23·2) | 48 (34·8) | |
| Food variety score | |||
| Low | 70 (50·7) | 49 (35·5) | |
| High | 68 (49·3) | 89 (64·5) | |
| Dietary diversity score | |||
| Low | 39 (14·1) | 25 (9·1) | |
| Medium | 64 (23·2) | 68 (24·6) | |
| High | 35 (12·7) | 45 (16·3) | |
| Animal source food | |||
| Low | 27 (9·8) | 34 (12·3) | |
| Medium | 80 (29) | 69 (25) | |
| High | 31 (11·2) | 35 (12·7) | |
| Body mass index | |||
| Under weight | 8 (2·9) | 4 (1·4) | |
| Normal weight | 126 (45·7) | 131 (47·5) | |
| Over weight | 4 (1·4) | 3 (1·1) | |
| MUAC | |||
| Under-nourished | 75 (27·2) | 82 (29·7) | |
| Well-nourished | 63 (22·8) | 56 (20·3) | |
MUAC, middle upper arm circumference.
p values denotes as p < 0.05* (χ2 test), p < 0.01** and p < 0.001***.
Parameter estimates from multivariate regression predicting dietary practice among participant women
| Parameters | Dietary practice status | AOR (95 % CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poor, | Good, | |||||
| Mothers group | ||||||
| Delivered newborn with NTD (case) | 106 (54·1) | 32 (40) | 1·00 | |||
| Delivered newborn without NTD (comparison) | 90 (45·9) | 48 (60) | 0·75 | 0·34 | 2·1 (1·07–4·1) | 0·029 |
| Residence | ||||||
| Urban | 96 (49) | 63 (78·8) | 1·00 | |||
| Rural | 100 (51) | 17 (21·2) | −1·2 | 0·49 | 0·29 (0·1–0·7) | 0·013 |
| Educational status of women | ||||||
| Illiterate | 18 (9·2) | 23 (28·7) | −1·7 | 0·8 | 0·16 (0·03–0·8) | 0·02 |
| Primary education (1–8) | 102 (52) | 22 (27·5) | 0·8 | 0·7 | 2·2 (0·5–8·9) | 0·25 |
| Secondary education (9–12) | 67 (34·2) | 19 (23·8) | 1·07 | 0·6 | 2·9 (0·8–10·4) | 0·09 |
| Tertiary education | 9 (4·6) | 16 (20) | 1·00 | |||
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NTD, neural tube defect.
Maximum Standard Error (se) = 0·8, Significant at P < 0·05.