Literature DB >> 35006810

Aligner-Mediated Cleavage-Based Isothermal Amplification for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection.

Chao Zhang1, Tingting Zheng1, Hongliang Fan2, Tao Zhang2, Da Han1.   

Abstract

Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is critical for reducing the global transmission of COVID-19. Here, we report a simple and versatile assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA based on aligner-mediated cleavage-based strand displacement amplification (AMC-SDA). The entire amplification procedure takes less than 25 min without professional instruments or requirement of specific target sequences and can reach a limit of detection of attomolar RNA concentration. Using pseudovirus as mimicry of clinical SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, we achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 100% in 10 simulated samples (five positive and five negative). We anticipate that our method will provide a universal platform for rapid and accurate detection of emerging infectious diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA detection; SARS-CoV-2; aligner-mediated cleavage; isothermal amplification; strand displacement amplification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35006810      PMCID: PMC7931623          DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c01674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater        ISSN: 2576-6422


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global pandemic and caused hundreds of thousands death because of its brilliant capacity for human-to-human transmission and strong pathogenicity,[1−4] which exemplify the urgent need for accurate and rapid diagnostic assays to facilitate clinical and public health interferences. In response, there are several quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) methods being applied in clinical and public health laboratories for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.[5−8] However, these tests are dependent on a thermocycler for delicate temperature modulation and therefore are not widely available because of the lack of scalable technology to quickly and inexpensively identify pathogens.[9] Therefore, a rapid diagnostic method with low instrumental dependence, short processing time, and high accuracy is needed to effectively monitor the virus transmission in populations. As an alternative technique to PCR, isothermal amplification is an important tool in the detection of nucleic acids, particularly in rapid and point-of-care diagnostics.[10−17] Among all kinds of isothermal amplification methods, the strand displacement reaction (SDA) has a simple mechanism and high amplification efficiency. SDA employs a nicking endonuclease to create a nick on one strand of a double-strand DNA, followed by sequence extension from the nicking site catalyzed by strand displacement polymerase.[18] Overall, the SDA method has been demonstrated to be able to detect trace amounts of DNA or RNA targets. However, one obstacle that prevents the universal use of traditional SDA for pathogen detection is the requirement of specific recognition sequences in the target templates for nicking endonuclease, which greatly impedes its universality in detecting different pathogen sequences such as SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, an improved SDA method that allows using conventional nicking endonuclease for versatile detection of pathogen targets with high sensitivity and specificity is still needed. In this study, we demonstrated a simple and versatile AMC (aligner-mediated cleavage)-SDA-based strategy that enables rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 with high specificity and sensitivity. Because of the excellent universality of AMC, the cleavage of pathogen DNA followed by primer-dependent amplification to generate recognition sites for endonuclease is no longer dependent on any specific sequence in the target template.[19] In addition, the detection sensitivity can achieve 10 copies/reaction (0.3 aM) for SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus through a real-time fluorescence detector under isothermal conditions within 25 min, which indicates the applicability of this method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in clinics. Furthermore, our AMC-SDA platform can be applied to other pathogen detection through a simple change of primers, highlighting the universality of this detection platform.

Experimental Section

Preparation of Oligonucleotides

All oligonucleotides used in this study were purchased from Beijing Tsingke Biotechnology Co. LTD (Beijing, China), and the sequence details are listed in Table S1. Purified lyophilized oligonucleotides were dissolved in nuclease-free water to make a 10 μM stock solution and stored at 4 °C. The plasmid with in vitro transcribed gene fragments used in this study was resuspended at 1 × 1012 copy/mL in nuclease-free water and stored at −20 °C.

Verification of AMC

The verification of AMC was carried out by incubation of 100 nM target sequences (synthetic in vitro-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein gene fragment) and 100 nM of forward aligner and forward linear primers in 1× reaction buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 100 μg/mL BSA, and 0.4 mM dNTP) with/without 6 U Nt.BstNBI (New England Biolabs, United States) at 55 °C for 1 h. Afterward, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was used to characterize the cleavage fragments. Five microliters of each resultant (mixed with loading buffer) were loaded onto 15% denaturing urea-PAGE gel and subjected to 100 V constant voltage in 0.5× TBE buffer for 60 min at room temperature. Finally, the gel was soaked in 3× Gelred dye solution (Sangon, China) for 15 min and then imaged on the Gel Doc EZ imager with Image Lab analysis software (BioRad, United States).

Isothermal Exponential Amplification Based on AMC

A fresh solution containing 6 U Nt.BstNBI, 0.8 U Bst 2.0 WarmStart DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, United States), 1× reaction buffer with 0.5× SYBR Green I (Solarbio, China), 100 nM forward aligner (FA) and primer (FP), and 100 nM reverse aligner (RA) and primer (RP) was prepared as the stock solution. The final reaction solutions were obtained by mixing the stock solution with various concentrations of target sequences. Afterward, the reaction solutions were subjected to a Roche Cobas Z480 real-time PCR system (Roche, Switzerland) and incubation at 55 °C for 30 min to real-time monitor the fluorescence of SYBR Green I (50 uL per reaction). Finally, the amplification resultants were loaded onto a 12% denaturing urea-PAGE to verify the occurrence of reactions. After being stained with 3× Gelred dye solution, the PAGE gel was imaged on the Gel Doc EZ imager with Image Lab analysis software.

Analytical Specificity of the AMC-SDA Assay

The specificity of the AMC-SDA for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was evaluated using synthetic plasmids (20 copies/μL) from 13 common pathogenic microorganisms, including N gene fragments of five human coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, HCoV -NL63, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-229E), the nucleocapsid protein (NP) gene of the influenza A virus (H7N9, H5N1, HIN1, and H3N2) and influenza B virus (Victoria), and 16S rRNA of Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Verification of AMC-SDA Assay for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA Using Pseudovirus Samples

Pseudoviruses of SARS-CoV-2 were provided by Zeesan Biotech (Xiamen, China), product batch number 20020101. The pseudovirus was composed of an adenovirus capsid with RNA fragments containing nucleoprotein gene sequence of SARS-CoV-2 virus. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using pseudovirus samples was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of this AMC-SDA method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. First, RNA was extracted from pseudovirus using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was reverse transcription by an Evo M-MLV kit (Accurate biotechnology, China) following the operation manual and the incubation program (37 °C for 15 min, 85 °C for 5 s, and then rapid cooling to 4 °C). Afterward, the reverse transcription DNA products were subjected to AMC-SDA detection procedure described in section 2.3.

Preparation of the Healthy Clinical Samples

All healthy clinical RNA samples used in this research were isolated from swab samples from the anonymized volunteers. All samples had been analyzed using a standard RT-qPCR to confirm the absence of the SARS-CoV-2. The primers and experimental protocols for RT-qPCR were performed according to the recommended protocols published by the Chinese CDC, and the primers were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Shanghai, China). All methods were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Results

AMC-SDA Platform

The scheme of AMC-SDA for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection involves three steps of forward initiation, reverse initiation, and exponential amplification, as shown in Figure . First, the target DNA template hybridizes with a forward aligner (FA) that contains the recognition sites for nicking endonuclease of Nt.BstNBI and is subsequently cleaved four bases downstream of the recognition site. After cleavage, the fragment dehybridizes with FA because the cleaved sequence is not adequate to preserve a stable Y-shaped structure under the reaction conditions. Afterward, a linear primer (FP) containing the recognition sequence of Nt.BstNBI can initiate polymerase-based elongation to generate dsDNA with a new recognition site for Nt.BstNBI. In this way, a new round of cleavage can free the FP binding site again and initiate another round of polymerase-based elongation for the synthesis of the antisense chain (T0) of target template. Similarly, a reverse initiation step uses T0 as the template and reverse aligner/linear primer (RA/RP) as primers to generate the amplification product strand (T1) with the help of Nt.BstNBI and DNA polymerase. It should be noted that we artificially applied a 3-terminator (e.g., 3′ inverted-dT) to FP and RP to eliminate the unexpected extensions of both primers along the target sequence. The goal of the first two steps is not only to amplify the target sequence in a linearly fashion but also to identify and cut the initiation strand with high specificity. Finally, the combination of T1 and FP resulted in the formation of T2 strand under the joint action of Nt.BstNBI and polymerase, followed by an identical process with T2 and RP for the regeneration of T1. In this way, an exponential amplification can be achieved with accumulation of a large amount of T1 and T2 as the final amplification products.
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of AMC-SDA. The forward and reverse initiation step can amplify the target template and generate the T1 strand continuously. The exponential amplification step can repeatedly generate a large amount of T1 and T2 strands as amplification products.

Schematic illustration of AMC-SDA. The forward and reverse initiation step can amplify the target template and generate the T1 strand continuously. The exponential amplification step can repeatedly generate a large amount of T1 and T2 strands as amplification products.

AMC-SDA for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection

To demonstrate the AMC-SDA platform can be used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA, we first designed primers that target the nucleoprotein (N) gene section of SARS-CoV-2 suggested by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.[20] The primers for AMC-SDA were subsequently designed and listed in Table S1. We first examined the performance of AMC by using Nt.BstNBI that cleaved only one strand of double-stranded DNA four bases downstream of the recognition site (Figure A). Herein, we used a synthetic ssDNA fragment that is identical to the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 as the template. As shown in Figure B, a newly formed shorter band can only be found in the case of ssDNA + FA + Nt.BstNBI along with the disappearance of FA band in the electrophoresis image (Figure B), which indicated cleavage of the ssDNA template with Nt.BstNBI specifically and efficiently.
Figure 2

Verification of AMC-SDA. (A) Schematic illustration of AMC and SDA process with the assistance of FA and FP. (B) Denatured gel electrophoresis analysis of the AMC process with different combinations of reactants. (C) Denatured gel electrophoresis of SDA products followed by AMC with different combinations of reactants. (D) Fluorescent kinetics of AMC-SDA process using SYBR Green I as the indicator. The corresponding amplification products (positive and negative) are shown in the electrophoresis images.

Verification of AMC-SDA. (A) Schematic illustration of AMC and SDA process with the assistance of FA and FP. (B) Denatured gel electrophoresis analysis of the AMC process with different combinations of reactants. (C) Denatured gel electrophoresis of SDA products followed by AMC with different combinations of reactants. (D) Fluorescent kinetics of AMC-SDA process using SYBR Green I as the indicator. The corresponding amplification products (positive and negative) are shown in the electrophoresis images. We next assessed the capability of AMC-SDA assay for amplification of the synthetic ssDNA template of N gene of SARS-CoV-2. As shown in Figure C, a clear and bright band of amplification products can only be found in the group of Template + FA + FP + RA + RP + Nt.BstNBI + Bst DNA Polymerase, which indicated that the target DNA was tailored by Nt.BstNBI exclusively and amplified by Bst DNA polymerase. We further used fluorescence to monitor the real-time reaction kinetics with SYBR Green I as the indicator. A distinct fluorescence increase was seen with the presence of 1000 copies/reaction template (∼33 aM, 50 μL per reaction), whereas no obvious signal was seen without template in 25 min of the reaction window. These data confirmed that the AMC-SDA can be used for detecting target DNA with the predesigned mechanism.

Performance of AMC-SDA Platform for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostics

Once the AMC-SDA platform have been established for target DNA detection, we further investigated the detection limit of the AMC-SDA system for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. One hundred-fold serial dilutions of the SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus with concentrations ranged from 1 × 101 to 1 × 109 copies/reaction were first reverse transcripted to DNA and then studied using the AMC-SDA platform (Figure A). Negative and positive results can be determined by calculating the threshold time (TT) value, which is defined as the time point when the normalized fluorescence intensity reaches the threshold (set as normalized fluorescence intensity of 10 in this study). Herein, a TT value less than 25 will be considered as a positive result, whereas a TT value more than 25 will be considered negative. We confirmed that the assay can generate obvious fluorescence signals with the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus down to 101 copies/reaction (0.33 aM, 50 μL per reaction) within 25 min. Our method showed a similar sensitivity to PCR-based assay, but a much shorter time for amplification and no need for delicate temperature modulation with thermocyclers.[5,21,22] Next, we further tested the specificity of our primer pairs for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Reverse transcripted cDNA from SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus and 13 types of synthetic plasmids from other common pathogenic microorganisms, including synthetic SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, HCoV-HKU1, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, influenza B virus, influenza H1N1, influenza H3N2, influenza H5N1, and influenza H7N9, were tested with the AMC-SDA platform under the same conditions, and no positive signals were observed for other pathogens except for SARS-CoV-2 within 25 min (Figure B). Finally, we further validated the specificity of our method with different concentrations of SARS plasmids as controls, and the results (Figure C) showed that high concentrations of SARS-CoV plasmids could not produce false positive signals. These results demonstrated that our platform can be a reliable system for diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2 with good specificity.
Figure 3

Performance of AMC-SDA platform and diagnostic results using synthetic samples. (A) Fluorescence kinetics (left) and standard curve (right) for the detection of different concentrations of pseudovirus templates of SARS-CoV-2 N gene (reverse transcript before use). R2 = 0.95. Data of the standard curve are presented as mean ± s.d. (B) Diagnostic results of genes from different pathogenic microorganisms using SARS-CoV-2 primer set. The template concentrations were 20 copies/μL (33 aM) for SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (reverse transcript before use) and 20 copies/μL (33 aM) for synthetic plasmids of other pathogenic microorganisms. (C) Fluorescence kinetics for different concentrations of SARS plasmids and 20 copies/μL SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (reverse transcript before use). (D) Diagnostic results of five positive (synthetic samples with pseudovirus) and five negative samples (healthy individuals). All reactions were performed under optimal conditions.

Performance of AMC-SDA platform and diagnostic results using synthetic samples. (A) Fluorescence kinetics (left) and standard curve (right) for the detection of different concentrations of pseudovirus templates of SARS-CoV-2 N gene (reverse transcript before use). R2 = 0.95. Data of the standard curve are presented as mean ± s.d. (B) Diagnostic results of genes from different pathogenic microorganisms using SARS-CoV-2 primer set. The template concentrations were 20 copies/μL (33 aM) for SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (reverse transcript before use) and 20 copies/μL (33 aM) for synthetic plasmids of other pathogenic microorganisms. (C) Fluorescence kinetics for different concentrations of SARS plasmids and 20 copies/μL SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (reverse transcript before use). (D) Diagnostic results of five positive (synthetic samples with pseudovirus) and five negative samples (healthy individuals). All reactions were performed under optimal conditions. Finally, to evaluate if this AMC-SDA platform can be used for diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2, we further tested its performance using simulated positive samples (five positive samples created by adding pseudovirus that replicated the concentrations appearing in the real medical record.[23]). Briefly, we prepared solutions with different concentrations of pseudovirus followed by RNA extraction. The extracted RNA was then reverse transcripted to DNA and used as template for AMC-SDA. For negative samples, five swab samples collected from healthy people were also subjected to RNA extraction and reverse transcription. Of the five samples with detectable pseudovirus (Table S3), we obtained positive results for all of them using the AMC-SDA platform (Figure S1), whereas negative results were seen with all five swaps from healthy individuals (Figure D). The total accuracy of this method for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in simulated samples was 100%. This indicates that our method can achieve rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Discussion & Conclusions

Rapid and accurate testing of pathogenic microorganisms is essential for early discovery, early reporting, early quarantine, early treatment, and efficient control of the epidemic transmission.[24,25] Although many in vitro diagnostic companies are trying to develop new diagnostic kits for rapid and inexpensive detection of pathogen genes, our AMC-SDA approach provides an alternative route for rapid diagnosis while maintaining the advantages of aligner-mediated cleavage and isothermal amplification in terms of simplicity, convenience, and affordability. However, our study also has limitations to consider. For instance, we used pseudovirus as a mimicry of the real virus for pathogen detection because of the difficulties in acquiring real clinical samples. Therefore, we cannot completely understand the performance of this AMC-SDA platform for detecting infectious individuals who are transmitting SARS-CoV-2 virus.[26,27] Moreover, our method still needs to use standard operating procedures for reverse transcription of virus RNA, which requires extra time and specialized kits, although the AMC-SDA reaction itself only takes 25 min.[28,29] In summary, we have developed a simple and universal platform of using AMC-SDA to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus rapidly and accurately. Given the simple probe design and rapid detection processes, AMC-SDA will be a suitable diagnostic method for emerging infectious diseases.
  27 in total

1.  Strand displacement amplification--an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique.

Authors:  G T Walker; M S Fraiser; J L Schram; M C Little; J G Nadeau; D P Malinowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Cancer diagnosis with DNA molecular computation.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Yumeng Zhao; Xuemei Xu; Rui Xu; Haowen Li; Xiaoyan Teng; Yuzhen Du; Yanyan Miao; Hsiao-Chu Lin; Da Han
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Rapid and specific detection of Asian- and African-lineage Zika viruses.

Authors:  Nunya Chotiwan; Connie D Brewster; Tereza Magalhaes; James Weger-Lucarelli; Nisha K Duggal; Claudia Rückert; Chilinh Nguyen; Selene M Garcia Luna; Joseph R Fauver; Barb Andre; Meg Gray; William C Black; Rebekah C Kading; Gregory D Ebel; Guillermina Kuan; Angel Balmaseda; Thomas Jaenisch; Ernesto T A Marques; Aaron C Brault; Eva Harris; Brian D Foy; Sandra L Quackenbush; Rushika Perera; Joel Rovnak
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Rapid pathogen-specific phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing using digital LAMP quantification in clinical samples.

Authors:  Nathan G Schoepp; Travis S Schlappi; Matthew S Curtis; Slava S Butkovich; Shelley Miller; Romney M Humphries; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Primer design for quantitative real-time PCR for the emerging Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Dandan Li; Jiawei Zhang; Jinming Li
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Selection of self-priming molecular replicators.

Authors:  Daechan Park; Andrew D Ellington; Cheulhee Jung
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Genotyping of Multiple Clinical Samples with a Combined Direct PCR and Magnetic Lateral Flow Assay.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Xiaonan Liu; Yao Yao; Kewu Liu; Wenli Hui; Juanli Zhu; Yaling Dou; Kai Hua; Mingli Peng; Zuankai Wang; Alphonsus J M Vermorken; Yali Cui
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-09-08

9.  Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Huan Han; Fang Liu; Zhihua Lv; Kailang Wu; Yingle Liu; Yong Feng; Chengliang Zhu
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 3.786

10.  CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  James P Broughton; Xianding Deng; Guixia Yu; Clare L Fasching; Venice Servellita; Jasmeet Singh; Xin Miao; Jessica A Streithorst; Andrea Granados; Alicia Sotomayor-Gonzalez; Kelsey Zorn; Allan Gopez; Elaine Hsu; Wei Gu; Steve Miller; Chao-Yang Pan; Hugo Guevara; Debra A Wadford; Janice S Chen; Charles Y Chiu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 68.164

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Types and Applications of Nicking Enzyme-Combined Isothermal Amplification.

Authors:  Siyu Cao; Xiaochen Tang; Tianshu Chen; Guifang Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostics Based on Nucleic Acids Amplification: From Fundamental Concepts to Applications and Beyond.

Authors:  João M Vindeirinho; Eva Pinho; Nuno F Azevedo; Carina Almeida
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.