Literature DB >> 3500602

Contrast optimization for the detection of focal hepatic lesions by MR imaging at 1.5 T.

W D Foley1, J B Kneeland, J D Cates, G M Kellman, T L Lawson, W D Middleton, R E Hendrick.   

Abstract

The relative efficacies of different spin-echo pulse sequences at 1.5 T were evaluated in the detection of focal hepatic disease. Pulse sequences compared were spin-echo with a repetition time (TR) of 200 msec and echo time (TE) of 20 msec, with six excitations; TR = 300 msec, TE = 20 msec, with 16 excitations (T1-weighted sequences); and a double spin-echo with TR = 2500 and TE = 25 and 70, with two excitations (proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted pulse sequences, respectively). Respiratory-motion compensation, which involved a recording of the phase-encoding gradients (Exorcist), was used for the last two sequences. Spin-echo with TR = 2500 msec and TE = 70 msec was superior in lesion detection and contrast-to-noise ratio. The proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted sequences with respiratory compensation produced better artifact suppression than did the short TR, short TE T1-weighted sequence with temporal averaging. In contradistinction to prior results at 0.6 T, T2-weighted pulse sequences appear superior to T1-weighted pulse sequences with multiple excitations for both lesion detection and artifact suppression at 1.5 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3500602     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.149.6.1155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T M Harris; M D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1989

2.  Preliminary experience with a new double-echo half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo acquisition in the characterization of liver lesions.

Authors:  H Bosmans; S Gryspeerdt; L Van Hoe; S Van Oostende; T De Jaegere; B Kiefer; A L Baert; G Marchal
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison between turbo spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  A Giovagnoni; E Paci; P Ercolani; B Kiefer; P Santino; A Piga
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Hepatic metastases: CT versus MR imaging at 1.5T.

Authors:  V G Vassiliades; W D Foley; J Alarcon; T Lawson; S Erickson; J B Kneeland; H V Steinberg; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

5.  Pulmonary imaging using respiratory motion compensated simultaneous PET/MR.

Authors:  Joyita Dutta; Chuan Huang; Quanzheng Li; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  J Gaa; H Fischer; G Laub; M Georgi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study.

Authors:  Liyun Zheng; Chun Yang; Ruofan Sheng; Yongming Dai; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-09-24

8.  Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery.

Authors:  M T Keogan; C E Spritzer; E K Paulson; S S Paine; L Harris; J L Dahlke; J R MacFall
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

9.  Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of RARE derived sequences with conventional sequences for detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  P Reimer; E J Rummeny; M Wissing; G M Bongartz; G Schuierer; P E Peters
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

10.  Liver lesion detection: comparison between excitation-spoiling fat suppression and regular spin-echo at 1.5T.

Authors:  R C Semelka; H Hricak; K G Bis; W C Werthmuller; C B Higgins
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1993
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.