Literature DB >> 35001178

Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.

Gleysson Matias de Assis1, Victor Diniz Borborema Dos Santos1, Salomão Israel Monteiro Lourenço Queiroz1, Adriano Rocha Germano2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate fixation resistance in mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy in standardized polyurethane hemimandibles with two types of advancement (6 and 12 mm), with or without mandibular plane rotation, using a 2.0-mm plate/screw system.
METHODS: Seven groups were evaluated using a vertical compressive load in the first molar region, and the applied force in Newtons was recorded in 1 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm displacements, as well as the maximum force.
RESULTS: There was a statistical intergroup difference and it was observed that increasing the advancement decreased fixation resistance with a single plate, and inserting an additional plate significantly increased osteosynthesis resistance.
CONCLUSION: In the 12 mm advancements, clockwise rotation proved to be more resistant when fixed with only one plate. By contrast, counterclockwise rotation was significantly more resistant in stabilizing the mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy when two plates were used.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mandibular advancement; Mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Orthognathic surgery; Osseodentary arch fixation techniques

Year:  2022        PMID: 35001178     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-01024-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  15 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.

Authors:  B Ozden; A Alkan; S Arici; E Erdem
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.

Authors:  Bernardo Ferreira Brasileiro; Rafael Grotta-Grempel; Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Postoperative skeletal stability following clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex compared to conventional orthognathic treatment.

Authors:  J P Reyneke; R S Bryant; R Suuronen; P J Becker
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.

Authors:  V A Pereira Filho; H Y Iamashita; M S Monnazzi; M F R Gabrielli; L G Vaz; L A Passeri
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.

Authors:  Y Oguz; E R Watanabe; J M Reis; R Spin-Neto; M A Gabrielli; V A Pereira-Filho
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Sang Hwa Lee; Leonard B Kaban; Edward T Lahey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients: long-term surgical stability.

Authors:  Y Nimkarn; P G Miles; P D Waite
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christof Urs Joss; Isabella Maria Vassalli
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Long-term results of maxillomandibular advancement surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Authors:  G W Jaspers; A Booij; J de Graaf; J de Lange
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.651

10.  An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.

Authors:  Bernardo Ferreira Brasileiro; Rafael Grotta Grempel; Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.