Literature DB >> 19138603

Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review.

Christof Urs Joss1, Isabella Maria Vassalli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate horizontal relapse and its causes in bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation of different types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the literature was performed in the databases PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Beta. From 488 articles identified, 24 articles were finally included. Six studies were prospective, and 18 were retrospective. The range of postoperative study records was 6 months to 12.7 years.
RESULTS: The short-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 1.5% and 32.7%, for miniplates between 1.5% and 18.0%, and for bioresorbable bicortical screws between 10.4% and 17.4%, at point B. The long-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 2.0% and 50.3%, and for miniplates between 1.5% and 8.9%, at point B.
CONCLUSIONS: BSSO for mandibular advancement is a good treatment option for skeletal Class II, but seems less stable than BSSO setback in the short and long terms. Bicortical screws of titanium, stainless steel, or bioresorbable material show little difference regarding skeletal stability compared with miniplates in the short term. A greater number of studies with larger skeletal long-term relapse rates were evident in patients treated with bicortical screws instead of miniplates. The etiology of relapse is multifactorial, involving the proper seating of the condyles, the amount of advancement, the soft tissue and muscles, the mandibular plane angle, the remaining growth and remodeling, the skill of the surgeon, and preoperative age. Patients with a low mandibular plane angle have increased vertical relapse, whereas patients with a high mandibular plane angle have more horizontal relapse. Advancements in the range of 6 to 7 mm or more predispose to horizontal relapse. To obtain reliable scientific evidence, further short-term and long-term research into BSSO advancement with rigid internal fixation should exclude additional surgery, ie, genioplasty or maxillary surgery, and include a prospective study or randomized clinical trial design with correlation statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19138603     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  30 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Belini Freire-Maia
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-12

2.  [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].

Authors:  X J Wang; Y M Zhang; Y H Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 3.  Mandibular condyle displacements after orthognathic surgery-an overview of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Dominik Pachnicz; António Ramos
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of condylar changes in surgical correction for open bite patients with skeletal class II and class III malocclusions.

Authors:  J T Zupnik; M Ioshida; M Yatabe; A C O Ruellas; L R Gomes; S Aronovich; E Benavides; S P Edwards; B Paniagua; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lauren Ehardt; Antonio Ruellas; Sean Edwards; Erika Benavides; Matthew Ames; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Sang Hwa Lee; Leonard B Kaban; Edward T Lahey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  [Evaluation of mandibular stability and condylar volume after orthognathic surgery in patients with severe temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis].

Authors:  L Hou; G H Ye; X J Liu; Z L Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

8.  Long-term stability of adolescent versus adult surgery for treatment of mandibular deficiency.

Authors:  W R Proffit; C Phillips; T A Turvey
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Hypoesthesia associated with mandibular movement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Toru Yamamoto; Keiko Fujii-Abe; Haruhisa Fukayama; Hiroshi Kawahara
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-05

10.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.