| Literature DB >> 35000025 |
Kenji Kawahara1, Shigetsugu Takano2, Katsunori Furukawa1, Tsukasa Takayashiki1, Satoshi Kuboki1, Masayuki Ohtsuka1.
Abstract
The optimal regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its biological and physiological modification of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR PDAC) remain unknown. A deeper understanding of the complex stromal biology of the TME will identify new avenues to establish treatment strategies for PDAC patients. Herein, we sought to clarify whether stromal remodeling by NAC affects recurrence patterns and prognosis in BR PDAC patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from 104 BR PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy with or without NAC (upfront surgery [UpS], n = 44; gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [GnP], n = 28; and gemcitabine + S-1 [GS], n = 32) to assess the correlations of treatment with early recurrence, the stromal ratio, and Ki-67 levels. Eighty-six patients experienced recurrence, and those with liver metastasis had significantly shorter recurrence-free survival than those with other recurrence patterns. The frequency of liver metastasis was significantly higher in patients with a low stromal ratio than in those with a high stromal ratio in the NAC group but not in the UpS group. Patients in the GnP group had significantly higher Ki-67 than those in the GS and UpS groups. A low stromal ratio was positively correlated with high Ki-67 in the NAC group but not in the UpS group. The low stromal ratio induced by NAC promoted early liver metastasis in patients with BR PDAC. Our findings provide new insights into the complexity of stromal biology, leading to consideration of the optimal NAC regimen.Entities:
Keywords: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; Liver metastasis; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Stroma
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35000025 PMCID: PMC8971157 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10142-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis ISSN: 0262-0898 Impact factor: 5.150
Fig. 1Study profile and effect of NAC on recurrence. A Flow chart of patient selection. B RFS in the NAC and UpS groups. C Initial recurrence patterns (some patients had one initial recurrence at more than one site). D, E RFS in patients with and without hematogenous dissemination in (D) the NAC group and (E) the UpS group. F RFS in patients with and without liver metastasis. NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, RFS recurrence-free survival, UpS upfront surgery
Comparisons of clinicopathological parameters among the UpS, GnP, and GS groups
| Clinicopathological parameters | UpS (n = 44) | GnP (n = 28) | GS (n = 32) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [IQR] | 67.5 [62, 75] | 69 [64, 75] | 65 [60, 71] | 0.45‡ |
| Sex (M/F) | 29/15 | 13 /15 | 24/8 | 0.065 |
| Operation (PD/DP/TP) | 39/4/1 | 20/8/0 | 20/9/3 | 0.024† |
| BR-PV/BR-A | 25/19 | 6/22 | 9/23 | 0.004 |
| PVR (+/−) | 35/9 | 19/9 | 18/14 | 0.093 |
| Arterial resection (+/−) | 4/40 | 3/25 | 10/22 | 0.031† |
| Histological grade (1,2/3,4) | 37/7 | 24/4 | 29/3 | 0.76† |
| pT (1,2/3,4) | 31/13 | 22/6 | 20/12 | 0.4 |
| pN (0/1,2,3) | 8/36 | 7/21 | 6/26 | 0.76 |
| UICC stage-8th (≤ IIA/ ≥ IIB) | 14/30 | 8/20 | 7/25 | 0.63 |
| Evans grade (I/IIa/IIb/III) | NA | 8 /1/5/0 | 15/14/2/1 | 0.22† |
| RDI of NAC (mean: %) | NA | 97.1 | 87 | 0.006§ |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 5/15/17/7/0 | 2/25/1/0/0 | 4/7/2/18/1 | < 0.001 |
| (None/S-1/Gem/GS/SC) |
n indicates the number of participants, UpS upfront surgery, GnP gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, GS gemcitabine plus S-1, IQR interquartile range, PD pancreaticoduodenectomy, DP distal pancreatectomy, TP total pancreatectomy, PVR portal vein resection, NA not applicable, RDI relative dose intensity, Gem gemcitabine, SC S-1 plus cisplatin
*, chi-square test unless otherwise noted; †, Fisher exact test, ‡, Kruskal–Wallis test; §, Wilcoxon rank sum test
Fig. 2Analysis of stromal ratio. A Representative specimens of a (upper panel) high and (lower panel) low stromal ratio. Scale bar: 400 μm. B OS according to stromal ratio. C, D RFS according to stromal ratio (C) in the NAC and (D) UpS groups. E, F Liver metastases and other metastases based on the stromal ratio in (E) the NAC and (F) UpS groups. G Comparison of stromal ratio by treatment method. *Fisher exact test, †chi-square test. OS overall survival; RFS recurrence-free survival, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, UpS upfront surgery
Fig. 3Assessment of radiological tumor volume. A Comparison of radiological tumor volume based on the treatment method and changes in the radiological tumor volume before and after treatment with GnP and GS. B RFS according to NAC regimen. C Correlation between radiological tumor volume and stromal ratio. D Correlation between stromal ratio and radiological tumor volume change (tumor volume calculated by CT after NAC divided by that before NAC.) E RFS according to tumor shrinkage (patients whose radiological tumor volume shrunk more than 35% after NAC were defined as “responders;” all others were defined as “non-responders”). F Correlation between liver metastasis and radiological tumor volume change. ‡Wilcoxon rank sum test, §Wilcoxon signed rank test. GnP gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, GS gemcitabine and S-1, RFS recurrence-free survival, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, CT computed tomography
Fig. 4Evaluation of TNC and Ki-67 expression on RFS. A IHC analysis was performed using an anti-TNC antibody, and patients were classified into two groups according to TNC expression. Representative examples of high TNC expression (upper panel) and low TNC expression (lower panel). Scale bar: 200 μm. B RFS according to TNC expression. C Correlation between TNC expression and liver metastasis. D Correlation between treatment method and TNC expression. E IHC of Ki-67. Representative examples of high Ki-67 expression (upper panel; 547 of the 596 nuclei [91.8%] were positive) and low Ki-67 expression (lower panel: 76 of the 494 nuclei [15.4%] were positive). Scale bar: 50 μm. F RFS according to Ki-67 expression. G Correlation of treatment method and Ki-67 expression. H Correlation of stromal ratio and Ki-67 in the NAC group (left) and the UpS group (right). *Fisher exact test, †chi-square test. IHC immunohistochemistry, TNC tenascin C, RFS recurrence-free survival, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, UpS upfront surgery
Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of recurrence-free survival
| Clinico-pathological parameters | n | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| Age (< 70/≥ 70) (years) | 60/44 | 1.21 (0.79–1.85) | 0.38 | ||
| Sex (M/F) | 66/38 | 1.10 (0.71–1.70) | 0.67 | ||
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (− /+) | 44/60 | 1.44 (0.94–2.20) | 0.092 | 1.09 (0.70–1.69) | 0.71 |
| PVR (−/+) | 37/67 | 1.90 (1.17–3.08) | 0.0099 | 1.67 (1.01–2.71) | 0.044 |
| Arterial resection (− /+) | 87/17 | 0.61 (0.33–1.13) | 0.12 | ||
| Preoperative CA19-9 (< 70/≥ 70) (U/mL) | 33/71 | 1.37 (0.87–2.16) | 0.18 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis (−/+) | 21/83 | 2.18 (1.24–3.82) | 0.0065 | 2.25 (1.28–4.01) | 0.0074 |
| Histological grade (0,1/2,3) | 90/14 | 0.74 (0.37–1.48) | 0.4 | ||
| Pre-treatment tumor volume (< 7000/≥ 7000) (mm3) | 44/60 | 0.91 (0.60–1.39) | 0.66 | ||
| Stromal ratio (High/Low) | 65/39 | 1.65 (1.06–2.59) | 0.027 | 1.69 (1.07–2.67) | 0.04 |
| TNC (Low/High) | 58/46 | 1.51 (0.98–2.32) | 0.06 | 1.12 (0.76–1.83) | 0.36 |
| POSTN (Low/High) | 68/36 | 0.87 (0.56–1.36) | 0.55 | ||
| Ki-67 (Low/High) | 51/53 | 1.12 (0.73–1.70) | 0.61 | ||
The left category is the reference for the hazard ratio
n indicates the number of participants, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, PVR portal vein resection
Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of recurrence-free survival in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group
| Clinico-pathological parameters | n | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| Age (< 70/≥ 70) (years) | 34/26 | 1.41 (0.80–2.49) | 0.23 | ||
| Sex (M/F) | 37/23 | 1.04 (0.59–1.86) | 0.88 | ||
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GnP/GS) | 28/32 | 1.23 (0.70–2.16) | 0.47 | ||
| PVR (− /+) | 23/37 | 1.57 (0.87–2.83) | 0.14 | ||
| Arterial resection (−/+) | 47/13 | 0.80 (0.40–1.60) | 0.53 | ||
| Preoperative CA19-9 (< 70/≥ 70) (U/mL) | 17/43 | 1.98 (1.04–3.76) | 0.037 | 1.62 (1.02–2.58) | 0.042 |
| Lymph node metastasis (−/+) | 13/47 | 2.03 (1.01–4.09) | 0.047 | 2.69 (1.51–4.81) | 0.0008 |
| Histological grade (0,1/2,3) | 53/7 | 1.21 (0.48–3.07) | 0.69 | ||
| Pre-treatment tumor volume (< 7000/≥ 7000) (mm3) | 20/40 | 0.75 (0.42–1.35) | 0.34 | ||
| Stromal ratio (High / Low) | 32/28 | 1.83 (1.03–3.24) | 0.038 | 1.89 (1.20–2.99) | 0.0061 |
| TNC (Low/High) | 40/20 | 1.23 (0.66–2.31) | 0.51 | ||
| POSTN (Low/High) | 44/16 | 0.55 (0.28–1.08) | 0.084 | 1.06 (0.67–1.68) | 0.36 |
| Ki-67 (Low/High) | 24/36 | 1.21 (0.68–2.15) | 0.51 | ||
The left category is the reference for the hazard ratio
n indicates the number of participants, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, GnP gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, GS gemcitabine plus S-1, PVR portal vein resection