Literature DB >> 23838925

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 for resectable and borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results from a prospective multi-institutional phase 2 trial.

Fuyuhiko Motoi1, Kazuyuki Ishida, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, Shigeru Ottomo, Masaya Oikawa, Takaho Okada, Hiromune Shimamura, Shinichi Takemura, Fuminori Ono, Masanori Akada, Kei Nakagawa, Yu Katayose, Shinichi Egawa, Michiaki Unno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. First-line treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is associated with promising antitumor activity with a high response rate. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of GS in the neoadjuvant setting.
METHODS: In a multi-institutional single-arm phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine and S-1, repeated every 21 days, was administered for two cycles (NAC-GS) to patients with resectable and borderline PDAC. The primary end point was the 2-year survival rate. Secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, pathological effect, recurrence-free survival, and tumor marker status.
RESULTS: Of 36 patients enrolled, 35 were eligible for this clinical trial conducted between 2008 and 2010. The most common toxicity was neutropenia in response to 90% of the relative dose intensity. Responses to NAC included radiological tumor shrinkage (69%) and decreases in CA19-9 levels (89%). R0 resection was performed for 87% in resection, and the morbidity rate (40%) was acceptable. The 2-year survival rate of the total cohort was 45.7%. Patients who underwent resection without metastases after NAC-GS (n = 27) had an increased median overall survival (34.7 months) compared with those who did not undergo resection (P = 0.0017).
CONCLUSIONS: NAC-GS was well tolerated and safe when used in a multi-institutional setting. The R0 resection rate and the 2-year survival rate analysis are encouraging for patients with resectable and borderline PDAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23838925     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3129-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  37 in total

Review 1.  Advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bhawna Sirohi; Ashish Singh; Shaheenah Dawood; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-13

2.  Optimal indication of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Sho; Takahiro Akahori; Toshihiro Tanaka; Shoichi Kinoshita; Minako Nagai; Satoshi Nishiwada; Tetsuro Tamamoto; Hideyuki Nishiofuku; Chiho Ohbayashi; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Kimihiko Kichikawa; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Amit Mahipal; Jessica Frakes; Sarah Hoffe; Richard Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 4.  Resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: what does it matter?

Authors:  Daniel M Halperin; Gauri R Varadhachary
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine and S-1 for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Norifumi Kennoki; Hidetsugu Nakayama; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yuichi Hosokawa; Tomohiro Itonaga; Y U Tajima; Sachica Shiraishi; Ryuji Mikami; Akihiko Tsuchida; Koichi Tokuuye
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-29

6.  Concurrent gemcitabine+S-1 neoadjuvant chemotherapy contributes to the improved survival of patients with small borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer tumors.

Authors:  Toshihiko Masui; Ryuichiro Doi; Yoshiya Kawaguchi; Asahi Sato; Kenzo Nakano; Tatsuo Ito; Takayuki Anazawa; Kyoichi Takaori; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Poorly differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with rapid progression in a young man.

Authors:  Koji Tezuka; Tomoharu Ishiyama; Akiko Takeshita; Hidekazu Matsumoto; Akira Jingu; Jiro Kikuchi; Hideyuki Yamaya; Rintaro Ohe; Tetsuya Ishizawa
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-16

8.  A replaced right hepatic artery adjacent to pancreatic carcinoma should be divided to obtain R0 resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Okada; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Yuji Kitahata; Masaji Tani; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Clinical outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy vs. chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Chisato Ohe; Chika Miyasaka; Yoshiko Uemura; Satoshi Hirooka; So Yamaki; Hironori Ryota; Taku Michiura; Kentaro Inoue; Yoichi Matsui; Noboru Tanigawa; Masanori Kon
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Long-Term Outcomes After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Elderly Patients: Special Reference to Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Tomohiko Shinkawa; Sho Endo; Yuji Abe; Kazuyoshi Nishihara; Toru Nakano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.