Matthew H G Katz1, Qian Shi2, Syed A Ahmad3, Joseph M Herman4, Robert de W Marsh5, Eric Collisson6, Lawrence Schwartz7, Wendy Frankel8, Robert Martin9, William Conway10, Mark Truty11, Hedy Kindler12, Andrew M Lowy13, Tanios Bekaii-Saab14, Philip Philip15, Mark Talamonti16, Dana Cardin17, Noelle LoConte18, Perry Shen19, John P Hoffman20, Alan P Venook6. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 2. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco. 7. Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York. 8. Department of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus. 9. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. 10. Department of Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. 11. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 12. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 13. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego. 14. Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus. 15. Department of Medical Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan. 16. Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 17. Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 18. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 19. Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina. 20. Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Although consensus statements support the preoperative treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, no prospective, quality-controlled, multicenter studies of this strategy have been conducted. Existing studies are retrospective and confounded by heterogeneity in patients studied, therapeutic algorithms used, and outcomes reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of conducting studies of multimodality therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in the cooperative group setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial of a multimodality treatment regimen administered within a study framework using centralized quality control with the cooperation of 14 member institutions of the National Clinical Trials Network. Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-confirmed pancreatic cancer preregistered, and 23 patients with tumors who met centrally reviewed radiographic criteria registered. Twenty-two patients initiated therapy (median age, 64 years [range, 50-76 years]; 55% female). Patients registered between May 29, 2013, and February 7, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received modified FOLFIRINOX treatment (85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, 180 mg/m2 of irinotecan hydrochloride, 400 mg/m2 of leucovorin calcium, and then 2400 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil for 4 cycles) followed by 5.5 weeks of external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy delivered in 28 daily fractions) with capecitabine (825 mg/m2 orally twice daily) prior to pancreatectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Feasibility, defined by the accrual rate, the safety of the preoperative regimen, and the pancreatectomy rate. RESULTS: The accrual rate of 2.6 patients per month was superior to the anticipated rate. Although 14 of the 22 patients (64% [95% CI, 41%-83%]) had grade 3 or higher adverse events, 15 of the 22 patients (68% [95% CI, 49%-88%]) underwent pancreatectomy. Of these 15 patients, 12 (80%) required vascular resection, 14 (93%) had microscopically negative margins, 5 (33%) had specimens that had less than 5% residual cancer cells, and 2 (13%) had specimens that had pathologic complete responses. The median overall survival of all patients was 21.7 months (95% CI, 15.7 to not reached) from registration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The successful completion of this collaborative study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting quality-controlled trials for this disease stage in the multi-institutional setting. The data generated by this study and the logistical elements that facilitated the trial's completion are currently being used to develop cooperative group trials with the goal of improving outcomes for this subset of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01821612.
IMPORTANCE: Although consensus statements support the preoperative treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, no prospective, quality-controlled, multicenter studies of this strategy have been conducted. Existing studies are retrospective and confounded by heterogeneity in patients studied, therapeutic algorithms used, and outcomes reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of conducting studies of multimodality therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in the cooperative group setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial of a multimodality treatment regimen administered within a study framework using centralized quality control with the cooperation of 14 member institutions of the National Clinical Trials Network. Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-confirmed pancreatic cancer preregistered, and 23 patients with tumors who met centrally reviewed radiographic criteria registered. Twenty-two patients initiated therapy (median age, 64 years [range, 50-76 years]; 55% female). Patients registered between May 29, 2013, and February 7, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received modified FOLFIRINOX treatment (85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, 180 mg/m2 of irinotecan hydrochloride, 400 mg/m2 of leucovorin calcium, and then 2400 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil for 4 cycles) followed by 5.5 weeks of external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy delivered in 28 daily fractions) with capecitabine (825 mg/m2 orally twice daily) prior to pancreatectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Feasibility, defined by the accrual rate, the safety of the preoperative regimen, and the pancreatectomy rate. RESULTS: The accrual rate of 2.6 patients per month was superior to the anticipated rate. Although 14 of the 22 patients (64% [95% CI, 41%-83%]) had grade 3 or higher adverse events, 15 of the 22 patients (68% [95% CI, 49%-88%]) underwent pancreatectomy. Of these 15 patients, 12 (80%) required vascular resection, 14 (93%) had microscopically negative margins, 5 (33%) had specimens that had less than 5% residual cancer cells, and 2 (13%) had specimens that had pathologic complete responses. The median overall survival of all patients was 21.7 months (95% CI, 15.7 to not reached) from registration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The successful completion of this collaborative study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting quality-controlled trials for this disease stage in the multi-institutional setting. The data generated by this study and the logistical elements that facilitated the trial's completion are currently being used to develop cooperative group trials with the goal of improving outcomes for this subset of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01821612.
Authors: Helmut Oettle; Stefan Post; Peter Neuhaus; Klaus Gellert; Jan Langrehr; Karsten Ridwelski; Harald Schramm; Joerg Fahlke; Carl Zuelke; Christof Burkart; Klaus Gutberlet; Erika Kettner; Harald Schmalenberg; Karin Weigang-Koehler; Wolf-Otto Bechstein; Marco Niedergethmann; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Lars Roll; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ross A Abrams; Andrew M Lowy; Eileen M O'Reilly; Robert A Wolff; Vincent J Picozzi; Peter W T Pisters Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Mark P Callery; Kenneth J Chang; Elliot K Fishman; Mark S Talamonti; L William Traverso; David C Linehan Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Robert Marsh; Joseph M Herman; Qian Shi; Eric Collison; Alan P Venook; Hedy L Kindler; Steven R Alberts; Philip Philip; Andrew M Lowy; Peter W T Pisters; Mitchell C Posner; Jordan D Berlin; Syed A Ahmad Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kathleen K Christians; Susan Tsai; Anna Mahmoud; Paul Ritch; James P Thomas; Lauren Wiebe; Tracy Kelly; Beth Erickson; Huamin Wang; Douglas B Evans; Ben George Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-02-25
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Nipun B Merchant; Steven Brower; Megan Branda; Mitchell C Posner; L William Traverso; Ross A Abrams; Vincent J Picozzi; Peter W T Pisters Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jerome Landry; Paul J Catalano; Charles Staley; Wayne Harris; John Hoffman; Mark Talamonti; Natalie Xu; Harry Cooper; Al B Benson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Giovanni Marchegiani; Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Vikram Deshpande; Erin I McDonnell; Francesco Sabbatino; Daniela Dias Santos; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Lipika Goyal; Eunice L Kwak; Janet E Murphy; David T Ting; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sonja Gillen; Tibor Schuster; Christian Meyer Zum Büschenfelde; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Laura Prakash; Priya Bhosale; Jordan Cloyd; Michael Kim; Nathan Parker; James Yao; Arvind Dasari; Daniel Halperin; Thomas Aloia; Jeffrey E Lee; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Vikrom K Dhar; Richard S Hoehn; Young Kim; Brent T Xia; Andrew D Jung; Dennis J Hanseman; Syed A Ahmad; Shimul A Shah Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Robert P Jones; Eftychia-Eirini Psarelli; Richard Jackson; Paula Ghaneh; Christopher M Halloran; Daniel H Palmer; Fiona Campbell; Juan W Valle; Olusola Faluyi; Derek A O'Reilly; David Cunningham; Jonathan Wadsley; Suzanne Darby; Tim Meyer; Roopinder Gillmore; Alan Anthoney; Pehr Lind; Bengt Glimelius; Stephen Falk; Jakob R Izbicki; Gary William Middleton; Sebastian Cummins; Paul J Ross; Harpreet Wasan; Alec McDonald; Tom Crosby; Yuk Ting; Kinnari Patel; David Sherriff; Rubin Soomal; David Borg; Sharmila Sothi; Pascal Hammel; Markus M Lerch; Julia Mayerle; Christine Tjaden; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; John P Neoptolemos Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: June S Peng; Jeffrey Mino; Rosebel Monteiro; Gareth Morris-Stiff; Noaman S Ali; Jane Wey; Kevin M El-Hayek; R Matthew Walsh; Sricharan Chalikonda Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Janet E Murphy; Jennifer Y Wo; David P Ryan; Wenqing Jiang; Beow Y Yeap; Lorraine C Drapek; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Eunice L Kwak; Jill N Allen; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Andrew X Zhu; Lipika Goyal; Keith D Lillemoe; Thomas F DeLaney; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Cristina R Ferrone; Theodore S Hong Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777