| Literature DB >> 34976318 |
Ajay Badhan1, Kristin E Low1, Darryl R Jones1, Xiaohui Xing1, Mohammad Raza Marami Milani1, Rodrigo Ortega Polo1, Leeann Klassen1, Sivasankari Venketachalam2,3, Michael G Hahn2,3, D Wade Abbott1, Tim A McAllister1.
Abstract
There is a knowledge gap regarding the factors that impede the ruminal digestion of plant cell walls or if rumen microbiota possess the functional activities to overcome these constraints. Innovative experimental methods were adopted to provide a high-resolution understanding of plant cell wall chemistries, identify higher-order structures that resist microbial digestion, and determine how they interact with the functional activities of the rumen microbiota. We characterized the total tract indigestible residue (TTIR) from cattle fed a low-quality straw diet using two comparative glycomic approaches: ELISA-based glycome profiling and total cell wall glycosidic linkage analysis. We successfully detected numerous and diverse cell wall glycan epitopes in barley straw (BS) and TTIR and determined their relative abundance pre- and post-total tract digestion. Of these, xyloglucans and heteroxylans were of higher abundance in TTIR. To determine if the rumen microbiota can further saccharify the residual plant polysaccharides within TTIR, rumen microbiota from cattle fed a diet containing BS were incubated with BS and TTIR ex vivo in batch cultures. Transcripts coding for carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) were identified and characterized for their contribution to cell wall digestion based on glycomic analyses, comparative gene expression profiles, and associated CAZyme families. High-resolution phylogenetic fingerprinting of these sequences encoded CAZymes with activities predicted to cleave the primary linkages within heteroxylan and arabinan. This experimental platform provides unprecedented precision in the understanding of forage structure and digestibility, which can be extended to other feed-host systems and inform next-generation solutions to improve the performance of ruminants fed low-quality forages.Entities:
Keywords: AB, arabinan; ADF, acid detergent fibre; AG, arabinogalactan; AGP, arabinogalactan protein; AIR, alcohol insoluble residue; AO, ammonium oxalate; AX, arabinoxylan; BS, barley straw; CAZyme, carbohydrate active enzyme; CAZymes; CE, carbohydrate esterase; CH, chlorite; DE, differentially expressed; Dietary polysaccharides; Differential gene expression; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FID, flame ionization detection GC, gas chromatography; GH, glycosyl hydrolase; Glycome profiling; Glycoside hydrolase; HG, homogalacturonan; HPAEC-PAD, high performance anion exchange chromatography coupled with pulsed amperometric detection; HX, heteroxylan; Linkage analysis; MS, mass spectrometry; NDF, neutral detergent fibre; Nutrient utilization; PC, post-chlorite; PL, polysaccharide lyase; RG, rhamnogalacturonan; Rumen microbiome; SC, sodium carbonate; TTIR, total tract indigestible residue; Transcriptome; XG, xyloglucan; mAbs, monoclonal antibodies
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976318 PMCID: PMC8702857 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 7.271
Fig. 1Experimental pipeline for the identification of rumen enzymes active on barley straw (BS) and total tract indigestible residue (TTIR). Barley straw is the predominant component in the cattle diet. The BS feed and total tract indigestible residue (TTIR) are subjected to chemical fractionation, releasing pectin, hemicellulose, and lignocellulose fractions. These fractions are then analyzed by comprehensive glycomics, including antibody-based glycome profiling and glycosidic linkage analysis, to determine total cell wall structure. Rumen microbes are grown ex vivo using BS and TTIR as the sole carbon source for transcriptomics and differential gene expression analysis. Transcriptomics informed by whole cell wall characterization provided evidence for the identification of rumen enzymes active against recalcitrant TTIR polysaccharides.
Fig. 2Glycome profile of barley straw (BS) and total tract indigestible residue (TTIR). BS and TTIR samples were sequentially extracted with ammonium oxalate (AO), sodium carbonate (SC), 1 M (1 M) and 4 M (4 M) KOH, chlorite (CH), and post-chlorite 4 M KOH (PC). The total carbohydrate recovered per gram of cell wall is indicated by bar graph (top). Cell wall extracts were analyzed through an ELISA-based screen against a collection of plant cell wall glycan-directed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and results shown as a heat map, where each row reflects the binding of a single mAb against the different extracts. The colour of each element in the heat map represents the strength of the ELISA signal, as indicated (black = no signal, yellow = strong signal). The panel on the righthand side depicts the clade of mAbs specific to various plant cell wall glycans. Numbered white boxes represent major differences in mAb binding intensities between BS and TTIR samples. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Digestibility of barley straw plant cell wall linkages. (A) Glycans were sampled from barley straw (BS) and total tract indigestible residue (TTIR) plant whole cell wall (de-starched alcohol insoluble residue, AIR) and isolated non-starch polysaccharides fractions (EDTA + Na2CO3, 4 M KOH, and cellulosic-residue). The relative abundance (molar %) of glycosidic linkages was determined by gas chromatography – mass spectrometry/flame ionization detection (GC–MS/FID) of partially methylated acetylated alditol (PMAA) derivatives. Heat maps were generated based on the calculated ratio of linkage abundance in the BS control over the digested TTIR (black = indigestible, bright green = most digestible). (B) Bar graphs were generated for the top 10 indigestible linkages within each plant cell wall fraction, representing the ratio of the highest average abundance calculated in TTIR over that of BS control. Linkages with standard deviations of greater than 50% were excluded as they were considered unreliable. (C) Linkage composition data for BS and TTIR were assigned to classes of polysaccharides according to Pettolino, et al. [13]. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Prediction of polysaccharide composition (%) based on glycosidic linkage data.
| Polysaccharides | AIR | EDTA + Na2CO3 | 4 M KOH | Residue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barley | TTIR | Barley | TTIR | Barley | TTIR | Barley | TTIR | |
| Arabinan (AB) | 1.9 | 2.1 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Heteroxylan (HX) | 30.8 | 33.8 | 17.1 | 32.4 | 79.6 | 76.2 | 4.7 | 7.9 |
| Type I arabinogalactan (AG-I) | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | t.r. | 0.1 |
| Type II arabinogalactan (AG-II) | 2.2 | 2.2 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| Xyloglucan (XG) | 5.1 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 2.3 | 3.0 |
| Mixed linkage glucan (MLG) | 3.3 | 1.9 | 23.7 | 21.0 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Cellulose | 49.7 | 47.2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 84.4 | 78.3 |
| Homogalacturonan (HG) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 7.0 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | t.r. | t.r. |
| Heteromannan (HM) | 0.9 | 0.8 | 9.6 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Unassigned (UA) | 4.8 | 4.7 | 15.8 | 9.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 6.1 | 7.4 |
Note: “t.r.” means trace amount (mol%<0.1%). “n.a.” means linkage not assigned to polysaccharide. No 4-Glcp linkage was assigned to cellulose as EDTA + Na2CO3, and 4 M KOH solutions do not extract this fraction [49].
The estimation of polysaccharide was according to Pettolino et al. 2012 [13].
Taxonomic analyses of rumen microbiota transcriptome.
| Domain | Phylum | Family |
|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | ||
| Unclassified | ||
Note: Taxonomical affiliations of whole transcriptomic data was obtained from taxonomic analyses of mRNA by Kaiju [16]. Relative abundance (%) at the domain level were calculated as a percentage of total mRNA transcripts, whereas relative abundance at the phyla and family level are calculated as a percentage of mRNA transcripts within the affiliated domain. Only those phyla and families with relative abundance higher than 0.6% are reported.
Proportional expression of CAZy families involved in cell wall degradation.
| CAZy family | Relative Transcript Abundance |
|---|---|
| Cellulose | |
| GH3 | 7.0 |
| GH5 | 3.7 |
| GH9 | 1.9 |
| GH51 | 1.2 |
| GH94 | 1.2 |
| GH1 | 1.0 |
| GH8 | 0.4 |
| GH48 | 0.2 |
| GH45 | 0.2 |
| GH74 | 0.2 |
| GH6 | 0.1 |
| GH44 | 0.03 |
| GH124 | 0.02 |
| Hemicellulose | |
| GH3 | 7.0 |
| GH43 | 6.3 |
| GH2 | 5.5 |
| GH5 | 3.7 |
| CE1 | 2.6 |
| CE4 | 1.9 |
| GH16 | 1.5 |
| GH95 | 1.3 |
| GH10 | 1.3 |
| GH51 | 1.2 |
| GH36 | 1.2 |
| GH92 | 1.1 |
| Other GH (21) | 8.7 |
| Other CE (6) | 2.7 |
| Pectin | |
| GH28 | 1.7 |
| PL1 | 1.5 |
| GH78 | 1.4 |
| GH53 | 1.2 |
| CE12 | 0.9 |
| GH4 | 0.6 |
| GH4 | 0.6 |
| Other GH (8) | 2.9 |
| Other PL (5) | 0.8 |
| Other CE (2) | 0.6 |
| Starch | |
| GH13 | 7.9 |
| GH31 | 1.8 |
| GH77 | 0.9 |
| Other GH (8) | 2.7 |
Note: The relative abundance of transcripts is defined as the proportion of transcripts for a given family in the total of all CAZyme (GH, CE, and PL only) transcripts targeting each plant polysaccharide.
Fig. 4Taxonomic classification of transcripts involved in the digestion of key plant cell wall components. Taxonomic affiliation and relative abundance of transcripts putatively known to be involved in the digestion of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and starch as assigned by Kaiju [16]. Relative abundance was defined as the proportion of transcripts from a given subphyla of the total CAZyme (GH, CE, and PL only) transcripts targeting individual plant polysaccharided.
Fig. 5Taxonomic affiliation of differentially expressed transcripts. Differentially expressed (DE) transcripts from BS (red) and TTIR (blue) representing >1% of the total DE pool were included and taxonomically assigned using Kaiju [16]. Transcripts with a fold change of 1.5 or more, with an FDR < 0.05 and p < 0.05 as calculated by DEseq were considered DE. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Total number of differentially expressed CAZyme transcripts on BS and TTIR substrates.
| CAZy Class | Number of transcripts | |
|---|---|---|
| BS | TTIR | |
| Glycoside hydrolase (GH) | 156 | 96 |
| Polysaccharide lyase (PL) | 6 | 8 |
| Carbohydrate esterase (CE) | 32 | 12 |
| Carbohydrate binding module (CBM) | 74 | 38 |
Note: Transcripts with a fold change of 1.5 or more, with an FDR < 0.05, and p < 0.05 as calculated by DEseq were considered differentially expressed.
Fig. 6Relative individual differentially expressed transcript expression levels for CAZy families of interest. The contribution levels of differentially expressed individual transcripts for GH, CE, and PL families of interest was calculated as the abundance (%) of the individual transcript relative to the expression levels of transcripts observed for those GH families listed, for each substrate (BS or TTIR), and a heat map was generated. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA and indicated on the plot (**** p < 0.001).
Fig. 7Prediction of enzyme activities by CAZyme fingerprinting. Translated protein sequences annotated by dbCAN2 [20] were used as query sequence inputs for SACCHARIS [24] and embedded into phylogenetic trees of characterized (A) GH11, (B) GH43, and (C) CE15 enzymes. Transcript sequences are highlighted with a coloured circle to represent whether they were highly expressed in in vitro with BS (red) or TTIR (blue) as the substrate. EC number and CAZy database annotated functions are colour-coded as indicated. CAZy subfamilies for GH43 are indicated as GH43_#. Domain boundaries are based on predictions by dbCAN [20] and InterProScan [73], with all schematics to scale and colour-coded for signal peptide (dark red), dockerin (teal), glycoside hydrolase (GH) (dark blue), carbohydrate esterase (CE) (light blue), carbohydrate binding module (CBM) (grey), or CBM-like (white). The polypeptide length for the open reading frame of each transcript is shown. Schematics of typical plant cell wall substrates, as identified by EC number, are shown with the targeted bond highlighted. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 8Digestion of xylan and arabinoxylan substrates by differentially expressed CAZymes from barley straw and total tract indigestible residue rumen cultures. (A) Substrates used to detect GH11 activity: oat spelt and beechwood heteroxylan, and rye and wheat arabinoxylan. (B) Thin layer chromatography of GH11 substrates without (-) and with (+) GH11 enzymes, as indicated. (C) Soluble products of enzymatic digestion were analyzed by HPAEC-PAD using a gradient of 10–120 mM sodium acetate in a constant background of 30 mM NaOH. Xylan mono- and oligosaccharide standards were included as controls: xylose (X), xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), xylotetraose (X4), xylopentaose (X5), and xylohexaose (X6), and/or a xylose ladder of X1-X6 forms. Arabinoxylan oligosaccharide standards are as follows: 32-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylobiose (A3X), 23-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylobiose (A2XX), 23,33-di-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A2,3XX).