Literature DB >> 34975974

Draft Genome Sequence of a New Fusarium Isolate Belonging to Fusarium tricinctum Species Complex Collected From Hazelnut in Central Italy.

Silvia Turco1, Alessandro Grottoli2, Mounira Inas Drais1, Carlo De Spirito1, Luigi Faino3, Massimo Reverberi3, Valerio Cristofori1, Angelo Mazzaglia1.   

Abstract

In summer 2019, during a survey on the health status of a hazelnut orchard located in the Tuscia area (the province of Viterbo, Latium, Italy), nuts showing symptoms, such as brown-grayish spots at the bottom of the nuts progressing upward to the apex, and necrotic patches on the bracts and, sometimes, on the petioles, were found and collected for further studies. This syndrome is associated with the nut gray necrosis (NGN), whose main causal agent is Fusarium lateritium. Aiming to increase knowledge about this fungal pathogen, the whole-genome sequencing of a strain isolated from symptomatic hazelnut was performed using long Nanopore reads technology in combination with the higher precision of the Illumina reads, generating a high-quality genome assembly. The following phylogenetic and comparative genomics analysis suggested that this isolate is caused by the F. tricinctum species complex rather than F. lateritium one, as initially hypothesized. Thus, this study demonstrates that different Fusarium species can infect Corylus avellana producing the same symptomatology. In addition, it sheds light onto the genetic features of the pathogen in subject, clarifying facets about its biology, epidemiology, infection mechanisms, and host spectrum, with the future objective to develop specific and efficient control strategies.
Copyright © 2021 Turco, Grottoli, Drais, De Spirito, Faino, Reverberi, Cristofori and Mazzaglia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusarium tricinctum species complex; genomics; hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.); hybrid assembly; nut gray necrosis (NGN)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34975974      PMCID: PMC8718101          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.788584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


Introduction

Corylus avellana L. (hazelnut) is a shrub species belonging to the Betulaceae family. Italy is the second largest hazelnut producer in the world, with an average production of about 140,000 t/year spread among four regions (Campania, Latium, Sicily, and Piedmont), behind Turkey (ISTAT[1], FAOstat Agriculture Data[2]). In the last decades, a fruit rot causing considerable yield losses has been observed and described as a new disease. The symptomatic fruits were characterized by the presence of brown-grayish spots at the bottom of the nuts progressing upward to the apex, and necrotic patches on the bracts and, less often, on the petioles (Belisario and Santori, 2009). Based on these symptoms, the disease has been named nut gray necrosis (NGN) and associated with Fusarium lateritium Nees [Gibberella baccata (Wallr.) Sacc.] as its causal agent (Santori et al., 2010; Vitale et al., 2011). Fusarium is a large cosmopolitan genus of filamentous ascomycetes fungi, ranked as one of the most economically destructive and species-rich groups in the world, including plant pathogens, saprophytes, and endophytes species, among others (O’Donnell et al., 2013, 2015). Among the numerous species, F. lateritium has been reported on numerous hosts, including woody fruit trees as well as shrubs and herbaceous plants, where it could induce wilting, tip or branch dieback, and cankers. F. lateritium has also been reported as the causal agent of twig canker on hazelnut, and fruit rot on walnut (Wollenweber, 1931) and olive (Elia, 1964). Several pathogenicity tests were conducted, supporting the involvement of this fungus in the NGN disease and twig canker of hazelnut (Belisario and Santori, 2009). In late summer 2019, a survey on the health status of a hazelnut orchard located in the Tuscia area (the province of Viterbo, Latium, Italy) was carried out in order to combine an agronomic evaluation of the state of the field approach with a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system for the precision farming of orchards. Nuts showing NGN symptoms were found and collected for further laboratory analysis and molecular characterization. Aiming to increase knowledge about this fungal pathogen, the genome of one fungal strain isolated from a typical NGN diseased nut was sequenced using both long- and short-reads sequencing technologies. The resulting genome when compared with other available Fusarium genomes showed that, despite a morphological similarity with F. lateritium, this isolate is related to the F. tricinctum species complex rather than to the F. lateritium one. Thus, this study aims to provide new insights about the complexity of Fusarium species that infect tissues and fruits of hazelnut and to better understand the genetics behind the pathogenic mechanisms of this fungal strain. The new information achieved represents the basis for a better focused and effective control strategy of this disease.

Materials and Methods

Fungal Isolation

Symptomatic nuts (Tonda Gentile Romana cv) were collected from a mature hazelnut orchard located in the Viterbo area (VT) (Latium, Italy; latitude 42°16′00.0″, longitude 12°17′00.0″, altitude 275 m). Small fragments of approximately 2 mm2 were taken from the nut surface and placed onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates supplemented with 0.2 g⋅L–1 streptomycin sulfate. The Petri plates were then incubated at 25°C until the fungal colonies were grown enough to be singularly further transferred onto new PDA plates to finally obtain monosporal isolates.

Morphological and Molecular Identification

For morphological characterization, the cultures were grown on Spezieller Nahrstoffarmer agar (SNA) (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). After 10 days, the cultures were examined using a Nikon SMZ128 stereomicroscope (Tokyo, Japan), and the images were captured using Alexasoft TPS5000H CMOS camera (Florence, Italy). For microscopic analysis, the samples were prepared by mixing with lactophenol blue dye using Leica DM6 B optical microscope (Wetzlar, Germany), the images were captured using Leica DFC 7000 T camera (Wetzlar, Germany), elaborated using Leica Application Suite X program (version 4.12) (Wetzlar, Germany), and all the morphological characteristics were evaluated according to The Fusarium Laboratory Manual (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). For each isolate, about 100 mg of mycelium was put into a sterile 2 ml microtube with 1 ml of lysis buffer (1 mM EDTA pH 8, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, SDS 1%) for DNA extraction. After 5 min of centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, the supernatant was transferred into a new microtube, and the DNA was precipitated with isopropanol and 70% ethanol. To characterize the isolates at the genus/species level, two genes were amplified using two different pairs of primers, one targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (White et al., 1990) and the second one targeting the Fusarium specific translation elongation factor 1-alpha (Edel-Hermann et al., 2015), and the amplicons were Sanger sequenced at Eurofins genomics (Eurofins Genomics GmbH, Konstanz, Germany).

Pathogenicity Tests

To confirm that the isolate in subject was responsible for the observed symptoms on fruits, the following pathogenicity tests were carried out. For inoculum preparation, the PT isolate of the Fusarium sp. was grown on SNA at 25°C for 10 days (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). Then, conidia were scraped from the fungal cultures and filtered through layers of cheesecloth to remove mycelial fragments. The resulting conidial suspension was quantified using a hemocytometer and diluted to a final concentration of 106 spore/ml. Inoculations were performed using two techniques: (i) inoculation of young to fully formed fruits with 20 μl of conidial suspension (106 conidia/ml) dropped between nut and bracts; and (ii) inoculation of the hazelnut mesocarp with 20 μl of conidial suspension (106 conidia/ml). Control fruits were inoculated with water. Inoculated and control fruits were placed in a moist chamber at room temperature for 12 days. The appearance of any symptoms was monitored daily.

High Molecular Weight DNA Extraction and Genome Sequencing

The fungal culture was initiated using ∼1 × 106 conidia inoculated in 100 ml of Czapek Dox Yeast broth (Leslie and Summerell, 2006) and grown for 3 days at 25°C. Next, the genomic DNA was extracted following a modified Cetrimioum bromide (CTAB) method (Graham and Henry, 1997) and performed as described below. The total mycelium grown in liquid media was lyophilized using a vacuum pump. An aliquot of 250 mg of lyophilized mycelium was fine grounded using a pestle and mortar in liquid nitrogen and transferred into a 2 ml tube. Then, 500 μl of CTAB buffer (10% CTAB, 25 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 200 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 2.50 M NaCl) and 5 μl proteinase K (20 mg/ml) were added to the sample and the solution was gently mixed and incubated overnight at 56°C. After 5 min of agitated incubation with 500 μl of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and 10 min of 12,000 rpm centrifugation, the aqueous clear phase was transferred to a new tube and incubated with 500 μl of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). After 10 min of centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, the aqueous phase was collected into a new tube and 0.6 VOL of cold isopropanol was added, followed by 30 min of centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for the DNA precipitation. Two cleaning/precipitation steps using 1 ml of 70% cold ethanol were performed by 10 min of centrifugation at 12,000 rpm. The pellet was dried, resuspended into a 100 μl of ultrapure sterile water, and treated with RNase at 37°C for 30 min. The DNA integrity was evaluated on a 1% agarose gel electrophoresis run, whereas the DNA purity was checked using Nanodrop™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA sequencing was performed on a MinION Mk1b device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, ONT, United Kingdom) using a R9.4.1 Flow Cell (ONT), after library preparation using the SQK-RBK004 Rapid Barcoding Kit (ONT). An aliquot of the same DNA sample was sequenced at Eurofins Genomics (Eurofins Genomics GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) with the genome sequencer Illumina NovaSeq 6000 S2 using the paired-end sequencing.

Genome Assembly

Illumina reads quality was evaluated using FastQC (Andrews, 2010), NovaSeq 6000 adapters were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.39 (Bolger et al., 2014), and low-quality reads were removed using Sickle (Joshi and Fass, 2011). To get the draft genome sequence, four different assemblers were used separately: SPAdes version 3.11.1 (Nurk et al., 2013), Minimap2 version 2.12-r849-dirty (Li, 2018) in combination with Miniasm version 0.3-r179 (Li, 2016), MaSuRCA version 3.4.2 (Zimin et al., 2013), and Canu version 2.1.1 (Koren et al., 2017). SPAdes was used in a first trial using only Illumina reads and in a second run for a hybrid assembly using both Illumina and Nanopore reads. A hybrid assembly was also performed using MaSuRCA, whereas Miniasm-Minimap2 and Canu used only Nanopore reads. For all the assemblers, default parameters were used, except for the expected genome size that was set at 40 Mb in Canu. The obtained assemblies were further polished using Nanopolish version 0.11.1 (Loman et al., 2015), Racon version 1.3.3 (Vaser et al., 2017), or Pilon version 1.23 (Walker et al., 2014). The assembly quality statistics, before and after polishing, were evaluated using QUAST version 5.0.2 (Gurevich et al., 2013), while BUSCO version 5.beta.1 (Simão et al., 2015) was used to assess the assembly completeness, using hypocreales_db10 as ortholog lineage dataset, which consists of a set of 4,494 conserved profiles.

Genome Annotation

The draft genome assembled using Canu, chosen for downstream analysis, was structurally annotated following the de novo MAKER pipeline version 3.01.03 (Holt and Yandell, 2011), using the built-in RepeatModeler to mask repetitive elements, SNAP and AUGUSTUS for an ab initio gene prediction, and Est2Genome and Protein2Genome to further refine introns and exons boundaries using Exonerate and tRNAscan-SE to identify the genes related to the tRNA biosynthesis. Transcripts and proteins concatenated from four closely related Fusarium species (F. fujikuroi, F. graminearum, F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, and F. verticillioides) were given as gene models, and the maximum intron size was set as 2,500. Functional annotation was performed using BLASTp and SwissProt as a database. The same annotation pipeline was applied to annotate the genomes of F. culmorum, F. circinatum, F. oxysporum f. sp. koae 44, F. pseudograminearum CS3270, F. solani IlSc-1, F. tricinctum INRA104, F. tricinctum NRRL25481, F. tricinctum T6, F. verticilloides BRIP 53263, BRIP 53590, and all the F. avenaceum isolates, except for the already annotated Fa05001 used for the following comparative genomics analysis.

Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis

The genome sequence of 27 others Fusarium species, together with their annotated proteins when available, were downloaded from the NCBI genome databases and used for phylogenetic and comparative genomics analysis (Table 1). Notably, the only F. lateritium genome sequence available in the NCBI database under the accession number GCA_014898835.1 refers to a strain isolated from a symptomatic elm tree in Pineville, Louisiana, United States (Kim et al., 2020).
TABLE 1

List of Fusarium species used for pairwise genome comparisons and phylogenetic analysis.

SpeciesStrainAccession number
Fusarium acuminatum F829 GCA_013363215.1
Fusarium avenaceum F156N33 GCA_018282135.1
Fusarium avenaceum Fa05001 GCA_000769215.1
Fusarium avenaceum FaLH03 GCA_000769305.1
Fusarium avenaceum FaLH27 GCA_000769295.1
Fusarium avenaceum NRRL 13321 GCA_013753855.1
Fusarium avenaceum S18/60 GCA_019055295.1
Fusarium avenaceum S18/70 GCA_019055285.1
Fusarium avenaceum S18/74 GCA_019055275.1
Fusarium circinatum FSP34 GCA_497325.3
Fusarium culmorum - GCA_900074845.1
Fusarium fujikuroi Augusto2 GCA_9663095.1
Fusarium fujikuroi CSV1 GCA_9663055.1
Fusarium graminearum - GCA_900073075.1
Fusarium graminearum PH-1 GCA_900044135.1
Fusarium lateritium NRRL 13622 GCA_14898835.1
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. koae44 GCA_14857105.1
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici4287 GCA_149955.2
Fusarium pseudograminearum CS3096 GCA_303195.2
Fusarium pseudograminearum CS3270 GCA_974265.2
Fusarium solani IISc-1 GCA_13168735.1
Fusarium tricinctum INRA104 GCA_900382705.2
Fusarium tricinctum NRRL 25481 GCA_012977725.1
Fusarium tricinctum T6 GCA_003045085.1
Fusarium venenatum A3-5 GCA_900007375.1
Fusarium verticillioides BRIP53263 GCA_3317015.2
Fusarium verticillioides BRIP53590 GCA_3316995.2
List of Fusarium species used for pairwise genome comparisons and phylogenetic analysis. For a phylogenetic analysis, the gene sequences of six housekeeping genes (EF-1α, RPB1, RPB2, beta tubulin, ITS, and LSU) were extracted from each genome and concatenated and aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004). The resulting alignment was used to build a maximum likelihood (ML) tree using raxmlHPC (Stamatakis, 2014) and visualized in a dendrogram using FigTree version 1.4.4[3]. A second ML phylogenetic tree was built using raxmlHPC on the core genome SNPs identified during a pan genome analysis performed using Panseq, with the run mode set to pan, the fragment size at 500 nucleotides, the percentage of identity at 90%, and the core genome threshold to 28 genomes, in order to find out the sequences in common among all the strains (Laing et al., 2010). To better discriminate between isolates belonging to the F. tricinctum species complex (FTSC), a phylogenetic ML tree was built on the alignment of the concatenated sequence of the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II largest (RPB1) and second largest subunit (RPB2) nucleotide sequence, as previously applied by O’Donnell et al. (2013); Ponts et al. (2020), and Crous et al. (2021). MUSCLE and RAxML were used as previously described, and the 63 Fusarium isolates used in this analysis are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Orthologous proteins were identified using OrthoFinder, and the results were used to build a species tree, visualized using FigTree as well (Emms and Kelly, 2019). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis was performed using the pyani script and ANIb as algorithm for the alignment (Pritchard et al., 2016).

Characterization of Transcripts Involved in Pathogenesis

The putative secreted proteins involved in pathogenesis were identified using SignalP version 5.0b with the cutoff set ≥ 0.5 (Almagro Armenteros et al., 2019a). TargetP version 2.0 was used to identify signal peptide (SP), mitochondrial and chloroplast transit peptide (mTP and cTP, respectively), and potential cleavage sites (CS) (Almagro Armenteros et al., 2019b). Prediction of transmembrane proteins was performed using TMHMM version 2.0 (Krogh et al., 2001). Pathogen Host Interactions database (Urban et al., 2019) was used to find the similarity with pathogenicity and virulence-related genes, experimentally tested for roles in pathogenicity. Instead, Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme (CAZy) database (Lombard et al., 2014) was used to identify families of enzymes related to degradation, modification, and creation of glycosidic bonds, focusing on the Cell Wall Digestion Enzymes (CWDE). The biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were automatically searched and analyzed using AntiSMASH6 (Blin et al., 2021). The presence of the emerging mycotoxin enniatin was verified by blasting the available gene sequences from several Fusarium species (EF029060.1, NW_022158785.1, NW_022158526.1, KP000028.1, NC_030995.1, ENA| Z18755, NW_023502434.1, NW_023501408.1, and NW_023501343.1) (Fraeyman et al., 2017; Ponts et al., 2018).

Results

Strain Identification

A Fusarium sp. strain was isolated from symptomatic nuts collected from a hazelnut field located in the VT (Italy), which was being monitored in the framework of the PANTHEON project and named as Fusarium sp. isolate PT (Figures 1A,B). The morphological analysis performed to look at both macroscopic and microscopic characteristics revealed a mycelia color variable from white in the first 3–4 days to pale orange. Abundant medium-long, thin macroconidia with walls parallel for most of the spore length were observed, in the absence of microconidia and rare monophialides (Figures 1C,D). The characteristics found on the sample resembled the ones from the F. lateritium species when compared with The Fusarium Laboratory Manual (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). The sequenced ITS and the EF-1α region showed the highest identities (98.22 and 99.69% respectively) with F. lateritium sequences when blasted in the NCBI database (Supplementary Table 2).
FIGURE 1

Symptomatic hazelnuts and microscopic characteristics of the Fusarium sp. isolate PT. (A,B) The symptomatic fruits were characterized by a brown grayish necrotic spot/patch on the nut shell, bracts and less often on the petioles. (C) Macroconidia and (D) monophiliades of the isolated fungus visualized through optical microscope.

Symptomatic hazelnuts and microscopic characteristics of the Fusarium sp. isolate PT. (A,B) The symptomatic fruits were characterized by a brown grayish necrotic spot/patch on the nut shell, bracts and less often on the petioles. (C) Macroconidia and (D) monophiliades of the isolated fungus visualized through optical microscope.

Pathogenicity Test

All fruits except the negative control developed symptoms similar to the one observed in the field (Figure 2). The Fusarium sp. isolate PT was consistently re-isolated from the inoculated nuts but not from the control fruits. The fungus re-isolated from diseased fruits showed the same morphology of the original isolate as well as the ITS, LSU, and β-tub, and EF-1α sequences were identical to those previously obtained, thus confirming Koch’s postulates.
FIGURE 2

Pathogen reinoculation. The isolated pathogen was reinoculated in healthy hazelnuts, which soon developed the same symptoms as the hazelnut collected in the field close to the Viterbo area (VT), confirming the Kock’s postulate.

Pathogen reinoculation. The isolated pathogen was reinoculated in healthy hazelnuts, which soon developed the same symptoms as the hazelnut collected in the field close to the Viterbo area (VT), confirming the Kock’s postulate.

Genome Assembly and Annotation

A clean and high molecular weight DNA was obtained, with both 260/230 nm and 260/280 nm ratios falling between 1.8 and 2 and was further sequenced using both ONT and Illumina technologies. ONT MinION run produced ∼701 k reads (1.92 Gbp; ∼73 × coverage), with a mean read length of 2,740 bp and an N50 of 4,588. Illumina NovaSeq 6000 S2 sequencing produced 2 × ∼2.5 M reads (2 Mbp × 385 Mbp; ∼20 × coverage). After low-quality reads and adapters removal done by sickle and trimmomatic, respectively, the total number of the paired-end Illumina reads resulted to be 4.8 M in total, with an average length of 151 bp and a GC content of 47%. Instead, the average length of the Nanopore reads, affected by the starting DNA fragments material, resulted in an average length of 2,740 bp, with a GC content of 47%. The reads were assembled following several pipelines and, thus, different algorithms whose results are described by QUAST statistics (Table 2). SPAdes draft genome derived either by only Illumina reads or by a hybrid assembly between Illumina and Nanopore reads, resulted to be the one with the lowest N50, the richest in undetermined bases N (171 and 48, respectively) and assembled in the highest number of contigs (70), and thus, it was discarded for further downstream analysis. The genome assembly derived from Miniasm-Minimap2 without any polishing yielded 70 contigs and 40.28 Mb of genome length with an N50 of 1.028 Mb that slightly increased to 1.029 Mb after five iterative polishing steps. MaSuRCA assembly resulted in 53 contigs arranged in a total length of 40.44 Mb and an N50 of 1.49 Mb. One step of Pilon polishing seemed to be unnecessary since the quality did not change much, proving that MaSuRCA itself with its POLCA polishing step is already enough to reach a good quality genome. Overall, Canu assembly resulted to be the one with the best statistics, with a total genome length of 40.51 Mb arranged in only 27 contigs.
TABLE 2

Quast assembly statistics.

AssemblySPAdesSPAdes hybridMinimap2- MiniasmMinimap2-Miniasm-PilonMaSuRCAMaSuRCA PilonCanuCanu-Pilon
# contigs407250707053532727
Largest contig1,476,0282,349,0712,564,2602,565,8504,680,6274,680,6345,683,9765,693,689
Total length40,511,78140,523,22940,281,04240,307,96640,444,18740,444,62240,511,59840,580,457
GC (%)47.5547.5447.5647.5847.5947.5947.5147.52
N50505,135933,9091,028,9941,029,7261,490,1351,490,1442,950,3662,955,107
N75289,142487,994526,152526,477908,446908,4461,649,7801,652,530
L50261614149955
L755330282817171010
# N’s per 100 kbp0.420.12000000
Quast assembly statistics. Then, the completeness of the three best quality assemblies was further evaluated by looking for the presence of 4,494 conserved ORF among the Hypocreales order (BUSCO). In fact, the polishing steps were needed to increase the quality and completeness of each of the three assemblies as well as to reduce the fragmented or missing BUSCO, leading to 99.6, 99.8, and 99.5% of completeness, respectively (Supplementary Dataset 1). Based on the assembly statistics results, the draft genome assembled using Canu was chosen for downstream analysis. Its sequence was further verified by mapping the Illumina reads back on the 27 contigs used as reference to finally reach a high-quality consensus sequence (BWA version 0.7.17-r1188, samtools version 1.2, Burrows and Wheeler, 1994; Li et al., 2009). The genome was then annotated following MAKER pipeline and deposited on the NCBI genome database under the accession number JAHMRZ000000000.

Phylogenetic Analysis

The aligned concatenated sequences of EF-1α, RPB1, RPB2, beta tubulin, ITS, and LSU (around 7,100 nucleotides) of the Fusarium isolates under comparison showed clear differences perfectly represented by the ML tree in Figure 3A. Interestingly, our Fusarium sp. isolate PT clustered together with the FTSC and not directly with the other F. lateritium strain, as one could expect from the symptoms associated to the NGN. This clustering is due to the low sequence similarity, ranging from 82 to 86% of similarity, respectively, between the EF-1α, RPB1, RPB2, and beta-tubulin genes of the sequenced Fusarium sp. isolate PT and the F. lateritium, even though the ITS and LSU sequences were 100 and 98% identical (Supplementary Dataset 2). On the contrary, the sequence similarity of these genes with the ones from the F. tricinctum species complex were, indeed, higher but never reaching the 100% similarity (Supplementary Dataset 2).
FIGURE 3

Phylogenetic analysis of 28 Fusarium strains. (A) The ML phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the EF-1α, RPB1, RPB2, beta tubulin, ITS, and LSU concatenated nucleotide sequences. Only the bootstraps value higher than 70 are shown. (B) The ML phylogenetic tree based on the 4,319 core genome SNPs identified using Panseq. The number of bootstraps is indicated as well. (C) The ML phylogenetic tree of the orthologous proteins identified using OrthoFinder. In panels (A–C) Fusarium solani JS169 was used as outgroup. (D) Heatmap of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) performed using blastn showing the percentage of identify among the different Fusarium strains.

Phylogenetic analysis of 28 Fusarium strains. (A) The ML phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the EF-1α, RPB1, RPB2, beta tubulin, ITS, and LSU concatenated nucleotide sequences. Only the bootstraps value higher than 70 are shown. (B) The ML phylogenetic tree based on the 4,319 core genome SNPs identified using Panseq. The number of bootstraps is indicated as well. (C) The ML phylogenetic tree of the orthologous proteins identified using OrthoFinder. In panels (A–C) Fusarium solani JS169 was used as outgroup. (D) Heatmap of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) performed using blastn showing the percentage of identify among the different Fusarium strains. Accordingly, to further disentangle the phylogenetic relationship among the Fusarium strains, a ML tree was built on 4,319 SNPs found in the core genome alignment derived from Panseq. As shown in Figure 3B, the clustering of our Fusarium sp. isolate PT within the FTSC was confirmed. The same clusterization was obtained when the orthologous proteins were identified and a species tree was built using OrthoFinder (Figure 3C). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) performed using blastn gave an overall picture of the sequence identity between the Fusarium strains under comparison, as shown by the heatmap in Figure 3D, with the Fusarium sp. isolate PT again among the FTSC isolates. Finally, a selection of 63 Fusarium isolates, belonging to the FTSC for which both RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences were available, was used to build an additional ML phylogenetic tree. As in the previous trees, the Fusarium sp. PT isolate constitutes an independent branch within the dendrogram (Supplementary Figure 1). It is well-known that proteins are secreted in many Fusarium species during the colonizing stages (Ma et al., 2010), and for this reason, we went looking for the transcripts involved in pathogenesis. In fact, 564 analogous genes involved in pathogenicity were identified from the PHI database. Among these, 24 genes were detected to be putative secreted proteins using SignalP. The 408 carbohydrate-active enzymes were detected, approximately 220 of which encoding glycoside hydrolases (GHs) and 79 genes encoding glycosyltransferases (Gts) (Table 3). Among the 1,288 proteins with a signal peptide, TargetP identified 525 proteins with a mitochondrial transit peptide, whereas 1,813 proteins resulted to have a possible cleavage site (Supplementary Figure 2). The predicted transmembrane helices found using TMHMM are reported in Supplementary Dataset 3.
TABLE 3

Characterization of the transcripts involved in pathogenesis.

Fusarium sp. PT
Total Transcripts12,093
Secreted Proteins519
PHI base564
Unaffected pathogenicity292
Reduced virulence244
Lethal45
Loss of pathogenicity26
Hypervirulence9
Chemistry target: resistance to chemical1
Enhanced antagonism1
PHI base secreted24
Unaffected pathogenicity13
Reduced virulence9
Loss of pathogenicity1
Lethal1
Hypervirulence2
CAZy enzymes408
Biosynthetic Gene Clusters39
Characterization of the transcripts involved in pathogenesis. Seventeen biosynthetic gene clusters belonging to T1PKSs, NRPs, and terpene synthases (Tss) were found using antiSMASH 6. Among the T1PKSs gene cluster, the fujikurin A, B, C, and D were found with 83% of similarity, bikaverin with 42 or 57% of similarity, and fusarielin H and oxyjavanicin with 50% of similarity. Besides gibepyrone A with 40% of similarity, the ACT-Toxin II shared 100% identity with the sequence deposited in the database. The NRP gene cluster is represented mainly by ilicicolin H (50% of similarity) and chrysogine (83%), whereas BGCs belonging to bassianolide, beauvericin, and fusariodione A showed a similarity below 20%. Finally, the koraiol and α-acorenol terpenes showed 100% of similarity, whereas squalestatin S1 and gibberellin were of 40% similarity. The complete sequence of the enniatin gene was also identified, sharing 85 and 86% of similarity with the gene deriving from F. scirpi and F. tricinctum strain INRA104, respectively (Supplementary Table 3).

Discussion

Fusarium is a wide fungal genus including numerous species, with an equally broad host range. Its classification has been traditionally based on morphological characters, such as asexual distinctive banana-shaped septate macroconidia (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). However, in the last decades, molecular approaches have made the species distinction more accurate, allowing the depiction of more than 300 phylogenetically distinct species (O’Donnell et al., 2004; Druzhinina et al., 2006). In most cases, the molecular analysis behind the species identification and the assignment of strains to definite species was, and still is, based on a multilocus sequence typing (MSLT) approach, meaning the comparison of complete or partial sequences of a bunch of housekeeping genes used, for example, in FUSARIUM-ID (Geiser et al., 2004; Park et al., 2010) and Fusarium MLST (O’Donnell et al., 2010). However, as already thoroughly discussed in several papers (see O’Donnell et al., 2015), even this approach during time has shown some limits. For instance, in Fusarium, ITS and LSU are often scarcely informative at species level and should be avoided, giving preference to EF1, RPB1, and RPB2. In addition, it must be considered that the complexity of the genus and the reported criticalities in the selection of genes for species identification have sometimes led to misidentification of strains and, consequently, to species assignment in corresponding sequences when deposited in molecular databases. It, therefore, seems clear why the new whole-genome sequencing (WGS) technologies are a powerful tool to solve these misunderstandings. Furthermore, they do not only allow accurate phylogenetic analysis but also provide the basic for a thorough understanding of molecular pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the plant-pathogen iteration, like the identification of the effector genes (Plissonneau et al., 2016; Möller and Stukenbrock, 2017). Knowledge of the infection pathways of the pathogen could allow to develop more effective control strategies. Thus, obtaining a high-quality genome as complete as possible, for those species who have not been sequenced yet, is an essential step to take. In this study, we report the draft genome sequence of the strain Fusarium sp. isolate PT isolated from hazelnut in Central Italy, which initially was thought to be F. lateritium, due to the previous knowledge about the symptoms induced in the host and the morphology of the pathogen itself (Belisario and Santori, 2009; Santori et al., 2010; Vitale et al., 2011). In fact, its morphological traits observed under the optical microscope showed the typical banana-shaped septate macroconidia of F. lateritium (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). Furthermore, ITS and translation elongation factor 1-alpha sequencing corroborated this first hypothesis, guiding us toward a WGS with the aim to obtain a genome of this pathogen with the highest possible quality. Accordingly, four different assembly approaches were applied, using both long reads obtained by ONT MinION and short reads by Illumina sequencing technologies, either in combination (hybrid assembly) or alone: (i) Miniasm-Minimap2, which use the overlap-layout-consensus (OLC); (ii) SPAdes uses the de Bruijn graph; (iii) MaSuRCA combines the de Bruijn graph with OLC, creating intermediate super-reads, further polished with POLCA; and (iv) Canu follows a MinHash Alignment Process (MHAP) based on k-mer weighting. The advantage of using long reads compared with using only short reads has been extensively proved, especially for more complex genomes that are rich in transposons or tandem repeat (Goodwin et al., 2016; van Dijk et al., 2018). In addition, performing a hybrid assembly guarantee to take advantage, from one side, of the depth coverage and basecalling quality given by the Illumina reads and, on the other side, to increase the genome contiguity with the ONT reads (Chen et al., 2020). In fact, this method proved to be very successful in fungal genome assembly, either within the Fusarium world (Million et al., 2019; Degradi et al., 2021; Dvorianinova et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2021) or to extended species (Faino et al., 2015; Saud et al., 2021). The same consideration applies to the assembly of the Fusarium sp. isolate in the study. In fact, the draft genome assembled by SPAdes using only Illumina reads gave the highest number of contigs but also undetermined nucleotides N, probably coming from repetitive regions or those gaps that Illumina reads could not fill. On the contrary, Canu, whose pipeline includes a de novo assembly from long reads followed by polishing with short reads, seemed to be the best strategy, also when compared with both MaSuRCA and Miniasm-Minimap2 hybrid assemblies. In fact, Canu produced less contigs (27) with the highest N50 (2,955,107bp) without Ns. In literature, good performance of Canu have been reported in F. musae (Degradi et al., 2021), F. oxysporum f. sp. capsici (Xingxing et al., 2021), and F. oxysporum f. sp. lini (Krasnov et al., 2020). Accordingly, using the draft genome obtained using Canu for further analysis and annotation, different phylogenetic analysis surprising showed that the Fusarium sp. isolate PT is more closely related to F. tricinctum species complex than F. lateritium. These results were further supported by the species tree based on clustering of the orthologs proteins and on the dendrogram based on the ANI results. Taken these results all together, it was once more demonstrated that species identification using only one or two housekeeping genes may led to wrong species assignment, as already shown for the ITS region in fungi such as Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Trichoderma (Raja et al., 2017). In fact, polyphasic taxonomic approach, instead, gives a more robust classification of the species under examination, from the bacterial level to the more complicated Fusarium family (Das et al., 2014; Crous et al., 2021). In contrast, the still limited availability of WGSs in the databases may restrict the comparison range. But thanks to the drop in sequencing price and the constant increase in computational power, a WGS followed by comparative genomics analysis is becoming the best choice for a precise taxonomy identification. Moreover, each effort taken to increase the database availability contributes to fulfill gaps in fungal knowledge, especially for a variegated genus as the one of Fusarium. At the same time, we did not go further in the attempt to assign a species name to the isolate in subject, leaving it at the status of undefined species. This agrees with the concept described by Summerell (2019) that the depiction of a new species must require the study of a number of strains with coherent genetic features that has to be sufficient to also describe the range of genetic variability within the new species. From a strictly phytopathological point of view, this is the first report of a Fusarium isolate referable to the F. tricinctum species complex associated with the already known disease named NGN. In fact, to our knowledge, the only other report of Fusarium related to the tricinctum species complex associated with hazelnut comes from Iran and refers to a generic plant decline (Ghasemi and Davari, 2019). The NGN has been, instead, well studied and repeatedly attributed to the pathogenic action of F. lateritium (Belisario and Santori, 2009; Santori et al., 2010; Vitale et al., 2011), with a secondary role for Alternaria spp. Recently, the same disease was reported for the first time in La Araucanìa, Chile, and again different fungi were isolated from diseased fruit: Fusarium sp., even if the closest species according to ITS blast resulted F. sporotrichioides, but also Alternaria alternata, Diaporthe sp., Phomopsis sp., and Neofusicoccum sp. (Duran et al., 2020). Several authors sustain the complexity of nut defects and rotting and the simultaneous occurrence of different pathogens in disease expression. Recently, Arciuolo et al. (2020), studying the fungal species associated with defective hazelnuts in Turkey, found that the prevalent fungi were Alternaria, Aspergillus, Botryosphaeria, Diaporthe, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Pestalotiopsis, proposing a major role for Diaporthe genus. In a previous paper, the species D. eres was demonstrated to be the main reason for the occurrence of brown spots on the kernel surface and of internal discoloration of nuts (Battilani et al., 2018). In Oregon, Pscheidt et al. (2018), studying the fungi involved in kernel mold on hazelnut, found out that Penicillium spp., Aspergillus and Cladosporium spp., and D. rudis were frequently isolated, together with F. lateritium (identified by ITS and EF-1α). All these studies demonstrate unequivocally that several fungi can concurrently invade and damage hazelnut generating various expressions of external and internal defects. Among them, Fusarium species undoubtedly have a key role in this type of disease. What remains to be assessed is the specific relevance of each of these species in the disease progression and which environmental factors influence the evolution of the disease. Investigating genomes as we did in this study, beside shedding light in the taxonomy of fungal species, particularly significant for the complex genus Fusarium, should allow to identify the genetic features of the pathogens involved in pathogenicity, thus representing milestones in understanding its evolution and eventually plan efficient control strategies to protect an important Italian crop as C. avellana.

Data Availability Statement

The Genome sequence can be found on the NCBI database genome under the accession number provided. The raw sequencing data are available under request.

Author Contributions

ST performed all the bioinformatics analysis, interpreted the results, prepared the figures, and wrote the manuscript in consultation with MD, LF, and AM. AG conceived and designed the study, collected the samples, and participated in the analysis. MD and CD performed the lab experiments. LF and MR provided the critical feedback and helped shape the research. VC and AM supervised the project and approved all the analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  53 in total

1.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Sara Goodwin; John D McPherson; W Richard McCombie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks.

Authors:  José Juan Almagro Armenteros; Konstantinos D Tsirigos; Casper Kaae Sønderby; Thomas Nordahl Petersen; Ole Winther; Søren Brunak; Gunnar von Heijne; Henrik Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  First Report of Fusarium lateritium as the Agent of Nut Gray Necrosis on Hazelnut in Italy.

Authors:  A Santori; S Vitale; L Luongo; A Belisario
Journal:  Plant Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Cyber infrastructure for Fusarium: three integrated platforms supporting strain identification, phylogenetics, comparative genomics and knowledge sharing.

Authors:  Bongsoo Park; Jongsun Park; Kyeong-Chae Cheong; Jaeyoung Choi; Kyongyong Jung; Donghan Kim; Yong-Hwan Lee; Todd J Ward; Kerry O'Donnell; David M Geiser; Seogchan Kang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation.

Authors:  Sergey Koren; Brian P Walenz; Konstantin Berlin; Jason R Miller; Nicholas H Bergman; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  PHI-base: the pathogen-host interactions database.

Authors:  Martin Urban; Alayne Cuzick; James Seager; Valerie Wood; Kim Rutherford; Shilpa Yagwakote Venkatesh; Nishadi De Silva; Manuel Carbajo Martinez; Helder Pedro; Andy D Yates; Keywan Hassani-Pak; Kim E Hammond-Kosack
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Nanopore and Illumina Genome Sequencing of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lini Strains of Different Virulence.

Authors:  Ekaterina M Dvorianinova; Elena N Pushkova; Roman O Novakovskiy; Liubov V Povkhova; Nadezhda L Bolsheva; Ludmila P Kudryavtseva; Tatiana A Rozhmina; Nataliya V Melnikova; Alexey A Dmitriev
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Evolution of Fusarium tricinctum and Fusarium avenaceum mitochondrial genomes is driven by mobility of introns and of a new type of palindromic microsatellite repeats.

Authors:  Nadia Ponts; Charlotte Gautier; Jérôme Gouzy; Laetitia Pinson-Gadais; Marie Foulongne-Oriol; Christine Ducos; Florence Richard-Forget; Jean-Michel Savoie; Chen Zhao; Gérard Barroso
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.