| Literature DB >> 34963874 |
Satya P Meena1, Metlapalli V Sairam1, Ashok K Puranik1, Mayank Badkur1, Naveen Sharma1, Mahendra Lodha1, Mahaveer S Rohda1, Nikhil Kothari2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anasarca is well-known and refers to generalized edema caused by underlying clinical conditions and unknown risk factors in the patient. However, it is a relatively unexplored postoperative symptom following major abdominal surgeries. It is associated with poor patient outcomes in terms of delayed recovery and associated severe complications. Pedal edema is an early sign of post-operative anasarca, which progresses into an unfavorable clinical condition due to generalized edema followed by multiple organ dysfunction. Aim: This study aimed to assess risk factors and complications associated with postoperative anasarca among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The prospective observational study included 241 patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries from July 2019 to February 2021 in a tertiary care health centre in Rajasthan, India. Risk factors like age, nutritional parameters, addictions like smoking, alcohol intake, opium intake, leukocytosis, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were assessed. Postoperative complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Mean, standard deviation, percentages, Pearson's Chi-square test and Student's t-test were used to analyze the data.Entities:
Keywords: albumin; anasarca; clavien-dindo grading; edema; laparotomy; mortality
Year: 2021 PMID: 34963874 PMCID: PMC8696563 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
NRS 2002 for the hospitalized patients
NRS- Nutritional risk screening, COPD- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CKD- Chronic kidney disease, DM- Diabetes mellitus, ICU- Intensive care unit
| NRS Score | Grade | Impaired nutritional status | Disease severity according to metabolism or requirement |
| 1 | Mild | Weight loss> 5% in last three months Or Food intake < 50-75% of normal diet requirement in the preceding week | Hip fracture Chronic disease with acute complications like COPD, Cirrhosis, CKD on hemodialysis, DM, malignant oncology |
| 2 | Moderate | Weight loss> 5% in last two months Or Food intake < 25-50% of normal diet requirement in the preceding week Or BMI 18.5-20.5 with impaired general condition | Major abdominal surgery Stroke Severe pneumonia Malignant hematology |
| 3 | Sever | Weight loss> 5% in last one month/ > 15 in last three months Or Food intake < 0-25% of normal diet requirement in the preceding week Or BMI <18.5 with impaired general condition | Head injury Bone marrow transplantation ICU patients(Apache>10) |
| Total score | Impaired nutritional status score plus | Impaired nutritional status score | |
| Note: | Age>70 – add 1 into a total score Total score 0- Normal nutritional status or requirements Total score 3 or > 3- The patient is nutritionally at risk and nutritional care should be initiated Total score <3- weekly basis nutritional screening should be planned | ||
Figure 1Demographic profile of study participants.
Risk factors associated with postoperative anasarca patients
NRS-Nutritional risk screening score, MAC- Mid-arm circumference, MTC- Mid-thigh circumference, BMI- Body mass index, CCI- Charlson-comorbidity index
| Risk Factors | Anasarca ( Mean±SD) | Without Anasarca (Mean±SD) | P-value |
| Age | 50.93 ± 4.60 | 46.53 ± 2.62 | 0.027 |
| NRS | 2.98 ± 0.36 | 2.08 ± 0.21 | 0.001 |
| MAC | 23.83 ± 0.81 | 24.30 ± 0.52 | 0.347 |
| MTC | 42.78 ± 1.40 | 42.40 ± 0.82 | 0.637 |
| BMI | 21.91 ± 0.90 | 21.93 ± 0.62 | 0.526 |
| Hemoglobin | 11.24 ± 0.61 | 11.88 ± 0.32 | 0.051 |
| Leukocytosis | 14.39 ± 2.14 | 11.06 ±1.02 | 0.001 |
| Albumin | 2.64 ± 0.16 | 3.47 ± 0.12 | 0.001 |
| CCI | 1.99 ± 0.52 | 1.86 ± 0.31 | 0.808 |
Clavien-Dindo Grading of complications following major abdominal surgery
n- Patient number, no- Number
| Clavien-Dindo grade | Anasarca (n=72) | Without anasarca (n=169) | P-value |
| Patients no (Percentage) | Patients no (Percentage) | ||
| Grade 1 | 12(16.7%) | 61(14.8%) | 0.002 |
| Grade 2 | 10(13.9%) | 14(8.3%) | 0.199 |
| Grade 3 | 1(1.4%) | 13(7.7%) | 0.049 |
| Grade 4 | 15(20.8%) | 9(5.3%) | <0.001 |
| Grade 5 | 30(41.7%) | 9(5.3%) | <0.001 |
Postoperative outcome among all study participants
n- Patient number, no- number, ICU- Intensive care unit
| Patient outcome | Anasarca (n=72) | Without anasarca (n=169) | P- value |
| Patients no(Percentage) | Patients no(Percentage) | ||
| Skin dehiscence | 46 (63.9%) | 40(23.7%) | <0.001 |
| Fascial dehiscence | 14 (19.4%) | 4 (2.4%) | <0.001 |
| Intestinal leak | 8/23 (34.8%) | 9/76 (11.8%) | 0.019 |
| ICU admission | 40 (55.5%) | 16 (9.5%) | <0.001 |
| Revision surgery | 18 (25%) | 22 (13.0%) | 0.027 |
| Mortality | 30 (41.67%) | 9 (5.33%) | <0.001 |
| Readmission among survival patients | 5/42 (11.90%) | 19/167 (11.38%) | 0.896 |