| Literature DB >> 34961160 |
Tanzina Sharmin Nipun1,2, Alfi Khatib1,3, Qamar Uddin Ahmed1, Mohd Hamzah Mohd Nasir4, Farahaniza Supandi5, Muhammad Taher1, Mohd Zuwairi Saiman5,6,7.
Abstract
Psychotria malayana Jack belongs to the Rubiacea and is widespread in Southeast Asian countries. It is traditionally used to treat diabetes. Despite its potential medicinal use, scientific proof of this pharmacological action and the toxic effect of this plant are still lacking. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the in vitro antidiabetic and antioxidant activities, toxicity, and preliminary phytochemical screening of P. malayana leaf extracts by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after derivatization. The antidiabetic activities of different extracts of this plant were investigated through alpha-glucosidase inhibitory (AGI) and 2-NBDG glucose uptake using 3T3-L1 cell line assays, while the antioxidant activity was evaluated using DPPH and FRAP assays. Its toxicological effect was investigated using the zebrafish embryo/larvae (Danio rerio) model. The mortality, hatchability, tail-detachment, yolk size, eye size, beat per minute (BPM), and body length were taken into account to observe the teratogenicity in all zebrafish embryos exposed to methanol extract. The LC50 was determined using probit analysis. The methanol extract showed the AGI activity (IC50 = 2.71 ± 0.11 μg/mL), insulin-sensitizing activity (at a concentration of 5 µg/mL), and potent antioxidant activities (IC50 = 10.85 μg/mL and 72.53 mg AAE/g for DPPH and FRAP activity, respectively). Similarly, the water extract exhibited AGI activity (IC50 = 6.75 μg/mL), insulin-sensitizing activity at the concentration of 10 μg/mL, and antioxidant activities (IC50 = 27.12 and 33.71 μg/mL for DPPH and FRAP activity, respectively). The methanol and water extracts exhibited the LC50 value higher than their therapeutic concentration, i.e., 37.50 and 252.45 µg/mL, respectively. These results indicate that both water and methanol extracts are safe and potentially an antidiabetic agent, but the former is preferable since its therapeutic index (LC50/therapeutic concentration) is much higher than for methanol extracts. Analysis using GC-MS on derivatized methanol and water extracts of P. malayana leaves detected partial information on some constituents including palmitic acid, 1,3,5-benzenetriol, 1-monopalmitin, beta-tocopherol, 24-epicampesterol, alpha-tocopherol, and stigmast-5-ene, that could be a potential target to further investigate the antidiabetic properties of the plant. Nevertheless, isolation and identification of the bioactive compounds are required to confirm their antidiabetic activity and toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: GC-MS; Psychotria malayana Jack; antidiabetic activity; antioxidant activity; derivatization; toxicity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34961160 PMCID: PMC8707723 DOI: 10.3390/plants10122688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The AGI activity and yield of extraction of different extracts of P. malayana leaves.
| Sample | AGI Activity | % Yield ( |
|---|---|---|
| Hexane extract | ND | 1.06 ± 0.13 c |
| Ethyl acetate extract | 5.37 ± 0.14 b | 18.87 ± 0.93 b |
| Methanol extract | 2.71 ± 0.11 c | 31.51 ± 1.24 a |
| Water extract | 6.75 ± 0.16 a | 20.40 ± 1.47 b |
| Quercetin | 1.88 ± 0.003 d | ND |
Data with a different letter are significantly different with a p-value less than 0.05. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to calculate the data with a 95% confidence level. All the findings are displayed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). ND = not determined.
Figure 1The cell viability (%) of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells measured by the MTT assay treated with methanol and water extracts of P. malayana leaves at the concentration of 3.125 to 100 μg/mL for 24 h. Data with a different letter are significantly different with the a p-value less than 0.05. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to calculate the data with a 95% confidence level; n = 3. NC: Negative control.
Figure 2The effect of methanol and water extracts on glucose [2-NBDG] uptake measurement of 3T3-L1 adipocyte cells. Data with a different letter are significantly different with a p-value less than 0.05. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to calculate the data with a 95% confidence level; n = 3.
DPPH and FRAP of methanol and water extracts of P. malayana leaves.
| Sample | DPPH | FRAP |
|---|---|---|
| Methanol extract | 10.85 ± 0.34 b | 72.53 ± 1.33 a |
| Water extract | 27.12 ± 0.95 a | 33.71 ± 1.84 b |
| Ascorbic acid | 5.08 ± 0.02 c | ND |
Data with a different letter are significantly different with a p-value less than 0.05. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to calculate the data with a 95% confidence level. All the findings are displayed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). ND = not determined.
Morphological defects related to the mortality of zebrafish embryos exposed to different extracts of P. malayana at 24 to 96 hpf along with the solvent control (0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide in E3 medium), positive control (4 mg/L of 3,4-dichloroaniline in E3 medium), and negative control (E3 medium) groups.
| Methanol-Water Extract | Extracts Concentration | Coagulation | Non-Detachment of the Tail | Lack of Somite Formation | Lack of Heartbeat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100, 50, 25, 12.5 | + | + | − | + |
| 6.25, 3.125 | − | − | − | − | |
| 75% | 100, 87.5, 75, 62.5, 50, 37.5, 25 | + | − | − | − |
| 12.5 | − | − | − | − | |
| 50% | 125, 112.5, 100, 87.5, 75, 62.5, 50, 37.5 | + | − | − | − |
| 25, 12.5 | − | − | − | − | |
| 25% | 175, 162.5, 150, 137.5, 125, 112.5, 100, 87.5 | + | − | − | − |
| 75, 62.5 | − | − | − | − | |
| 0% | 350, 300, 250, 200, 150 | + | − | − | − |
| 100, 50 | − | − | − | − | |
| Controls | Negative control | − | − | − | − |
| Solvent control | − | − | − | − | |
| Positive control | + | + | − | + |
(+): present; (−): not present.
Figure 3Logarithmic measurement of the LC50 value of five P. malayana leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% v/v methanol-water) using probit analysis.
Mortality rate (24 to 96 hpf) and hatching rate (72 hpf) of the developing zebrafish embryos treated with different concentrations of 100% v/v methanol extract of P. malayana leaves.
| Plant Extract Concentration (µg/mL) | Mortality Rate (%) at 24 to 96 hpf | Hatching Rate (%) at 72 hpf |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 100 | 0 |
| 50 | 60 | 0 |
| 25 | 20 | 0 |
| 12.5 | 5 | 10 |
| 6.25 | 0 | 70 |
| 3.125 | 0 | 100 |
| NC | 0 | 100 |
| SC | 0 | 100 |
| PC | 90 | 5 |
NC: negative control; SC: solvent control; PC: positive control.
Observations of eye size, yolk size, heartbeat, body length, hatching defect, less pigmentation, awkward position, and heart edema of the developing zebrafish embryos treated with six different concentrations of 100% v/v methanol extract of P. malayana leaves.
| 100% Methanol Extract | Eye Size × 104 | Yolk Size × 105 | Body Length | Hatching Defect | Less | Yolk Edema | Crooked Backbone | Heart Edema |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.25 | 6.1 ± 0.3 a | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | 2.5 ± 0.1 b | + | + | − | + | + |
| 3.125 | 5.6 ± 0.5 b | 2.6 ± 0.1 b | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | − | − | − | − | − |
| NC | 5.7 ± 0.3 b | 2.6 ± 0.2 b | 2.8 ± 0.2 a | − | − | − | − | − |
| SC | 5.7 ± 0.3 a,b | 2.6 ± 0.2 b | 2.8 ± 0.2 a | − | − | − | − | − |
| PC | 2.4 ± 0.7 c | 3.2 ± 0.3 a | NA | + | NA | + | NA | + |
(−): not present; (+): present; NA: not analyzed due to hatching defect; NC: negative control; SC: solvent control; PC: positive control. The values are presented as mean ± SD, n = 20. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Morphological defect in zebrafish embryo/larvae. (A) NC/healthy embryo at 24 hpf; (B) embryo in SC at 24 hpf; (C) heart edema observed in the PC embryo; (D) yolk edema observed in the PC embryo; (E) NC/healthy larvae; (F) larvae in the solvent control; (G) larvae treated with C6; (H) crooked backbone observed in the larvae treated with C5; (I) less pigmentation observed in the larvae treated with C5; (J) heart edema observed in the larvae treated with C5.
Figure 5Heartbeat per minute (BPM) of zebrafish embryo/larvae exposed to different concentrations of methanol extracts along with the negative, solvent, and positive control. C2–C6 = treatment concentrations, NC = Negative control; SC = Solvent control; PC = Positive control. Different letters (a,b,c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among samples.
Putative compounds identified in the methanol and water extracts of P. malayana leaves by GC-MS after derivatization.
| Extracts | Putative Compounds | Retention Time (min) | % of Area | Similarity Index | Molecular Formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | Phosphonic acid | 16.261 | 0.03 | 93 | H2O3P+ |
| Resorcinol | 19.941 | 0.34 | 95 | C6H6O2 | |
| 1,3,5-benzenetriol | 37.213 | 0.61 | 98 | C6H6O3 | |
| DL-arabinose | 49.569 | 0.81 | 93 | C5H10O5 | |
| D-ribose | 50.112 | 3.86 | 93 | C5H10O5 | |
| D-mannose | 50.815 | 2.87 | 91 | C6H12O6 | |
| D-psicose | 51.393 | 0.12 | 90 | C6H12O6 | |
| L-sorbose | 52.941 | 1.47 | 91 | C6H12O6 | |
| Palmitic acid | 58.142 | 0.04 | 98 | C16H32O2 | |
| Myo-inositol | 60.234 | 0.15 | 94 | C6H12O6 | |
| 1-monopalmitin | 81.935 | 0.17 | 93 | C19H38O4 | |
| Sucrose | 83.878 | 4.21 | 93 | C12H22O11 | |
| Beta-tocopherol | 100.870 | 0.10 | 93 | C28H48O2 | |
| Alpha-tocopherol | 101.104 | 0.24 | 98 | C29H50O2 | |
| 24-epicampesterol | 104.362 | 0.03 | 90 | C28H48O | |
| Stigmast-5-ene | 107.083 | 0.31 | 99 | C29H50 | |
| Water | Resorcinol | 19.941 | 0.21 | 91 | C6H6O2 |
| Hydroquinone | 21.690 | 0.42 | 94 | C6H6O2 | |
| D-ribino-1,4-lactone | 36.384 | 0.11 | 97 | C5H8O5 | |
| 1,3,5-benezenetriol | 37.213 | 0.45 | 98 | C6H6O3 |
Figure 6GC-MS chromatogram of derivatized methanol extract (A) and water extract (B) of P. malayana leaves.
2-NBDG treatment groups.
| Groups | 2-NBDG | Insulin | Rosiglitazone | Methanol Extract | Water Extract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| IC | 100 | 10 | - | - | - |
| PC | 100 | 10 | 10 | - | - |
| Insulin-sensitizing activity of methanol extract | 100 | 10 | - | 5, 10, 15 | - |
| Insulin-sensitizing activity of water extract | 100 | 10 | - | - | 5, 10, 15 |
NC = Negative control; IC = Insulin control; PC = Positive control.