| Literature DB >> 35874426 |
Yunxuan Hu1,2,3, Xiaoze Liu1,2,3, Xiuna Wu1,2,3, Zhengxiao Zhang1,2,3, Daren Wu1,2,3, Chaoxiang Chen1,2,3, Wenjin Su1,2,3, Lingyu Zhang1,2,3, Jian Li1,2,3, Hui-Min David Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to isolate and identify the bioactive compounds from 5-year pickled radish. The pickled radish was extracted with methanol or ethyl acetate. Sephadex LH-20, normal phase and reverse phase silica gel column chromatography were used for separation and purification, combined with thin layer chromatography (TLC), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) technology for structural identification. The results showed that 6 compounds were separated and purified from methanol and ethyl acetate extracts of 5-year-old pickled radish. The structures were identified as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, β-sitosterol, β-sitosterol-3-O-glucose glycosides, α-linolenic acid, 1-monopalmitin and chaenomic acid A. Using molecular docking, it was determined that β-sitosterol and its derivative β-sitosterol-3-O-glucose glycosides have high affinity for five antioxidant enzymes, and there were multiple hydrogen bonds between them. These results indicated that pickled radishes might be used as an important source of natural chemical substances.Entities:
Keywords: 1-Monopalmitin (PubChem CID14900); 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF, PubChem CID237332); Chaenomic acid A (PubChem CID102339344); Fermented food; Molecular docking; Pickled radish; Purified; Separated; α-Linolenic (PubChem CID5280934); β-Sitosterol (PubChem CID222284); β-Sitosterol-3-O-glucose (PubChem CID5742590)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874426 PMCID: PMC9303827 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem X ISSN: 2590-1575
1H NMR and 13C NMR Spectral Data of Compound 1 to 3 (1H 400 MHz, 13C 100 MHz, TMS, δ ppm).
| 5-HMF | β-sitosterol | β-sitosterol-3-O-glucose glycosides | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvent | CDCl3 | CDCl3 | DMSO‑ | ||||||
| Position | 13C | 1H | Multiplicity; | 13C | 1H | Multiplicity; | 13C | 1H | Multiplicity; |
| 1 | 57.8 | 4.73 | s | 37.3 | — | 37.3 | — | ||
| 2 | 160.6 | — | 31.6 | — | 29.8 | — | |||
| 3 | 110.1 | 6.53 | d; 3.2 | 71.8 | 3.55 | m | 77.4 | — | |
| 4 | 122.7 | 7.23 | d; 3.2 | 42.4 | — | overlapped | — | ||
| 5 | 152.6 | — | 140.9 | — | 140.9 | — | |||
| 6 | 177.8 | 9.61 | s | 121.7 | 5.38 | d; 5.0 | 121.7 | 5.27 | d; 4.0 |
| — | 3.71 | s | |||||||
| 7 | 31.6 | — | 31.9 | — | |||||
| 8 | 31.6 | — | 31.9 | — | |||||
| 9 | 50.1 | — | 50.1 | — | |||||
| 10 | 36.5 | — | 36.7 | — | |||||
| 11 | 21.1 | — | 21.1 | — | |||||
| 12 | 39.8 | — | 39.8 | — | |||||
| 13 | 42.3 | — | 42.3 | — | |||||
| 14 | 56.7 | — | 56.6 | — | |||||
| 15 | 24.3 | — | 24.3 | — | |||||
| 16 | 28.3 | — | 28.2 | — | |||||
| 17 | 56.1 | — | 55.9 | — | |||||
| 18 | 11.9 | 0.71 | s | 12.1 | 0.67 | s | |||
| 19 | 19.4 | 1.03 | s | 19.5 | 0.97 | s | |||
| 20 | 36.1 | — | 36.0 | — | |||||
| 21 | 18.8 | 0.95 | d; 6.5 | 19.1 | 0.89 | d; 5.6 | |||
| 22 | 33.0 | — | 34.0 | — | |||||
| 23 | 26.2 | — | 26.2 | — | |||||
| 24 | 45.8 | — | 45.9 | — | |||||
| 25 | 29.2 | — | 29.3 | — | |||||
| 26 | 19.8 | 0.84 | d; 7.0 | 19.6 | 0.80 | m | |||
| 27 | 19.0 | 0.86 | d; 7.0 | 19.4 | 0.81 | m | |||
| 28 | 23.1 | — | 23.1 | — | |||||
| 29 | 12.0 | 0.87 | t; 7.4 | 12.2 | 0.83 | m | |||
| Hexose | |||||||||
| 1′ | 101.2 | 4.16 | d; 4.0 | ||||||
| 2′ | 73.9 | 2.95 | m | ||||||
| 3′ | 77.1 | 3.06 | m | ||||||
| 4′ | 70.6 | 3.00 | m | ||||||
| 5′ | 77.3 | 2.97 | m | ||||||
| 6′ | 61.6 | 3.40, 3.57 | m,m | ||||||
1H NMR and 13C NMR Spectral Data of Compound 4 to 6 (1H 400 MHz, 13C 100 MHz, TMS, δ ppm).
| α-linolenic acid | 1-monopalmitin | chaenomic acid A | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvent | CD3OD | CDCl3 | CDCl3 | ||||||
| Position | 13C | 1H | Multiplicity; | 13C | 1H | Multiplicity; | 13C | 1H | Multiplicity; |
| 1 | 174.6 | — | 174.4 | — | 176.4 | — | |||
| 2 | 33.4 | 2.28 | t; 7.0 | 34.2 | 2.35 | t; 6.5 | 33.6 | 2.31 | t; 6.5 |
| 3 | 24.6 | 1.61 | m | 24.9 | 1.62 | m | 25.5 | 1.59 | m |
| 4 | 28.7 | 1.32 | br s | 29.1 | 1.28 | br s | 28.9 | 1.38 | br s |
| 5 | 28.8 | 1.32 | br s | 29.3 | 1.28 | br s | 29.2 | 1.38 | br s |
| 6 | 28.9 | 1.32 | br s | 29.4 | 1.28 | br s | 28.9 | 1.38 | br s |
| 7 | 29.3 | 1.32 | br s | 29.5 | 1.28 | br s | 24.7 | 1.38 | br s |
| 8 | 26.7 | 2.09 | m | 29.6 | 1.28 | br s | 36.9 | 1.55 | m |
| 9 | 129.7 | 5.37 | m | 29.7 | 1.28 | br s | 71.6 | 4.15 | q; 12 |
| 10 | 126.8 | 5.37 | m | 29.6 | 1.28 | br s | 134.6 | 5.73 | m |
| 11 | 25.1 | 2.82 | t; 6.2 | 29.5 | 1.28 | br s | 129.4 | 5.73 | m |
| 12 | 127.8 | 5.37 | m | 29.4 | 1.28 | br s | 74.6 | 3.95 | m |
| 13 | 127.7 | 5.37 | m | 29.3 | 1.28 | br s | 74.6 | 3.95 | m |
| 14 | 25.0 | 2.82 | t; 6.2 | 31.9 | 1.28 | br s | 129.6 | 5.73 | m |
| 15 | 127.4 | 5.37 | m | 22.7 | 1.28 | br s | 135.1 | 5.73 | m |
| 16 | 131.2 | 5.37 | m | 14.1 | 0.88 | t; 8.0 | 74.3 | 4.15 | m |
| 17 | 20.1 | 2.09 | m | 29.3 | 1.55 | m | |||
| 18 | 13.3 | 0.97 | t; 7.3 | 13.0 | 0.94 | t; 7.4 | |||
| — | 5.35 | – | |||||||
| 1′ | 65.2 | 4.18 | dd | ||||||
| 2′ | 70.3 | 5.36, 3.70 | m, dd; 4,12 | ||||||
| 3′ | 63.3 | 3.94, 3.60 | m, dd; 4,12 | ||||||
Fig. 1Comparison of HPLC Chromatogram of Methanol Extract and Ethyl Acetate Extract.
Fig. 2Structures of 6 Compounds Extracted from Pickled Radish.
Fig. 3Calculation of binding energy between pickled radish compound and protein.
Fig. 4Interaction patterns between pickled radish compounds and proteins.