The development of anticancer drugs remains challenging owing to the potential for drug resistance. The simultaneous inhibition of multiple targets involved in cancer could overcome resistance, and these agents would exhibit higher potency than single-target inhibitors. Protein kinases represent a promising target for the development of anticancer agents. As most multi-kinase inhibitors are heterocycles occupying only the hinge and hydrophobic region in the ATP binding site, we aimed to design multi-kinase inhibitors that would occupy the ribose pocket, along with the hinge and hydrophobic region, based on ATP-kinase interactions. Herein, we report the discovery of a novel 4'-thionucleoside template as a multi-kinase inhibitor with potent anticancer activity. The in vitro evaluation revealed a lead 1g (7-acetylene-7-deaza-4'-thioadenosine) with potent anticancer activity, and marked inhibition of TRKA, CK1δ, and DYRK1A/1B kinases in the kinome scan assay. We believe that these findings will pave the way for developing anticancer drugs.
The development of anticancer drugs remains challenging owing to the potential for drug resistance. The simultaneous inhibition of multiple targets involved in cancer could overcome resistance, and these agents would exhibit higher potency than single-target inhibitors. Protein kinases represent a promising target for the development of anticancer agents. As most multi-kinase inhibitors are heterocycles occupying only the hinge and hydrophobic region in the ATP binding site, we aimed to design multi-kinase inhibitors that would occupy the ribose pocket, along with the hinge and hydrophobic region, based on ATP-kinase interactions. Herein, we report the discovery of a novel 4'-thionucleoside template as a multi-kinase inhibitor with potent anticancer activity. The in vitro evaluation revealed a lead 1g (7-acetylene-7-deaza-4'-thioadenosine) with potent anticancer activity, and marked inhibition of TRKA, CK1δ, and DYRK1A/1B kinases in the kinome scan assay. We believe that these findings will pave the way for developing anticancer drugs.
Although cancer has been extensively investigated, drug resistance remains a major challenge in the clinical progress of anticancer drugs [1]. It is frequently responsible for treatment failure in patients with cancer undergoing monotherapy. Under these circumstances, a polypharmacological strategy may overcome the drug resistance crisis. The question then arises: How would it work? Cancer cells are dependent not only on a single oncogene but also on cells enclosing it. Therefore, inhibition of a single target produces mutations that promote cancer cell survival, in advanced cancers [2]. Rationally designed multi-target inhibitors that could hit more than one oncogenic target may surpass the effect mediated by single-target inhibitors, as they would obstruct cancer cell proliferation and, secondly, block the microenvironment that facilitates oncogenesis [3]. This would more comprehensively inhibit the pathway involved, simultaneously reducing the negative impact on tumor cells to acquire a resistance mutation. Accordingly, the synergistic effect of inhibiting multiple targets would induce less resistance and greater efficacy [3]. As cancer is a polygenic disease, it is worth noting that a single drug acting synchronously on multiple targets is advantageous over the combined use of individual single-target drugs [3]. Accordingly, smaller doses are required for simultaneous targets to produce desired effects as the molecule will be concurrently present in tissues (at the site of action). On the other hand, combination therapy complicates the dosing schedule, increases the risk of toxicity arising from drug-drug interactions, and negatively impacts patient adherence, contrary to multi-target drugs [4,5]. These well-established facts motivate our interest in the current study. Polypharmacology has become more appealing in recent years and is currently a hot topic in this field [6,7,8].One main factor underlying cancer growth is the presence of kinase mutations. Protein kinases play a crucial role in cellular functions by mediating protein phosphorylation. These enzymes transfer the terminal phosphoryl group of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to a protein substrate, ultimately resulting in processes, such as signal transduction, gene regulation, and metabolism. Therefore, dysregulation of kinases is often associated with several diseases, including cancer [9]. The protein kinase domain is the most common domain encoded by cancer genes [10] and is linked to cancer onset and progression [10,11]. Several multi-kinase inhibitors are currently in clinical use, indicating growing attention for multi-kinase inhibitors [12]; for example, multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib—approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma, and sunitinib—approved for the treatment of RCC and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor have been developed [3,13,14]. Recently, the multi-target kinase inhibitor, entrectinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of ROS1 (c-ros oncogene 1)-positive, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and solid tumors with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions [15,16].The majority of the kinase inhibitors are heterocycles, which are ATP-competitive [17,18,19], i.e., they act by competing with ATP to bind to the ATP-binding site of kinases, and therefore, block the phosphorylation process. The ATP binding site of protein kinases is illustrated in Figure 1A. The catalytic domain of all protein kinases encompasses two lobes, linked by a flexible hinge region. ATP binds to the cleft, between the two lobes, a highly conserved catalytic structure in protein kinases [20], where the transfer of γ-phosphate of ATP to protein substrate is catalyzed by kinases in their active DFG-in conformation. The adenine ring from ATP forms two hydrogen bonds with the amino acids in the hinge region [21]. The ATP pocket also contains the unoccupied hydrophobic pockets and a hydrophilic ribose region. Most of the ATP-competitive inhibitors known, commonly occupy the hinge and hydrophobic regions I, II [22,23] but rarely the ribose pocket. Nevertheless, it is worthy to note that, occupying the ribose region results in improved binding towards kinases as demonstrated by Gandin et al. [23]. Since ATP binding site is conserved in protein kinases, it could be a challenging task to design selective multi-kinase inhibitors [24] as it can often lead to off-target interactions [22,25]. It may be advantageous in treating polygenic diseases like cancer, where polypharmacological agents are more effective [3]. However, to maintain the safety profile of a multi-kinase inhibitor, only specific kinases should be targeted [22]. It would be of great importance to find out the combination of kinases whose inhibition would result in therapeutic benefits without unwanted side effects [26,27]. The state-of-the-art of kinase inhibitors in human trials have been provided by Klaeger et al. [28].
Figure 1
The rationale for the design of multi-kinase inhibitors with a nucleoside skeleton. (A) Schematic representation displaying catalytic domain of typical protein kinases binding ATP. Important interactions are highlighted with either colored or dashed lines, indicating hydrophobic interaction/hydrogen bonding. (B) Rational design of kinase inhibitors based on ATP-kinase interactions.
In the present study, we aimed to design multi-kinase inhibitors that would interact with the hinge region, hydrophobic pocket I, also known as buried region adjacent to the hinge region and ribose pocket at the same time. The interactions with the hydrophobic pocket have frequently been utilized to achieve inhibitor selectivity over kinases [23]. On this basis, we attempted to design novel kinase inhibitors with a nucleoside skeleton as it’s an ATP-mimic by modifying the hydrophobic residue (R), based on ATP-kinase interactions, as illustrated in Figure 1B. These compounds are expected to simultaneously inhibit several kinases, given the sequence and structural homology among the ATP binding sites of kinases [20]. Nevertheless, we wanted to determine the most suitable substituent for the hydrophobic pocket which is not occupied by ATP, whether acting as a pharmacophore for selective kinase inhibition. To achieve this goal, we selected a 7-deazaadenine scaffold, as it serves as a good template for functionalization at the 7-position to occupy the adjacent hydrophobic pocket, thereby enhancing the interactions with the kinase. It is interesting to note how a subtle structural variation in the nucleobase of adenosine exerts cytotoxic biological properties, as demonstrated by a natural product tubercidin (7-deazaadenosine) [29,30]. The 7-substituted-tubercidin analogs also showed very interesting anti-cancer activity [31]. The sugar pocket is predominantly hydrophilic and conserved in most protein kinases. It is well known that the bioisosteric replacement of oxygen with sulfur on furanose imparts chemotherapeutic properties to its respective sulfur analog [32,33,34,35] with metabolic stability [36]. Like the ribose ring in ATP, the hydrophilic polar hydroxyl group of the 4-thiosugar moiety will form a hydrogen bond with the sugar region enabling the molecule to fit in it, resulting in enhanced binding [23].All the synthesized compounds were evaluated for their anticancer activity by employing a sulforhodamine B (SRB) colorimetric assay and the most potent compound 1g (7-acetylene-7-deaza-4′-thioadenosine) was screened for kinase panel assay. Accordingly, compound 1g was found to inhibit TRKA (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase 1, NTRK1), DYRK1A/1B (dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A and 1B), and CK1δ (casein kinase 1 delta, CSNK1D) kinases, reportedly associated with overexpression in cancer cells [11,37,38,39]. To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time the design and synthesis of 7-substituted 7-deaza-4′-thionucleoside analogs that are supposed to simultaneously occupy hinge, hydrophobic, and ribose regions and their structure-activity relationship as a multi-kinase inhibitor against TRKA, DYRK1A, DYRK1B, and CK1δ with potent anticancer activity.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The structures of synthesized compounds are represented in Figure 2.
Figure 2
The structures of target nucleoside analogs were modified at the C7 position.
As shown in Scheme 1, to synthesize the final nucleoside 1, we first synthesized the glycosyl donor 9 from commercially available D-ribose.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of glycosyl donor 9 from D-ribose. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) MsCl, pyridine, 0 °C, 4 h; (ii) KOH, H2O, rt, 12 h; (b) TBDPSCl, imidazole, DMAP, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (c) NaBH4, THF/MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 2 h; (d) MsCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 2 h; (e) Na2S.9H2O, DMF, 90 °C, 15 h; (f) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, −78 °C, 45 min; (g) acetic anhydride, 110 °C, 4 h.
D-Ribose was converted to 2,3-O-isopropylidene-D-ribonic γ-lactone (2) using the two steps protocol as described previously [40]. First, D-ribose was converted to D-ribonolactone using bromine/water in the presence of potassium carbonate and later treated with acetone in the presence of a catalytic amount of concentrated sulfuric acid at room temperature to afford 2. Following the reported general protocol [41] for thiosugar 7, the inversion of configuration at the C4 chiral center of D-ribonolactone was achieved by treating 2 initially with mesyl chloride and subjecting it to base hydrolysis using aqueous potassium hydroxide solution to give 3 with inverted stereochemistry. Protection of the C5-hydroxyl of 3 with tert-butyldiphenylsilyl (TBDPS), followed by reduction of the resulting compound 4 with NaBH4, afforded diol 5. Sulfur heterocyclization was performed by converting 5 to dimesylate 6, immediately reacted with sodium sulfide nonahydrate at 90 °C to give 7 at a 28% overall yield from 2. Compound 7 was subjected to mCPBA oxidation at −78 °C to give sulfoxide 8 (82% yield). Pummerer rearrangement of 8 occurred upon heating with acetic anhydride to afford glycosyl donor 9 as a 1:1.6 α/β anomeric mixture.The glycosyl donor 9 was then condensed with silylated 7-deaza-7-iodo-6-chloropurine under heating at 80 °C for 1 h in the presence of a Lewis acid, TMSOTf, to afford the desired β-stereoisomer 10 as a single stereoisomer (40% yield; Scheme 2); however, the same reaction at room temperature failed to afford the desired product. The β configuration of condensed nucleoside 10 was easily determined by 2D NOESY experiments. The NOESY spectrum revealed a correlation between 1′-H and 4′-H, as well as between 1′-H and one of the two methyl groups of the acetonide group. A correlation between 5′-H and H-8 was also observed, confirming the presence of the β-D-anomer (see the Supporting Information). Ammonolysis of 10 in tert-butanolic ammonia at 90 °C produced key intermediate 11, which was ready for functionalization with hydrophobic groups at the C7 position via palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. Pd-catalyzed Stille coupling of 7-iodo derivative 11 with 2-tributylstannylfuran and 2-tributylstannylthiophene in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2 yielded 7-furanyl and 7-thiofuranyl derivatives 12a and 12b, respectively. Removal of acetonides of 12a and 12b with 50% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) afforded the final nucleosides, 1a, and 1b, respectively.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 7-substituted 7-deaza-4′-thioadenosine derivatives 1a–f. Reagents and conditions: (a) 7-Deaza-7-iodo-6-chloropurine, BSA, TMSOTf, CH3CN, rt to 80 °C, 1 h; (b) NH3/tert-BuOH, 90 °C, 12 h; (c) corresponding 2-tributylstannylheteroaryl, PdCl2(PPh3)2, THF, MW, 70 °C, 1 h; (d) 50% TFA/H2O, THF, rt, 12 h; (e) corresponding boronic ester, PdCl2(PPh3)2, Na2CO3, DMF/H2O, MW, 70 °C, 1 h.
Further Suzuki coupling reactions were performed to introduce other hydrophobic groups, such as vinyl, phenyl, and 4-substituted-phenyl to 11. Coupling of 11 with vinyl boronic ester in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2 in DMF/H2O gave 12c in 85% yield. In this Suzuki coupling reaction, water was used as a co-solvent to avoid side reactions, resulting from Heck coupling [42]. The desired Suzuki coupled product was obtained as a single product. Similar Suzuki reactions of 11 with phenyl and 4-substituted phenyl boronic esters afforded 7-phenyl and 7-(4-substituted)phenyl derivatives, 12d–f. Treatment of 12c–f with 50% aqueous TFA yielded the final nucleosides 1c–f, respectively.Next, to introduce other linear hydrophobic groups, such as acetylene, Sonogashira coupling was employed, as shown in Scheme 3. Treatment of 11 with trimethylsilyl acetylene in the presence of a palladium catalyst and copper iodide afforded 13 (93% yield). Removal of the silyl groups of 13 with 1 M TBAF solution in THF afforded 14, which was treated with 2 N HCl to yield the 7-acetylene derivative 1g. The molecular structure of 1g was confirmed by a single X-ray crystal analysis (CCDC 1575257); further evidence supporting the β-configuration is provided in the Supporting Information [43]. Several 2-substituted acetylene analogs 15a–d were also synthesized from 11 by employing the same Sonogashira coupling conditions. The final propylene, butylene, tert-butyl acetylene, and cyclopropyl acetylene analogs 1h–k were obtained by treating 15a–d with 50% aqueous TFA at room temperature.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of 7-substituted 7-deaza-4′-thioadenosine derivatives 1g–k. Reagents and conditions: (a) corresponding alkyne, PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, Et3N, DMF, MW, 50 °C, 1 h; (b) 1 M TBAF, THF, rt, 40 min; (c) 2 N HCl, THF, rt, 15 h; (d) 50% TFA/H2O, THF, rt, 12 h.
2.2. Biological Evaluation
2.2.1. Antiproliferative Activity
All synthesized compounds 1a–k were evaluated for their antiproliferative activity against six different cancer cell lines, including human lung (A549), colon (HCT116), breast (MDA-MB-231), liver (SK-HEP-1), stomach (SNU638), and prostate (PC-3) cancer cells, using SRB colorimetric assay [44,45]. As demonstrated in Table 1, compounds 1a and 1b possessing furanyl and thiofuranyl moieties at the 7-position, respectively, exhibited moderate antiproliferative activity. Compound 1c, with a vinyl substituent at the 7-position, displayed potent anticancer activity, whereas bulky groups, such as phenyl (1d) and substituted phenyls (1e and 1f) showed low to no anticancer activity. In contrast, the linear acetylene moiety (1g) at the 7-position exhibited excellent anticancer activity in the nanomolar range. Surprisingly, 2-substituted acetylene derivatives 1h–k abolished antiproliferative activity. This result demonstrates that a small and linear hydrophobic group, such as acetylene is necessary for potent anticancer activity. Since compound 1g exhibited the most potent antiproliferative activity against cancer cells (IC50 = 0.004–0.06 μM), the antiproliferative activity of 1g against normal cells was additionally evaluated in primary dermal fibroblast cells. Compound 1g also showed considerable growth inhibition in cultured human normal dermal fibroblast cells (IC50 = 0.15 μM). Although rather toxic, compound 1g seems to be more potent in the antiproliferative activity of cancer cells than normal cells.
Table 1
Anticancer activity of the final 7-substituted 7-deaza-4′-thionucleosides 1a–k against several human cancer cell lines.
Compound No.
IC50 (μM) a
A549 b
HCT116 c
MDA-MB-231 d
SK-HEP-1 e
SNU638 f
PC-3 g
1a
1.02
2.16
3.31
3.38
1.95
2.46
1b
1.65
1.74
2.72
1.38
2.41
2.48
1c
0.97
0.56
0.31
0.22
0.47
0.2
1d
7.57
6.35
8.83
7.81
6.32
9.21
1e
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
1f
41.6
30.6
30.1
10.3
27.5
15.4
1g
0.06
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.004
1h
>50
>50
45.5
6.05
>50
>50
1i
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
1j
>50
>50
29.6
>50
>50
>50
1k
>50
>50
30.6
8.31
>50
>50
Etoposide h
0.36
1.11
4.9
0.91
0.41
23.4
Gemcitabine i
0.3
0.2
1.1
0.2
0.1
3.6
Measured using SRB assay. Human lung cancer cells. Human colon cancer cells. Human breast cancer cells. Human liver cancer cells. Human stomach cancer cell. Human prostate cancer cells. Etoposide was used as positive control. Gemcitabine was used as positive control [44].
2.2.2. Kinome Scan Profile
To characterize the kinase inhibition profile of the most potent compound 1g, it was profiled against a panel of 96 kinases at a concentration of 1 μM (Figure 3). The results revealed that compound 1g exhibited strong inhibitory activities against four kinases at 1 μM (<20% activity remaining), i.e., TRKA (NTRK1), DYRK1B, and CK1δ (CSNK1D) among the panel (see the Supporting Information for tabular representation of kinome scan data, Table S1). Since compound 1g showed strong inhibition of DYRK1B, it was evaluated for its isoform, DYRK1A inhibition. Compound 1g displayed potent inhibition of DYRK1A (IC50 = 43 nM, see the Supporting information, Table S2). These kinases are reportedly involved in cancer initiation and progression [11,37,38,39] and represent promising targets for cancer therapy. Based on this result, it could be inferred that the hydrophobic pocket in the ATP binding site of these four kinases could accommodate only small and linear hydrophobic groups such as acetylene for kinase inhibition. Next, the concentration-dependent inhibitory activities of compounds 1a–k were investigated and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined against four kinases, TRKA, DYRK1A, DYRK1B, and CK1δ (see the Supporting information, Table S2). The kinase inhibition trend observed for 1a–k was almost similar to that of their antiproliferative activity. In general, compounds 1a, 1b, and 1g exhibited excellent kinase inhibition activities, whereas compounds 1c and 1d exhibited moderate kinase inhibition. Among compounds tested, compounds 1a and 1b with 7-furanyl and 7-thiofuranyl substituents, respectively showed excellent kinase inhibition activity against NTRK1, whereas compounds 1a and 1g with 7-furanyl and 7-acetylene substituents, respectively showed excellent kinase inhibition activity against DYRK1A and DYRK1B. Compounds 1b and 1d with 7-thiofuranyl and 7-phenyl substituents, respectively showed excellent inhibition against CSNK1D. However, sterically demanding compounds 1e and 1f and the 2-substituted acetylene derivatives 1h–k demonstrated weak to no inhibitory activity. Compound 1g showed the best antiproliferative activity, but compound 1a was discovered as the best inhibitory compound against the above-mentioned four kinases, indicating that the anti-cancer effect of 1g might occur by unexpected mode of action.
Figure 3
Kinase inhibition profile of compound 1g. Kinome scan assays were performed for compound 1g (1 μM) against 96 kinases. **—strong inhibition of target kinases (<20% activity remaining).
2.2.3. Antiproliferative Activity against KM12 and ACHN Cell Lines
The effect of 1g on cell growth was also determined in KM12, a colon cancer cell line that highly expresses NTRK1/2/3 and DYRK3. Compared to doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.12 μM), compound 1g (IC50 = 0.07 μM) showed marked activity against the cell growth of KM12. Likewise, IC50 of 1g on cell growth of ACHN, a renal cancer cell line, expressing CK1δ and DYRK2 was approximately 0.04 μM, when compared with 0.04 μM of doxorubicin, suggesting the highly effective and selective anti-proliferative activity of 1g in cancer cell lines expressing NTRK, DYRK2 or CK1δ; However, we can’t exclude the possibility that anti-cancer phenotype might be driven through some other mechanism.
2.2.4. Metabolic Stability and CYP Inhibition
Based on anticancer and kinase inhibition data, compound 1g was examined for its microsomal stability and CYP isozyme inhibition in vitro (Table 2). Compound 1g was metabolically stable in human liver microsomes. Moreover, it showed no CYP isozyme inhibition against the five major drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 isozymes.
Table 2
Human liver microsomal stability and CYP isozyme inhibition activity of 1g.
Compound No.
Metabolic Stability (%) a
CYP Inhibition, IC50 (μM) b
CYP1A2
CYP2C9
CYP2C19
CYP2D6
CYP3A4
1g
82.3
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
Verapamil
15.3
-
-
-
-
-
Ketoconazole d
-
95.7 c
93.6 c
93.6 c
96.0 c
27.2 c
% Remaining during 30 min. IC50 < 1 μM—potent inhibition; 1 μM < IC50 < 10 μM—moderate inhibition; IC50 > 10 μM—no or weak inhibition. Percentage of enzyme remaining after inhibition. CYP3A4 inhibitor (0.1 μM).
2.3. Docking Analysis
Next, to justify the rationale of this design strategy, the ligand-bound DYRK1A (PDB ID: 7A51) [46] and TRKA (PDB ID: 5JFV) [47] crystal structures were used for the molecular docking study (Figure 4). The docked pose of compound 1g into the ATP binding site of DYRK1A and TRKA, as depicted in Figure 4A and 4B respectively, revealed that the purine ring formed two key hydrogen bonds with hinge residue Leu 241, and Glu 239 of DYRK1A, whereas in the case of TRKA the purine ring of 1g formed hydrogen bonding with Met 592 and Glu 590, in a manner comparable with that of ATP. Furthermore, hydrogen bonding interaction was seen between 5′-OH of 1g and Glu 291 of DYRK1A (Figure 4C). Similarly, hydrogen bonding interaction between 5′-OH of 1g and Glu 518 of TRKA was observed. In addition, the acetylene moiety occupied the hydrophobic pocket as supposed and displayed hydrophobic interactions with gatekeeper residue, Phe 238 and Val 306 of DYRK1A (Figure 4C). While, in the TRKA: 1g docked pose acetylene was found to form hydrophobic interactions with the gatekeeper residue, Phe 589 and Phe 669 (Figure 4D). Additionally, a hydrophobic interaction of 4-thio of the sugar moiety with Val 173 and Val 524 of DYRK1A and TRKA, respectively was observed. Thus, it can be concluded that compound 1g fits markedly well in the ATP binding sites of DYRK1A and TRKA, thus providing a new scaffold that inhibits the activity of these enzymes.
Figure 4
(A) Proposed binding mode of 1g (represented in green) in the ATP binding site of (A) DYRK1A (represented in pale cyan; PDB ID: 7A51). (B) TRKA (represented in gray; PDB ID: 5JFV). Hydrogen bonding is represented as yellow dashed lines. Non-polar hydrogen atoms are omitted. (B) 2D interaction diagram of 1g (represented in green) with (C) DYRK1A amino acid residues. (D) TRKA amino acid residues.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. General Methods
Proton (1H) and carbon (13C) NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-GCX (400/100 MHz), Bruker AMX-500 (500/125 MHz), or JEOL JNM-ECA 600 (600/150 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical shifts are given in parts per million (δ), calibrated to the solvent peak, and coupling constants (J) in hertz (Hz). High-resolution mass (HRMS) measurements were recorded on a Thermo LCQ XP instrument. UV spectra were recorded in methanol on a U-3000 made by Hitachi. Optical rotations were measured on Jasco III in an appropriate solvent and [α]25D values are given in 10−1 deg cm2 g−1. Melting points were determined on a Barnstead electrothermal 9100 instrument and are uncorrected. Microwave-assisted reactions were conducted in Biotage Initiator+ US/JPN (part no. 356007) microwave reactor. The TLC spots were examined under ultraviolet light at 254 nm and further visualized by p-anisaldehyde or phosphomolybdic acid stain solution. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 70–230 mesh, Merck). The purity of all tested compounds was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, confirming ≥95% purity.
To an ice-cooled solution of 2 (50 g, 0.265 mol) in pyridine (330 mL), methanesulfonyl chloride (52.34 g, 0.45 mol) was dropwise added under a nitrogen atmosphere and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with slow addition of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (520 mL) with stirring until no effervescence and extracted with dichloromethane (2 L). The combined organic layer was washed successively with water and brine, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo below 25 °C to give the crude product. To this crude mesylate, a solution of potassium hydroxide (36.74 g, 0.65 mol) in water (250 mL) was added using a dropping funnel, maintaining the temperature below 30 °C. This reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h and then adjusted to pH 3.0 to 4.0 by adding 3 M hydrochloric acid (260 mL). The acidic solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a solid mass. The solid mass was triturated with acetone (2 L) and heated to 50 °C for 30 min. The acetone was decanted, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to obtain crude 3 (Rf = 0.45, TLC eluent = CH2Cl2/MeOH, 19:1).
To a solution of 3 in methylene chloride (240 mL), imidazole (8.78 g, 129 mmol) was added, followed by dropwise addition of tert-butyldiphenylsilyl chloride (26 g, 94.26 mmol) at 0 °C. After being stirred at room temperature for 12 h, the reaction mixture was partitioned between methylene chloride (3 × 600 mL) and water (760 mL). The layers were separated and the combined organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and evaporated to give crude 4 (Rf = 0.50, TLC eluent = hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1).
The crude 4 was dissolved in THF-MeOH (285 mL-54 mL) and to this, sodium borohydride (14.64 g, 387.07 mmol) was added portion wise at 0 °C. After stirring for 2 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with glacial acetic acid (26 mL) and evaporated. The residue was diluted with 20% aqueous potassium sodium tartrate (500 mL) and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 600 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to obtain crude 5 (Rf = 0.50, TLC eluent = hexane/ethyl acetate, 3:2).
To a solution of 5 in methylene chloride (277 mL), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (0.36 g, 2.96 mmol) and triethylamine (106.40 g, 1051.53 mmol) were added and the solution was cooled to 0 °C. To this methanesulfonyl chloride (59.11 g, 516.09 mmol) was added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (300 mL) until no effervescence and extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 520 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine (150 mL), dried (MgSO4), and passed through silica to remove any inorganic impurities and evaporated below 25 °C to give crude di-O-mesylate 6 (Rf = 0.55, TLC eluent = hexane/ethyl acetate, 3:2).
A solution of 8 (16 g, 35.98 mmol) in acetic anhydride (142 mL) was transferred to a preheated bath at 110 °C and stirred at the same temperature for 4 h. After concentration under reduced pressure, the residue was neutralized with aqueous sat. NaHCO3 until pH 7.0 and stirred for 15 min. To the solution brine was added and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 600 mL). The organic layer was combined and washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue obtained was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 19:1) to give 9 (12.6 g, 72%) as a colorless syrup: 1:1.6 α/β mixture of anomers; UV (CH3OH) λmax 259.85 nm; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 7.70–7.62 (m, 6H), 7.43–7.40 (m, 3H), 7.39–7.36 (m, 7H), 6.09 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 0.4H), 5.90 (s, 1H), 4.99 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.82–4.80 (m, 0.6H), 4.64–4.61 (m, 1.5H), 3.82–3.80 (m, 1H), 3.77–3.72 (m, 1.6H), 3.60–3.52 (m, 2H), 2.13 (s, 1.4H), 1.81 (s, 3H), 1.53 (s, 1.9H), 1.48 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 1.6H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.06 (s, 9H), 1.04 (s, 5H); HRMS (ESI-Q-TOF) m/z [M + Na]+ for C26H34NaO5SSi calculated 509.1788, found 509.1791.
N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (BSA, 2.5 mL, 10.27 mmol) was added to a stirred suspension of 4-chloro-5-iodo-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine (2.6 g, 9.33 mmol) in anhydrous acetonitrile (67 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting suspension was stirred at room temperature for 10 min until a homogeneous solution was obtained. To this clear solution a solution of 9 (5 g, 10.27 mmol) in anhydrous acetonitrile (50 mL) were added followed by dropwise addition of trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (1.5 mL, 8.40 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min before transferring it to a preheated bath at 80 °C. After stirring at the same temperature for 1 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (700 mL). The organic layer was washed with aqueous sat. NaHCO3 (3 × 250 mL) and brine (100 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane/ethyl acetate, 50:3) to give 10 (2.9 g, 40%) as a pale yellow sticky mass; [α]25D −7.03 (c 0.6, CH3OH); UV (CH3OH) λmax 310.78 nm; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 8.46 (s, 1H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 7.64–7.58 (m, 4H), 7.40–7.33 (m, 4H), 7.31–7.28 (m, 2H), 6.24 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (dd, J = 5.5, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (dd, J = 5.5, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (dd, J = 10.4, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (dd, J = 10.4, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (td, J = 7.2, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.04 (S, 9H); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz): δ 154.2, 152.5, 152.3, 137.5, 137.4, 136.2, 135.0, 134.7, 131.9, 131.8, 129.7, 129.6, 119.9, 114.0, 90.9, 87.0, 70.1, 67.7, 58.9, 53.5, 28.3, 28.1, 26.1, 20.8; HRMS (ESI-Q-TOF) m/z [M + H]+ for C30H34ClIN3O3SSi calculated 706.0818, found 706.0798.
A solution of 10 (2.9 g, 4.11 mmol) in saturated solution of NH3/t-BuOH (30 mL) contained in a stainless steel bomb reactor was transferred to a preheated bath at 90 °C and stirred at the same temperature for 24 h. The steel bomb containing reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 13:7) to obtain 11 (2.42 g, 86%) as a sticky mass; [α]25D −45.49 (c 2.4, CH3OH); UV (CH3OH) λmax 286.04 nm; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 7.64–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.43–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.33 (m, 5H), 6.21 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 5.88 (br s, 2H), 4.88 (dd, J = 5.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (dd, J = 5.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.86–3.79 (m, 2H), 3.77–3.75 (m, 1H), 1.58 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.07 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 156.7, 151.9, 150.1, 135.5, 135.5, 132.9, 132.8, 129.9, 129.8, 127.8, 127.0, 112.4, 104.5, 89.0, 84.0, 66.3, 65.1, 55.7, 50.5, 27.3, 26.8, 25.1, 19.2; HRMS (ESI-Q-TOF) m/z [M + H]+ for C30H36IN4O3SSi calculated 687.1317, found 687.1301.General Procedure of Stille Coupling for the Synthesis of 12a and 12b. To the compound 11 (1 equiv) in a microwave vial equipped with a septum, catalyst PdCl2(PPh3)2 (15 mol %) was added and degassed THF (2.8 mL/mmol) under nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting solution was degassed for 5 min and a corresponding 2-(tributylstannyl)hetaryl (2.5 equiv) was added. After stirring the reaction mixture in a microwave for 1 h at 70 °C, it was quenched by adding water and brine. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate thrice and organics were concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography.
Human lung cancer cells (A549), colorectal cancer (HCT116) cells, breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231), liver cancer cells (SK-HEP-1), and prostate cancer cells (PC-3) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Human gastric cancer cells (SNU-638) were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). Cells were cultured in medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium for MDA-MB-231 and SK-HEP-1 cells; Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 for A549, HCT116, SNU-638, PC-3 cells) supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% carbon dioxide. Cells were seeded at a density of 4–7 × 104 cells/mL in 96-well culture plates, and then treated with indicated compounds for 72 h. At the end of the experiment, cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution and subjected to sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay to determine cell proliferation [42]. The percentage of cell proliferation was calculated with the following formula:Cell proliferation (%) = 100 × [(A treated − A zero day)/(A control − A zero day)],
where A is the average absorbance. The IC50 values were calculated through non-linear regression analysis using TableCurve 2D v5.01 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicate and data shown are representative of two or three independent experiments.
Cell Culture
The human colon cancer (KM12) and renal cancer (ACHN) cell lines were obtained from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). Cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics-antimycotics (PSF: 100 units/mL penicillin G sodium, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 250 ng/mL amphotericin B). All cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and subcultured twice a week.
3.4. Kinome Scan Assays
The kinome scan assays were carried out at Eurofins DiscoverX Corporation. For kinome scan profiling of compound 1g, it was screened at 1μM against 96 kinases (N = 2 independent experiments) [26]. The results for binding interactions are reported as % inhibition, where higher values indicate strong affinity; see the Supporting Information, Table S1 for full kinome profile. For kinase inhibition profile of compounds 1a–k [see the Supporting information, Table S2, whose IC50 values were determined using an 11-point 3-fold serial dilution of each test compound using their KINOMEscan assay and Ki was determined by the Cheng-Prusoff equation..
3.5. Metabolic Stability
Phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) containing human liver microsomes (0.5 mg/mL) and test compound (a final concentration of 1 μM) were pre-incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. NADPH regeneration system solution was added to it and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Acetonitrile solution containing chlorpropamide was added at the end of the reaction. The sample was centrifuged for 5 min (14,000× g rpm, 4 °C) and the supernatant was injected into the LC-MS/MS system for the analysis. The amount of substrate that remained after the reaction was analyzed using the Shimadzu Nexera XR system and TSQ vantage (Thermo). Kinetex C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.6 μm particle size; Phenomenex) was used for HPLC. The mobile phase used contained 0.1% formic acid in distilled water (A) and 0.1% formic acid containing acetonitrile (B). Xcalibur (version 1.6.1) was used for data analysis. Verapamil was used as a positive control [48,49].
3.6. CYP Inhibition Assay
Human liver microsomes (0.25 mg/mL), 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), a cocktail of five coenzyme substrates (Phenacetin 50 μM, Diclofenac 10 μM, S-mephenytoin 100 μM, Dextromethorphan 5 μM, Midazolam 2.5 μM), and test compound (10 μM concentration) was pre-incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. NADPH generation system solution was added and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. In order to terminate the reaction, acetonitrile solution containing an internal standard (Terfenadine) was added and centrifuged for 5 min (14,000× g rpm, 4 °C). The supernatant was injected into the LC-MS/MS system to analyze the metabolites of the substrates simultaneously. Metabolites of each substrate produced during the reaction were analyzed using the Shimadzu Nexera XR system and TSQ vantage (Thermo). Kinetex C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.6 μm particle size; Phenomenex, USA) was used for HPLC. The mobile phase used contained 0.1% formic acid in distilled water (A) and 0.1% formic acid containing acetonitrile (B). The generated metabolites were quantified using MRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring) and Xcalibur (version 1.6.1) was used for data analysis [50,51].
3.7. Computational Docking Simulation
Ligand binding site for docking was defined as a 30 Å3 grid box for DYRK1A and 20 × 24 × 20 Å3 grid box for TRKA centered on the centroid of co-crystallized native ligands. The crystal structures of DYRK1A (PDB ID: 7A51) [46] and TRKA (PDB ID: 5JFV) [47] were downloaded from RCSB PDB and computational docking was performed using AutoDock Vina version 1.5.6 (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA) [52]. For the macromolecule-ligand pair, the binding model of the ligand with the lowest binding free energy (kcal/mol) was used for further analysis. Figure to show the molecular modeling results were visualized using PyMOL (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA) [53]. LIGPLOT+ (version 2.2.4) was used to view the interactions between amino acid residues of enzyme and compound [54].
4. Conclusions
Protein kinases represent a promising target for the development of anticancer agents due to their association with cancer growth and progression [10,11,12]. In the present study, we designed molecules using the nucleoside skeleton with the intention to simultaneously occupy the hinge and the hydrophobic region I (buried region), along with the ribose region of the ATP-binding site. We sought to identify whether the hydrophobic pocket I acts as a pharmacophore in kinase inhibition. Thus, we designed and synthesized 7-substituted 7-deaza-4′-thioadenosine derivatives 1 with a nucleoside skeleton by modifying the hydrophobic residue (R), based on ATP-kinase interactions. Among all the synthesized compounds, compound 1g with acetylene at the 7-position of 7-deaza-4′-thioadenosine (R = acetylene) exhibited markedly potent anticancer activity in vitro against six different cancer cell lines and potent kinase inhibition of TRKA, DYRK1A/1B, and CK1δ at a concentration of 1 μM among the panel of 96 kinases. The results showed that the C-7 substituent of 7-deazaadenine was optimal for substituting extremely small and linear acetylene, indicating that a very small linear hydrophobic group is required to inhibit TRKA, DYRK1A/1B, and CK1δ. These results will contribute greatly to the further development of new anticancer agents with multi-kinase inhibition.
Authors: George D Demetri; Allan T van Oosterom; Christopher R Garrett; Martin E Blackstein; Manisha H Shah; Jaap Verweij; Grant McArthur; Ian R Judson; Michael C Heinrich; Jeffrey A Morgan; Jayesh Desai; Christopher D Fletcher; Suzanne George; Carlo L Bello; Xin Huang; Charles M Baum; Paolo G Casali Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-10-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John J Molloy; Ciaran P Seath; Matthew J West; Calum McLaughlin; Neal J Fazakerley; Alan R Kennedy; David J Nelson; Allan J B Watson Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: P Andrew Futreal; Lachlan Coin; Mhairi Marshall; Thomas Down; Timothy Hubbard; Richard Wooster; Nazneen Rahman; Michael R Stratton Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: David Lee Walmsley; James B Murray; Pawel Dokurno; Andrew J Massey; Karen Benwell; Andrea Fiumana; Nicolas Foloppe; Stuart Ray; Julia Smith; Allan E Surgenor; Thomas Edmonds; Didier Demarles; Mike Burbridge; Francisco Cruzalegui; Andras Kotschy; Roderick E Hubbard Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Aneesha Radhakrishnan; Vishalakshi Nanjappa; Remya Raja; Gajanan Sathe; Vinuth N Puttamallesh; Ankit P Jain; Sneha M Pinto; Sai A Balaji; Sandip Chavan; Nandini A Sahasrabuddhe; Premendu P Mathur; Mahesh M Kumar; T S Keshava Prasad; Vani Santosh; Geethanjali Sukumar; Joseph A Califano; Annapoorni Rangarajan; David Sidransky; Akhilesh Pandey; Harsha Gowda; Aditi Chatterjee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 4.379