| Literature DB >> 34959412 |
Daniel Andrés Real1,2, Karen Bolaños1,2,3, Josefina Priotti4, Nicolás Yutronic5, Marcelo J Kogan1,2, Rodrigo Sierpe1,2,5,6, Orlando Donoso-González1,2,5.
Abstract
In drug delivery, one widely used way of overcoming the biopharmaceutical problems present in several active pharmaceutical ingredients, such as poor aqueous solubility, early instability, and low bioavailability, is the formation of inclusion compounds with cyclodextrins (CD). In recent years, the use of CD derivatives in combination with nanomaterials has shown to be a promising strategy for formulating new, optimized systems. The goals of this review are to give in-depth knowledge and critical appraisal of the main CD-modified or CD-based nanomaterials for drug delivery, such as lipid-based nanocarriers, natural and synthetic polymeric nanocarriers, nanosponges, graphene derivatives, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, plasmonic and magnetic nanoparticles, quantum dots and other miscellaneous systems such as nanovalves, metal-organic frameworks, Janus nanoparticles, and nanofibers. Special attention is given to nanosystems that achieve controlled drug release and increase their bioavailability during in vivo studies.Entities:
Keywords: bioavailability; controlled release; cyclodextrins derivatives; drug delivery; nanomaterials; nanoparticles; polymers
Year: 2021 PMID: 34959412 PMCID: PMC8706493 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1General scheme of the construction of nanosystems based on CD, polymers, and nanomaterials for their use in controlled release and enhanced bioavailability. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2General classification of CD-modified nanomaterials applied to drug delivery composed of CDs and their derivatives, drugs, polymers, and nanomaterials, considering the characteristics and composition. Created with BioRender.com.
Summary of the most important data based on the classification according to the type of nanosystem, type of CD used, types of polymers, and results regarding drug loading, release mechanism, and in vivo studies (if available) from Section 2.1 and Section 2.2.
| System | CD | API | Loading Capacity | Loading Efficiency | Drug Release Mechanism | In Vivo Studies | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid-based nanocarriers derivates | CD–drug loaded liposomes | Amino-deoxy-βCD | Pin1 inhibitor | - | 91% | Slow diffusive release | Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and efficacy | [ |
| Double-loaded liposomes | Dimethyl-βCD | Paclitaxel | 1.2 mg/mL | 93% | Slow diffusive release | Pharmacokinetics and acute toxicity after intravenous administration | [ | |
| Single and double-loaded deformable liposomes | HPβCD, SBEβCD and MEβCD | Butamben | 0.01% | 92–100% | Diffusive release | Ex vivo permeation and in vivo anesthetic effect | [ | |
| Nanoemulsion with HPβCD and Tween-80 | HPβCD | Cinnamon essential oil | - | - | Slow diffusive release | - | [ | |
| Multiple nanoemulsion (w/o/w) with HPβCD and poloxamer 188 | HPβCD | Pemetrexed | - | 95% | Quick diffusive release | Oral bioavailability and in vivo tumor growth inhibition effect | [ | |
| SLN capped with βCD polymers | βCD | Benzophenone | 9–12% | 72–96% | Higuchi and Korsmeyer–Peppas kinetics | - | [ | |
| NLC loaded with CD–drug complex | HPβCD and SBEβCD | Hydrochlorothiazide | 2–4% | 40–88% | Quick diffusive release | Diuretic activity after oral administration | [ | |
| NLC loaded with CD–drug complex | HPβCD | Thymol | 2.2% | 79% | Higuchi kinetic | Ex vivo skin permeation | [ | |
| Micelles assembled from HPβCD and glyceryl monostearate | HPβCD | Astaxanthin | 2.7% | 100% | pH change | Oral bioavailability, tissue distribution | [ | |
| Polymeric nanocarriers | CD-cellulose nanocrystals | Glycidyltrimethyl ammonium chloride-βCD | Curcumin | 91 mg/g | 9% | More likely, cell internalization due to endocytosis followed by release into lysosomes | Bioavailability, in vivo nervous function | [ |
| CD–drug inclusion complex loaded chitosan nanoparticles | Dimethyl-βCD | Salazosulfapyridine | 3–10% | 80–90% | Degradation of polymeric matrix | - | [ | |
| Red blood membrane-coated nanogels formulated | HPβCD acrylate | Paclitaxel and IL-2 | 93% (500 µg Paclitaxel) | 32% (500 µg Paclitaxel) | pH change | Drug release in tumor microenvironment, bioavailability, biodistribution, antitumor efficacy, immune response | [ | |
| Polysaccharide-based noncovalent assembly for targeted drug delivery | Permethyl-β-CD | Porphyrin modified paclitaxel | 31% | 85% | Enzyme-triggered drug release | - | [ | |
| Nanoformulation based on PEGylated liposomal and nanocurcumin | HPβCD (+citric acid) | DOX + Curcumin | - | >95% (data not shown) | - | - | [ | |
| Ocular nanosuspension based on commercial polymers | Methyl-βCD/HPβCD | Econazole Nitrate | 43–52% | - | Degradation of polymeric matrix | Ocular irritation, Bioavailability in tears | [ | |
| Amino-βCD-containing polymers nanoassemblies | Amino-βCD with various alkyl chains | Ferulic acid | 4% | - | pH change | Biodistribution | [ | |
| Dual stimuli-responsive supramolecular self-assemblies | βCD-graft-poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) | DOX | 13% | 66% | pH change and UV irradiation responsive release | - | [ | |
| Multifunctional nanoconjugates | βCD-Maleic anhydride | Curcumin and DOX | 0.45 g/g and 0.32 g/g | 88% | pH change and temperature change | Blood markers, gene expression in liver tissue | [ |
Summary of the most important data based on the qualification according to the type of nanosystem, type of CD used, types of polymers, and results regarding drug loading, release mechanism, and in vivo studies (if available) from Section 2.3, Section 2.4, Section 2.5 and Section 2.6.
| System | CD | API | Loading Capacity | Loading Efficiency | Drug Release Mechanism | In Vivo Studies | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymeric nanosystems based on CDs | βCD polymer-based nanosponge | βCD | Temoporfin | - | - | Diffusive release under tumor spheroid conditions | - | [ |
| βCD polymer-based nanocarrier | βCD | Sorafenib | ~5.7 and ~9.9 mg/g | - | Diffusive release under cell and mice pshysiological conditions | Toxicity and accumulation | [ | |
| βCD-based polymer with RGD peptides | βCD | DOX | - | - | Diffusive release under carcinogenic cellular conditions | - | [ | |
| Cationic βCD polymer with fluorescent probe nanocarrier | βCD | Diclofenac | 16% | 100% | Diffusive release under physiological conditions | - | [ | |
| βCD polymer-based nanoparticle | βCD | Ethionamide and BDM-smart420-booster | ~21 and ~6 mg/g | - | - | - | [ | |
| 25 mg/g | - | Diffusive release in vivo | Efficacy | [ | ||||
| Pseudopolyrotaxane-βCD-based polymer | βCD | Novobiocin | 23% | - | Diffusive release under physiological conditions | - | [ | |
| Vancomycin | 6% | - | ||||||
| Novobiocin | 18% | - | ||||||
| Vancomycin | 6% | - | ||||||
| βCD-based nanosponge tablet | βCD | Paracetamol, aceclofenac and caffeine | - | 81–89% | Diffusive release from the tablet | - | [ | |
| βCD-based nanosponge suspension | βCD | Nifedipine | - | 78% | Diffusive release under simulated gastric fluid | Oral bioavailability | [ | |
| βCD polymer-based nanosponge | βCD | Atorvastatin | - | 34% | Diffusive release in dialysis sac methods | Oral bioavailability, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy | [ | |
| βCD-based nanosponge tablet | βCD | Febuxostat | - | 88–100% | Diffusive release using dissolution apparatus | Oral bioavailability | [ | |
| βCD polymer-based nanosponge functionalized with gold nanoparticles | βCD | Phenylethylamine | 90% | - | - | - | [ | |
| 2-amino-4-(4-chlorophenyl)-thiazole | 150% | - | ||||||
| Graphene derivatives | Multi-walled carbon nanotubes CD-Maleic Anhydride-N-Isopropylacrylamide-Fluorescein-folic acid | βCD | Curcumin + DOX | 29 wt% (curcumin) and 19 wt% (DOX) | 92% | Temperature change, pH change and laser irradiation at 808 nm | Progression and regression of tumor in BALB/c mice model | [ |
| Graphene oxide-L-phenylalanine-βCD | βCD | DOX | 85%, | 79% | pH change | - | [ | |
| Graphene oxide-Fe3O4-βCD | Mono-6-deoxy-6-ethylenediamino-βCD | DOX | 4% | 37% | pH change | - | [ | |
| Methotrexate | 2% | 23% | ||||||
| Graphene oxide-βCD-poly(amido amine) dendrimer | aminated-βCD | DOX | 0.4 mg/mg | - | pH change | - | [ | |
| Camptothecin | 4.0 mg/mg | |||||||
| Protoporphyrin IX | 0.8 mg/mg | |||||||
| Graphene oxide + mPEG−QPDMAEMA/α-CD supramolecular hydrogel | αCD | 5-fluorouracil | 4.6 mg/g | - | Temperature change, pH change and UV irradiation responsive release | - | [ | |
| βCD/Ni nanoparticle-modified GO and mitochondrial ion-targeting peptide-grafted hyaluronic acid | Mono-6-deoxy-6-ethylenediamino-βCD | DOX | >36% | - | AMF responsive release | - | [ | |
| Core: Curcumin@CD-oxide graphene, Shell: Gallic acid@Chitosan | 6-O-monotosyl-βCD | Curcumin | pH change | - | [ | |||
| Gallic acid | ||||||||
| βCD/Carbon dots | βCD | DOX | 27% | - | pH change | - | [ | |
| Associated to inorganic nanoparticles | Tetra-ortho-methoxy-substituted azobenzene/βCD-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles | aminated-βCD | p-Coumalic acid | - | - | Green light (520 nm) | - | [ |
| Gold nanostar modified with cationic βCD-based polymer | βCD | Phenylethylamine and piperine | 95% | 91–76% | - | - | [ | |
| Electrospun CD/Ag nanoparticles nanofibers | HPβCD | Ag nanoparticles | - | - | ions on agar plates | - | [ | |
| Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with loaded mono-6-thio-βCD | 6-thio-βCD | DOX | 90% | - | pH change | - | [ | |
| Nickel ferrite nanoparticles covered with CD-dextran polymers | Mono-6-deoxy-6-aminoethylamino-βCD | camptothecin | - | - | pH change | - | [ | |
| ZnSe/ZnS quantum dots on βCD/chitosan polymer | βCD | Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid | 22% | - | pH change | Biodistribution in a melanoma animal model injected subcutaneously | [ | |
| Other nanosystems | Mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified with CDs/2-diazo-1,2-naphthoquinone nanovalves | βCD | DOX | 5% | 69% | NIR light irradiation | Intratumoral injection in tumor-bearing mice | [ |
| MOF nanoparticles functionalized with iron (III) polycarboxylates/CDs | Phosphated CD | Azidothymidine-triphosphate | 8% | - | [ | |||
| Janus gold nanostar–mesoporous silica nanoparticle modified with a thiolated photolabile molecule and proton-responsive benzimidazole-βCD | β-CD | DOX | - | - | NIR light irradiation | - | [ | |
| βCD functionalized polyurethane fibrous membranes | βCD | Gentamicin sulphate | 68% | - | Diffusive release in PBS at pH 7.4 | Antibacterial activity against Gram positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative Escherichia Coli | [ |
Figure 3Construction of the nanosystem ZnPc-(PEG)5:Ac-CD:DOX with pH and light sensitivity for in vivo synergistic chemo- and photo-therapy of tumors in an H22 tumor-bearing mice model [170]. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 4Stimuli-controlled drug release from CD-modified nanomaterials in tumor sites. The conjugates reach the tumor sites by passive/active targeting, then an external stimulus (alternating magnetic field, AMF, or UV irradiation) and/or an internal stimulus (temperature, intracellular metabolites, or acidic pH) triggers the drug release from the conjugates. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 5Different routes of administration where CD-modified nanomaterials have been shown to increase bioavailability. Created with BioRender.com.