| Literature DB >> 32104450 |
Tingting Liu1, Xiaocao Wan2, Zheng Luo2, Chao Liu2, Peng Quan2, Dongmei Cun1, Liang Fang2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a palatable donepezil (Entities:
Keywords: Absorption; Donepezil; Dynamic process; E-tongue; Orodispersible film; Taste-masking
Year: 2018 PMID: 32104450 PMCID: PMC7032196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 1818-0876 Impact factor: 6.598
Fig. 1The structures of DP (a) and HP-β-CD (b).
The result of polymer optimization (n = 3).
| Formulation no. | Polymers | Viscosity of coating solution (mPa·s) | Coating process | Film-forming capacity | Appearance of film |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PS | Pasty | Difficult | Bad | — |
| 2 | L-HPC | 13 | Difficult | Bad | White opacity |
| 3 | HPMC | 762 | Easy | Good | Colorless transparent |
| 4 | PEO | 258 | Medium | Medium | White translucent |
The result of plasticizer optimization (n = 3).
| Formulation no. | Plasticizer (w/w: plasticizer/polymer) | Polymer | DP content (mg/2 × 3 cm2) | Folding endurance value | Dissolution within 3 min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20%PG | HPMC | 5 | 1 | — |
| 2 | 30%PG | HPMC | 5 | 3 | 41.5% |
| 3 | 40%PG | HPMC | 5 | >20 | 33.4% |
| 4 | 20%Gl | HPMC | 5 | 1 | — |
| 5 | 30%Gl | HPMC | 5 | 8 | 38.3% |
| 6 | 40%Gl | HPMC | 5 | >20 | 50.8% |
| 7 | 20%PEG 400 | HPMC | 5 | 1 | — |
| 8 | 30%PEG 400 | HPMC | 5 | 1 | — |
| 9 | 40%PEG 400 | HPMC | 5 | >20 | 30.4% |
Critical quality attributes of the optimized DP/HP-β-CD ODF.
| Thickness (µm) | Weight (mg) | DP content (mg) | Tensile strength (N·mm2) | Elongation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.80 ± 1.68 | 129.02 ± 6.29 | 4.96 ± 0.21 | 45.72 ± 1.98 | 10.31 ± 1.02 |
Fig. 2The dissolution profiles of DP/HP-β-CD ODF in distilled water and 0.1 mol/l HCl solution.
Fig. 3PCA map displaying 4 sensors outputs in a two-dimensional graph.
Fig. 4Euclidean distances from samples to the drug substance (DH) (b). * indicated a significant difference in statistics.
Fig. 5Pharmacokinetic profiles of DH solution after intragastrical administration and DP/HP-β-CD ODF after oral cavity administration (A); Pharmacokinetic profile of DP after injection (B).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of DH after injection of DH (3 mg/kg), following oral gavage of DH (10 mg/kg) and oral cavity administration of DP/HP-β-CD ODF (10 mg/kg) (n = 6, mean ± SD).
| Parameter | ODF | Oral gavage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 738 ± 264 | 385 ± 110 | 439 ± 108 | |
| 0.08 ± 0.00 | 0.83 ± 0.61 | 0.58 ± 0.20 | |
| 959 ± 185 | 1836 ± 498 | 1669 ± 249 | |
| 3.39 ± 0.35 | 6.74 ± 0.89 | 7.38 ± 1.39 |
Fig. 6The FT-IR spectra of samples: DP (a), HP-β-CD (b), the physical mixtures (c) and DP/HP-β-CD inclusion complexes (d).
Fig. 7The DSC curves of samples: DP (a), HP-β-CD (b), the physical mixtures (c) and DP/HP-β-CD inclusion complexes (d).
Fig. 8The XRD patterns of samples: DP (a), HP-β-CD (b), the physical mixtures (c) and DP/HP-β-CD inclusion complexes (d).
Fig. 9Models of the DP/HP-β-CD inclusion complexes and DP/HCl from docking calculation: DP/HP-β-CD inclusion complexes (A) and DP/HCl (B).