Literature DB >> 34952540

DNA strand break induction of aqueous plasmid DNA exposed to 30 MeV protons at ultra-high dose rate.

Daisuke Ohsawa1, Yota Hiroyama1,2, Alisa Kobayashi1,3, Tamon Kusumoto1,4, Hisashi Kitamura4, Satoru Hojo5, Satoshi Kodaira1,4, Teruaki Konishi1,2.   

Abstract

Radiation cancer therapy with ultra-high dose rate exposure, so called FLASH radiotherapy, appears to reduce normal tissue damage without compromising tumor response. The aim of this study was to clarify whether FLASH exposure of proton beam would be effective in reducing the DNA strand break induction. We applied a simple model system, pBR322 plasmid DNA in aqueous 1 × TE solution, where DNA single strand breaks (SSBs) and double strand breaks (DSBs) can be precisely quantified by gel electrophoresis. Plasmid DNA were exposed to 27.5 MeV protons in the conventional dose rate of 0.05 Gy/s (CONV) and ultra-high dose rate of 40 Gy/s (FLASH). With both dose rate, the kinetics of the SSB and DSB induction were proportional to absorbed dose. The SSB induction of FLASH was significantly less than CONV, which were 8.79 ± 0.14 (10-3 SSB per Gy per molecule) and 10.8 ± 0.68 (10-3 SSB per Gy per molecule), respectively. The DSB induction of FLASH was also slightly less than CONV, but difference was not significant. Altogether, 27.5 MeV proton beam at 40 Gy/s reduced SSB and not DSB, thus its effect may not be significant in reducing lethal DNA damage that become apparent in acute radiation effect.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA strand breaks; FLASH; high dose rate; plasmid DNA; proton

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34952540      PMCID: PMC8944314          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  33 in total

Review 1.  Formation of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation: a review.

Authors:  Megumi Hada; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Effect of high dose per pulse flattening filter-free beams on cancer cell survival.

Authors:  Ines Lohse; Stephanie Lang; Jan Hrbacek; Stephan Scheidegger; Stephan Bodis; Nadia S Macedo; Jianhua Feng; Urs M Lütolf; Kathrin Zaugg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Faster and safer? FLASH ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Mark Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Bringing FLASH to the Clinic: Treatment Planning Considerations for Ultrahigh Dose-Rate Proton Beams.

Authors:  Patricia van Marlen; Max Dahele; Michael Folkerts; Eric Abel; Berend J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?

Authors:  Jean Bourhis; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Claude Bailat; Benoît Petit; Jonathan Ollivier; Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi; Mahmut Ozsahin; François Bochud; Raphaël Moeckli; Jean-François Germond; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Laura Caplier; Virginie Monceau; Frédéric Pouzoulet; Mano Sayarath; Charles Fouillade; Marie-France Poupon; Isabel Brito; Philippe Hupé; Jean Bourhis; Janet Hall; Jean-Jacques Fontaine; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  FLASH Irradiation Spares Lung Progenitor Cells and Limits the Incidence of Radio-induced Senescence.

Authors:  Sandra Curras-Alonso; Lorena Giuranno; Charles Fouillade; Eddy Quelennec; Sophie Heinrich; Sarah Bonnet-Boissinot; Arnaud Beddok; Sophie Leboucher; Hamza Umut Karakurt; Mylène Bohec; Sylvain Baulande; Marc Vooijs; Pierre Verrelle; Marie Dutreix; Arturo Londoño-Vallejo; Vincent Favaudon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A physicochemical model of reaction kinetics supports peroxyl radical recombination as the main determinant of the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Rudi Labarbe; Lucian Hotoiu; Julie Barbier; Vincent Favaudon
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Role of isolated and clustered DNA damage and the post-irradiating repair process in the effects of heavy ion beam irradiation.

Authors:  Yuka Tokuyama; Yoshiya Furusawa; Hiroshi Ide; Akira Yasui; Hiroaki Terato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 10.  FLASH Radiotherapy: Current Knowledge and Future Insights Using Proton-Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan R Hughes; Jason L Parsons
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of FLASH effect.

Authors:  Binwei Lin; Dan Huang; Feng Gao; Yiwei Yang; Dai Wu; Yu Zhang; Gang Feng; Tangzhi Dai; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.