Literature DB >> 18413977

Formation of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation: a review.

Megumi Hada1, Alexandros G Georgakilas.   

Abstract

Radiation can cause as well as cure cancer. The risk of developing radiation-induced cancer has traditionally been estimated from cancer incidence among survivors of the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.(1)) These data provide the best estimate of human cancer risk over the dose range for low linear energy transfer (LET) radiations, such as X- or gamma-rays. The situation of estimating the real biological effects becomes even more difficult in the case of high LET particles encountered in space or as the result of domestic exposure to alpha-particles from radon gas emitters or other radioactive emitters like uranium-238. Complex DNA damage, i.e., the signature of high-LET radiations comprises of closely spaced DNA lesions forming a cluster of DNA damage. The two basic groups of complex DNA damage are double strand breaks (DSBs) and non-DSB oxidative clustered DNA lesions (OCDL). Theoretical analysis and experimental evidence suggest an increased complexity and severity of complex DNA damage with increasing LET (linear energy transfer) and a high mutagenic or carcinogenic potential. Data available on the formation of clustered DNA damage (DSBs and OCDL) by high-LET radiations are often controversial suggesting a variable response to dose and type of radiation. The chemical nature and cellular repair mechanisms of complex DNA damage have been much less characterized than those of isolated DNA lesions like an oxidized base or a single strand break especially in the case of high-LET radiation. This review will focus on the induction of clustered DNA damage by high-LET radiations presenting the earlier and recent relative data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18413977     DOI: 10.1269/jrr.07123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  123 in total

1.  Radiosensitization effect of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition in cells exposed to low and high liner energy transfer radiation.

Authors:  Takahisa Hirai; Hidenori Shirai; Hiroaki Fujimori; Ryuichi Okayasu; Keisuke Sasai; Mitsuko Masutani
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 2.  Biologically relevant oxidants and terminology, classification and nomenclature of oxidatively generated damage to nucleobases and 2-deoxyribose in nucleic acids.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Steffen Loft; Ryszard Olinski; Mark D Evans; Karol Bialkowski; J Richard Wagner; Peter C Dedon; Peter Møller; Marc M Greenberg; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2012-02-22

3.  Transcription profile of DNA damage response genes at G₀ lymphocytes exposed to gamma radiation.

Authors:  Divyalakshmi Saini; Shridevi Shelke; A Mani Vannan; Sneh Toprani; Vinay Jain; Birajalaxmi Das; M Seshadri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 4.  Coordination of DNA-PK activation and nuclease processing of DNA termini in NHEJ.

Authors:  Katherine S Pawelczak; Sara M Bennett; John J Turchi
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 5.  Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Christian Orlowski; Li-Jeen Mah; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  The effect of post-irradiation tumor oxygenation status on recovery from radiation-induced damage in vivo: with reference to that in quiescent cell populations.

Authors:  Shin-ichiro Masunaga; Ryoichi Hirayama; Akiko Uzawa; Genro Kashino; Minoru Suzuki; Yuko Kinashi; Yong Liu; Sachiko Koike; Koichi Ando; Koji Ono
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Non-specific DNA binding interferes with the efficient excision of oxidative lesions from chromatin by the human DNA glycosylase, NEIL1.

Authors:  Ian D Odell; Kheng Newick; Nicholas H Heintz; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-12-11

8.  Analysis of heat-labile sites generated by reactions of depleted uranium and ascorbate in plasmid DNA.

Authors:  Janice Wilson; Ashley Young; Edgar R Civitello; Diane M Stearns
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Radiosensitivity of pimonidazole-unlabelled intratumour quiescent cell population to γ-rays, accelerated carbon ion beams and boron neutron capture reaction.

Authors:  S Masunaga; Y Sakurai; H Tanaka; R Hirayama; Y Matsumoto; A Uzawa; M Suzuki; N Kondo; M Narabayashi; A Maruhashi; K Ono
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A recombinase paralog from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus enhances SsoRadA ssDNA binding and strand displacement.

Authors:  William J Graham; Cynthia A Haseltine
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.