Literature DB >> 30348017

Assessing speech correction abilities with acoustic analyses: Evidence of preserved online correction in persons with aphasia.

Caroline A Niziolek1, Swathi Kiran1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Disorders of speech production may be accompanied by abnormal processing of speech sensory feedback. Here, we introduce a semi-automated analysis designed to assess the degree to which speakers use natural online feedback to decrease acoustic variability in spoken words. Because production deficits in aphasia have been hypothesised to stem from problems with sensorimotor integration, we investigated whether persons with aphasia (PWA) can correct their speech acoustics online. Method: Eight PWA in the chronic stage produced 200 repetitions each of three monosyllabic words. Formant variability was measured for each vowel in multiple time windows within the syllable, and the reduction in formant variability from vowel onset to midpoint was quantified. Result: PWA significantly decreased acoustic variability over the course of the syllable, providing evidence of online feedback correction mechanisms. The magnitude of this corrective formant movement exceeded past measurements in control participants.
Conclusion: Vowel centreing behaviour suggests that error correction abilities are at least partially spared in speakers with aphasia, and may be relied upon to compensate for feedforward deficits by bringing utterances back on track. These proof of concept data show the potential of this analysis technique to elucidate the mechanisms underlying disorders of speech production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphasia; auditory feedback; speech error correction; speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30348017      PMCID: PMC6476704          DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1498920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1754-9507            Impact factor:   2.484


  35 in total

1.  Reliance on auditory feedback in children with childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel; Tiffany P Hogan; Anthony J Guarino; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-01

3.  Compensation for jaw fixation by aphasic patients.

Authors:  S R Baum; J A Kim; W F Katz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  An acoustic study of vowel production in aphasia.

Authors:  J H Ryalls
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Possible role of abnormal auditory feedback in conduction aphasia.

Authors:  F Boller; P Marcie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Production deficits in aphasia: a voice-onset time analysis.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; W E Cooper; H Goodglass; S Statlender; J Gottlieb
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory - an aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data.

Authors:  Bradley R Buchsbaum; Juliana Baldo; Kayoko Okada; Karen F Berman; Nina Dronkers; Mark D'Esposito; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging studies of acquired apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Kirrie J Ballard; Jason A Tourville; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fundamental deficits of auditory perception in Wernicke's aphasia.

Authors:  Holly Robson; Manon Grube; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Timothy D Griffiths; Karen Sage
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production.

Authors:  Marc Sato; Krystyna Grabski; Maëva Garnier; Lionel Granjon; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Richard B Ivry; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Authors:  Nicole E Tomassi; Hasini R Weerathunge; Megan R Cushman; Jason W Bohland; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation.

Authors:  Hantao Wang; Ludo Max
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability.

Authors:  Hung-Shao Cheng; Caroline A Niziolek; Adam Buchwald; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.