Literature DB >> 17471743

Time course of speech changes in response to unanticipated short-term changes in hearing state.

Joseph S Perkell1, Harlan Lane, Margaret Denny, Melanie L Matthies, Mark Tiede, Majid Zandipour, Jennell Vick, Ellen Burton.   

Abstract

The timing of changes in parameters of speech production was investigated in six cochlear implant users by switching their implant microphones off and on a number of times in a single experimental session. The subjects repeated four short, two-word utterances, /dV1n#SV2d/ (S = /s/ or /S/), in quasi-random order. The changes between hearing and nonhearing states were introduced by a voice-activated switch at V1 onset. "Postural" measures were made of vowel sound pressure level (SPL), duration, F0; contrast measures were made of vowel separation (distance between pair members in the formant plane) and sibilant separation (difference in spectral means). Changes in parameter values were averaged over multiple utterances, lined up with respect to the switch. No matter whether prosthetic hearing was blocked or restored, contrast measures for vowels and sibilants did not change systematically. Some changes in duration, SPL and F0 were observed during the vowel within which hearing state was changed, V1, as well as during V2 and subsequent utterance repetitions. Thus, sound segment contrasts appear to be controlled differently from the postural parameters of speaking rate and average SPL and F0. These findings are interpreted in terms of the function of hypothesized feedback and feedforward mechanisms for speech motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471743     DOI: 10.1121/1.2642349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Lori L Holt; Patryk Laurent; Sung-Joo Lim; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Brain-Computer Interface: Applications to Speech Decoding and Synthesis to Augment Communication.

Authors:  Shiyu Luo; Qinwan Rabbani; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.088

5.  Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Authors:  Nicole E Tomassi; Hasini R Weerathunge; Megan R Cushman; Jason W Bohland; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Real-time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Anirudh Gautam; Jason A Brant; Michael J Ruckenstein; Steven J Eliades
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-21

7.  Speech perception under adverse conditions: insights from behavioral, computational, and neuroscience research.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Sheila E Blumstein; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-03

8.  Sensorimotor adaptation of voice fundamental frequency in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ayoub Daliri; Ashling A Lupiani; Frank H Guenther; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.