Sara E Bell1,2, Insu Park3, Stanislav S Rubakhin1,2, Rashid Bashir2,3,4,5, Yurii Vlasov2,3,4,5, Jonathan V Sweedler1,2,5. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States. 2. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States. 3. Holonyak Micro & Nanotechnology Laboratory, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States. 4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States. 5. Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Abstract
Microfluidic and mass spectrometry (MS) methods are widely used to sample and probe the chemical composition of biological systems to elucidate chemical correlates of their healthy and disease states. Though matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI)-MS has been hyphenated to droplet microfluidics for offline analyses, the effects of parameters related to droplet generation, such as the type of oil phase used, have been understudied. To characterize these effects, five different oil phases were tested in droplet microfluidics for producing samples for MALDI-MS analysis. Picoliter to nanoliter aqueous droplets containing 0.1 to 100 mM γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and inorganic salts were generated inside a polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic chip and deposited onto a conductive glass slide. Optical microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and MALDI-mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) of the droplet samples and surrounding areas revealed patterns of solvent and oil evaporation and analyte deposition. Optical microscopy detected the presence of salt crystals in 50-100 μm diameter dried droplets, and Raman and MSI were used to correlate GABA signals to the visible droplet footprints. MALDI-MS analyses revealed that droplets prepared in the presence of octanol oil led to the poorest detectability of GABA, whereas the oil phases containing FC-40 provided the best detectability; GABA signal was localized to the footprint of 65 pL droplets with a limit of detection of 23 amol. The effect of the surfactant perfluorooctanol on analyte detection was also investigated.
Microfluidic and mass spectrometry (MS) methods are widely used to sample and probe the chemical composition of biological systems to elucidate chemical correlates of their healthy and disease states. Though matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI)-MS has been hyphenated to droplet microfluidics for offline analyses, the effects of parameters related to droplet generation, such as the type of oil phase used, have been understudied. To characterize these effects, five different oil phases were tested in droplet microfluidics for producing samples for MALDI-MS analysis. Picoliter to nanoliter aqueous droplets containing 0.1 to 100 mM γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and inorganic salts were generated inside a polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic chip and deposited onto a conductive glass slide. Optical microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and MALDI-mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) of the droplet samples and surrounding areas revealed patterns of solvent and oil evaporation and analyte deposition. Optical microscopy detected the presence of salt crystals in 50-100 μm diameter dried droplets, and Raman and MSI were used to correlate GABA signals to the visible droplet footprints. MALDI-MS analyses revealed that droplets prepared in the presence of octanol oil led to the poorest detectability of GABA, whereas the oil phases containing FC-40 provided the best detectability; GABA signal was localized to the footprint of 65 pL droplets with a limit of detection of 23 amol. The effect of the surfactant perfluorooctanol on analyte detection was also investigated.
Mass spectrometry (MS)
is widely used for the analysis of chemical
and biological systems owing to its highly sensitive, multiplexed,
and untargeted nature.[1−3] Similarly, the development of droplet microfluidic
techniques has enabled high-throughput sample preparation and analysis
of chemical and biological systems, in particular, the chemistry of
the brain.[4−6] Conventional brain microfluidic dialysis coupled
to MS produces results on the time scale of minutes, whereas detection
of small molecule neurochemicals by spectroscopy or electrochemistry
has uncovered dynamic chemical signaling on the time scale of seconds.[7,8] While fast, these latter techniques require analyte preselection
and detection of fluorescence activity or electroactivity. In contrast,
MS allows for multiplexed detection of neurochemicals on a fast time
scale and is free from these limitations.[1,9,10] To reach the second-scale time resolution,
analytes may be packaged into individual picoliter-volume droplets,
allowing preservation of chemical gradients obtained from dynamic
biological systems by preventing analyte diffusion and biofouling.[11] Analyte segmentation into a train of individual
droplets requires the use of two immiscible phases, such as an oil
and an aqueous phase (e.g., water or cerebral spinal fluid). Additionally,
various surfactants are often used to stabilize the interface between
the two phases,[12] facilitating the generation,
transport, and storage of droplets. Transfer of droplets to separate
storage microarrays[13] allows sample generation
and MS analysis to be decoupled, increasing the choice of detection
methods.Many MS techniques[14−16] can be utilized to measure
droplet contents, including
electrospray ionization (ESI),[5,17−19] inductively coupled plasma (ICP),[20−22] or matrix-assisted laser
desorption/ionization (MALDI).[23−29] Carrier oils and surfactants have been shown to interfere with spray
stability and ion detection in ESI-MS,[30] where droplet production and analysis are not always decoupled.
However, when coupled to MALDI-MS, the influence of commonly used
carrier oils and surfactants has not been well evaluated.Previous
studies of MALDI-MS detection of larger molecules, such
as peptides and proteins,[26,27] have not reported any
adverse effects caused by the most commonly used fluorinated oils
and surfactants; no oil residue has been observed on the sample substrate
nor the presence of oil-related or surfactant-related mass spectral
peaks. Though oils and surfactants in MALDI samples may not influence
the detection of large molecules, their effect on the detectability
of small molecules (in the range of most classical neurotransmitters)
has not been well studied. Most of the recent reports on droplet-assisted
MALDI sample preparation utilize electrowetting on dielectric devices
that are capable of forming and manipulating aqueous droplets in ambient
air without the presence of oils.[31−36] Though Pereira et al.[29] documented adverse
effects of the perfluorinated oil FC-40 on MALDI matrix crystallization,
a comparative study of different oils and surfactant-related effects
on MALDI-MS detection of small molecule neurochemicals (<500 Da)
in droplets is lacking.Typically, microfluidic-generated droplets
with volumes over 100
pL, often a few nanoliters, result in successful MS analysis of peptides
and proteins. In a few cases, droplet volumes less than 100 pL have
successfully been analyzed by ESI-MS[5] and
ICP-MS.[22] For MALDI-MS analysis, the reduction
of sample volumes to the low picoliter range has been shown by the
application of continuous flow microfluidics with integrated microdispensers.[37−39] However, development of droplet microfluidics sample preparation
approaches in picoliter volumes requires additional characterization
of the influence of the oil phase on different parameters of sampling
and analyte detection.To determine the effects of oils on sample
preparation for MALDI-MS
analysis, we tested a series of carrier oil phases for production
of aqueous droplets containing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in
artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF). First, we used optical microscopy,
Raman spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to validate
analyte-droplet footprint colocalization on the nonpatterned surface
of an indium–tin oxide (ITO) coated glass slide. This was done
in contrast to previous studies utilizing a variety of alternating
hydrophobic and hydrophilic patterns on MALDI substrates to effectively
capture droplets and repel oil.[20,23,24,26−28,40−42] By using a nonpatterned ITO slide,
a substrate commonly used in MALDI-MS analysis, we were able to probe
surface-oil-GABA interactions and characterize the dried droplet morphologies.
Additionally, droplets produced using different oils were compared
for GABA localization and detectability using MALDI-MS. Ultimately,
we achieved a 23 amol limit of detection (LOD) for GABA in droplets
produced in the oil phase FC-40: perfluorooctanol (PFO) (10:1 v/v).
The work described here allowed generation and measurement of 65 pL
droplets, which may become enabling for smaller diameter sampling
systems such as push–pull capillary sampling of the brain.[17,19,43] Furthermore, this work opens
new perspectives for application of droplet microfluidics hyphenated
with MALDI-MS to other sampling and measurement fields.
Experimental Section
Chemicals
aCSF was purchased from
Tocris Bioscience
(Bristol, UK). Fluorinert FC-40, PFO, perfluorodecalin (PFD), 1-octanol,
GABA, and α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All chemicals were used without
further purification.
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Microfluidic
Chip
For stable
generation of droplets, PDMS chips, each with an integrated T-junction,
were designed and fabricated with the channel width and depth varied
from 10 to 50 μm and 50 to 100 μm, respectively. PDMS
and curing agent (10:1 mixing ratio) were poured on the master wafer
and cured for 2 h at 60 °C. Master PDMS was bonded to a flat
PDMS plate with an activated hydrophilic surface produced by 2 min
exposure to low-pressure oxygen plasma and baking overnight at 50
°C. Once fabricated, the microfluidic channels in the PDMS chip
were made hydrophobic by application of Aquapel (Aquapel Glass Treatment,
Cranberry Twp, PA, USA) for 5 min and then rinsed with isopropyl alcohol
(IPA). The inlet and outlet of the PDMS chip were designed for fitting
of two fused silica glass capillaries to avoid solution leakage. Two
fused silica glass capillaries (150 μm outer diameter/50 μm
inner diameter) were cut to approximately 3 cm and inserted into the
outlet and inlet of the chip. Once fabricated and plumbed, the chip
was again treated with Aquapel for 5 min and rinsed with IPA. Lastly,
the oil used for the continuous phase was flushed through the channels
of the chip helping to remove IPA residue and air bubbles. A new PDMS
chip was used for each oil phase to avoid cross-contamination.
Droplet
Production and Deposition on MALDI Substrates
To simulate
the conditions of biological samples, droplets were generated
from aCSF containing differing concentrations of GABA. Injection of
the dispersed, aqueous phase into an integrated T-junction with a
constant supply of oil-based continuous phase resulted in the generation
of aqueous droplets with volumes between 65 pL and 1000 pL at 2 to
10 Hz frequency (Figure S1). The dispersed
aqueous phase contained 100 mM or 100 μM GABA in aCSF. The following
oils and oil mixtures were evaluated as the continuous oil phase:
(1) 1-octanol; (2) a fluorocarbon PFD (C10F18) supplemented with surfactant
PFO (10:1 ratio, v/v); (3) a fluorocarbon oil Fluorinert FC-40 supplemented
with surfactant PFO (10:1 ratio, v/v); (4) PFO; and (5) Fluorinert
FC-40 (Table S1). Two syringe pumps (Pump
11-Pico Plus Elite, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA), directly connected
with the inlet fused silica capillaries through 100 μL syringes
and connectors, controlled the flow rates of the dispersed and continuous
phases. The flow rate ratio between the dispersed and continuous phases
was adjusted from 0.05:10 to 5:10 (nL/min), depending on the channel
cross section and droplet volume required (Figure S1).Droplets were transferred off-chip to an ITO-coated
glass slide (Delta Technologies, Loveland, CO). This was accomplished
by mechanical contact of the outlet fused silica capillary to the
surface of the ITO slide. Positioning of the capillary was controlled
manually using x–y–z micromanipulators. Droplets were
deposited in relation to fiducial markers engraved into the slide
by a diamond tip pen.
Optical Microscopy
After droplet
deposition, the ITO
slide was mounted for optical microscopy imaging using a Mitutoyo
FS70 inspection microscope (Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan) at a 90°
angle and a Dino-Lite digital microscope, model AM73515MZT (Dino-Lite,
New Taipei, Taiwan); 45° and 0° angle projections were used
to record the evaporation of water and oil phases. All time-lapsed
images of the evaporation process were recorded using 10× and
20× objective lenses and cameras with 20 frames/s capture rates.
Each droplet evaporation area was analyzed using the time-lapsed images
and an in-house code,[44] created using MATLAB
(Mathworks, Natick, MA) and based on a particle tracking algorithm.After evaporation, the entire ITO slide surface was recorded by
whole slide bright-field microscopy using an Axio Imager M2 (Carl
Zeiss, Jena, Germany) in order to visualize droplet locations with
respect to fiducial marks. Images were acquired with a 10× objective
and tiled to cover the whole slide surface. Images were stitched and
exported as TIFF files using Zen 2 (Carl Zeiss, Blue edition) software.
These images were further used to guide MALDI-MSI. Individual droplets
were imaged for further characterization of morphology both before
and after MALDI matrix application using an Axiovert 25 inverted microscope
(Carl Zeiss).
Droplet Evaporation Analysis
The
in-house MATLAB code[44] was used to analyze
the area changes and particle
trajectories of each droplet and surrounding oil phase during evaporation.
First, the two regions of interest corresponding to the oil and droplet
phases were manually selected for separate analysis. Next, adaptive
histogram equalization was applied to the raw images to enhance the
contrast between the droplet and oil phases. Additionally, a pixel-wise
adaptive low-pass Wiener filter was used to reduce noise. After filtering,
threshold values distinguishing the droplet and oil phases from the
background were defined to create a binary mask, converting the images
to binary format. Using the binary mask, center coordinates and radii
were determined in all regions of interest and at each time point
during evaporation.
MALDI Matrix Application
The MALDI
matrix CHCA was
applied by sublimation using a lab-constructed, glass sublimation
chamber.[45,46] An ITO slide was attached to the bottom
of a coldfinger using conductive copper tape. A shallow foil boat,
50 mm × 5 mm, containing CHCA was attached to the bottom of
the chamber by conductive copper tape. The coldfinger was inserted
into the chamber and sealed with an O-ring. A mechanical pump was
used to establish vacuum for 5 min. Then ice was added to the coldfinger
and the slide allowed to cool for 5 min. A variable power supply (120
V at 55%) and heating mantle were used to heat the chamber for 16
min to sublime the CHCA. The chamber was removed from the heating
mantle and allowed to cool for 5 min before vacuum was released and
the slide removed.
MALDI-TOF-MS
Droplets of different
volumes (65–1000
pL) containing known concentrations of GABA ([M + H]+ ion
signal at m/z 104.07) were profiled
with MS. Mass spectra were acquired on an ultrafleXtreme MALDI TOF/TOF
mass spectrometer with a frequency tripled Nd:YAG solid-state laser
(Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA). FlexImaging (Bruker Corp.) was used
to profile each droplet and a surrounding area of approximately 1
× 1 mm2 with a spatial resolution of either 100 ×
100 μm2 or 50 × 50 μm2. The
“Ultra” setting produced an ∼100 μm diameter
laser beam footprint. Each pixel of the resulting molecular images
corresponds to data collected by 100 laser shots.
MALDI-MS Data
Analysis
FlexImaging and ClinProTools
software (Bruker Corp.) were used to visualize ion intensity distributions
and extracted total ion count (TIC) normalized intensities for the m/z 104.07 ion, respectively. Principal
component analysis (PCA) of data on analyte and matrix species observed
in samples prepared using all studied conditions was carried out by
ClinProTools. The TIC normalized intensities for m/z 104.07 were thresholded to determine the total
GABA signal per droplet. First, the maximum intensity of the signal
at m/z 104.07 detected in the blank
area (corresponding to chemical noise and possible isobaric ions formed
from MALDI matrix and/or the ITO-coated glass surface) was used as
a threshold for the m/z 104.07 signal
observed at each pixel in the MS images of droplet areas. Any signals
with intensities below this threshold were excluded; all signal intensities
above the threshold were summed to yield the total GABA signal intensity
per droplet area. This thresholding technique is used for all cumulative
MSI data and for construction of three-dimensional (3-D) heat maps
of MS imaged areas in MATLAB.
Raman Spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy was performed
using a Nanophoton Raman 11 laser confocal microscope (Nanophoton,
Osaka, Japan) with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. The excitation
power was set at 20 and 50 mW for point spectra and mapping, respectively,
with a 2 s exposure time and 5× averaging for both modes. For
Raman spectroscopy mapping, the defined region of interest was 20
by 70 μm2 in the x–y plane with 1 pixel/μm resolution. The objective
lens used was 50×, and the grating was 600 gr/mm. The wavenumber
range covered was 400 to 2900 cm–1. The wavenumber
shift compensation was −7.89 cm–1 after calibration
using a standard, low-pressure neon lamp.
Results and Discussion
Droplet
Morphology on MALDI Substrates
To understand
how aqueous droplets and the surrounding oil interact with the ITO
glass substrate surface, we performed a series of optical microscopy
studies to visualize the droplets. Once single droplets were deposited
onto the ITO surface, two cameras were used to track the evaporation
of both aqueous and oil phases in 45° and 0° angle projections,
respectively (Figure A). Upon single droplet deposition, a large area was covered by both
the oil phase and aqueous phase (e.g., 800 μm diameter for a
65 pL droplet). Due to the hydrophobic nature of the ITO surface,
the contact angle of the aqueous picoliter droplet was larger than
that of the oil, protruding above the surface of the oil, and started
to evaporate almost immediately after deposition. To analyze the water
and oil evaporation rates, fluorescein was added into a series of
65 pL aCSF droplets to clearly visualize changes in droplet morphology
and formation of the dried droplet deposit (Figure B). Particle tracking analysis[44] revealed two stages of size reduction in the
deposited droplets, pinning and depinning,[47] characterized by constant contact area and constant contact angle,
respectively (Figure C). During this process, the aqueous droplet held its position on
the ITO surface, revealing minor in-plane motion (Figure S2). Due to the lack of droplet translation during
evaporation, we expected the analyte to be localized to the dried
droplet deposit visible after evaporation was complete.
Figure 1
Dynamics of
droplet drying and morphology on an ITO glass slide.
Evaporation of picoliter sessile droplets and surrounding oil are
responsible for size reduction of visible structures. (A) Time-lapsed
microscope images of 500 nL aqueous droplet and FC40:PFO oil phase
at a 0° and 45° angle projections. Scale bar, 500 μm.
(B) Time-lapsed images of evaporation of 65 pL droplet containing
100 μM fluorescein and 100 μM GABA surrounded by oil phase.
Scale bar, 150 μm. (C) Time course of pinning and depinning
phases of droplet on ITO substrate. Droplet and oil are completely
dried in 10 and 100 s, respectively. (D) Dried cores of droplets produced
in FC-40:PFO for 1000 pL volumes (i) before matrix and (ii) after
matrix application; and for 65 pL volumes (iii) before matrix and
(iv) after matrix. The oil residue halo surrounding the droplet core
is visible in (iii) (marked by an orange arrow).
Dynamics of
droplet drying and morphology on an ITO glass slide.
Evaporation of picoliter sessile droplets and surrounding oil are
responsible for size reduction of visible structures. (A) Time-lapsed
microscope images of 500 nL aqueous droplet and FC40:PFO oil phase
at a 0° and 45° angle projections. Scale bar, 500 μm.
(B) Time-lapsed images of evaporation of 65 pL droplet containing
100 μM fluorescein and 100 μM GABA surrounded by oil phase.
Scale bar, 150 μm. (C) Time course of pinning and depinning
phases of droplet on ITO substrate. Droplet and oil are completely
dried in 10 and 100 s, respectively. (D) Dried cores of droplets produced
in FC-40:PFO for 1000 pL volumes (i) before matrix and (ii) after
matrix application; and for 65 pL volumes (iii) before matrix and
(iv) after matrix. The oil residue halo surrounding the droplet core
is visible in (iii) (marked by an orange arrow).After evaporation, the morphological features of droplet volumes
ranging from 65 to 1000 pL were characterized both before and after
MALDI matrix application (Figure D). For all volumes, a 50 to 100 μm diameter
deposit, referred to as the droplet core, remained surrounded by a
faint outline, referred to as the droplet halo (orange arrow in Figure D(iii)). For 1000
pL droplets, inorganic salts present in the aCSF crystallized to develop
the droplet core, which did not integrate well with the MALDI matrix
(Figure D(i) and (ii)).
The lack of matrix–analyte contact and cocrystallization resulted
in poor ionization of GABA at this position (Figure S3). GABA signals acquired from the salt crystal positions
were 2 orders of magnitude lower in intensity compared to signals
observed at the adjacent pixels. This phenomenon was observed for
volumes of 400 pL or greater. For droplet volumes below 400 pL, images
show only partial or no internal crystallization within the droplet
core (Figure D(iii)).
In addition, the less-abundant presence of crystals allowed for better
integration of MALDI matrix with the droplet core (Figure D(iv)). In both cases, droplet
cores that remained after evaporation were typically smaller than
the 100 μm diameter laser beam used for MALDI-MSI. To determine
both GABA localization and detectability, the observed morphological
features (core and halo) can be further correlated with molecular
maps of the distribution of different compounds determined by Raman
spectroscopy and MSI. Based on these observations, we anticipated
that the small volumes would produce better MS signal and both Raman
and MS results to show GABA localized to the droplet core.
GABA Localization
in Dried Droplets Determined by Raman Spectroscopy
Application
of MALDI matrix solutions onto samples by nebulizing
sprayers or airbrushing can induce analyte delocalization due to diffusion
and/or mechanical forces.[48−50] To minimize this undesirable
effect, solvent-free MALDI matrix application by sublimation was used
for all droplet-based samples. Previously, this approach demonstrated
the least amount of delocalization of analytes for enhanced MS image
quality.[46] However, humidity[50] and water condensation on the ITO slide surface
can cause analyte delocalization similar to that caused by solvent-based
MALDI matrix application approaches. Unfortunately, the presence of
inorganic salts may induce signal suppression as well as a nonhomogeneous
matrix coating, resulting in varying degrees of matrix-analyte cocrystallization.
MALDI-MSI results may be strongly affected by these phenomena due
to a mixture of both “hot spots” with enhanced signal
and areas of diminished signal. Therefore, it is important to examine
the effects of MALDI matrix application on analyte detection and localization
in samples by using an approach orthogonal to MS.To this end,
Raman spectroscopy was utilized to determine analyte location with
respect to the dried droplet and surrounding areas (Figure ). These measurements also
allowed further evaluation of the influence of droplet deposition
and solvent evaporation stages as well as provided higher spatial
resolution than MALDI-MSI. For these experiments, 100 mM GABA, 65
pL aCSF droplets produced in FC-40:PFO were further investigated.
As seen in our optical studies (Figure ), the diameter of the dried droplet core is ∼50
μm in the x–y plane
(Figure A), with a
surrounding halo visible in approximately 50% of droplets. Once matrix
was applied, the outer halo surrounding the droplet cores, with a
diameter of ∼100 μm, was more consistently visible (Figure C). Within the halo
region, the CHCA MALDI matrix density was reduced, with a lack of
matrix around the perimeter (Figure C). A similar halo region and change in matrix density
was seen for a majority of droplets produced in all oils. Since CHCA
is 25× more polar than FC-40, the decrease in matrix density
suggests increased hydrophobicity of the substrate from incomplete
oil phase evaporation or substrate modification by the oil phase within
the halo region.
Figure 2
Raman spectroscopy characterization of dried droplets
produced
in FC-40:PFO. (A) Upright microscope image of the dried droplet after
evaporation. Crystals formed mostly by inorganic salts present in
aCSF are visible at the point marked 1; point 2 marks the outer edge
of the droplet core; point 3 marks the droplet’s halo; point
4 marks the area outside of the droplet and represents the controls/blanks.
Points 2–4, respectively, occur at distances 25, 38, and 50
μm from point 1. (B) Raman spectra measured at locations corresponding
to points 1–4. (C) Upright microscope image of the dried droplet
after MALDI matrix application by sublimation. Points 1–4 correspond
to the same droplet areas as in (A); points 2–4, respectively,
occur at distances 28, 42, and 65 μm from point 1. (D) Raman
spectra measured at the corresponding droplet locations taken after
MALDI matrix application. (E) Raman mapping of the droplet area before
matrix deposition at frequencies of ITO peak (1092 cm–1) and GABA peaks (1312 and 1403 cm–1).
Raman spectroscopy characterization of dried droplets
produced
in FC-40:PFO. (A) Upright microscope image of the dried droplet after
evaporation. Crystals formed mostly by inorganic salts present in
aCSF are visible at the point marked 1; point 2 marks the outer edge
of the droplet core; point 3 marks the droplet’s halo; point
4 marks the area outside of the droplet and represents the controls/blanks.
Points 2–4, respectively, occur at distances 25, 38, and 50
μm from point 1. (B) Raman spectra measured at locations corresponding
to points 1–4. (C) Upright microscope image of the dried droplet
after MALDI matrix application by sublimation. Points 1–4 correspond
to the same droplet areas as in (A); points 2–4, respectively,
occur at distances 28, 42, and 65 μm from point 1. (D) Raman
spectra measured at the corresponding droplet locations taken after
MALDI matrix application. (E) Raman mapping of the droplet area before
matrix deposition at frequencies of ITO peak (1092 cm–1) and GABA peaks (1312 and 1403 cm–1).Raman spectroscopy was performed on the same droplets before
and
after MALDI matrix application for comparison of GABA-related signals.
Prominent signals related to the ITO substrate were detected at 554
and 1092 cm–1; signals specific to the CHCA matrix
were observed at 1168 and 1560 cm–1. The GABA signals
at 1063 cm–1 (CH2 bending), 1312 cm–1 (CH2 bending), and 1403 cm–1 (COO– symmetric stretch) were detected at the
center (point 1) and edge (point 2) of the crystalline droplet core
and were not detectable just 10 μm outside (point 3), both before
and after matrix deposition (Figure B and D). Raman mapping was then performed on droplets
across an area 20 × 70 μm2 in the x–y plane. Intensity profiles for both the
prominent ITO peak and GABA peaks (Figure E) indicate that the concentration of GABA
outside of the droplet core fell below the Raman spectroscopy LOD
of about 1 nmol (see Figure S4). This suggests
that the visible halo deposit is not formed by dislocation of droplet
contents during the matrix application process but can be attributed
to oil residue.
GABA Signal Intensity Is Affected by the
Oil Phase
To accurately perform GABA spatial mapping with
MSI, we first had
to determine if the oil phases affect the detection of GABA in single
droplets. Our study focuses on the use of fluorinated oils for droplet
production because most organic compounds are insoluble and do not
partition to these phases.[12] Octanol was
chosen as a comparison due to its nonfluorinated nature and lower
vapor pressure. In this way, we were able to compare the effects of
fluorination, vapor pressure/drying time, and surfactant-character
on MS detection of GABA.Between five and eight droplets produced
in oil phases FC-40:PFO, PFD:PFO, PFO, or octanol were investigated
with MALDI-MSI. For each droplet, the total area imaged was on average
1 × 1 mm2 in order to include all pixels corresponding
to the area covered by the aqueous droplet and surrounding oil during
deposition, as well as pixels representative of the blank corresponding
to the MALDI matrix. Consistently, the GABA [M + H]+ ion
images showed the most intense signal for m/z 104.07 at the pixel corresponding to the droplet core
and a few adjacent pixels. Additional [M + H]+ signal of
10× lower intensity was also detected in the surrounding area
at an ∼400 μm radius. This area of low intensity GABA
signal corresponded to the area covered by oil during deposition and
the droplet’s halo. Other ions were also detected, localized
to the same pixels as the GABA [M + H]+ ion, including
a sodiated CHCA matrix [M + Na]+ at m/z 212.07, a putative GABA dimer [2 M + H]+ at m/z 208.14, and an unidentified signal
at m/z 656.03.All signals
associated with droplet contents were detected across
multiple pixels. To evaluate MALDI detection capabilities with the
different oil phases, the total GABA signal detected for each imaged
area was summed using the thresholding technique described above.
After determination of total signal for each droplet, we found that
GABA total signal intensity was significantly higher for droplets
prepared using the FC-40:PFO mixture than for droplets made using
the other three oils (Figure A). Most strikingly, in the presence of octanol the GABA signal
intensity was lowest and often below the background formed by chemical
noise and other ions, likely related to the MALDI matrix. To further
understand these differences in GABA detectability, PCA was used to
compare the MALDI matrix ion profile of all droplet samples (Figure B, C). This analysis
revealed different ionization profiles for perfluorinated oils vs
unfluorinated. All perfluorinated oil-related samples showed the expected
ion profile for CHCA matrix, whereas octanol-related samples produced
fewer MALDI matrix-related signals, along with lower GABA signal intensities
(Figure A). These
differences in not only GABA detection but also in MALDI matrix detection
suggest that residual octanol may interfere with the ionization process.
This also further supports conclusions from our microscopy and Raman
studies that the observed droplet halo may be formed by oil residue
or substrate modification by the oil.
Figure 3
Effect of oil on summed and individual
pixel intensities of selected
mass spectral features. (A) Summed GABA signal intensity per droplet
is plotted for each oil. Each blue circle represents the summed, thresholded
GABA signal intensity for each singular dried droplet. Droplets produced
in FC-40 and octanol are 65 pL, and droplets produced in PFD and PFO
are 200 pL. The summed intensity is normalized to volume to account
for this difference. Each oil had between five and eight individual
dried droplets examined. Significantly higher signal intensity is
seen for droplets generated using FC-40 with 10% PFO where *p = 0.04, **p = 0.003, ***p = 0.00002 (by one-way ANOVA). In the case of droplets produced in
PFD with 10% PFO or PFO, summed signal intensities are not significantly
higher (p > 0.05) compared to octanol-produced
droplets.
(B, C) PCA plots for the data collected from samples prepared using
the four oil phases, where (B) shows single pixel principal component
scores for each oil phase type and (C) shows loading plot with GABA
[M + H]+m/z 104.07 ion
and MALDI matrix-related signals at m/z 74.17, 118.18, 122.17, 190.13, and 212.07.
Effect of oil on summed and individual
pixel intensities of selected
mass spectral features. (A) Summed GABA signal intensity per droplet
is plotted for each oil. Each blue circle represents the summed, thresholded
GABA signal intensity for each singular dried droplet. Droplets produced
in FC-40 and octanol are 65 pL, and droplets produced in PFD and PFO
are 200 pL. The summed intensity is normalized to volume to account
for this difference. Each oil had between five and eight individual
dried droplets examined. Significantly higher signal intensity is
seen for droplets generated using FC-40 with 10% PFO where *p = 0.04, **p = 0.003, ***p = 0.00002 (by one-way ANOVA). In the case of droplets produced in
PFD with 10% PFO or PFO, summed signal intensities are not significantly
higher (p > 0.05) compared to octanol-produced
droplets.
(B, C) PCA plots for the data collected from samples prepared using
the four oil phases, where (B) shows single pixel principal component
scores for each oil phase type and (C) shows loading plot with GABA
[M + H]+m/z 104.07 ion
and MALDI matrix-related signals at m/z 74.17, 118.18, 122.17, 190.13, and 212.07.When comparing the mass spectra of droplet samples prepared with
both FC-40 and octanol to the blank MALDI matrix spectra (Figure S5), multiple signals are colocalized
with the droplet area that are not attributable to the MALDI matrix
nor to GABA. However, none could be identified as FC-40 or octanol
and could be due to the known poor ionizability of the oils. Alternatively,
the colocalized signals may represent contaminants that are present
in the oil phase. Despite the possible presence of contaminants in
both oils, the FC-40:PFO oil phase resulted in the least amount of
interference with GABA detection. Accordingly, we determined that
FC-40:PFO was the best performing of the four oil mixtures for MALDI-MSI.
GABA Signal Localization in Dried Droplets Determined by MSI
Spreading of analyte on the surface of the MALDI substrate during
droplet deposition and MALDI matrix application is another factor
influencing the intensity of analyte signals and, therefore, one of
the important factors limiting the sensitivity of detection. If GABA
is spread and delocalized, the moles of GABA per unit area will decrease
and require a lower LOD for detection; thus, delocalization of GABA
from the droplet core would be detrimental to the detection capabilities
of our system. Our Raman spectroscopy studies indicate that the GABA
concentration outside of the droplet core is below the 1 nmol LOD.
To further quantify GABA localization, we performed MSI on droplet
cores, halos, and surrounding areas.MSI was performed on 65–1000
pL aqueous droplets containing 6.5 fmol to 100 pmol of GABA produced
in FC-40:PFO or octanol oil phases. For all droplets, the highest
intensity signals of [M + H]+ at m/z 104.07 were detected in the droplet core (Figure A(ii) and B(ii)). Circular
patterns of ∼10× lower intensity signal for m/z 104.07 were detected in the surrounding area
that is occupied by the oil phase during deposition and the droplet’s
halo. Typically, the signal for m/z 104.07 was delocalized to a diameter 3–4 times larger than
the droplet core (e.g., ∼600 μm diameter m/z 104.07 ion images vs 50–100 μm droplet
core). Additionally, unidentified, colocalized signals were detected
across the same area as m/z 104.07
GABA signals (Figure A(iii) and B(iii)). This extent of delocalization of GABA and related
signals was observed across different droplet volumes and therefore
moles of GABA per droplet (Figure S6).
Furthermore, for all droplet volumes produced in the FC-40:PFO and
octanol oil phases, the theoretical droplet contact area on the ITO-glass
slide (Figure S7) underestimated the ion
image areas for m/z 104.07 signal
by one to 2 orders of magnitude. Since the observed ion patterns were
consistently larger than the droplet core, we hypothesized that the
presence of surfactant-like molecules (PFO or octanol) may act as
a permeable interface[51,52] between GABA and the oil phase
or the hydrophobic ITO-glass surface. However, even after removal
of the surfactant, GABA ion images for droplets produced in FC-40
exhibited the same extent of delocalization (Figure S6). Unlike the observations from Raman imaging of droplets,
the MS data suggests that GABA is not localized only to the droplet
core. Furthermore, this analysis was not able to attribute the cause
of the delocalization phenomenon observed in MSI to the oil phase
properties or droplet volume.
Figure 4
MALDI-MS imaging of dried droplets. (A) 65 pL
droplets containing
6.5 fmol of GABA produced in the FC-40:PFO oil phase. Panel (i) shows
an optical image of the dried droplet core outlined by an orange circle.
Panel (ii) shows the MS ion image for m/z 104.07 corresponding to the GABA [M + H]+ ion, where
the orange circle denotes the same area as shown in (i); the core
is centered between 4 pixels in the MS image. Panel (iii) shows the
MS ion image for colocalized signal at m/z 656.03. Panel (iv) shows a 3-D heat map of m/z 104.07 ion image to quantify the extent of signal
spreading by calculation of the fwhm of the physical distribution
of GABA. For FC-40:PFO, the fwhm is 100 μm. (B) 65 pL droplets
containing 6.5 fmol of GABA produced in the octanol oil phase. Panel
(i) optical image of the dried droplet core outlined by a black circle.
Panel (ii) shows the MS ion image for m/z 104.07 corresponding to the GABA [M + H]+ ion where the
black circle denotes the same area as shown in (i), the core is centered
between 4 pixels in the MS image. Panel (iii) shows the MS ion image
for colocalized signal at m/z 656.03.
Panel (iv) shows a 3-D heat map of m/z 104.07 ion image where the fwhm of GABA distribution is 500 μm.
Scale bars in panels (i) are 200 μm. Pixels are 100 μm
in panels (ii)–(iv).
MALDI-MS imaging of dried droplets. (A) 65 pL
droplets containing
6.5 fmol of GABA produced in the FC-40:PFO oil phase. Panel (i) shows
an optical image of the dried droplet core outlined by an orange circle.
Panel (ii) shows the MS ion image for m/z 104.07 corresponding to the GABA [M + H]+ ion, where
the orange circle denotes the same area as shown in (i); the core
is centered between 4 pixels in the MS image. Panel (iii) shows the
MS ion image for colocalized signal at m/z 656.03. Panel (iv) shows a 3-D heat map of m/z 104.07 ion image to quantify the extent of signal
spreading by calculation of the fwhm of the physical distribution
of GABA. For FC-40:PFO, the fwhm is 100 μm. (B) 65 pL droplets
containing 6.5 fmol of GABA produced in the octanol oil phase. Panel
(i) optical image of the dried droplet core outlined by a black circle.
Panel (ii) shows the MS ion image for m/z 104.07 corresponding to the GABA [M + H]+ ion where the
black circle denotes the same area as shown in (i), the core is centered
between 4 pixels in the MS image. Panel (iii) shows the MS ion image
for colocalized signal at m/z 656.03.
Panel (iv) shows a 3-D heat map of m/z 104.07 ion image where the fwhm of GABA distribution is 500 μm.
Scale bars in panels (i) are 200 μm. Pixels are 100 μm
in panels (ii)–(iv).To better understand the extent of delocalization, the pattern
of GABA MSI signals was further quantified. To this end, the m/z 104.07 [M + H]+ ion images
were thresholded using the blank, MALDI matrix signal at m/z 104.07. The full-width half-maximum (fwhm) was
determined for the thresholded distribution of GABA signal in the x–y plane of the ion image (Figure ). For droplets made
in FC-40:PFO (Figure A(iv)), the fwhm of the [M + H]+ distribution was 100–200
μm in the x–y plane.
This fwhm was also consistent for droplets of different volumes: 1000
vs 65 pL (Figure S6). Furthermore, the
removal of the surfactant PFO in the FC-40 oil phase did not affect
the fwhm of the intensity profile (Figure S6). Given that the focused laser spot diameter was 100 μm, the
image pixel width was 100 μm, and droplet cores were ≤100
μm in diameter, the droplet core was imaged within a maximum
of 2 × 2 pixels in the x–y plane, depending on alignment of the laser with the core. This analysis
shows that the dimensions of the fwhm and the droplet core correspond
to the same 2 × 2 pixels in the x–y plane. Furthermore, this fwhm of the ion distribution
overlaps with both the droplet core seen in the optical images and
the area of high intensity GABA signals observed by Raman spectroscopy.
Therefore, in the FC-40:PFO-mediated samples, a majority of the GABA
signals were localized to the droplet core.In contrast, with
octanol as the oil phase, the peak intensity
decreased 16-fold while the fwhm increased 2.5-fold (Figure B(iv)). These results suggest
that analyte spreading may be partially dependent on oil phase properties
such as vapor pressure[53] and surfactant
character. The time scale of solute exchange from the aqueous to oil
phase ranges from minutes to days depending on analyte identity.[51] When using the FC-40:PFO oil phase, droplet
generation, deposition, and drying occur within 2 min. In this case,
we expect GABA exchange to be minimal in FC-40. Using octanol, the
majority of the oil evaporates in ∼2 min; however, complete
evaporation of oil residue occurs over ∼24 h, which may increase
the chance for exchange. Overall, this shows that droplets produced
in FC-40-based oils generate the highest intensity GABA signals localized
to the ≤100 μm diameter droplet cores.
Concentration
Dependence of MALDI-MS Detection of GABA
Since FC-40-based
oil phases produced both the lowest analyte spreading
and the best signal intensities, we evaluated the MALDI-MSI linearity
and LOD using droplets produced in the FC-40:PFO oil phase (Figure ). We studied two
concentration regimes: 1) 100 mM GABA in droplet volumes from 300
pL to 1000 pL and 2) 100 μM GABA in droplet volumes 65 pL to
380 pL. These volumes and concentrations correspond to 30 to 100 pmol
and 6.5 to 38 fmol of GABA for each regime, respectively. The dependence
of signal on droplet volume, and therefore on moles of GABA deposited,
for each concentration regime can be fitted to respective linear regressions.
For the pmol range of GABA (Figure A), the calculated LOD is 122 fmol. This LOD is well
above the target biological concentrations[19] in sub-100 pL droplets taken from the brain. However, data points
for the 1000 pL droplets (corresponding to 100 pmol) level off, possibly
due to detector saturation[54] at high concentrations
or a reduction in analyte signal due to large salt deposits. Overall,
these results in the large-volume regime illustrate the complex interaction
between the droplet’s inorganic salts, MALDI matrix, and analyte
with MS peak intensity. As expected, the high amount of salts in large
volumes leads to completely crystallized droplet cores and visible
artifacts in the MALDI matrix coating, leading to poor GABA ionization
(Figure S3). Due to the salt interference
with ionization, it is less favorable to produce volumes of 400 pL
or greater when dealing with salty biological samples.
Figure 5
Dependence of GABA [M
+ H]+ ion signal intensity on
amount of GABA per droplet. Each data point corresponds to the thresholded
and summed intensity of GABA signal in single dried droplets. Droplets
were produced in FC-40:PFO oil phase to create two concentration regimes:
100 mM and 100 μM. (A) 100 mM concentration regime for volumes
300 to 1000 pL corresponding to 30, 40, 60, and 100 pmol of GABA per
droplet, respectively. Linear regression for the pmol range, y = 17.856x + 0.9085, R2 = 0.87; where the intercept is set at the mean blank
signal. LOD is calculated by meanblank + 3SDblank and is equal to 122 fmol. (B) 100 μM concentration regime
for volumes 65–380 pL corresponding to 6.5, 8.5, 20, 30, and
38 fmol of GABA per droplet, respectively. Linear regression for the
fmol range, y = 12.752x + 0.6231, R2 = 0.35; where the intercept is set at the
mean blank signal. LOD is calculated by meanblank + 3SDblank and is equal to 23 amol.
Dependence of GABA [M
+ H]+ ion signal intensity on
amount of GABA per droplet. Each data point corresponds to the thresholded
and summed intensity of GABA signal in single dried droplets. Droplets
were produced in FC-40:PFO oil phase to create two concentration regimes:
100 mM and 100 μM. (A) 100 mM concentration regime for volumes
300 to 1000 pL corresponding to 30, 40, 60, and 100 pmol of GABA per
droplet, respectively. Linear regression for the pmol range, y = 17.856x + 0.9085, R2 = 0.87; where the intercept is set at the mean blank
signal. LOD is calculated by meanblank + 3SDblank and is equal to 122 fmol. (B) 100 μM concentration regime
for volumes 65–380 pL corresponding to 6.5, 8.5, 20, 30, and
38 fmol of GABA per droplet, respectively. Linear regression for the
fmol range, y = 12.752x + 0.6231, R2 = 0.35; where the intercept is set at the
mean blank signal. LOD is calculated by meanblank + 3SDblank and is equal to 23 amol.Our goal was to detect small amounts of GABA in
sub-100 pL volumes
that exhibit less extensive crystallization. Correspondingly, in the
small volume range from 65 to 380 pL, we see less salt interference
in GABA detection at the droplet core. The observed variability in
small-volume performance may be attributed in part to the manually
controlled hardware. Compared to automated deposition techniques,[23,26,27] the use of manual deposition
produces less repeatable droplet measurements. In response, future
work will be focused on improving deposition through automated device
handling. Results from these droplet samples containing 6.5–38
fmol of GABA were used for linear regression (Figure B), with the intercept set at the mean background
signal for m/z 104.07. From the
resulting trendline, the LOD is determined to be 23 amol of GABA.These results indicate that the analysis of samples prepared using
smaller droplets is favorable when working with salty solutions, since
the total amount of salt per droplet decreases. Furthermore, removal
of PFO surfactant when producing 65 pL droplets led to an increase
in total ion intensity detected in droplets containing 65 pmol and
6.5 fmol of GABA (green data points in Figure S8). This increase is most prominent at 6.5 fmol of GABA, most
likely due to a decrease in ion suppression that occurs in surfactant-mediated
droplets when the amount of PFO molecules nears or surpasses the number
of GABA molecules. Accordingly, we observed a 10-fold increase in
average intensity in 65 pL, surfactant-free droplets containing 6.5
fmol of GABA. Since both lower volumes and surfactant-free droplets
reduce ion suppression by the removal of interfering substances (salt
and surfactant, respectively), the combination of these parameters
improves the GABA signal. More work is needed to investigate possible
improvement of the LOD with surfactant-free droplets. Overall, this
work allowed us to develop a droplet production and MS analysis pipeline
producing a 23 amol LOD for GABA.
Conclusions
We
performed an analytical evaluation of droplet microfluidic-assisted
sample preparation parameters and determined their effects on MALDI-MSI
detection of a classical neurotransmitter, GABA. Our results demonstrate
the ability of droplet microfluidics coupled with MALDI-MS detection
to analyze the contents of 65 pL droplets, the smallest volume measured
with this approach so far. Additionally, we found that, at sub-400
pL volumes, the salt content of droplets likely has minimal influence
on analyte detection, encouraging efforts to further reduce droplet
size. FC-40 oil was shown to produce the highest localization of the
GABA signal to the dried droplet core along with the highest intensity
MS signals, allowing us to achieve a LOD of 23 amol for GABA detection.
Furthermore, removal of the surfactant lead to a 10-fold increase
in intensity of GABA signal; however, more studies are needed to determine
any effect on LOD.In summary, we have shown that analytical
evaluation of the oil
phase for droplet generation is important for MS method development.
Our analysis of different experimental parameters allowed us to successfully
hyphenate droplet microfluidic-assisted sample generation with off-line
MALDI-MS to achieve attomole levels of detection, laying the groundwork
for future analysis of neurochemical systems in low picoliter-volume
droplets.
Authors: S Ekström; D Ericsson; P Onnerfjord; M Bengtsson; J Nilsson; G Marko-Varga; T Laurell Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2001-01-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Aaron R Wheeler; Hyejin Moon; Christopher A Bird; Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Chang-Jin C J Kim; Joseph A Loo; Robin L Garrell Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Dominik Haidas; Simon Bachler; Martin Köhler; Lars M Blank; Renato Zenobi; Petra S Dittrich Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Eric J Lanni; Sage J B Dunham; Peter Nemes; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Elizabeth K Neumann; Joseph F Ellis; Amelia E Triplett; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Thanh D Do; Joseph F Ellis; Elizabeth K Neumann; Troy J Comi; Emily G Tillmaand; Ashley E Lenhart; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 3.102