Literature DB >> 34936392

Inequities in Drinking Water Quality Among Domestic Well Communities and Community Water Systems, California, 2011‒2019.

Clare Pace1, Carolina Balazs1, Komal Bangia1, Nicholas Depsky1, Adriana Renteria1, Rachel Morello-Frosch1, Lara J Cushing1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate universal access to clean drinking water by characterizing relationships between community sociodemographics and water contaminants in California domestic well areas (DWAs) and community water systems (CWSs). Methods. We integrated domestic well locations, CWS service boundaries, residential parcels, building footprints, and 2013-2017 American Community Survey data to estimate sociodemographic characteristics for DWAs and CWSs statewide. We derived mean drinking and groundwater contaminant concentrations of arsenic, nitrate, and hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) between 2011 and 2019 and used multivariate models to estimate relationships between sociodemographic variables and contaminant concentrations. Results. We estimated that more than 1.3 million Californians (3.4%) use domestic wells and more than 370 000 Californians rely on drinking water with average contaminant concentrations at or above regulatory standards for 1 or more of the contaminants considered. Higher proportions of people of color were associated with greater drinking water contamination. Conclusions. Poor water quality disproportionately impacts communities of color in California, with the highest estimated arsenic, nitrate, and Cr(VI) concentrations in areas of domestic well use. Domestic well communities must be included in efforts to achieve California's Human Right to Water. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):88-97. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306561).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34936392      PMCID: PMC8713636          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cumulative Environmental Health Impacts in California: Evidence From a Statewide Environmental Justice Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen 1.1).

Authors:  Lara Cushing; John Faust; Laura Meehan August; Rose Cendak; Walker Wieland; George Alexeeff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Approaches for estimating prevalence ratios.

Authors:  J A Deddens; M R Petersen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A hybrid machine learning model to predict and visualize nitrate concentration throughout the Central Valley aquifer, California, USA.

Authors:  Katherine M Ransom; Bernard T Nolan; Jonathan A Traum; Claudia C Faunt; Andrew M Bell; Jo Ann M Gronberg; David C Wheeler; Celia Z Rosecrans; Bryant Jurgens; Gregory E Schwarz; Kenneth Belitz; Sandra M Eberts; George Kourakos; Thomas Harter
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Delivering Fresh Water: Critical Infrastructure, Environmental Justice, and Flint, Michigan.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Agriculture's Contribution to Nitrate Contamination of Californian Groundwater (1945-2005).

Authors:  Todd S Rosenstock; Daniel Liptzin; Kristin Dzurella; Anna Fryjoff-Hung; Allan Hollander; Vivian Jensen; Aaron King; George Kourakos; Alison McNally; G Stuart Pettygrove; Jim Quinn; Joshua H Viers; Thomas P Tomich; Thomas Harter
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  The drinking water disparities framework: on the origins and persistence of inequities in exposure.

Authors:  Carolina L Balazs; Isha Ray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Social disparities in nitrate-contaminated drinking water in California's San Joaquin Valley.

Authors:  Carolina Balazs; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Alan Hubbard; Isha Ray
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Maya Spaur; Melissa A Lombard; Joseph D Ayotte; David E Harvey; Benjamin C Bostick; Steven N Chillrud; Ana Navas-Acien; Anne E Nigra
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 9.  U.S. drinking water challenges in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Ronnie B Levin; Paul R Epstein; Tim E Ford; Winston Harrington; Erik Olson; Eric G Reichard
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Inequalities in Public Water Arsenic Concentrations in Counties and Community Water Systems across the United States, 2006-2011.

Authors:  Anne E Nigra; Qixuan Chen; Steven N Chillrud; Lili Wang; David Harvey; Brian Mailloux; Pam Factor-Litvak; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  High-resolution gridded estimates of population sociodemographics from the 2020 census in California.

Authors:  Nicholas J Depsky; Lara Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The Drinking Water Tool: A Community-Driven Data Visualization Tool for Policy Implementation.

Authors:  Clare Pace; Amanda Fencl; Lauren Baehner; Heather Lukacs; Lara J Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Human Right to Water: A 20-Year Comparative Analysis of Arsenic in Rural and Carceral Drinking Water Systems in California.

Authors:  Jenny Rempel; Isha Ray; Ethan Hessl; Jasmine Vazin; Zehui Zhou; Shin Kim; Xuan Zhang; Chiyu Ding; Ziyi He; David Pellow; Alasdair Cohen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 11.035

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.