Literature DB >> 33991916

Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States.

Maya Spaur1, Melissa A Lombard2, Joseph D Ayotte2, David E Harvey3, Benjamin C Bostick4, Steven N Chillrud4, Ana Navas-Acien5, Anne E Nigra5.   

Abstract

Geogenic arsenic contamination typically occurs in groundwater as opposed to surface water supplies. Groundwater is a major source for many community water systems (CWSs) in the United States (US). Although the US Environmental Protection Agency sets the maximum contaminant level (MCL enforceable since 2006: 10 μg/L) for arsenic in CWSs, private wells are not federally regulated. We evaluated county-level associations between modeled values of the probability of private well arsenic exceeding 10 μg/L and CWS arsenic concentrations for 2231 counties in the conterminous US, using time invariant private well arsenic estimates and CWS arsenic estimates for two time periods. Nationwide, county-level CWS arsenic concentrations increased by 8.4 μg/L per 100% increase in the probability of private well arsenic exceeding 10 μg/L for 2006-2008 (the initial compliance monitoring period after MCL implementation), and by 7.3 μg/L for 2009-2011 (the second monitoring period following MCL implementation) (1.1 μg/L mean decline over time). Regional differences in this temporal decline suggest that interventions to implement the MCL were more pronounced in regions served primarily by groundwater. The strong association between private well and CWS arsenic in Rural, American Indian, and Semi Urban, Hispanic counties suggests that future research and regulatory support are needed to reduce water arsenic exposures in these vulnerable subpopulations. This comparison of arsenic exposure values from major private and public drinking water sources nationwide is critical to future assessments of drinking water arsenic exposure and health outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; Environment and Public Health; Water pollution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33991916      PMCID: PMC8192485          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   10.753


  18 in total

1.  Factors affecting temporal variability of arsenic in groundwater used for drinking water supply in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Marcel Belaval; Scott A Olson; Karen R Burow; Sarah M Flanagan; Stephen R Hinkle; Bruce D Lindsey
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Estimating domestic well locations and populations served in the contiguous U.S. for years 2000 and 2010.

Authors:  Tyler D Johnson; Kenneth Belitz; Melissa A Lombard
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Trends in urinary arsenic among the U.S. population by drinking water source: Results from the National Health and Nutritional Examinations Survey 2003-2014.

Authors:  Barrett Welch; Ellen Smit; Andres Cardenas; Perry Hystad; Molly L Kile
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Well characteristics influencing arsenic concentrations in ground water.

Authors:  Melinda L Erickson; Randal J Barnes
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 5.  Arsenic reduction to <1 µg/L in Dutch drinking water.

Authors:  Arslan Ahmad; Patrick van der Wens; Kirsten Baken; Luuk de Waal; Prosun Bhattacharya; Pieter Stuyfzand
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Private-well stewardship among a general population based sample of private well-owners.

Authors:  Kristen M C Malecki; Amy A Schultz; Dolores J Severtson; Henry A Anderson; James A VanDerslice
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Arsenic Drinking Water Violations Decreased across the United States Following Revision of the Maximum Contaminant Level.

Authors:  Stephanie A Foster; Michael J Pennino; Jana E Compton; Scott G Leibowitz; Molly L Kile
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Reduction in drinking water arsenic exposure and health risk through arsenic treatment among private well households in Maine and New Jersey, USA.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Sara V Flanagan; Steven Chillrud; James Ross; Wenke Zeng; Charles Culbertson; Steven Spayd; Lorraine Backer; Andrew E Smith; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The effect of the Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level on arsenic exposure in the USA from 2003 to 2014: an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Anne E Nigra; Tiffany R Sanchez; Keeve E Nachman; David Harvey; Steven N Chillrud; Joseph H Graziano; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Inequities in Drinking Water Quality Among Domestic Well Communities and Community Water Systems, California, 2011‒2019.

Authors:  Clare Pace; Carolina Balazs; Komal Bangia; Nicholas Depsky; Adriana Renteria; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Lara J Cushing
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine M Bulka; Molly Scannell Bryan; Melissa A Lombard; Scott M Bartell; Daniel K Jones; Paul M Bradley; Veronica M Vieira; Debra T Silverman; Michael Focazio; Patricia L Toccalino; Johnni Daniel; Lorraine C Backer; Joseph D Ayotte; Matthew O Gribble; Maria Argos
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 13.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.