Lara Cushing1, John Faust1, Laura Meehan August1, Rose Cendak1, Walker Wieland1, George Alexeeff1. 1. Lara Cushing is with the Energy & Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley. At the time of study, Lara Cushing was and all of the other authors are with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We used an environmental justice screening tool (CalEnviroScreen 1.1) to compare the distribution of environmental hazards and vulnerable populations across California communities. METHODS: CalEnviroScreen 1.1 combines 17 indicators created from 2004 to 2013 publicly available data into a relative cumulative impact score. We compared cumulative impact scores across California zip codes on the basis of their location, urban or rural character, and racial/ethnic makeup. We used a concentration index to evaluate which indicators were most unequally distributed with respect to race/ethnicity and poverty. RESULTS: The unadjusted odds of living in one of the 10% most affected zip codes were 6.2, 5.8, 1.9, 1.8, and 1.6 times greater for Hispanics, African Americans, Native Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and other or multiracial individuals, respectively, than for non-Hispanic Whites. Environmental hazards were more regressively distributed with respect to race/ethnicity than poverty, with pesticide use and toxic chemical releases being the most unequal. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental health hazards disproportionately burden communities of color in California. Efforts to reduce disparities in pollution burden can use simple screening tools to prioritize areas for action.
OBJECTIVES: We used an environmental justice screening tool (CalEnviroScreen 1.1) to compare the distribution of environmental hazards and vulnerable populations across California communities. METHODS: CalEnviroScreen 1.1 combines 17 indicators created from 2004 to 2013 publicly available data into a relative cumulative impact score. We compared cumulative impact scores across California zip codes on the basis of their location, urban or rural character, and racial/ethnic makeup. We used a concentration index to evaluate which indicators were most unequally distributed with respect to race/ethnicity and poverty. RESULTS: The unadjusted odds of living in one of the 10% most affected zip codes were 6.2, 5.8, 1.9, 1.8, and 1.6 times greater for Hispanics, African Americans, Native Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and other or multiracial individuals, respectively, than for non-Hispanic Whites. Environmental hazards were more regressively distributed with respect to race/ethnicity than poverty, with pesticide use and toxic chemical releases being the most unequal. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental health hazards disproportionately burden communities of color in California. Efforts to reduce disparities in pollution burden can use simple screening tools to prioritize areas for action.
Authors: Latetia V Moore; Ana V Diez Roux; Kelly R Evenson; Aileen P McGinn; Shannon J Brines Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jason G Su; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Bill M Jesdale; Amy D Kyle; Bhavna Shamasunder; Michael Jerrett Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Marie S O'Neill; Michael Jerrett; Ichiro Kawachi; Jonathan I Levy; Aaron J Cohen; Nelson Gouveia; Paul Wilkinson; Tony Fletcher; Luis Cifuentes; Joel Schwartz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Joan A Casey; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Kristina Dang; Paula A Braveman; Rachel Morello-Frosch Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Margaret M MacDonell; Richard C Hertzberg; Glenn E Rice; J Michael Wright; Linda K Teuschler Journal: Risk Anal Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Caitlin G Howe; Birgit Claus Henn; Shohreh F Farzan; Rima Habre; Sandrah P Eckel; Brendan H Grubbs; Thomas A Chavez; Dema Faham; Laila Al-Marayati; Deborah Lerner; Alyssa Quimby; Sara Twogood; Michael J Richards; John D Meeker; Theresa M Bastain; Carrie V Breton Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 6.498