Literature DB >> 28599372

A hybrid machine learning model to predict and visualize nitrate concentration throughout the Central Valley aquifer, California, USA.

Katherine M Ransom1, Bernard T Nolan2, Jonathan A Traum3, Claudia C Faunt4, Andrew M Bell5, Jo Ann M Gronberg6, David C Wheeler7, Celia Z Rosecrans3, Bryant Jurgens3, Gregory E Schwarz2, Kenneth Belitz8, Sandra M Eberts9, George Kourakos10, Thomas Harter10.   

Abstract

Intense demand for water in the Central Valley of California and related increases in groundwater nitrate concentration threaten the sustainability of the groundwater resource. To assess contamination risk in the region, we developed a hybrid, non-linear, machine learning model within a statistical learning framework to predict nitrate contamination of groundwater to depths of approximately 500m below ground surface. A database of 145 predictor variables representing well characteristics, historical and current field and landscape-scale nitrogen mass balances, historical and current land use, oxidation/reduction conditions, groundwater flow, climate, soil characteristics, depth to groundwater, and groundwater age were assigned to over 6000 private supply and public supply wells measured previously for nitrate and located throughout the study area. The boosted regression tree (BRT) method was used to screen and rank variables to predict nitrate concentration at the depths of domestic and public well supplies. The novel approach included as predictor variables outputs from existing physically based models of the Central Valley. The top five most important predictor variables included two oxidation/reduction variables (probability of manganese concentration to exceed 50ppb and probability of dissolved oxygen concentration to be below 0.5ppm), field-scale adjusted unsaturated zone nitrogen input for the 1975 time period, average difference between precipitation and evapotranspiration during the years 1971-2000, and 1992 total landscape nitrogen input. Twenty-five variables were selected for the final model for log-transformed nitrate. In general, increasing probability of anoxic conditions and increasing precipitation relative to potential evapotranspiration had a corresponding decrease in nitrate concentration predictions. Conversely, increasing 1975 unsaturated zone nitrogen leaching flux and 1992 total landscape nitrogen input had an increasing relative impact on nitrate predictions. Three-dimensional visualization indicates that nitrate predictions depend on the probability of anoxic conditions and other factors, and that nitrate predictions generally decreased with increasing groundwater age.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boosted regression trees; Groundwater; Machine learning; Modeling; Nitrate

Year:  2017        PMID: 28599372     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  Inequities in Drinking Water Quality Among Domestic Well Communities and Community Water Systems, California, 2011‒2019.

Authors:  Clare Pace; Carolina Balazs; Komal Bangia; Nicholas Depsky; Adriana Renteria; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Lara J Cushing
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Drinking water sources and water quality in a prospective agricultural cohort.

Authors:  Cherrel K Manley; Maya Spaur; Jessica M Madrigal; Jared A Fisher; Rena R Jones; Christine G Parks; Jonathan N Hofmann; Dale P Sandler; Laura Beane Freeman; Mary H Ward
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Examining Relationships Between Groundwater Nitrate Concentrations in Drinking Water and Landscape Characteristics to Understand Health Risks.

Authors:  Q F Hamlin; S L Martin; A D Kendall; D W Hyndman
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-05-01

4.  Mapping the Distributions of Mosquitoes and Mosquito-Borne Arboviruses in China.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Zheng-Wei Fan; Yang Ji; Jin-Jin Chen; Guo-Ping Zhao; Wen-Hui Zhang; Hai-Yang Zhang; Bao-Gui Jiang; Qiang Xu; Chen-Long Lv; Xiao-Ai Zhang; Hao Li; Yang Yang; Li-Qun Fang; Wei Liu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 5.818

5.  Widespread and increased drilling of wells into fossil aquifers in the USA.

Authors:  Merhawi GebreEgziabher; Scott Jasechko; Debra Perrone
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Machine Learning Models of Arsenic in Private Wells Throughout the Conterminous United States As a Tool for Exposure Assessment in Human Health Studies.

Authors:  Melissa A Lombard; Molly Scannell Bryan; Daniel K Jones; Catherine Bulka; Paul M Bradley; Lorraine C Backer; Michael J Focazio; Debra T Silverman; Patricia Toccalino; Maria Argos; Matthew O Gribble; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Drinking Water Nitrate and Human Health: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Mary H Ward; Rena R Jones; Jean D Brender; Theo M de Kok; Peter J Weyer; Bernard T Nolan; Cristina M Villanueva; Simone G van Breda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  An improved adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system model using conjoined metaheuristic algorithms for electrical conductivity prediction.

Authors:  Iman Ahmadianfar; Seyedehelham Shirvani-Hosseini; Jianxun He; Arvin Samadi-Koucheksaraee; Zaher Mundher Yaseen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.