PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We re-evaluated clinical applications of image-to-FE models to understand if clinical advantages are already evident, which proposals are promising, and which questions are still open. RECENT FINDINGS: CT-to-FE is useful in longitudinal treatment evaluation and groups discrimination. In metastatic lesions, CT-to-FE strength alone accurately predicts impending femoral fractures. In osteoporosis, strength from CT-to-FE or DXA-to-FE predicts incident fractures similarly to DXA-aBMD. Coupling loads and strength (possibly in dynamic models) may improve prediction. One promising MRI-to-FE workflow may now be tested on clinical data. Evidence of artificial intelligence usefulness is appearing. CT-to-FE is already clinical in opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis, and risk of metastasis-related impending fractures. Short-term keys to improve image-to-FE in osteoporosis may be coupling FE with fall risk estimates, pool FE results with other parameters through robust artificial intelligence approaches, and increase reproducibility and cross-validation of models. Modeling bone modifications over time and bone fracture mechanics are still open issues.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We re-evaluated clinical applications of image-to-FE models to understand if clinical advantages are already evident, which proposals are promising, and which questions are still open. RECENT FINDINGS: CT-to-FE is useful in longitudinal treatment evaluation and groups discrimination. In metastatic lesions, CT-to-FE strength alone accurately predicts impending femoral fractures. In osteoporosis, strength from CT-to-FE or DXA-to-FE predicts incident fractures similarly to DXA-aBMD. Coupling loads and strength (possibly in dynamic models) may improve prediction. One promising MRI-to-FE workflow may now be tested on clinical data. Evidence of artificial intelligence usefulness is appearing. CT-to-FE is already clinical in opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis, and risk of metastasis-related impending fractures. Short-term keys to improve image-to-FE in osteoporosis may be coupling FE with fall risk estimates, pool FE results with other parameters through robust artificial intelligence approaches, and increase reproducibility and cross-validation of models. Modeling bone modifications over time and bone fracture mechanics are still open issues.
Authors: Philippe Zysset; Ling Qin; Thomas Lang; Sundeep Khosla; William D Leslie; John A Shepherd; John T Schousboe; Klaus Engelke Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Elizabeth J Samelson; Kerry E Broe; Hanfei Xu; Laiji Yang; Steven Boyd; Emmanuel Biver; Pawel Szulc; Jonathan Adachi; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth Atkinson; Claudie Berger; Lauren Burt; Roland Chapurlat; Thierry Chevalley; Serge Ferrari; David Goltzman; David A Hanley; Marian T Hannan; Sundeep Khosla; Ching-Ti Liu; Mattias Lorentzon; Dan Mellstrom; Blandine Merle; Maria Nethander; René Rizzoli; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Bert Van Rietbergen; Daniel Sundh; Andy Kin On Wong; Claes Ohlsson; Serkalem Demissie; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: J H Keyak; S Sigurdsson; G Karlsdottir; D Oskarsdottir; A Sigmarsdottir; S Zhao; J Kornak; T B Harris; G Sigurdsson; B Y Jonsson; K Siggeirsdottir; G Eiriksdottir; V Gudnason; T F Lang Journal: Bone Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Shreyasee Amin; David L Kopperdhal; L Joseph Melton; Sara J Achenbach; Terry M Therneau; B Lawrence Riggs; Tony M Keaveny; Sundeep Khosla Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Eric S Orwoll; Lynn M Marshall; Carrie M Nielson; Steven R Cummings; Jodi Lapidus; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Nancy Lane; Paul R Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: T M Keaveny; B L Clarke; F Cosman; E S Orwoll; E S Siris; S Khosla; M L Bouxsein Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 5.071