Literature DB >> 34926215

Fourier analysis of corneal Scheimpflug imaging: clinical use in keratoconus.

Dorukcan Akincioglu1, Gokhan Ozge2, Onder Ayyildiz3, Gokcen Gokce4, Umut Karaca5, Fatih Mehmet Mutlu2.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical use of Fourier analysis of videokeratography data in the diagnosis and follow-up of keratoconus (KC).
METHODS: We conducted a chart review of consecutive patients presented to our cornea clinic. A team of two experienced cornea specialists divided the patients into three groups: normal cornea, forme fruste KC (FFKC), and clinical KC. The exclusion criteria were a history of previous ocular surgery, any accompanying corneal pathology other than KC, high myopia (>6.00 diopters), amblyopia, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or any current autoimmune disease. The data of Fourier series harmonic analysis were evaluated for their diagnostic capacity using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A binary logistic regression analysis was also conducted to construct a diagnostic model. A total of 259 eyes showed progression in the clinical KC group and underwent a combination of accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking and topography-guided customized treatment with an excimer laser.
RESULTS: The study included 1262 eyes (618 normal, 530 KC, and 114 FFKC) of 1262 patients. We observed that maximum decentration (MaxDec) was almost as good as maximum keratometry (Kmax) in detecting progressive KC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.95 for KC [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.96] and 0.84 for FFKC (95%CI: 0.79-0.88). Higher predictive accuracy was obtained using a model combining the spherical component, MaxDec, irregularity, and regular astigmatism in the center of the cornea (AUC: 0.97; sensitivity: 89%, and specificity: 96%).
CONCLUSION: Decentration, Kmax, and posterior radii of curvatures from a 3.0-mm optical zone centered on the thinnest point of the cornea provide the highest accuracy with low reproducibility of Kmax. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fourier; Scheimpflug imaging; keratoconus; tomography; topography

Year:  2021        PMID: 34926215      PMCID: PMC8640755          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  20 in total

1.  Tolerance and Relative Utility: Two Proposed Indices for Comparing Change in Clinical Measurement Noise Between Different Populations (Repeatability) or Measurement Methods (Agreement).

Authors:  Ciara Bergin; Ivo Guber; Kattayoon Hashemi; François Majo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes.

Authors:  Ömür Ö Uçakhan; Volkan Cetinkor; Muhip Özkan; Ayfer Kanpolat
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Validation of Fourier analysis of videokeratographic data.

Authors:  Haris Sideroudi; Georgios Labiris; Fienke Ditzel; Efi Tsaragli; Kimonas Georgatzoglou; Haralampos Siganos; Vassilios Kozobolis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Pentacam HR criteria for curvature change in keratoconus and postoperative LASIK ectasia.

Authors:  Robert L Epstein; Yi-Lin Chiu; Greg L Epstein
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A statistical approach to classification of keratoconus.

Authors:  Murat Ucar; Hasan Basri Cakmak; Baha Sen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Multicentre study: reliability and repeatability of Scheimpflug system measurement in keratoconus.

Authors:  Beatriz de Luis Eguileor; Pedro Arriola-Villalobos; Jose Ignacio Pijoan Zubizarreta; Raquel Feijoo Lera; Alaitz Santamaria Carro; David Diaz-Valle; Jaime Etxebarria
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  The keratoconus enigma: A review with emphasis on pathogenesis.

Authors:  Giulio Ferrari; Paolo Rama
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 8.  The correlation between keratoconus and eye rubbing: a review.

Authors:  Hatim Najmi; Yara Mobarki; Khalid Mania; Bashaer Altowairqi; Mohammed Basehi; Mohammed Salih Mahfouz; Mona Elmahdy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Corneal collagen cross-linking for treating keratoconus.

Authors:  Evripidis Sykakis; Rushmia Karim; Jennifer R Evans; Catey Bunce; Kwesi N Amissah-Arthur; Showrob Patwary; Peter J McDonnell; Samer Hamada
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-24

Review 10.  Corneal topography in keratoconus: state of the art.

Authors:  F Cavas-Martínez; E De la Cruz Sánchez; J Nieto Martínez; F J Fernández Cañavate; D G Fernández-Pacheco
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.