| Literature DB >> 34916617 |
Kathryn V Dalrymple1,2, Christina Vogel1,3,4, Keith M Godfrey1,3, Janis Baird1,3,4, Nicholas C Harvey1,3, Mark A Hanson3,5, Cyrus Cooper1,3,6, Hazel M Inskip1,3, Sarah R Crozier7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rates of childhood obesity are increasing globally, with poor dietary quality an important contributory factor. Evaluation of longitudinal diet quality across early life could identify timepoints and subgroups for nutritional interventions as part of effective public health strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34916617 PMCID: PMC8960403 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-01047-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) ISSN: 0307-0565 Impact factor: 5.551
Fig. 1Flow diagram.
Demographic characteristics of 2936 mother-child pairs from the Southampton Women’s Survey.
| Maternal | NMean (SD)/N (%)/Median (IQR)a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 2910 | 24.1 (21.8–27.3) | ||
| Body mass index categories (kg/m2) | Underweight | 49 (2%) | ||
| Healthy weight | 1658 (57%) | |||
| Overweight | 798 (27%) | |||
| Obese | 405 (14%) | |||
| Qualification level | A levels or higher | 2928 | 1741 (59%) | |
| Ethnicity (white) | 2936 | 2812 (96%) | ||
| Ever smoked | 2934 | 1283 (44%) | ||
| Ever smoked in pregnancy | 2802 | 432 (15%) | ||
| Parity (Multiparous) | 2934 | 1418 (48%) | ||
| Age at birth (years) | 2936 | 30.7 (3.8) | ||
| Dominant social class | Non-manualβ | 2891 | 2382 (82%) | |
| Breastfeeding | >1 month | 2806 | 1733 (62%) | |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks) | 2936 | 39.8 (1.8) | ||
| Birthweight (grams) | 2909 | 3442 (548.0) | ||
| Sex (female) | 2936 | 1405 (48%) | ||
IQR Interquartile range, N number, SD standard deviation.
aBinary and categorical variables are presented using counts and percentages. The distribution of continuous variables was assessed using coefficients of skewness and then summarised by mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) where appropriate.
βIncludes professional, management and technical and skilled non-manual vs. skilled manual, partly skilled and unskilled.
Fig. 2Diet quality trajectories, using group-based trajectory modelling, from preconception to 8–9 years of age.
Maternal and child demographic characteristics according to the five diet trajectories obtained using group-based trajectory modelling (n = 2963).
| Trajectory group | Poor ( | Poor-medium ( | Medium ( | Medium-better ( | Best ( | Odds ratio (95% CI)b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal | Mean (SD)/N (%)/Median (IQR)a | ||||||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.2 (22.0–27.6) | 25.0 (22.2–28.9) | 24.3 (22.1–27.4) | 23.7 (21.7–26.3) | 23.0 (21.2–25.6) | 1.05 (1.03, 1.06)*** | |
| Body mass index categories (kg/m2) | Underweight | 7 (5%) | 13 (2%) | 16 (1%) | 10 (1%) | 3 (2%) | 2.11 (1.22, 3.64)** |
| Healthy weight | 76 (54%) | 322 (49%) | 637 (56%) | 509 (63%) | 114 (70%) | 1 | |
| Overweight | 37 (26%) | 194 (29%) | 316 (28%) | 213 (26%) | 38 (23%) | 1.30 (1.12, 1.52)** | |
| Obese | 21 (15%) | 131 (20%) | 164 (14%) | 81 (10%) | 8 (5%) | 1.96 (1.61, 2.38)*** | |
| Qualification level | A levels or higher | 27 (19%) | 228 (34%) | 673 (59%) | 668 (82%) | 145 (90%) | 0.19 (0.16, 0.22) *** |
| Ethnicity (white) | 139 (98%) | 655 (98%) | 1098 (96%) | 768 (94%) | 152 (93%) | 2.10 (1.52, 2.90)*** | |
| Ever smoked | 99 (70%) | 385 (58%) | 480 (42%) | 274 (33%) | 45 (27%) | 2.26 (1.97, 2.59)*** | |
| Ever smoked in pregnancy | 77 (55%) | 194 (30%) | 128 (12%) | 29 (4%) | 4 (2%) | 6.68 (5.45, 8.19)*** | |
| Parity (multiparous) | 116 (82%) | 428 (64%) | 533 (47%) | 295 (36%) | 46 (28%) | 2.63 (2.29, 3.01)*** | |
| Age at birth (years) | 28.8 (4.2) | 29.6 (4.1) | 30.6 (3.7) | 31.8 (3.4) | 31.9 (3.2) | 0.89 (0.87, 0.90)*** | |
| Dominant social class | Non-manualβ | 79 (55%) | 475 (73%) | 951 (84%) | 729 (91%) | 148 (91%) | 0.34 (0.28, 0.41) *** |
| Breastfeeding | >1 month | 26 (19%) | 274 (42%) | 694 (63%) | 605 (79%) | 134 (88%) | 0.24 (0.21, 0.29) *** |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks) | 39.5 (2.0) | 39.6 (1.9) | 39.8 (1.8) | 39.8 (1.8) | 40.0 (1.4) | 0.96 (0.92, 0.99) * | |
| Birthweight (grams) | 3259.2 (572.9) | 3445.5 (585.3) | 3447.9 (537.8) | 3457.3 (534.3) | 3479.6 (477.6) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | |
| Sex (female) | 67 (47%) | 299 (45%) | 554 (48%) | 412 (50%) | 73 (45%) | 0.90 (0.79, 1.03) | |
IQR Interquartile range, N number, SD standard deviation.
***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *P < 0.05.
aBinary and categorical variables are presented using counts and percentages. The distribution of continuous variables was assessed using coefficients of skewness and then summarised by mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range where appropriate.
bOrdered logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the demographic variables and the five trajectories on a continuous scale, the odds ratio refers to membership of a lower diet trajectory.
βIncludes professional, management and technical and skilled non-manual vs. skilled manual, partly skilled and unskilled.
Adjusted associations between the five dietary trajectories and adiposity z-scores at 8–9 year of age in children from the Southampton Women’s Survey.
| Outcome | Poor ( | Poor-medium ( | Medium ( | Medium-better ( | Best ( | β-trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression coefficients (95% confidence interval) | ||||||
| BMI for agea | 0.26 (−0.16, 0.68) | 0.33 (0.02, 0.63) | 0.25 (−0.03, 0.52) | 0.17 (−0.10, 0.44) | Ref | 0.08 (0.00, 0.16)* |
| Height for agea | 0.07 (−0.31, 0.45) | −0.19 (−0.46, 0.09) | −0.05 (−0.30, 0.19) | 0.05 (−0.19, 0.29) | Ref | −0.06 (−0.13, 0.01) |
| Weight for agea | 0.17 (−0.23, 0.57) | 0.10 (−0.18, 0.38) | 0.12 (−0.14, 0.38) | 0.13 (−0.13, 0.38) | Ref | 0.01 (−0.06, 0.09) |
| Arm circumference | 0.18 (−0.19, 0.54) | 0.24 (−0.02, 0.50) | 0.20 (−0.03, 0.44) | 0.17 (−0.07, 0.40) | Ref | 0.05 (−0.02, 0.11) |
| Waist circumference | 0.23 (−0.14, 0.61) | 0.14 (−0.12, 0.41) | −0.09 (−0.15, 0.33) | 0.07 (−0.17, 0.30) | Ref | 0.05 (−0.02, 0.11) |
| Total body fat | 0.26 (−0.13, 0.64) | 0.18 (−0.10, 0.67) | 0.13 (−0.13, 0.38) | 0.09 (−0.16, 0.34) | Ref | 0.06 (−0.02, 0.13) |
| Percentage body fat | 0.27 (−0.10, 0.64) | 0.22 (−0.05, 0.49) | 0.11 (−0.13, 0.35) | 0.04 (−0.20, −0.27) | Ref | 0.08 (0.01, 0.15)* |
| Total lean | 0.09 (−0.32, 0.50) | −0.01 (−0.30, 0.29) | 0.12 (−0.15, 0.39) | 0.18 (−0.10, 0.44) | Ref | −0.03 (−0.11, 0.04) |
| Percentage lean | −0.27 (−0.63, 0.10) | −0.21 (−0.48, 0.05) | −0.10 (−0.34, 0.14) | −0.04 (−0.27, 0.20) | Ref | −0.08 (−0.14, −0.01)* |
All outcomes are adjusted for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal highest education attainment, maternal age at birth and parity. The DXA and circumferences outcomes have also been adjusted for child sex and age at the 8–9-year visit.
BMI Body mass index, DXA dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
*p < 0.05.
aWHO z-scores were calculated using the WHO standards which are age and sex standardised [18]. The DXA and circumferences outcomes have been normalised using Fisher–Yates transformation. All regression coefficients represent the relative change in the standard deviation of the outcome per 1-category decrease in the diet trajectory.
Fig. 3Adjusted means (and 95% CI) for offspring outcomes at 8–9 years of age.
All outcomes were adjusted for maternal BMI, parity, highest maternal education attainment and maternal age. Percentage body fat and lean mass were also adjusted for offspring sex and age. Trajectory categories: 1 = poor, 2 = poor-medium, 3 = medium, 4 = medium-better, 5 = best.