| Literature DB >> 27884184 |
Brandon H Hidaka1, Elizabeth H Kerling1, Jocelynn M Thodosoff1, Debra K Sullivan1, John Colombo2, Susan E Carlson3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary habits established in early childhood and maternal socioeconomic status (SES) are important, complex, interrelated factors that influence a child's growth and development. The aim of this study was to define the major dietary patterns in a cohort of young US children, construct a maternal SES index, and evaluate their associations.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Dietary pattern; Early childhood; Empirically derived; Multivariate; Socioeconomic status
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27884184 PMCID: PMC5123236 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0729-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Mother-Child Characteristics
| N | % of total | ||
| Group | Placebo | 91 | 48% |
| DHA | 99 | 52% | |
| Race/Ethnicity | White | 119 | 63% |
| Black | 56 | 29% | |
| Hispanic | 12 | 6% | |
| Other | 3 | 2% | |
| Maternal Smoking | Never | 103 | 54% |
| Ever | 87 | 46% | |
| Breastfeedinga | None | 38 | 20% |
| Some | 151 | 80% | |
| Offspring Sex | Female | 95 | 50% |
| Male | 95 | 50% | |
| Range | Mean ± SD | ||
| Maternal age (yr) | 16.1 to 36.0 | 26.1 ± 4.8 | |
| Maternal education (yr) | 9 to 20 | 14.6 ± 2.5 | |
| Zip code income ($1 k) | 18 to 154 | 48 ± 20 | |
| Maternal height (cm) | 146 to 182 | 164 ± 6.7 | |
| Maternal weight (kg) | 45.4 to 110.2 | 72.7 ± 13.6 | |
| BMI at enrollment | 16.5 to 42.6 | 27.3 ± 5.2 | |
| Gestational weight gain (kg) | -2.7 to 25.9 | 12.8 ± 5.9 | |
| Birthweight (g) | 1290 to 4704 | 3348 ± 504 | |
| Formula feda (days) | 0 to 999 | 271 ± 158 | |
| Breast fedb (days) | 0 to 1236 | 203 ± 244 | |
| RBC DHA at enrollmenta (%) | 1.73 to 8.60 | 4.36 ± 1.20 | |
| RBC DHA at deliveryc (%) | 2.50 to 12.26 | 6.15 ± 2.23 | |
| RBC DHA changed (%) | -5.29 to 7.32 | 1.79 ± 2.29 | |
| Adherence (% of capsules consumed) | 16 to 100 | 81.4 ± 19.1 |
aMissing data for n = 1
bMissing data for n = 2
cMissing data for n = 5
dMissing data for n = 6
Associations among Maternal Socioeconomic Status Score and Maternal and Child Characteristics
| Mean ± SD |
| ||
| Group | Placebo | 1.92 ± 1.04 | 0.30 |
| DHA | 2.08 ± 0.97 | ||
| Race/ethnicity | White | 2.54 ± 0.75 | <0.0001 |
| Black | 1.02 ± 0.56 | ||
| Hispanic | 1.18 ± 0.92 | ||
| Other | 2.43 ± 0.53 | ||
| Maternal smoking | Never | 2.17 ± 1.01 | 0.017 |
| Yes | 1.81 ± 0.96 | ||
| Breast feeding | None | 1.42 ± 0.76 | <0.0001 |
| Some | 2.14 ± 1.01 | ||
| Offspring sex | Female | 1.98 ± 0.97 | 0.74 |
| Male | 2.02 ± 1.05 | ||
| Correlationb |
| ||
| Maternal age | 0.69 | <0.0001 | |
| Maternal education (yr) | 0.83 | <0.0001 | |
| Zip code income ($1 k) | 0.80 | <0.0001 | |
| Maternal height (cm) | 0.18 | 0.0135 | |
| Maternal weight (kg) | -0.22 | 0.0023 | |
| BMI at enrollment | -0.29 | <0.0001 | |
| Gestational weight gain (kg) | 0.16 | 0.029 | |
| Birthweight (g) | 0.17 | 0.0227 | |
| Formula fed(days) | -0.36 | <0.0001 | |
| Breast fed (days) | 0.47 | <0.0001 | |
| RBC DHA at enrollment (%) | 0.17 | 0.017 | |
| RBC DHA at delivery (%) | 0.32 | <0.0001 | |
| RBC DHA change (%) | 0.22 | 0.0024 | |
| Adherence (% of capsules consumed) | 0.26 | 0.0003 |
aThe P-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test
bSpearman’s correlation and corresponding P-value
Fig. 1Food Groups and Beverage Categories Intake Changes from Age 2 to 4.5 Years. Mean daily intake of the 6 of 24 food groups that increased or decreased significantly over time during early childhood. Error bars are the standard error. Spearman’s correlations and corresponding p-values are shown
Fig. 2Average Daily Food and Beverage Intake of the Dietary Pattern Clusters. Error bars are standard error. P-values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test
Associations of Dietary Patterns with Maternal and Child Characteristics
| Prudent Pattern | Western Pattern ( | ||||
| n (column%) | n (column%) |
|
| ||
| Group | Placebo | 41 (48%) | 50 (48%) | 0.94 | 0.46 |
| DHA | 44 (52%) | 55 (52%) | |||
| Race/Ethnicity | White | 71 (84%) | 48 (46%) | <0.0001 | 0.24 |
| Black | 9 (11%) | 47 (45%) | |||
| Hispanic | 5 (6%) | 7 (7%) | |||
| Other | 0 (0%) | 3 (3%) | |||
| Maternal Smoking | Never | 48 (56%) | 55 (52%) | 0.57 | 0.38 |
| Ever | 37 (44%) | 50 (48%) | |||
| Breast Feeding | None | 6 (7%) | 32 (31%) | <0.0001 | 0.01 |
| Some | 79 (93%) | 72 (69%) | |||
| Offspring Sex | Female | 47 (55%) | 48 (46%) | 0.19 | 0.089 |
| Male | 38 (45%) | 57 (54%) | |||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||
| Maternal age | 27.7 ± 4.1 | 24.8 ± 4.9 | <0.0001 | 0.18 | |
| Maternal education (yr) | 16.0 ± 2.3 | 13.5 ± 2.1 | <0.0001 | 0.068 | |
| Zip code income ($1 k) | 57 ± 22 | 41 ± 15 | <0.0001 | 0.85 | |
| Maternal height (cm) | 165.2 ± 6.5 | 162.1 ± 6.5 | 0.0024 | 0.028 | |
| Maternal weight (kg) | 70.1 ± 12.2 | 74.8 ± 14.3 | 0.015 | 0.28 | |
| BMI at enrollment | 25.7 ± 4.3 | 28.5 ± 5.5 | 0.0002 | 0.038 | |
| Gestational weight gain (kg) | 13.7 ± 5.7 | 12.1 ± 6.0 | 0.12 | 0.51 | |
| Birthweight (g) | 3386 ± 550 | 3318 ± 464 | 0.15 | 0.94 | |
| Formula feeding duration (days) | 225 ± 171 | 308 ± 137 | <0.0001 | 0.13 | |
| Breast feeding duration (days) | 286 ± 251 | 136 ± 216 | <0.0001 | 0.0021 | |
| RBC DHA at enrollment (%) | 4.61 ± 1.24 | 4.14 ± 1.12 | 0.0043 | 0.076 | |
| RBC DHA at delivery (%) | 6.44 ± 2.46 | 5.92 ± 2.01 | 0.22 | 0.37 | |
| RBC DHA Change (%) | 1.80 ± 2.35 | 1.79 ± 2.26 | 0.91 | 0.076 | |
| Adherence (% of capsules consumed) | 81.4 ± 21.5 | 81.4 ± 17.1 | 0.41 | 0.0041 | |
| SES Factor | 2.58 ± 0.84 | 1.53 ± 0.87 | <0.0001 | ------- |
aThe P-value was calculated by Pearson’s Chi-Square or the Mann-Whitney U test
bThe P-value represents the association between dietary pattern and the maternal or child characteristic when controlling for SES
Fig. 3Red blood cell (RBC) Change and SES Score. The change in RBC DHA is related to randomization (placebo or DHA supplementation) and SES score. The effect of supplementation on maternal RBC DHA differed by SES (pinteraction = 0.002); high SES was associated with a larger increase in DHA among those who received DHA (r = 0.34, p = 0.0007), but not among those who received placebo (p = 0.76)